logo
Hamas says it has given a 'positive' response to the latest ceasefire proposal in Gaza

Hamas says it has given a 'positive' response to the latest ceasefire proposal in Gaza

Yahoo20 hours ago
DEIR al-BALAH, Gaza Strip (AP) — Hamas said Friday it has given a 'positive' response to the latest proposal for a ceasefire in Gaza but said further talks were needed on implementation.
It was not clear if Hamas' statement meant it had accepted the proposal from U.S. President Donald Trump for a 60-day ceasefire. Hamas has been seeking guarantees that the initial truce would lead to a total end to the war, now nearly 21 months old. Donald Trump has been pushing hard for a deal to be reached, and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is due to visit the White House next week to discuss a deal.
The Hamas statement came as Israeli airstrikes killed 15 Palestinians in Gaza early Friday, while a hospital said another 20 people died in shootings while seeking aid.
The U.N. human rights office said it has recorded 613 Palestinians killed within the span of a month in Gaza while trying to obtain aid. Most were killed while trying to reach food distribution points run by an Israeli-backed American organization, while others were massed waiting for aid trucks connected to the United Nations or other humanitarian organizations, it said.
Efforts ongoing to halt the war
Trump said Tuesday that Israel had agreed on terms for a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza, during which the U.S. would "work with all parties to end the war.' He urged Hamas to accept the deal before conditions worsen.
In its statement late Friday, Hamas said it 'has submitted its positive response' to Egyptian and Qatari mediators.
It said it is 'fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework.' It did not elaborate on what needed to be worked out in implementation.
A Hamas official said the ceasefire could start as early as next week but he said talks were needed first to work out how many Palestinian prisoners would be released in return for each freed Israeli hostage and to specify the amount of aid that will enter Gaza during the truce. Hamas has said it wants aid to flow in greater quantities through the United Nations and other humanitarian agencies. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because he wasn't authorized to discuss the response with the press.
The official also said that negotiations would start from the first day of the truce on a permanent ceasefire and full withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza in return for the release of remaining hostages. He said that Trump has guaranteed that the truce will be extended beyond 60 days if needed for those negotiations to reach a deal. There has been no confirmation from the United States of such a guarantee.
Previous rounds of negotiations have run aground over Hamas demands of guarantees that further negotiations would lead to the war's end, while Netanyahu has insisted Israel would resume fighting to ensure the destruction of the militant group.
'We'll see what happens. We're going to know over the next 24 hours,' Trump told reporters on Air Force One late Thursday when asked if Hamas had agreed to the latest framework for a ceasefire.
20 killed Friday while seeking aid
Officials at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis said at least three Palestinians were killed Friday while on the roads heading to food distribution sites run by the Israeli-backed the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in southern Gaza.
Since GHF began distributions in late May, witnesses have said almost daily that Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians on the roads leading to the food centers. To reach the sites, people must walk several kilometers (miles) through an Israeli military zone where troops control the road.
The Israeli military has said previously it fires warning shots to control crowds or at Palestinians who approach its troops. The GHF has denied any serious injuries or deaths on its sites and says shootings outside their immediate vicinity are under the purview of Israel's military.
On Friday, in reaction to the U.N. rights agency's report, it said in a statement that it was investigating reports of people killed and wounded while seeking aid. It said it was working at 'minimizing possible friction between the population' and Israeli forces, including by installing fences and placing signs on the routes.
Separately, witnesses have said Israeli troops open fire toward crowds of Palestinians who gather in military-controlled zones to wait for aid trucks entering Gaza for the U.N. or other aid organizations not associated with GHF.
On Friday, 17 people were killed waiting for trucks in eastern Khan Younis in the Tahliya area, officials at Nasser Hospital said.
Three survivors told the AP they had gone to wait for the trucks in a military 'red zone' in Khan Younis and that troops opened fire from a tank and drones.
It was a 'crowd of people, may God help them, who want to eat and live,' said Seddiq Abu Farhana, who was shot in the leg, forcing him to drop a bag of flour he had grabbed. 'There was direct firing.'
Airstrikes also hit the Muwasi area on the southern end of Gaza's Mediterranean coast, where hundreds of thousands of Palestinians driven from their homes are sheltering in tent camps. Of the 15 people killed in the strikes, eight were women and one was a child, according to the hospital.
Israel's military said it was looking into Friday's reported airstrikes. It had no immediate comment on the reported shootings surrounding the aid trucks.
U.N. investigates shootings near aid sites
The spokeswoman for the U.N. human rights office, Ravina Shamdasani, said the agency was not able to attribute responsibility for the killings. But she said 'it is clear that the Israeli military has shelled and shot at Palestinians trying to reach the distribution points' operated by GHF.
In a message to The Associated Press, Shamdasani said that of the total tallied, 509 killings were 'GHF-related,' meaning at or near its distribution sites.
In a statement Friday, GHF cast doubt on the casualty figures, accusing the U.N. of taking its casualty figures 'directly from the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry'and of trying 'to falsely smear our effort.'
Shamdasani, the U.N. rights office spokesperson, told the AP that the data 'is based on our own information gathering through various reliable sources, including medical, human rights and humanitarian organizations.'
Rik Peeperkorn, representative of the World Health Organization, said Nasser Hospital, the biggest hospital operating in the south, receives dozens or hundreds of casualties every day, most coming from the vicinity of the food distribution sites.
The International Committee of the Red Cross also said in late June that its field hospital near one of the GHF sites has been overwhelmed more than 20 times in the previous months by mass casualties, most suffering gunshot injuries while on their way to the food distribution sites.
Also on Friday, Israel's military said two soldiers were killed in combat in Gaza, one in the north and one in the south. Over 860 Israeli soldiers have been killed since the war began, including more than 400 during the fighting in Gaza.
The Israeli military also issued new evacuation orders Friday in northeast Khan Younis in southern Gaza and urged Palestinians to move west ahead of planned military operations against Hamas in the area. The new evacuation zones pushed Palestinians into increasingly smaller spaces by the coast.
The Health Ministry in Gaza said the number of Palestinians killed in the territory has passed 57,000. The ministry does not differentiate between civilians and combatants in its count, but says more than half of the dead are women and children. The ministry is run by medical professionals employed by the Hamas government, and its numbers are widely cited by the U.N. and international organizations.
The war began when Hamas-led militants attacked southern Israel, killing 1,200 people and taking roughly 250 hostages.
___
Kullab reported from Jerusalem and Mroue from Beirut. Associated Press writers Jamey Keaten in Geneva, Julia Frankel in Jerusalem and Fatma Khaled in Cairo contributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk Forms a New Political Party to Challenge Trump and the Republicans
Elon Musk Forms a New Political Party to Challenge Trump and the Republicans

Gizmodo

time18 minutes ago

  • Gizmodo

Elon Musk Forms a New Political Party to Challenge Trump and the Republicans

As he had previously vowed, Tesla CEO Elon Musk officially announced the formation of a new, third political party on Saturday, July 5, 2025. This dramatic move comes just hours after President Donald Trump signed his 'One Big Beautiful Bill' into law, a sweeping budget measure that implements massive spending cuts and eliminates nearly all federal climate and clean energy programs, legislation Musk staunchly opposed. The announcement was definitive. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom,' the world's richest man posted on X (formerly Twitter) at 3:46 PM ET. He did not immediately provide further details on the party's platform or organizational structure. By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it! When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy. Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 5, 2025This decision directly follows a highly visible poll Musk conducted on X the previous day, July 4, as Trump prepared to enact the bill that had become a centerpiece of his administration. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' Musk wrote, directly posing the question: 'Should we create the America Party?' X users were given only two options: 'Yes' or 'No.' The results of the poll, also posted on X, showed overwhelming support. Nearly 1.25 million accounts participated, with approximately 65.4% voting 'yes.' Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system! Should we create the America Party? — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 4, 2025'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' the SpaceX founder declared on Saturday while announcing the party's creation. He further elaborated on his motivation, stating, 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste and graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy.' The formation of this party, while impactful, does not come as an absolute surprise. Musk had previously hinted at such a move last month, amid an escalating feud with Trump, whom he had publicly labeled ungrateful. This isn't the first time Musk has publicly entertained the idea of a third party. In May 2022, he posted, 'A party more moderate on all issues than either Reps or Dems would be ideal,' adding that, 'This is what most people in America want, but unfortunately it's not realistic.' However, after a tumultuous recent period in Washington where he led the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) within the Trump administration, and a highly publicized rift with the President, he appears more determined than ever to turn rhetoric into political action. Musk's core belief is that neither the Republican Party, which currently controls the government, nor the Democratic opposition adequately represents a significant segment of the American population. He seems convinced that the political landscape is ripe for a new movement. This conviction is supported by recent polling data: according to a 2024 Gallup study, a substantial 43% of Americans identified as independents, while only 28% identified specifically as Republican and 28% as Democrat. Despite this apparent opening for a new political force, history suggests that third party candidates face considerable challenges within the U.S. electoral system. Historically, even strong independent bids have struggled to translate popular support into electoral victories. For instance, Ross Perot's notable 1992 presidential run captured 18.9% of the popular vote but secured no electoral college votes. More recent third party candidates, such as Jill Stein, have typically polled below 1% in national presidential elections.

SHAPIRO: Is America starting to see the end of patriotism?
SHAPIRO: Is America starting to see the end of patriotism?

Yahoo

time31 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

SHAPIRO: Is America starting to see the end of patriotism?

America has a major problem. Nearly half of Americans — 42% — don't believe in America. According to Gallup, just 58% of adults say they are either 'extremely' or 'somewhat' proud to be American. That number has been in steep decline for a decade. In 2004, that number was 91% and was still 81% as of 2016. Then it began to tumble and it hasn't recovered. The trend isn't equivalent across the political spectrum. Republicans have always been far prouder of their country; their pride number has never dropped below 84% in 2022 and currently stands at 92%. The serious decline is located among independents, who have dropped from 76% in 2013 to 53% today, and Democrats, who plummeted from 80% to 36% during that same period. Furthermore, Americans' age correlates highly with levels of American pride: 83% of the Silent Generation venerates the country, as do 75% of Baby Boomers and 71% of Generation Xers — but just 58% of Millennials and 41% of Generation Z do. So, what precisely happened? The answer is simple. Republicans started winning and Democrats spiralled off. President Donald Trump's victory in 2016 sent Democrats spiralling into an anti-American black hole, with their pride in America dropping off a cliff during the first Trump term, recovering only moderately during Joe Biden's term (62% in 2021), and then plummeting again this year. Democrats embraced a new and extreme anti-American point of view, reflected most obviously in the elevation of figures like Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y.; Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; and now New York Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani. These figures, emblems of a new wave in the Democratic Party, are disaffected with America in general. If the promise of Barack Obama is that the vessel of the Democratic Party could be used to bottle the fire and fervour of the revolutionary left, these radicals believe that all bottles must be shattered — that the institutions of the United States must be exploded entirely. They see the re-election of Donald Trump as indicative of a deep rot at the heart of the American experiment and wish to eviscerate the fundamental ideas of that experiment. They champion the supposed virtue of the Third World and the supposed evil of the United States; the supposed beauties of socialism and evils of capitalism; the supposed virtue of transgressive social values and the supposed evils of traditionalism. They believe that America's unique Constitution is a framework for oppression; they believe that rights are mere guises for despotic power and that duties are cynically placed fetters upon their true selves. They are, as I describe in my upcoming book, Lions and Scavengers, the scavengers. They are all about tearing down, not about building something new. They have taken over the Democratic Party and they are making extraordinary inroads among younger Americans. Ironically, that's due to the failure of the very institutions the political left hijacked and misused for decades. Democrats heavily regulated and taxed the free market and then blamed the free market for recession or inflation; Democrats hijacked our educational institutions to pay off their union cronies and indoctrinate young people in their mindset and then blamed capitalists for failing to pay off young people's debts; Democrats abused our scientific and governmental institutions and then suggested that Republican resistance was actually Biblical fundamentalism rearing its ugly head. Meanwhile, political independents grow increasingly discouraged by our politics. They see Republicans shifting the deck chairs atop the Titanic of state as Democrats eagerly drill more holes in the hull — and they are increasingly depressed. They are not wrong to be. But they are wrong to believe that they can or should chart a middle course between those who love America and its founding principles and those who despise them. We should all be proud of America, the greatest country in the history of the world, with all of its faults and flaws. And we should work to correct those faults and flaws, rather than seek its overthrow or despairing and throwing up our hands.

Trump's Tariff Date Arrives After a 90-Day Rollercoaster
Trump's Tariff Date Arrives After a 90-Day Rollercoaster

Bloomberg

time32 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's Tariff Date Arrives After a 90-Day Rollercoaster

The world economy, beset with uncertainty for three months over Donald Trump's on-again-off-again tariffs, is about to get more clarity as the US president's deadline for trade deals arrives on Wednesday. That's when the 90-day reprieve from Trump's so-called 'reciprocal' levies ends, clearing the way for the protectionism he thinks will narrow US trade deficits and spark a manufacturing revival. The wielding of unilateral tariffs is upending a system that for decades encouraged lower barriers to commerce under rules enforced by the World Trade Organization.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store