logo
The four ICC judges sanctioned by the US for Palestine and Afghanistan work

The four ICC judges sanctioned by the US for Palestine and Afghanistan work

Middle East Eye06-06-2025
The US State Department announced sanctions on Thursday against four judges of the International Criminal Court (ICC), targeting them over investigations involving the United States and its ally Israel.
The move follows the designation of ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan in February, under an executive order issued by US President Donald Trump shortly after he was reinaugurated.
The governments of the Netherlands, Belgium and Slovenia have been among the first to denounce the sanctions as an attempt to obstruct the work of the court.
The sanctioned judges are: ICC Second Vice-President Reine Alapini-Gansou (Benin), Solomy Balungi Bossa (Uganda), Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza (Peru) and Beti Hohler (Slovenia).
Alapini-Gansou and Hohler were targeted for their role as Pre-Trial judges in issuing arrest warrants in November 2024 for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant. The charges involve alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity committed in Gaza.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
The Pre-Trial chamber that issued the warrants also included French Judge Nicolas Guillou, who was not subject to US sanctions.
Judges Bossa and Ibanez Carranza were sanctioned for their participation in a 2020 ICC appeals chamber decision that allowed an investigation into crimes committed in Afghanistan since 2003.
The scope of that investigation included the Taliban, Afghan National Security Forces, and US military and CIA personnel. These sanctions were imposed despite a 2021 decision by the ICC prosecutor to deprioritise investigations involving US nationals.
The ICC has a total of 18 judges who serve in different chambers, including the Pre-Trial, Trial and Appeals chambers.
Judges are nominated by state parties to the Rome Statute, the ICC's founding treaty, and then elected by the Assembly of States Parties, the court's governing body.
Judges must demonstrate high moral character, impartiality and integrity, meeting the qualifications required in their home countries for appointment to the highest judicial offices.
Once elected, ICC judges serve a non-renewable nine-year term.
Below are the profiles of the four judges sanctioned by the Trump administration on 5 June 2025.
Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa (Uganda)
Judge Solomy Balungi Bossa is a Ugandan jurist currently serving as a judge on the Appeals Chamber of the ICC, to which she was elected in 2017 and sworn in in March 2018.
She has participated in appellate proceedings before the ICC concerning several landmark cases, including The Prosecutor v Bosco Ntaganda and The Prosecutor v Dominic Ongwen.
According to her official profile, Judge Bossa joined the ICC after an extensive judicial career spanning national, regional and international legal bodies.
She previously served on the United Nations Mechanism for International Criminal Tribunals (2012-2018), the African Court on Human and Peoples' Rights (2014-2018), and Uganda's Court of Appeal (2013-2018). Earlier, she held judicial roles at the UN International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (2003-2013), the East African Court of Justice (2001-2006), and the High Court of Uganda (1997-2013).
Before her judicial appointments, Bossa practised law privately between 1988 and 1997, and lectured at Uganda's Law Development Centre from 1980 to 1997. During that period, she was actively involved in human rights work, often representing disadvantaged women in court. She also played a central role in establishing and leading several NGOs focused on legal advocacy and support for individuals living with HIV and AIDS.
Her professional commitments extended to legal institutions at both national and international levels. She was vice chairperson of the International Bar Association Human Rights Institute (1993-1999), led the Legal Aid Clinics at the Law Development Centre (1999-2001), and served as president of the Uganda Law Society (1993-1995). She also chaired the Uganda Law Council (1998-2003) and the National Steering Committee on Community Service (1997-2000).
Judge Bossa is affiliated with several professional organisations, including the International Association of Women Judges and the African Centre for Democracy and Human Rights. She is also an honorary member of the International Commission of Jurists.
Judge Bossa holds a Bachelor of Laws from Makerere University, a postgraduate diploma in legal practice from Uganda's Law Development Centre and a Master of Laws in public international law from the University of London.
Judge Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza (Peru)
Judge Luz del Carmen Ibanez Carranza, a Peruvian jurist, has served on the Appeals Chamber of the ICC since March 2018.
Elected by the Assembly of States Parties in December 2017, she is the first Peruvian to hold a judgeship at the ICC. From 2021 to 2024, she served as first vice-president of the court, contributing to its administrative leadership alongside her judicial responsibilities.
Prior to joining the ICC, Judge Ibanez Carranza held senior prosecutorial roles within Peru's national justice system, according to her official ICC profile.
She served as a senior national prosecutor in the country's specialised system for addressing terrorism, grave human rights violations and crimes against humanity. In this capacity, she also acted as the coordinator of 17 prosecutorial offices responsible for such cases.
During her tenure as a public prosecutor in her home country, Judge Ibanez Carranza implemented a range of victim-centred measures aimed at supporting reparations processes. These included efforts to search for missing persons, recover and identify remains from mass graves, and facilitate the return of those remains to victims' families. She also played a role in organising public ceremonies in which the Peruvian state issued official apologies and took part in operations to rescue children abducted by armed groups.
Her work extended beyond the national context, as she was appointed on multiple occasions to represent Peru before international bodies. These included the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW), and the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism (CICTE), among others.
Judge Ibanez Carranza holds a doctorate and a master's degree in criminal law from Universidad Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, and degrees in law and political science from Universidad Nacional de Trujillo. She also spent over 20 years as a university lecturer, teaching criminal law, criminal procedure and human rights law.
Judge Ibanez Carranza has participated in appellate proceedings for landmark cases, including The Prosecutor v. Bosco Ntaganda and The Prosecutor v. Dominic Ongwen.
Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou (Benin)
Judge Reine Alapini-Gansou, from Benin, is the second vice-president of the ICC and a member of Pre-Trial Chamber I.
She was a member of the Pre-Trial Chamber that issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin in March. On 13 November, a court in Moscow ordered her arrest in absentia over what the court said was an 'illegal' arrest warrant issued for Putin.
Alapini-Gansou began her term as an ICC judge on 11 March 2018.
Before joining the ICC, Alapini-Gansou served as chair of the African Commission on Human and Peoples' Rights, Africa's primary human rights body (2009-2012), and as special rapporteur on the situation of human rights defenders in Africa (2005-2009 and 2012-2017).
In 2011, she was appointed as a judge at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, the world's oldest international court.
Alapini-Gansou has served as a Pre-Trial judge in numerous cases, including those in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Libya, Mali, Myanmar, Bolivia and Belarus.
Her educational background includes a joint postgraduate degree (DEA) from the Universities of Maastricht (Netherlands), Lome (Togo) and Bhutan and a university degree in common law from the Jean Moulin University Lyon 3 (France). She also has a master's in business law and judicial careers from the National University of Benin.
Judge Beti Hohler (Slovenia)
Judge Beti Hohler, from Slovenia, is a member of Pre-Trial Chamber I.
She was appointed to the chamber in October, following a sudden request for leave by her predecessor, Romanian Judge Iulia Motoc, on health grounds.
Hohler is also a member of Trial Chamber V at the ICC, currently presiding over The Prosecutor v Alfred Yekatom and Patrice-Edouard Ngaissona case.
She began her term as an ICC judge on 11 March 2024. Prior to this, she served as a trial lawyer in the Office of the Prosecutor at the ICC.
Before joining the ICC in 2015, Hohler was an adviser for the EU Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo.
In February 2015, she wrote a legal and policy briefing commenting on Palestine's accession to the ICC. In her analysis, Hohler explained the legal consequences of Palestine's membership, how Israel may challenge the court and the extent of the court's jurisdiction over Israelis and non-Palestinians. She concluded that 'with Palestine's accession to the statute, the legal framework has changed and the parties to the conflict would be wise to accept and respect that'.
Hohler began her career in Ljubljana, Slovenia, where she served at the Court of Appeals before working as a senior associate at a law firm.
She regularly trains judges and advocates. Hohler is also co-founder of the Institute for International Legal and Advocacy Training in The Hague.
According to her official profile, Hohler is the recipient of several awards, including the 2012 EU Common Security and Defence Policy Service Medal, awarded for her service in the Rule of Law Mission in Kosovo.
She holds a Master of Laws from the University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, and another one in international and European law from the University of Amsterdam.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US reacts to killing of journalists in Gaza: Israel 'is a nation fighting a war'
US reacts to killing of journalists in Gaza: Israel 'is a nation fighting a war'

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US reacts to killing of journalists in Gaza: Israel 'is a nation fighting a war'

At the first US State Department briefing since Israel killed a team of journalists in northern Gaza on Sunday - including Al Jazeera's highest profile correspondent in the strip, Anas al-Sharif - the Trump administration appeared to brush off the attack as a mere casualty of being in a war zone before deferring to Israel for any potential investigation. While the US has "concern about the loss of any innocent life", spokesperson Tammy Bruce told reporters on Tuesday, "many of you know of someone who's been killed, who you've worked with because of a war situation". "I will remind you again that we're dealing with a complicated, horrible situation," she told a reporter from Aljazeera Arabic who asked if she was comfortable with the Israeli justification for targeting Sharif. "We refer you to Israel," she added. "Israel has released evidence al-Sharif was part of Hamas and was supportive of the Hamas attack on October 7. They're the ones who have the evidence". Sharif, a longtime Al Jazeera employee and father of two who died aged 28, had always said he had "no political affiliations". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But Bruce insisted that "Hamas, historically, has had members who are embedded in society, including posing as journalists". Israeli forces deliberately killed six Palestinian journalists, five of whom worked for Al Jazeera, late on Sunday in an intentional drone strike, hours after Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu rejected international condemnation over his plan to occupy the Palestinian enclave. The Al Jazeera Media Network said in a statement that its correspondents Sharif and Mohammed Qreiqeh, along with four other colleagues, were targeted when Israeli forces struck their tent outside al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City. "Anas and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices from within Gaza, providing the world with unfiltered, on-the-ground coverage of the devastating realities endured by its people," the statement read. Gaza: Online tributes pour in for Al Jazeera journalists assassinated by Israel Read More » "Through continuous, courageous live coverage, they have delivered searing eyewitness accounts of the horrors unleashed over 22 months of relentless bombing and destruction". Asked if the US would back an independent commission to look into the killings of journalists, which the Gaza media office has said totals 247 victims since 7 October 2023, Bruce brushed off any doubts that Israel can investigate itself if it needs to. "I would take issue with your premise here to say that Israel, every time, has failed to do that," she said. "This is a nation fighting a war with a terrorist group that have always used human shields, have used hospitals, have used schools... it's been just the worst example of the barbarity of human beings, if you can call them that," she said in reference to allegations against Hamas. "We call on our ally and partner, Israel, to investigate these situations. I do it from this podium. The United States does it. We expect investigations, and for a sovereign nation to engage in that. And then we'll follow up to see what those results are," Bruce said. Food aid Regarding aid allowed in by Israel, Bruce confirmed that half of the $30m pledged by the Trump administration to the scandal-plagued Gaza Humanitarian Foundation has already been distributed. 'That situation is rapidly evolving. We've been working from the beginning for a ceasefire, specifically for the reasons you've noted and that we all care about, which is the aid for the people of Gaza," she said. "Hamas has been at war with the people of Gaza. We've seen that through their refusal to stop this war," she added, despite multiple offers the group said it has made to Washington since Trump took office. GHF has so far given out 120 million meals, Bruce said. It remains unclear how the US arrives at its figures, given that Palestinians have described the rations as meagre. Not everyone makes it back alive. According to the United Nations, nearly 1,000 Palestinians have been shot dead by Israeli soldiers, quadcopters, or US military contractors at the four GHF sites in Gaza. But despite initially distancing the US government from what was meant to be a private entity, Bruce has increasingly defended the GHF. "Nothing will ever be enough in a war zone. The war zone has to stop. It has to end," she told reporters. "What I can tell you is what this administration is trying to do: Trying to stop it, finally, once and for all".

US reporter criticises US media's 'complicity' in deaths of Palestinian journalists
US reporter criticises US media's 'complicity' in deaths of Palestinian journalists

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

US reporter criticises US media's 'complicity' in deaths of Palestinian journalists

Multimedia reporter Marina Watanabe has accused US media of being "complicit" in the deaths of five Al Jazeera staff who the Israeli military killed in an intentional drone strike while they were in a media tent stationed outside of al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City. In a post on X on Monday, the former LA Times reporter said the publication had prevented her and 100 of her colleagues from covering Palestine for three months: "Shortly after the Gaza genocide began, I signed an open letter demanding that Israel stop killing journalists. @latimes [LA Times] punished me and 100 of my colleagues and banned us from covering Palestine for 3 months. I will never forgive US media for its complicity in their deaths". US publications such as The New York Times, CNN and others have been under fire for inaccurate and biased reporting on Israel's war on Gaza.

Pen America under fire for saying targeted killing of journalist 'could' constitute war crime
Pen America under fire for saying targeted killing of journalist 'could' constitute war crime

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Pen America under fire for saying targeted killing of journalist 'could' constitute war crime

Pen America has faced criticism after it said the targeted killing of five Al Jazeera staff members, including much-loved reporter Anas al-Sharif, "could" constitute a war crime. The Israeli military killed all five in a drone strike while they were stationed in a media tent beside al-Shifa hospital in Gaza City late on Sunday. The literary non-profit, which says it stands at the "intersection of literature and human rights", has been largely silent about atrocities committed by Israel in Gaza, and is currently on the boycott list of Writers for the War Against Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store