NC bill seeks more public reporting of hospital charges and price guarantees for patients
A Senate bill would provide patients with more up-front information about hospital charges and would fine hospital CEOs whose facilities do not report their prices.
The Senate Health Committee on Wednesday approved Senate bill 316, called Lower Healthcare Costs.
'This bill is an attempt to shine a light on every part of the health care system to begin to see where the cost drivers truly exist and to start to tamp down on those costs,' said Sen. Amy Galey (R-Alamance), who is one of the bill's sponsors.
The bill focuses on hospitals and other health facilities.
Under the bill, hospitals would be largely prohibited from charging what are known as facility fees. Those are charges that may be added to bills when patients go to a hospital-owned clinics.
Health care facilities would have to send patients itemized lists of charges before sending unpaid bills to collections.
Hospitals and ambulatory care facilities would be required to provide quarterly reports on the costs of common procedures. CEOs would face fines of up to $2,000 a day for failure to comply.
In cases where patients are not experiencing health emergencies, health care facilities would have to provide them with 'good faith estimates' for each procedure. The final bills could not exceed the estimates by more than 5%.
A spokeswoman for the North Carolina Healthcare Association, which represents hospitals, said in an email that the organization is evaluating the bill and its potential impacts, and would communicate directly with senators.
Sen. Jim Burgin (R-Harnett), said greater price transparency will result in lower costs. People who don't need emergency medical care will have time to compare prices, he said.
'You ought to know what it's going to cost,' said Burgin, one of the bill sponsors. 'You ought to know if you're going to get a separate bill from the anesthesiologist, or the radiologist, or the lab, or anybody else.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 hours ago
- Yahoo
GOP's health care plan: We're all going to die, so whatever
If death and taxes are the only certainties, Joni Ernst is here to cut one and fast-track the other. 'We all are going to die," she said. You might think that's a line from a nihilistic French play. Or something a teenage goth said in Hot Topic. Or an epiphany from your stoner college roommate after he watched Interstellar at 3 a.m. But that was actually the Iowa Senator's God-honest response to concerns that slashing Medicaid to achieve President Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' would lead to more preventable deaths. The full exchange at a May 30 town hall included one audience member shouting at the stage, 'People will die!' And Ernst responding, 'People are not — well, we all are going to die, so for heaven's sake.' That's not a health care policy — that's a horoscope for the terminally screwed. As you can imagine, the internet didn't love it, because losing your health should not trigger the equivalent of a shrug emoji from someone elected to serve the public good. But rather than walking it back, Ernst leaned in, filming a mock apology in a graveyard because nothing says, 'I care about your future,' like filming next to people who don't have one. Opinion: Nurses are drowning while Braun ignores Indiana's health care crisis Ernst's comments aren't just philosophical musings. She's justifying policy choices that cause real harm. If passed, this bill would, according to the Congressional Budget Office, remove health coverage for up to 7.6 million Americans. That's not just 'we all die someday' territory. That's 'some people will die soon and needlessly.' What makes this even more galling is that the people pushing these cuts have access to high-quality, taxpayer-subsidized healthcare. Congress gets the AAA, platinum, concierge-level government plan. Meanwhile, millions of Americans are told to try their luck with essential oils or YouTube acupuncture tutorials. Honestly, it felt more like performance art than policy: 'Sorry about your grandma getting kicked out of her assisted living facility. Please enjoy this scenic view of her future! LOL!' We're not asking you to defeat death, senator. Death is both inevitable and bipartisan. But there is a broad chasm between dying peacefully at 85 and dying in your 40's because your Medicaid plan disappeared and your GoFundMe didn't meet its goal. Fundamentally, governing is about priorities. A budget is a moral document. When a lawmaker tells you 'we're all going to die' in response to a policy choice, they're telling you 'I've made peace with your suffering as collateral damage.' And if a U.S. Senator can stand in a cemetery and joke about it, you have to wonder — who do our federal legislators think those graves are for? Opinion: Indiana DCS cut foster care in half — and now claims children are safer This isn't just about one comment or one bill. It's about a mindset that treats healthcare as a luxury rather than a right. If death is inevitable, then access to healthcare you can afford is what helps determine how long you have, how comfortably you live, and whether you get to watch your kids grow up. Healthcare isn't about escaping death. It's about dignity and quality of life while we are here. Ernst got one thing right: death will come for us all. But leadership, real leadership, is about helping people live as long and as well as they can before that day comes. You want to make jokes, Senator? Fine. But if your punchline is 'You're all going to die anyway,' don't be surprised when your constituents realize the joke's on them. Kristin Brey is the "My Take" columnist for the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. This article originally appeared on Milwaukee Journal Sentinel: Joni Ernst films graveyard video after telling sick people "we all die" | Opinion
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Reynolds signs bill to extend cancer coverage for first responders
DES MOINES, Iowa — It's been years in the making, and now emergency responders will be getting more cancer benefits. House File 969 is a bill that has been trying to get passed to expand cancer coverage for firefighters, police officers, and emergency responders to cover all types of cancer, rather than just 14 types of cancer that are currently covered for disabilities and death benefits. The bill passed in the Senate 46-1 in April with a minor amendment, and then the final unanimous House vote got a standing ovation. Governor Kim Reynolds signed the bill Friday morning at the Shop Event Center, where many supporters gathered. This included many people who fought for this, and they had a reason behind it all. Three local firefighters recently passed away from cancer. 'Phillip Mike Broaderick, Brian Stoaks, and Malcolm Cortner were the main reason why we fought so hard for this,' the President of Des Moines Professional Firefighters Union, Joe Van Haalen said. 'We are part of a big family, and if you think we can't accomplish something, you're crazy. Because when we get together and take care of this, this is the stuff that we can do.' Exciting discovery brings historic Iowa 'birthing hospital' back to life, learn more during upcoming event 'Their selflessness is inspiring, and it deserves our greatest and deepest gratitude,' Reynolds said. 'This means thanking first responders for their service, but it also means ensuring that they receive the care that they deserve and the care that they've earned through years of selfless sacrifice.' A big reason this bill is becoming a law is the wives, families, and friends of those firefighters who passed. 'To be able to have this for the men and women that are serving at the end of their day, at the end of their battle and were able to they had every feeling, every option, every health care option accessible,' Sheena Cortner, who lost her firefighter husband to cancer, said. 'They were able to do everything they could in their own fight against cancer.' 'Moving forward to just know that no family is going to have to go through the mental anguish of that piece of the cancer battle,' widow Emily Broderick said. 'It is huge.' And no doubt, they helped finish the jobs that their husbands started. 'He would be beyond thrilled. He was able to help a little bit in the beginning with the fight, but as time went on and he got sicker, he was not able to,' Broderick said. 'But his message before he passed away was don't quit. And we didn't quit. And here we are.' 'He's so proud of us, of Local 4 Union Des Moines Fire Department,' Cortner added. 'He was really passionate about this, so I know that he is so happy that this day has finally come. This law will go into effect July 1st, 2025. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Ohio budget moves closer to doing away with elected county coroners
Jun. 6—For now, the Ohio Senate is going along on an Ohio House plan to make county coroners appointed by county commissioners instead of being elected by county voters. But, while the Senate didn't change the House's proposal in its initial draft of the state's two-year operating budget, Senate President Rob McColley, R-Napoleon, told reporters that there's still a chance the Senate could eliminate the House's proposal when it amends the budget next week. McColley said he put a request out for those in his caucus with strong feelings on the matter to weigh in. "If members feel strongly that it should go back to the way that it is under current law, then there's a possibility to see an amendment here in the omnibus," McColley told this news outlet. "We didn't see a lot of members — we saw some — but we didn't see a lot of members asking for it to be changed back." The Senate is expected to make those amendments on Wednesday or Thursday of next week. The change could be consequential in counties where county commissioners and the coroner are different political parties. In Montgomery County, for example, the elected coroner is a Republican while Democrats hold two of the three seats on the county commission. The House's primary advocate for the change, county commissioner-turned-lawmaker Rep. Brian Stewart, R-Ashville, has framed the change as necessary to solve a scarcity issue. "It's really hard to find folks that want to serve as a coroner at all, it's even harder to find folks who are willing to be the coroner and want to run a political campaign to do so," Stewart said in April. But the proposed change is opposed by Ohio State Coroners Association, whose Executive Director David Corey told this outlet that he's still hopeful that former coroners in the Ohio Senate, like Sen. Matt Huffman, R-Tipp City, will help the Senate reverse course. "Commissioners already have the authority to appoint a physician to be coroner if no one runs," Corey said. "So they already have this authority — so why subject this as a blanket on everyone?" Corey noted that commissioners also already have the authority to contract out with different county coroner offices if there's no elected coroner and the commission cannot find an in-county physician that wants to be appointed. "We don't really know what (problem) the House is trying and the Senate are trying to fix ... other than chipping away at other elected officials," Corey said. Corey said the idea is "wrought with potential problems," and speculated that coroners appointed by commissioners might be more beholden to those officials than they are to the public. He said appointees could also be fired at will, which would make it harder for a coroner to stand up to the commission in budget negotiations or other high-stakes situations. "We just think it's a horrible precedent," Corey said. Senate Minority Leader Nickie Antonio, D-Lakewood, whose home county of Cuyahoga is one of two counties in the state where the position is already appointed following a local vote, told this outlet that she didn't like the sound of applying the idea to every coroner in the state. "You want the coroner to feel like they can have a lot of pressure on them," Antonio said. "If they're appointed, then it's almost like they have an affiliation to the person that appointed them." She said this could lead to undue influence. "I think we, probably in the long run, would be better off continuing to have them be elected," Antonio said. ------ For more stories like this, sign up for our Ohio Politics newsletter. It's free, curated, and delivered straight to your inbox every Thursday evening. Avery Kreemer can be reached at 614-981-1422, on X, via email, or you can drop him a comment/tip with the survey below.
