&w=3840&q=100)
Karnataka Cabinet decides to provide internal reservation among SCs
In a special meeting, the Cabinet discussed the recommendations of the Justice H N Nagmohan Das Commission report, aimed at providing internal reservation among Scheduled Castes (SCs).
The commission had submitted its 1,766-page report to Chief Minister Siddaramaiah on August 4, and it was placed before the cabinet on August 7.
The internal reservation is aimed at slicing up the 17 per cent reservation matrix given to 101 scheduled castes.
According to sources, the cabinet decided to accept the Justice Nagamohan Das Commission's report, but made some alterations.
Of the 17 per cent reservation that SCs have in the state, as per the internal reservation formula evolved by the Cabinet, the SC (Right) and SC (Left) will get 6 per cent each, while the 'touchable' Dalit communities (Lambani, Bhovi, Korma and Korcha) and most backward and nomadic communities got 5 per cent quota.
The commission had reportedly made recommendation for internal reservation in five categories -- 'most backward' communities (group A)- 1 per cent; SC (Left)/Madiga community (group B) 6 per cent; SC (Right)/ Holeya (group C) 5 per cent; 'touchable' communities (group D) 4 per cent, and Adi Karnataka, Adi Dravida and Adi Andhra communities (group E) 1 per cent.
The commission's report was not officially made public.
Speaking to reporters, Law and Parliamentary Affairs Minister H K Patil said the Cabinet meeting had been "fruitful" and ministers representing all SC communities are satisfied.
"The cabinet meeting went on for about two-and-a-half hours.. All of us have come out of the cabinet hall happy and satisfied. The state legislature is in session, and there is no scope for revealing details. The chief minister will make a statement on behalf of the government on the floor of the House tomorrow," he said.
However, Minister for Backwards Class Development Shivaraj Tangadagi confirmed that internal reservation has been decided upon by making three groups among SCs -- right, left and others. He termed the cabinet decision "historical".
"Reservations provided for these three categories are six, six and five per cent, respectively. After a detailed discussion, we all accepted it.
"The most backwards communities categorised under group A by the commission, have been added to the group of 'Touchable' Dalits (Bhovi, Banjara, Korma and Korcha). While group E of the commission have been added to group B and C," he added.
According to sources, most backwards and nomadic communities are apparently not happy with the decision.
The government, in November last year, set up the Justice Nagmohan Das commission to recommend internal reservation among SCs by gathering empirical data.
This came after the Supreme Court last year allowed states to provide internal reservation, and the Karnataka Cabinet agreed to implement internal reservation.
In a landmark verdict delivered by the Supreme Court on August 1 last year, it held that states are constitutionally empowered to make sub-classifications within the SCs, which form a socially heterogeneous class, for granting reservation for the uplift of castes that are socially and educationally more backward.
(Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Internal quota: Most-backward, microscopic communities disappointed
A day after the State Cabinet decided on the categories to provide internal reservation among the Scheduled Castes, a section of the community has expressed anguish at the scrapping of a category that provided 1% quota for 59 microscopic communities and grouping them with the 'touchable' communities of Korama, Koracha, Lambani and Bhovi instead. Chief Minister Siddaramaiah, in his statement to the Legislature, defended the decision, saying that it was done due to technical issues. Sources also said that fixing roaster points would have been difficult for 1%. Their numbers The 59 castes, of which 49 have been identified as nomadic and semi-nomadic, together constitute about 5.22 lakh or 4.97% of the total enumerated population. They have been grouped with the 'touchable' castes whose population is about 28.34 lakh or 26.97% of the total SC population. The microscopic communities were given Category A with 1% reservation since they were classified as most-backward based on socio-economic and educational backwardness. According to the survey results, the communities are extremely backwards in education, with a low literacy rate, live in poor conditions, and very few of them make it to technical and higher education. All communities together have only 0.86% representation in government employment and 0.09% in political representation, with 31.83% owning land. Very few from these 59 communities have received government benefits. It was for this specific reason that they were in Category A to receive priority. How Dalit Right and Left groups see it Welcoming the government's decision to implement internal reservation, the Federation for Social Justice for Scheduled Castes has thanked Chief Minister Siddaramaiah for making a 'historic decision'. 'With commitment to social justice, internal reservation has been announced. We also welcome the decision to withdraw cases against activists fighting for the cause,' said the federation coordinator, Basawaraj Kowthal. He, however, urged the government to consider reservations for microscopic communities. The Dalit Right (Holeyas), who were up in arms against the recommendations, have termed the decision as 'satisfactory' since their plea had been considered, but 'not completely happy'. 'The government should segregate Right communities that are grouped with Left communities and vice versa when it notifies the decision. There is still a lot of confusion about the lists,' said Karnataka Rajya Chalavadi Mahasabha coordinator D. Chandrashkaraiah. He also said that the government should re-examine categories and the reservation matrix once the Centre releases data on castes that will be collected as part of the next General Census. 'Why were the commission's recommendations overlooked to accommodate political interests?' asked K. Lokesh Chavadi, from the Gorangi community with a population of 2,467. Mr. Chavadi is the president of Karnataka Alemari, Are Alemari Vimuktha Budukattugala Okkoota. 'When the numerically bigger Madiga community (Dalit Left) had to fight for 35 years, imagine how much more time we will have to fight for justice,' he added. He explained that they would have to compete with the 'touchable' communities, who are numerically larger, and better off socio-economically and educationally. As many as 50 communities in this group of 59 have populations of less than 10,000, with six communities having a population of less than 100. The population of 17 communities is less than 1,000. Masthi, with 33 members, has been identified as the smallest community. Future plans Meanwhile,the Federation for Social Justice for Scheduled Castes, which has been protesting in Freedom Park here since August 11 seeking early implementation of the report submitted by a one-man commission headed by retired judge H.N. Nagamohan Das, has criticised the Cabinet decision for 'letting down' microscopic communities. Plans are being chalked out to launch an indefinite hunger strike. On Thursday, thousands from nomadic and semi-nomadic communities are congregating at Freedom Park.
Hindustan Times
32 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Accused can't be allowed to languish in jail without fair, speedy trial: SC
New Delhi, An accused cannot be allowed to languish in jail without being given a fair and speedy trial, the Supreme Court on Wednesday said in a UA case. Accused can't be allowed to languish in jail without fair, speedy trial: SC A bench of Justices Vikram Nath and K V Viswanathan, therefore, directed the trial court to expedite the trial and conclude it within two years considering there were over 100 witnesses to be examined by the prosecution. The top court delivered its verdict on two appeals challenging an April 2022 order of the Karnataka High Court which granted bail to an accused in the case but denied the relief to another co-accused. While the Centre's appeal challenged the grant of bail, the other appeal was filed by the co-accused who was denied the relief. An FIR was registered in Bengaluru against 17 accused persons in January 2020 for the alleged offences, including under the provisions of the Unlawful Activities Act, 1967 . The matter was subsequently referred to the National Investigation Agency and a chargesheet was filed in July 2020. "However, the fact remains that the trial has not commenced despite lapse of five-and-a-half years. Accused cannot be allowed to languish in jail without being given a fair and speedy trial," the bench said. The reasons given for grant and denial of bail to the two accused, the bench said, were fully justified and reasonable. The high court noted that allegations in the chargesheet related to the accused person's connections with an organisation which admittedly was not banned under the schedule to UA. The bench refused to interfere with the high court order granting bail to the accused. Dealing with the plea of co-accused denied bail, the bench said the high court found his involvement with banned terrorist organisations besides his active role in operating dark web and assisting the members of the banned organisations. "The reasons given by the high court are based upon the material collected during investigation and as reflected in the chargesheet," it said. The bench said the high court was justified in not granting him bail. While dismissing the appeals, the top court directed the prosecution to ensure full cooperation in leading evidence and getting the trial concluded within the specified time and asked the accused to co-operate as well. The bench said the trial court or the prosecuting agency was at liberty to apply for cancellation of bail of the accused in case it was found that he was trying to delay the trial. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Hans India
32 minutes ago
- Hans India
Denied discussion over K'taka CM's 'internal reservation' remark, BJP legislators stage walkout
Bengaluru: The BJP legislators, led by Leader of the Opposition R. Ashoka, staged a walkout from the Karnataka Legislative Assembly on Wednesday, condemning Speaker U.T. Khader's decision not to allow a discussion on Chief Minister Siddaramaiah's statement regarding the acceptance and implementation of the judicial commission report on internal reservation. Following Siddaramaiah's statement that the government had accepted the Justice H.N. Nagamohan Das Commission report, with certain modifications, and implemented its recommendations on the long-pending issue of internal reservation, Ashoka and other BJP leaders demanded a discussion. Speaker Khader, however, turned down the request, stating that there was no provision under the guidelines. Shortly afterward, Siddaramaiah rose from his seat to leave the House. Ashoka taunted him, alleging that the CM was trying to run away out of fear. Siddaramaiah retorted that in his 42 years of political life, he had never feared anyone. Khader clarified that the Chief Minister was only going to the Legislative Council. Former Deputy Chief Minister and BJP MLA C.N. Ashwath Narayan said that the internal reservation framework had originally been prepared by the previous BJP government and that the Congress was merely rehashing and presenting it again. Ashoka further maintained that the Speaker had allowed discussions on government statements on several earlier occasions. 'If the CM had courage, he should have stayed in the Assembly. Why did he run away? What new thing have they done regarding internal reservation? The Congress government appointed the Sadashiva Commission, but it was the BJP government that provided it with infrastructure. It is former CM and current BJP MP Basavaraj Bommai who is the real architect of internal reservation,' he stressed. He further alleged: 'This report is a mixture of everything. All oppressed communities are coming out on the streets and protesting.' BJP MLA and State General Secretary V. Sunil Kumar read out the guidelines and argued that the discussion could, in fact, be allowed. Khader responded that the guidelines clearly state that it is left to the discretion of the Speaker. Senior BJP MLA S. Suresh Kumar said that the principle of natural justice should prevail. 'When the CM makes a statement, seeking clarification is only natural. Instead of participating in the interaction, Siddaramaiah chose to walk out of the Assembly like the leader of the opposition,' he remarked. Sunil Kumar added sarcastically that perhaps the criticism was too hard for the CM to digest. Ashoka said that the issue pertained to both Dalits and the state. 'The opposition has a constitutional right to discuss it. On what basis has the Congress government adopted the 6-6-5 formula for internal reservation? Should I tear up this copy of the statement? Under whose influence are you doing this?' he questioned Speaker Khader. Ashoka further remarked: 'I have seen ruling party MLAs sit in opposition four times. If Deputy CM D.K. Shivakumar has won eight times, I have won seven. I know the tricks you played while in Opposition.' Responding, Deputy CM Shivakumar said: 'We have resolved an issue that was pending for 25 years. The Scheduled Caste community is happy. I appeal to you to also be happy.' Ashoka then jibed that after the exit of K.N. Rajanna (a close aide of CM Siddaramaiah and former minister) from the Cabinet, Shivakumar had become more active and vibrant. Speaker Khader noted that while the Opposition's demand for a discussion was valid, the government's refusal was also within its rights. He said the issue could be discussed the following morning, stressing that the Speaker's decision was final. Protesting this, Ashoka announced a walkout. Law Minister H.K. Patil accused the BJP of enacting a drama, adding that people across the state had welcomed the Congress government's decision on internal reservation and were celebrating it.
