logo
Ohio must redraw its congressional maps this year: Here's how and why that's happening

Ohio must redraw its congressional maps this year: Here's how and why that's happening

Yahooa day ago
Aug. 14—Ohio's elected leaders are mandated this year to redraw boundaries of the state's 15 congressional districts amid a brewing fight for political control of the U.S. House of Representatives as the 2026 midterm election approaches.
While states like Texas and California threaten to redraw their congressional maps to favor one political party, Ohio alone is required by its state constitution to produce new maps.
INSIDE OHIO POLITICS: Go here for more from our special reporting project explaining the inner-workings of Ohio statehouse politics.
Ohio's congressional redistricting process is almost entirely spelled out in its constitution after Ohio voters approved a bipartisan reform measure in 2018. Under those rules, the congressional map created in 2021 after the most recent U.S. Census is only good through 2026 because the maps were approved without requisite support from Democrats.
This sets Ohio apart from other states, whose maps are theoretically good through the 2030 election cycle and are due to be updated after the 2030 Census, barring intervention from those states' leaders.
And with Republicans in control of all key state offices and holding supermajorities in both chambers of the Ohio General Assembly, some suggest this gives the GOP an opportunity to gerrymander in the party's favor and help sway the balance of power in Washington D.C.
How Ohio's redistricting process works
The Ohio Constitution allocates map drawing responsibilities, establishes required deadlines, and provides specific parameters for mapmakers to follow in creating an enforceable map. Here's how the process works:
Stage 1: Ohio General Assembly
The Ohio General Assembly has until Sept. 30 to come up with and approve new congressional maps.
In order to take effect, the legislature's proposal would need to be approved by a three-fifths vote in both the Ohio House and Senate, with the added stipulation that the map would need majority support from the Republicans and Democrats of each chamber.
Failure to meet that threshold by the end of September would kick the process to its second stage.
Ohio's constitution requires the legislature's map proposals to come in the form of a traditional bill, which makes any plan approved in this first stage subject to a governor's veto or public referendum.
Stage 2: Ohio Redistricting Commission
If the legislature fails, then the responsibility falls on the Ohio Redistricting Commission — a seven-member board made up of Ohio's governor; auditor; secretary of state; and two other designees per party, picked by Republican and Democratic legislative leaders.
Ohio's governor, auditor and secretary of state are all Republicans.
The redistricting commission would have until Oct. 31 to create and approve a map. Like the legislature in the first stage, it is required to have a bipartisan vote to adopt its map. A redistricting commission map can be approved by a four affirmative votes, including support from at least two Democrats and two Republicans.
Failure to meet that threshold before the Oct. 31 deadline sends the process to its third stage.
Stage 3: Back to the legislature
The Ohio General Assembly would get a second bite of the apple if the redistricting commission were to fail, this time with the goal of producing a map that could get three-fifths support from both chambers, including support from at least one-third of the members of each chamber's Democratic and Republican caucus, before Nov. 30.
In this stage, however, the Ohio Constitution allows for a temporary map to be adopted with just a simple majority vote.
A map passed in this stage, like the first stage, can be vetoed by the governor or become the subject of a voter referendum.
Isn't gerrymandering prohibited?
The Ohio Constitution doesn't really address gerrymandering in the first two steps outlined above, relying instead on the effort to get a 10-year map with bipartisan support.
But if lawmakers create a temporary map passed on a partisan basis, the constitution does list certain restrictions: — The legislature's map cannot "unduly" favor or disfavor a political party; — The plan's districts cannot unduly split local governmental units; — The legislature must at least "attempt" to draw compact districts; — The plan goes into effect for two election cycles, which in this case would be for the 2026 and 2028 elections.
How we got here
In 2021, Ohio's political leaders took on the task of redrawing congressional districts for the first time since Ohio voters overwhelmingly (with nearly three-quarters of voters in support) voted in 2018 to amend the Ohio Constitution to create the current process.
It didn't work. Republican officeholders and legislative leaders pushed through maps with little support from Ohio Democratic leaders, going through the three-stage process outlined above and ending up with a temporary map.
The League of Women Voters of Ohio and others sued, and the Ohio Supreme Court deemed the map unconstitutionally gerrymandered in favor of Republicans, with Republican Chief Justice Maureen O'Connor siding with the court's three Democrats and casting the deciding vote.
But a federal court ruled the maps had to be used in order to carry out the 2022 election.
After O'Connor left office and the balance of power on the state's high court changed in 2022, the League dropped their lawsuit and instead backed an effort to amend the Ohio Constitution again to remove politicians from the redistricting process. But Ohio voters rejected the proposed reforms in the 2024 election.
So that leaves us with the current map that is only good for the 2022 and 2024 election cycles. This year it falls to Ohio elected officeholders and legislative leaders to again draw a map using the steps outlined above.
But now, it's happening amid a national fervor over congressional maps.
Partisan politics
The two election cycles that used Ohio's expiring maps resulted in the election of 10 Republicans and five Democrats to represent the state in the U.S. House — with only a handful of competitive districts.
Ohio House Minority Leader Dani Isaacsohn, D-Cincinnati, told this news outlet that he's hoping for — and believes the law calls for — a new map to give Republicans less of an advantage.
"Right now we have maps that are out of whack with where Ohioans are," Isaacsohn said. "We live in a state that leans Republican, so we should have congressional districts that lean Republican. That's probably, for 15 seats, an eight-to-seven (split) with some tossups."
But Ohio Republicans are again in the driver's seat. Ohio House Speaker Matt Huffman, R-Lima, previously suggested it may be possible to have a bipartisan bill in September after informal negotiations this month.
But GOP leaders could again just push through a map without Democratic support that would stand for the next two congressional elections in 2026 and 2028. And this time the Ohio Supreme Court, which could be asked to weigh whether a temporary map is gerrymandered, has a six-to-one Republican advantage.
U.S. Sen. Bernie Moreno, a Republican, thinks the state's new maps should give Republicans a 12-to-3 advantage, according to The Ohio Capital Journal.
But, despite external pressures, Isaacsohn maintained a guarded optimism that the Republicans won't use the opportunity to stretch their advantage even further.
"The Speaker has said publicly that he is not amenable or susceptible to pressure from outside forces, including those in D.C., and I certainly hope that's the case," he said.
Looking ahead
Jen Miller, executive director of the League of Women Voters of Ohio, told this news outlet she doesn't want to predict what would happen in the forthcoming redistricting process.
But, Miller said she doesn't expect the national conversation around redistricting to make advocating for fair maps more difficult. Which is to say: "I think redistricting is always hard when politicians are in charge."
"The national conversation proves that politicians should not be part of the redistricting (and) that both parties, when given the power, will rig maps for their candidates," she said. "We stand firmly against gerrymandering, no matter who is doing it."
While there are plenty of factors that go into making a fair district map, Miller said she places value on "proportional fairness" — whether a map's competitive advantages are in line with the electorate's political preferences. Miller explained the goal as a map where "the percent of votes cast for each party generally mirrors the percent of seats each party would get."
"The foundation (of a fair map) should be districts that don't split communities of interest and bring together communities that are very alike. Right now we have these sprawling, weird-shaped districts that smoosh together populations of people that have very different needs from infrastructure and the economy, healthcare and more," Miller said. "So the foundation really is keeping communities together, but a good measure is proportional fairness."
------
For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening.
Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'
Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Zohran Mamdani Torches Cuomo With 1 Brutal Zinger: 'I Don't Need To Do Much'

New York City's Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani doubled down Thursday after releasing a viral campaign video highlighting a link between his opponent, former Gov. Andrew Cuomo, and late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Mamdani pounced on the subject during a press conference in the Bronx, where he was asked if the video was intended to make Cuomo appear unlikable by pairing him with someone as disgraced as Epstein, an accused sex trafficker. 'I don't need to do much to make the governor appear extremely dislikable,' Mamdani said. 'The intent of that video was to shine a light on what journalists have uncovered over many months, which is the fact of what the former governor did after resigning in disgrace.' Related: 'We know that which has been reported, and yet we also know that there is likely more,' he continued. 'Because, as is the case with Andrew Cuomo, when you think you found out about all of his scandals — there seems to always be another one.' Cuomo slammed Mamdani last week for campaigning on more affordable housing in New York City while living in a rent-controlled apartment, only for Mamdani to share clippings from major media outlets who covered Cuomo's most recent scandals. Related: 'Finally in June, the New York Times covered that Cuomo had worked with his longtime friend Andrew Farkas on a luxury marina project in Puerto Rico,' Mamdani said in the video. 'Farka's previous partner on luxury marinas in the Caribbean? Jeffrey Epstein.' The paper reported at the time that Cuomo declined to share information about the clients and companies who paid him as a consultant after resigning in 2021, but noted the marina project and two other deals had already come to light — as Mamdani noted in his video. Mamdani on Cuomo: "I don't need to do much to make the governor appear extremely dislikable." — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) August 14, 2025 'Cuomo advised a cryptocurrency exchange based in the Seychelles as it faced federal investigations,' he said in the clip. 'Then in May, Politico reported that Cuomo failed to disclose $2.6 million in stock options to the New York City Conflicts of Interest board.' Cuomo spoke ahead of Mamdani on Thursday and said New York City faces 'serious difficulty' in fighting unemployment. Mamdani, who has slammed President Donald Trump for his potential involvement in the mayoral race, leapt on the comment Thursday. 'To hear from a former governor about the difficulties of attracting additional jobs without the recognition of what the Trump administration has done to make it so difficult ...' said Mamdani, citing Trump's tariffs and the current 'business climate' hampering local tourism. Related: 'We're seeing estimates of about a $4 billion loss compared to other years in this city,' he said. 'That is something that has massive ramifications for the ability for our city to continue functioning as it has, and yet I cannot recall the last time the former governor even brought that up.' Related... Zohran Mamdani Slams Possible Trump Involvement In NYC Mayoral Race Meghan McCain Taunts Andrew Cuomo And Makes Stunning Prediction For NYC Mayor Race Washington Sues To Block Trump's Federal Takeover Of Its Police Department

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity
Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Some workers would be excluded from student loan forgiveness program for 'illegal' activity

WASHINGTON (AP) — Teachers, social workers, nurses and other public workers would be cut off from a popular student loan cancellation program if the Trump administration finds their employer engaged in activities with a 'substantial illegal purpose,' under a new federal proposal released on Friday. The Education Department took aim at nonprofits or government bodies that work with immigrants and transgender youth, releasing plans to overhaul the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program. Opponents fear the new policy would turn the loan forgiveness benefit into a tool of political retribution. The proposal would give the education secretary the final say in deciding whether a group or government entity should be excluded from the program, which was created by Congress in 2007 to encourage more college graduates to enter lower-paying public service fields. The proposal says illegal activity includes the trafficking or 'chemical castration' of children, illegal immigration and supporting foreign terrorist organizations. 'Chemical castration' is defined as using hormone therapy or drugs that delay puberty — gender-affirming care common for transgender children or teens. President Donald Trump ordered the changes in March, saying the loan forgiveness program was steering taxpayer money to 'activist organizations' that pose a threat to national security and do not serve the public. The public will be given 30 days to weigh in on the proposal before it can be finalized. Any changes would take effect in July 2026. Under current rules, government employees and many nonprofit workers can get their federal student loans canceled after they've made 10 years of payments. The program is open to government workers, including teachers, firefighters and employees of public hospitals, along with nonprofits that focus on certain areas. The new proposal would exclude employees of any organization tied to an activity deemed illegal. The Education Department predicts that fewer than 10 organizations would be deemed ineligible per year. It doesn't expect a 'significant reduction' in the percentage of borrowers who would be granted forgiveness under the program, according to the proposal. Yet the agency acknowledges that not all industries would be affected evenly. Schools, universities, health care providers, social workers and legal services organizations are among those most likely to have their eligibility jeopardized, the department wrote. It did not give more specifics about what 'illegal' actions those groups were taking that could bar them from the program. But the proposal suggests that performing gender-affirming care in the 27 states that outlaw it would be enough. If a state or federal court rules against an employer, that could lead to its expulsion from the program, or if the employer is involved in a legal settlement that includes an admission of wrongdoing. Even without a legal finding, however, the education secretary could determine independently that an organization should be ejected. The secretary could judge whether an organization participated in illegal activity by using a legal standard known as the 'preponderance of the evidence' — meaning it's more likely than not that an accusation is true. Once an organization is barred from the program, its workers' future loan payments would no longer count toward cancellation. They would have to find work at another eligible employer to keep making progress toward forgiveness. A ban from the Education Department would last 10 years or until the employer completed a 'corrective action plan' approved by the secretary. Critics blasted the proposal as an illegal attempt to weaponize student loan cancellation. Kristin McGuire, CEO of the nonprofit Young Invincibles, which advocates for loan forgiveness, called it a political stunt designed to confuse borrowers. 'By using a distorted and overly broad definition of 'illegal activities,' the Trump administration is exploiting the student loan system to attack political opponents,' McGuire said in a statement. The Education Department sketched out its plans for the overhaul during a federal rulemaking process that began in June. The agency gathered a panel of experts to help hash out the details — a process known as negotiated rulemaking. But the panel failed to reach a consensus, which freed the department to move forward with a proposal of its own design. The proposal released on Friday included some changes meant to ease concerns raised by the expert panel. Some had worried the department would ban organizations merely for supporting transgender rights, even if they have no direct involvement in gender-affirming care. The new proposal clarifies that the secretary would not expel organizations for exercising their First Amendment rights. ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Solve the daily Crossword

The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands
The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

The moment Vladimir Putin has craved - a red carpet from Donald Trump for a man with blood on his hands

All eyes were on Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin as they met for the first time in more than six years, the Russian president visiting the US for high-stakes talks that could reshape the war in Ukraine. The two leaders greeted each other with a handshake after stepping off their planes at the Elmendorf-Richardson military base in Anchorage, Alaska - and a smiling Trump even applauded Putin as he approached him on a red carpet that had been laid out. It is exactly the moment Putin has craved, writes Moscow correspondent Ivor Bennett. The Russian leader has been welcomed on to US soil as an equal for a meeting of great powers. Trump-Putin summit - latest updates The red carpet, the handshake, the flypast - only North Korea would give an indicted war criminal a greeting like this. It marks the end of his isolation from the West in the most spectacular fashion. Instead of sanctions, Trump has rewarded the Russian president with the equivalent of a state visit. The pariah looks more like a partner. , reporting from the ground in Alaska, describes the meeting on the tarmac as "extraordinary". There was the red carpet and more for a man with blood on his hands, he writes. Putin - aggressor, pariah and wanted for war crimes. Quite the CV for a man who was applauded on to the airbase by his host, the US president. It couldn't have looked more cordial - a superpower moment with a smile and a shake between the men who hold peace in their hands. Read more: If that wasn't enough, there followed a military flypast to dress the spectacle. A smiling Putin seemed duly impressed, but what it says about the power dynamic in the relationship will trouble onlookers in Ukraine - and one moment they may have found particularly galling. Posing for photographs with Trump before waiting media, Putin was asked: "Will you stop killing civilians?" To which he smiled, and gave it a deaf ear

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store