Couple accused of having illicit relationship shot dead in Balochistan
The killings last month in the southwestern Balochistan province, underscores the shocking and persistent nature of such crimes across parts of Central and South Asia, where family and community members believe they can restore 'honor' through bloodshed.
At least 11 people have been arrested since video of the incident recently went viral on social media, Balochistan's chief minister Safraz Bugti said.
Graphic video of the killing shows about a dozen men surrounding several vehicles in a desert.
A woman, her head wrapped in a shawl, can be seen slowly walking in front of one of the vehicles as a man follows her, watched by the group.
'You are only allowed to fire at me, nothing else,' she can be heard saying in Brahvi, a local language, before the man raises a pistol and shoots her at close range.
The woman remains standing after two shots, collapsing only after the third, the video shows. The video then captures more gunshots.
Another video shows the bloodied bodies of a man and woman lying side by side.
CNN cannot independently verify the authenticity of the videos. Police told CNN they believe the footage does show the murder under investigation.
The man and woman were killed because they were allegedly engaged in a relationship considered 'illicit' by a local tribal leader, according to a police report seen by CNN.
The leader had allegedly issued a verdict to execute them, the police report said.
Honor killings remain disturbingly common in Pakistan, with hundreds of cases reported each year — though experts believe the real number is much higher due to underreporting.
These murders are typically carried out by family members or village leaders who believe a relative, often a woman, has brought 'shame' upon the family, sometimes for reasons as seemingly innocuous as marrying by choice, seeking a divorce, or defying traditional gender roles.
Deeply-rooted patriarchal norms that equate family honor with women's behavior, cultural acceptance, and weak law enforcement, allow perpetrators to act with near impunity.
In recent years, a string of high-profile so-called honor killings have made headlines in Pakistan, drawing national and international condemnation and underscoring the persistence of the practice.
In 2016, social media star Qandeel Baloch was murdered by her brother in a so-called 'honor killing.' Baloch gained both fame and notoriety in inherently conservative and patriarchal Pakistan for her bold, sassy and increasingly political social media posts.
Her murder sparked a national outcry and promoted changes in the country's so-called 'honor killing' laws. Honor killings now carry a life sentence but the change in legislation has not made the crimes go away.
At least 335 women and 119 men were killed in so-called 'honor killings' last year alone, according to data from the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP).
Balochistan's chief minister Bugti called the most recent alleged murder 'intolerable' and a 'blatant violation of social values and human dignity.' — CNN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Saudi Gazette
3 days ago
- Saudi Gazette
Trump calls to prosecute Beyoncé based on a nonexistent $11 million payment
WASHINGTON — US President Donald Trump over the weekend called for the prosecution of music superstar Beyoncé – based on something that did not actually happen. Trump claimed in a social media post that Beyoncé broke the law by supposedly getting paid $11 million for her endorsement of Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris during an October 2024 event in Houston. But there is simply no basis for Trump's claim that Beyoncé received an $11 million payment related to the Harris campaign, let alone for the endorsement in particular. Federal campaign spending records show a $165,000 payment from the Harris campaign to Beyoncé's production company, which the campaign listed as a 'campaign event production' expense. A Harris campaign spokesperson told Deadline last year that they didn't pay celebrity endorsers, but were required by law to cover the costs connected to their appearances. Regardless of the merits of this particular $165,000 expenditure, it's far from an $11 million one. Nobody has ever produced any evidence for the claim of an eight-figure endorsement payment to Beyoncé since the claim that it was '$10 million' began spreading last year among Trump supporters on social media. Fact-check websites and PolitiFact looked into the '$10 million' claim during the campaign and did not find any basis for it. The White House did not immediately respond to a CNN request late Saturday for any evidence of Trump's $11 million figure. When Trump previously invoked the baseless figure, during an interview in February, he described his source in the vaguest of terms: 'Somebody just showed me something. They gave her $11 million.' A Harris spokesperson referred CNN on Saturday to a November social media post by Beyoncé's mother Tina Knowles, who called the claim of a $10 million payment a 'lie' and noted it was taken down by Instagram as 'False Information.' 'When In Fact: Beyonce did not receive a penny for speaking at a Presidential candidate Vice President Kamala Harrris's (sic) Rally in Houston,' Knowles wrote. A spokesperson for Beyoncé told PolitiFact in November that the claim about a $10 million payment is 'beyond ridiculous.' Trump revived the false claim in a social media post published after midnight early Sunday morning in Scotland, where he is visiting. He wrote that he is looking at 'the fact' that Democrats 'admit to paying, probably illegally, Eleven Million Dollars to singer Beyoncé for an ENDORSEMENT.' Democratic officials actually reject the claim of an $11 million payment. The White House did not immediately respond to CNN's request for any evidence of a Democratic admission of such a payment. Trump went on to criticize other payments from the Harris campaign to organizations connected to prominent endorsers. He asserted without evidence that these payments were inaccurately described in spending records. And he wrongly asserted that it is 'TOTALLY ILLEGAL' to pay for political endorsements, though no federal law forbids endorsement payments. Trump concluded: 'Kamala, and all of those that received Endorsement money, BROKE THE LAW. They should all be prosecuted! Thank you for your attention to this matter.' Trump has repeatedly called for the prosecution of political opponents. His Saturday post about Harris and celebrity endorsements was an escalation from a post in May, when he said he would call for a 'major investigation' on the subject but did not explicitly mention prosecutions. — CNN
Arab News
6 days ago
- Arab News
Pakistan PM assures continued support in Aafia Siddiqui case during meeting with her sister
ISLAMABAD: Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Friday met with Dr. Fauzia Siddiqui, the sister of Pakistani neuroscientist Dr. Aafia Siddiqui who is jailed in the US, and reaffirmed his government's commitment to providing all possible legal and diplomatic support in the high-profile case, the PM's Office said. Siddiqui, a Pakistani national, is currently serving an 86-year prison sentence in the United States after being convicted in 2010 of attempted murder of US personnel in Afghanistan. Her trial and detention have long sparked public outcry in Pakistan, with successive governments under pressure to secure her repatriation. 'The government is in no way negligent in the matter of Dr. Aafia Siddiqui,' Sharif was quoted as saying in a statement issued by his office after he met Fauzia and assured her that his administration would 'continue to provide every possible legal and diplomatic assistance' in her sister's case. The Prime Minister's Office said Sharif had earlier written a letter to then-US President Joe Biden to urge action in the matter. He has now also formed a special committee, chaired by Federal Law Minister Azam Nazeer Tarar, to pursue further progress on the case. 'The committee will remain in contact with Dr. Fauzia Siddiqui and work to provide any necessary support,' the statement said. In October 2024, Sharif wrote a letter to Biden calling for Siddiqui's release and highlighting concerns about her treatment in prison. He also warned that her deteriorating physical and mental health could lead to self-harm. This January, as he stepped down as US president, Biden rejected a petition seeking clemency for the jailed academic. Siddiqui was arrested in July 2008 by Afghan police who said she was carrying two pounds (900 grams) of sodium cyanide and crumpled notes referring to mass casualty attacks and New York landmarks. The day after her arrest, according to the indictment, Siddiqui grabbed an M-4 rifle in her interrogation room and started shooting while yelling 'death to America,' the trial jury heard. No US agents or soldiers were hit, but Siddiqui was shot and wounded in response, according to US prosecutors. She was subsequently convicted in 2010 by a New York federal jury of attempted murder, armed assault and other charges. Siddiqui was never charged with links to terrorism. Siddiqui's family says she was visiting Pakistan in 2003 when she was abducted with her three children by Pakistani intelligence officials and handed to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which took her to Afghanistan. Pakistan's intelligence agencies deny the claims.
Arab News
6 days ago
- Arab News
Court frees men accused in 2006 train bombings India blamed on Pakistan-based group
MUMBAI: Nearly two decades lost, a family fractured and a city still without closure — the scars of the 2006 Mumbai train bombings remain, even as the men once blamed for the deadly attacks walk free. After 19 years behind bars, Mohammad Sajid Margub Ansari can finally hold his daughter in his arms. Ansari, now 48, was one of 12 men convicted in 2015 for murder, conspiracy and waging war against India over the 2006 train blasts. The evening rush-hour attacks, carried out with pressure-cooker bombs hidden in bags beneath newspapers and umbrellas, killed 187 people and wounded hundreds more. Five of the accused were sentenced to death, while the other seven — including Ansari — were given life imprisonment. At the time of the blasts, Ansari was just 29, running a modest mobile and computer repair shop. He was arrested soon after the explosions, reportedly accused of assembling the bombs and sheltering two Pakistani nationals. But this week, a two-judge bench of the Bombay High Court overturned the convictions, ruling that the prosecution had 'utterly failed' to prove the men were responsible. The prosecution appealed to the Supreme Court to halt their release, but it declined to intervene. 'It feels amazing to be free,' Ansari told AFP. 'We are innocent.' Freedom, however, feels bittersweet for Ansari. 'My whole youth is gone. My family had to face financial troubles,' he said. His wife was pregnant when Ansari was arrested, leaving him to miss his daughter's entire childhood. In her early years, she wouldn't even come near him. 'As a dad that felt terrible, that I could not hold my own daughter,' he said. 'I used to feel very helpless and think why do we have to go through all this when I am innocent.' The 2006 attacks were initially blamed on the Pakistan-based militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba, although a little-known outfit, Lashkar-e-Qahhar, later claimed responsibility. Pakistan denied the allegations. For survivor Chirag Chauhan, who was paralyzed from the waist down in one of the blasts, the acquittal of the men felt like being dragged 'back to square one.' 'We don't know what to do and where to start from. The entire system is hopeless,' he told AFP. In 2006, Chauhan, now 40, was returning home from chartered accountancy training when the train he boarded was hit by an explosion. Prosecutors said the explosives were deliberately placed in first-class coaches to target the city's wealthy Gujarati community. They also said the bombings were intended as revenge for riots in the western state of Gujarat in 2002, which left around 2,000 people dead, most of them Muslims. A spinal cord injury left Chauhan requiring the use of a wheelchair. 'After 19 years if the accused are let free, who carried out the blasts then?' he asked. But he also said there should be a 'fair investigation,' noting that the now freed men could have been framed. 'All are equally to be blamed, the judiciary, the investigative agencies, everyone,' he said. For Ansari, his years behind bars demand more than an acquittal. 'The agencies should be ashamed of what they did and should definitely apologize to us,' he said. While his old mobile and computer repair shop is no longer an employment option, given the advances in technology since he was imprisoned, Ansari is aiming to rebuild his life. He plans to finish the undergraduate law degree which he enrolled in while in prison. 'I hope to put it to good use,' he said.
