logo
Will criminalising coercive control make a difference in the fight against domestic violence?

Will criminalising coercive control make a difference in the fight against domestic violence?

It often begins with controlling behaviour creating fear, intimidation and isolation.
Australia's domestic violence scourge has already claimed the lives of 18 women and several children this year.
At its core is coercive control which, according to one NSW review, played a role in almost 100 per cent of intimate partner murders over 10 years.
It's now a standalone criminal offence in two Australian states, after coming into effect in Queensland today.
But will it be enough to end the violence when the next generation is being barraged with toxic online influences?
Don't wear pink
Students at Whites Hill State College wear pink in honour of their former school captain Hannah Clarke. ( ABC News: Josh Baker )
It may look like a regular free dress day at Whites Hill State College in Brisbane's inner city suburb of Camp Hill.
Hannah Clarke was told by her husband she couldn't wear pink. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
But these students are wearing pink in honour of a former school captain, Hannah Clarke.
It's the colour her estranged husband forbid her from wearing because it was "childish".
Just streets away from the school, a horrific tragedy unfolded in February 2020.
Wide shot aerial of where the tragedy unfolded.
Ms Clarke and her three children — Aaliyah, Laianah and Trey — were murdered by her former partner Rowan Baxter.
He ambushed them on the morning school run, doused them in petrol and set them alight.
The young children died in the car, while Ms Clarke later died in hospital from her injuries.
Hannah Clarke and her three children all perished in the fire.
Their deaths put a spotlight on coercive control and again sparked a national conversation around domestic violence.
"He would go through her phone, he would go through her handbag, he would ask the children 'who did mummy talk to today?', 'what did mummy do?'" Hannah's mother recounts.
"He would stop her being friends with her close friends, and even her brother."
Since the murders, her parents, Sue and Lloyd Clarke, have become fierce advocates for law reform — calling for the behaviour to be criminalised.
Sue and Lloyd Clarke have been fierce advocates for criminalising coercive control. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
But they've also gone a step further to guide the next generation.
"I think education is the key to break the cycle," Mrs Clarke says.
Their foundation, Small Steps 4 Hannah, is now running a respectful relationships program for high schoolers across the country.
Tackling toxic masculinity
"How many intimate partners should a man have throughout his lifetime?"
It's a question HALT program facilitator Dave Kramer asks a group of grade 12 students.
HALT program facilitator Dave Kramer speaking to children at Hannah Clark's former school. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
"75," answers one student as others laugh.
"There shouldn't be expectations," is another answer.
Mr Kramer asks the students another question — "What sort of jobs should a man have?"
The answers: diesel mechanic, CEO, tradie, finance, business, construction.
These sessions are designed to challenge attitudes and stereotypes in order to prevent violence and control in relationships.
Mr Kramer is a behavioural scientist and was close friends with Ms Clarke, with the pair training at the gym together and competing in CrossFit competitions.
"What surprised me in the beginning was what I thought I knew versus what's really happening with young people," he says.
The HALT program is designed to challenge attitudes and stereotypes in young males. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
Mr Kramer says young boys face significant barriers to knowing how to contribute to safe relationships. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
"What I thought I knew was that young people don't know what to do, they don't know how to contribute to safe and respectful relationships.
"What I found out is they do, but there are significant barriers … like social media and pornography.
"It's the kinds of things they consume online that really influence who they think they're supposed to be in the context of their relationships.
"And the absence of these conversations is really hurting young people."
Dave Kramer says social media and pornography influence young people in who they become. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
Mr Kramer says adolescents are exposed to content on many different social media platforms.
A similar message is constantly pushed by an algorithm.
He says the damaging content is often a mix of messages about being "strong and successful" whilst also making young boys feel inadequate and like they need to "dominate in every relationship".
"What we try and do is help them recognise when they're seeing those types of influencers, what they're saying and how they can challenge it," he says.
"Not only within themselves but also within their peer groups."
Are you scared of me?
Laura — not her real name — was psychologically, physically and financially abused by her ex-husband for years.
After initially rejecting his advances, they went on a date and she became enamoured by his "willpower, charm and wit".
Laura says she was psychologically, physically and financially abused by her ex-husband for years. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
The relationship moved quickly — she was pregnant within six months and the pair were living together with plans to get married.
"I was love bombed from the start," she says.
"When I look back there were definitely some little flags that I completely ignored.
"He really quite heavily encouraged me to come off my birth control.
"He explained the hormones weren't good for me and we should start a family and that he loved me."
Laura's experience is typical of coercive control behaviour — an ongoing pattern of abuse that can be physical as well as emotional or financial.
The intention is to hurt, humiliate, isolate, frighten or threaten another person in order to control or dominate them.
There's been growing calls for it to be criminalised across the country, with research suggesting that women and children are most at risk of serious harm and homicide after a separation, when the perpetrator feels a loss of control.
NSW and Queensland have now made it a standalone offence, with Queensland's laws only coming into effect today.
Other jurisdictions are either looking at making it illegal or have aspects of coercive control outlawed under more general family violence legislation.
For Laura, her partner became jealous of male work colleagues, created tension with her mother, and eventually stopped her from seeing friends.
His behaviour escalated to controlling her finances, what music she listened to, the TV shows she watched and the clothes she wore.
One day he said he "mistakenly" bought a smart watch in a colour he didn't like.
He told Laura to wear it and he'd buy another. But his intentions were far more sinister.
"He would monitor my heart rate on a daily basis and my sleep activity," she says.
"If my heart rate had changed in the middle of the night, or if I'd been up to help my son, he would question me.
Laura says her partner monitored her smart watch. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
"He accused me of sleeping with another man, asking where I'd been, what had I been doing.
"If my heart rate was high he would ask — 'Are you scared of me? Is it high because you're scared?'"
This controlling behaviour took place alongside sexual and physical abuse, where Laura would be strangled and assaulted during arguments and forced into sex.
"There was a lot of talk about me being the wife, that I must submit to this person," she says.
After years of suffering abuse, the incident that made Laura leave for good was when her ex threatened to shoot her in front of her daughter.
"He didn't have a gun but he threatened to shoot me in the face and my six-year-old was standing in front of me and she looked up and said, 'It's time to go'," she says.
"It was my daughter's strength really and the fact that months leading up to that he became more unhinged."
Laura says her daughter's strength helped her leave her partner's abusive behaviour. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
Laura has welcomed coercive control as a standalone offence, but acknowledges gathering evidence will be hard. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
While Laura has welcomed coercive control as a standalone offence, she acknowledges gathering evidence will be hard.
"I think it will be incredibly hard to capture that," she says.
"I'm not quite sure how they're going to do it.
"I do know firsthand how hard it is to prove physical offences but I do think as a society we need the police, the courts, organisations, victims and their families all working together.
"It will mean that the pattern of behaviour that starts very early on, that graduates into physical violence, can be recognised and acknowledged and we can be validated for the things we've been through."
How effective is criminalisation?
Coercive control was criminalised in NSW last July, attracting a maximum penalty of up to seven years in jail.
It applies to current and former intimate partner relationships but the offence in Queensland also applies to family members and unpaid carers.
Queensland also has a harsher maximum penalty, which is up to 14 years' imprisonment.
In NSW, a driving factor in introducing the laws was strong links to intimate partner homicide.
The state's Domestic Violence Death Review Team found in 97 per cent of intimate partner domestic violence homicides cases, the victim had experienced coercive and controlling behaviours before being killed.
Since the new laws were introduced six months ago, data gathered by the NSW Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research found 157 incidents were recorded between July and December 2024.
Of those, just three resulted in a coercive control charge being laid against three men.
One charge was later withdrawn by the prosecution, one charge was proven and resulted in an Intensive Correction Order, and the other charge remains before the court.
Out of the other 154 incidents reported — 58 per cent resulted in no charges while 40 per cent resulted in other charges being laid.
The most common were intimidation or stalking, DV assault, and property damage offences.
Professor Silke Meyer says the conviction rate for coercive control is relatively low both here and overseas. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
Griffith University criminologist and professor of social work, Silke Meyer, says the conviction rate for coercive control is relatively low both in Australia and overseas.
"I think the question is, how do we define success?
"We've seen reporting behaviour so I think there's success in that victim-survivors feel confident in reporting to police coercive controlling behaviours.
"If we say success is the actual criminalisation and the criminal justice pathway, then I would say the success has been limited."
Professor Meyer says there's about a one per cent conviction rate for coercive control in England, Wales and Scotland, which have led the way in criminalising controlling behaviour.
Data from the United Kingdom's Office for National Statistics show there were 45,310 offences of coercive control recorded by police in England and Wales in the year ending March 2024.
There were 1,002 defendant proceedings in court and 745 convictions of controlling or coercive behaviour reported in the latest data release, which only has figures to December 2023.
Professor Meyer says there isn't evidence that tougher penalties for domestic and family violence offences will act as a deterrent.
"I think a good example in Queensland is the increased penalties in relation to protection order breaches," she says.
"And we haven't seen a decrease in domestic violence and we haven't seen a decrease in protection order breaches.
"I would question whether it can have a deterrent effect, but I think it can have other positive effects, including hopefully a more holistic and coordinated service system response to victim-survivors."
Breaking the cycle
Women's Legal Service Queensland CEO Nadia Bromley says the laws have brought the issue to light.
Nadia Bromley says education is critical. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
"As much as the law being enforced is important, it existing is a good way to start conversations, to educate the community, and to have more awareness about the risks associated with coercive control.
"I think there are a number of challenges — it is a very serious offence, so it will be interesting to see whether the prosecution rates are what we expect.
"We're also alert to the issue of misidentification and seeing the wrong people prosecuted.
"This offence is designed to protect women, not misidentify them and prosecute them and criminalise them further."
National conversations about consent, sexual assault and domestic violence have led to improvements in respectful relationship education across public and private schools.
Hannah Clarke's parents hope the program will help break the cycle of control for future generations. ( ABC News: Mark Leonardi )
Balloons spelling out HALT for the special assembly at Hannah Clarke's school. ( ABC News: Josh Baker )
Hannah Clarke's parents watching the assembly. ( ABC News: Josh Baker )
Sitting centrestage, Mr and Mrs Clarke are at the special school assembly, with gold coin donations going towards their foundation.
"[Hannah] loved this school and she loved being school captain," Ms Clarke remembers fondly.
"[Children] are our future," Mr Clarke adds. "We need to get them educated on the red flags but also their feelings, their social media, and boys being able to release their feelings."
Hannah Clarke was school and house captain, and loved sports.
Mr Kramer hopes increased awareness and changing the attitudes of young people will make a difference.
"This program is at the beginning of the line — what does disrespect look like in the context of any kind of relationship?"
"And how do we ensure that these forms of disrespect don't escalate to forms of violence and control?
"The way it works for us in the HALT program is to have those conversations earlier, to make sure young people have the skills they need to have safe conversations and relationships.
"And hopefully we get to a point that no one actually needs a law around coercive control."
Credits

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hundreds gather in Brisbane over deaths in police custody, Sydney rally expected
Hundreds gather in Brisbane over deaths in police custody, Sydney rally expected

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Hundreds gather in Brisbane over deaths in police custody, Sydney rally expected

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised that this article contains the name of an Indigenous person who has died, used with the permission of their family. Hundreds of protesters gathered in Brisbane's King George Square to "demand justice" over the death of 24-year-old Kumanjayi White, who died in police custody in the Northern Territory last month. Mr White died last Tuesday after he was restrained on the floor of a Coles supermarket in Alice Springs. Police have said two off-duty officers detained him after an alleged altercation with a security guard who accused him of shoplifting. Organiser Sam Watson expressed anger that Mr White's death comes more than three decades after the royal commission into Aboriginal deaths in custody. "These deaths are happening all over the country, and they have been for the 30 years since the royal commission," he said. The statements were met with shouts of "shame" from the crowd gathered. Raelene Nixon, whose 27-year-old son Steven Lee Nixon-McKeller died in police custody in Toowoomba in 2021, joined protesters. "We do this not for those we've lost but for those who are to come; we have a responsibility to our future generations. "One third of the deaths in custody have been Aboriginal people but we make up just three per cent of the population. "When we ask for justice, they give us silence and more violence." Wakka Wakka man and South Sea Islander Kevin Yow Yeh called for more community support from the crowds gathered. "Solidarity means action; you've come here today but there's so much more we need to do," he said. "This story is unfortunately not a unique one. "This is our opportunity to mobilise and active, do something, because they're killing us." Another rally is expected to be held in Sydney this evening. They follow rallies held across the nation, including in Alice Springs, yesterday.

Experts back NSW Premier Chris Minns' plea for cigarette tax cut despite opposition
Experts back NSW Premier Chris Minns' plea for cigarette tax cut despite opposition

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Experts back NSW Premier Chris Minns' plea for cigarette tax cut despite opposition

NSW Premier Chris Minns says law-abiding citizens are being 'dragged into the black market' by the federal government's tobacco tax – and he wants that to change. Mr Minns threw down the gauntlet this week when he called for a re-evaluation of the tobacco excise, kicking-off political rows in both Sydney and Canberra. Twice yearly, the federal government sets the excise for tobacco products but in this year's budget recorded a $5.2bn decline in revenue since 2022-23. The NSW Premier has pointed the finger at illicit sales at tobacconists, some 5000 of which have opened up across NSW over the past few years. 'There's a whole bunch of law-abiding people who wouldn't break the law in a million years,' Mr Minns said. 'But, they're being dragged into a black market where they go to the store and they can either buy a $17 packet of illegal cigarettes or a $60 packet of cigarettes. 'It's a no-brainer.' Despite pushback, Mr Minns said every tax change started with 'an idea from someone who calls out a policy that's no longer fit for purpose'. 'So, let's get the ball rolling here because these illegal tobacco stores are pushing out hot bread shops, small businesses and restaurants. 'Because the sales from illegal tobacco are so lucrative, they can just pay the rent at a higher price. 'Something's gone amiss here and we need to have a crack at fixing it alongside our federal colleagues.' Mr Minns earlier signalled that police resources may have to be moved from domestic violence and organised crime to combat illicit tobacco. Mr Minns said the situation was 'intolerable', with 'every to-let shop in every high street in Sydney taken over by a tobacconist'. 'The biggest supporters of a massive excise on tobacco sales in NSW are probably organised criminals,' he said. 'It's a giant black market and major display on every street in every suburb in NSW.' No easy answers On Wednesday, federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers ruled out any change to the excise, saying making cigarettes cheaper wouldn't solve the issue of the booming illegal tobacco trade. In NSW, there are about 19,500 tobacco stores across the state – up from 14,500 a few years earlier – that are overseen by only about 30 health inspectors. A parliamentary inquiry into illicit tobacco sales, pushed for by the NSW opposition, will later this year examine which agency is best suited to the task. Until now, Liberal leader Mark Speakman has remained mum on whether NSW Police should takeover illicit tobacco enforcement from NSW Health. On Thursday, Mr Speakman said illicit tobacco had exploded under Mr Minns and organised criminal gangs were 'raking in big money'. 'They know NSW has minimal enforcement and some of the weakest penalties in the country,' Mr Speakman said. 'While other states have acted to drastically increase penalties and improve enforcement, Chris Minns has been missing in action. 'Now that the federal Treasurer has ruled out changes to the federal excise, Chris Minns needs to tell people how he is going to tackle this issue.' Under law, an individual found to be selling a prohibited tobacco product faces a maximum fine of $55,000 for a first offence. Those laws will change on July 1 when a new tobacco licensing scheme is introduced, requiring businesses to obtain a tobacco retailing licence. Businesses found to be selling tobacco products without a licence will face fines of up to $220,000 and $44,000 for an individual. Nonetheless, the issue sparked a fierce debate in NSW parliament on Wednesday between Mr Speakman and Police Minister Yasmin Catley. Asked about whether anti-gang Taskforce Falcon will expand its remit to illicit tobacco, Ms Catley struck out. 'The leader of the opposition knows that it is Health that enforce illicit tobacco. He knows that,' she said. 'And, he has come in here and has the audacity to come in here and say the police are not doing their job. Well, shame on you. Shame on you. 'NSW Police are doing absolutely everything they can and I am disgusted that the leader of the opposition could come to the NSW parliament and suggest otherwise.' For his part, NSW Health Minister Ryan Park has pointed the finger at the former Coalition government for not earlier introducing a licensing scheme. What do the experts say? Over the past six years, the duty price put on a 20-pack of cigarettes has gone up by about 75 per cent – from $16 to $28. As a result, the price of a packet at the counter sits about $40-50, with the cheapest little more than $30. Illicit cigarettes, meanwhile, cost about $13-15 per 20-pack and up to $20 for premium brands. University of Sydney School of Public Health researcher Edward Jegasothy supported Mr Minns' comments on the tobacco excise. He said there was no solution to the prevalence of illicit tobacco without a re-examination of the 'punitive' policy. 'There's really no ethical basis for the policy because it's essentially just a punitive policy attack on the poor,' he said. Mr Jegasothy said the policy had failed to demonstrate any 'meaningful health benefits and certainly no equitable health benefits'. 'I can't see a solution that doesn't have involve bringing down the tax,' he said. 'It has to be part of the solution … because it is essentially putting more holes in the bottom of the boat.' Mr Jegasothy said the belief that the excise, in increasing the cost of cigarettes, would reduce rates of smoking 'didn't hold water'. With rates of smoking higher among poor and marginalised groups, he instead encouraged solutions that addressed the root causes, 'which is largely poverty'. He urged for a review of the excise as a public health policy, including up until the explosion of black market sales in the early 2020s. That explosion, Mr Jegasothy suggested, came as a result of a combination of factors, including the cumulative impact of the excise and a tightening on loose leaf tobacco. The Australian Association of Convenience Stores has also backed Mr Minns' call for a rethink of the tobacco excise. Chief executive Theo Foukkare said it was 'extraordinary that it's gotten to this point'. 'Tobacco is a price-sensitive consumer product,' he said. 'If you put a price on it that is manifestly higher than what people can afford, they'll find a cheaper alternative and that's where this incredibly dangerous black market is cashing in – and even worse, they're using that money to fund the most atrocious crimes.' What about other states? NSW is far from the only state or territory in Australia where the issue of illicit tobacco has become a hot-button topic in recent years. In Victoria, police have continuingly battled the so-called tobacco wars, conflict between organised crime groups during which stores have been burned. According to Victoria Police, there were about 1300 stand-alone tobacco stores in the state – of these, 1000 sell some kind of illicit tobacco. From July 1, business caught possessing or selling an illicit tobacco product in Victoria face fines of up to $1.7m. For an individual, that penalty is about $830,000 or 15 years in prison. Further north, Queensland Health seized more than 15.2 million illicit cigarettes worth $12.2m across the state between July 1, 2024 and February 28, 2025. Mr Jegasothy said outside of NSW and Victoria, there was little publicly available information about the prevalence of illicit tobacco.

'I shouldn't have lied to them': Accused mushroom cook's week on the witness stand
'I shouldn't have lied to them': Accused mushroom cook's week on the witness stand

SBS Australia

time3 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

'I shouldn't have lied to them': Accused mushroom cook's week on the witness stand

Mushroom cook Erin Patterson has admitted to lies, spoken of past shames and apologised while testifying at her triple murder trial. The 50-year-old has pleaded not guilty over the deaths of her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, 70, and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson, 66, following a July 2023 lunch. Patterson also denies the attempted murder of the only survivor of the meal, Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson. The church pastor has attended most days of the trial after giving evidence himself and this week sat quietly at the back of court watching Patterson in the witness box. She maintains the poisonings were not deliberate. The Supreme Court trial in Victoria's regional town of Morwell has run into its sixth week, with curious spectators queuing before dawn to grab a coveted seat from where they could witness the accused give evidence. Sitting behind a varnished timber stand, Patterson told the jury about having low self-esteem as an adult and wanting to do something about her weight and poor eating habits. She also admitted lying to her lunch guests about it. "I was planning to have gastric bypass surgery, and so I remember thinking, 'I didn't want to tell anybody what I was going to have done'," she told the court. "I thought perhaps letting them believe I had some serious issue that needed treatment might mean they'd be able to help me with the logistics around the kids." She told the jury she had also invited her estranged husband Simon Patterson for lunch that day to talk about "some health stuff" but he did not attend. Patterson said she mentioned at the table an issue she had "a year or two earlier where I thought I had ovarian cancer and had various scans about and related to that". "I'm not proud of this but I led them to believe that I might be needing some treatment in regards to that in the next few weeks or months." "Did you lie to them?" Defence barrister Colin Mandy SC asked. "I did lie to them," she replied. Asked why, Patterson said: "I was really embarrassed. I was ashamed of the fact that I didn't have control over my body or what I ate ... I didn't want to tell anybody but I shouldn't have lied to them." Crown prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC asked about that conversation but Patterson denied she told her lunch guests she had been diagnosed with cancer and needed advice on how to break this news to her children. "I suggest you never thought you'd have to account for this lie about having cancer because you thought the lunch guests would die," Rogers said. "That's not true," Patterson replied. "What I was trying to communicate was … that I was undergoing investigations around ovarian cancer and might need treatment in that regard in the future." Mandy cited the accused's police interview on 5 August 2023, where she told them she had never dehydrated food and denied owning a dehydrator. "Were those lies?" Mandy asked. "Yes," Patterson replied. Asked why she lied to detectives about the dehydrator, Patterson said: "I had disposed of it a few days earlier in the context of thinking that maybe mushrooms that I'd foraged for the meal I prepared was responsible for making people sick." After police told her Gail and Heather had died during a search of her home before the interview, Patterson said she had a "stupid knee-jerk reaction to just dig deeper and keep lying". "I was just scared but I shouldn't have done it," Patterson said. He asked Patterson if her answer to police that she had "never" foraged for mushrooms was also a lie. "Yes, they were both lies," she replied. Months before the fatal lunch, Patterson revealed she had apologised for sending Facebook messages to her online friends about her relatives after a dispute between her and Simon about child support and schooling. She said she did not mean the messages, "this family, I swear to f***ing god" and "I'm sick of this shit, I want nothing to do with them", insisting it was her "venting" frustration. "It wasn't Don and Gail's fault. It wasn't the family's fault. It wasn't even entirely Simon's fault. I played a part in the issue too," she told the court. After returning from a family holiday to New Zealand, Patterson said she apologised to her in-laws. "What were you apologising for?" Mandy asked. "For trying to involve them in something that they didn't need to be worried about," she said. "I wasn't asking them to take sides but, in effect, I was. "I wanted them to agree with me that I was right and Simon was wrong, and that wasn't fair." She denied Rogers assertion she was angry with them for taking Simon's side in the dispute or that those comments were her true feelings towards her in-laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store