logo
Bill looks to increase Oil and Gas Act penalties to $10K to discourage bad players

Bill looks to increase Oil and Gas Act penalties to $10K to discourage bad players

Yahoo19-02-2025
Feb. 18—SANTA FE — If oil and gas operators are excessively emitting greenhouse gases or contaminating groundwater, state officials want to threaten them back into compliance with an up to $10,000 daily penalty.
That's a 300% increase from the current $2,500 maximum daily penalty, included in House Bill 259, which would also raise fees imposed on operators applying to drill wells. The bill passed its first of three House committees Tuesday on a 7-4 vote along party lines.
The legislation aims to discourage operators from violating the state's Oil and Gas Act, which has public and environmental health and safety regulations in place.
The measure also seeks to increase the cap on aggregate civil penalty assessments from $200,000 to $2.65 million. The ask was initially a $3.65 million cap, but the House Energy, Environment and Natural Resources Committee decreased that number through an amendment.
Since 2019, the Oil Conservation Division has assessed $29 million in penalties, said Ben Shelton, the acting deputy secretary of the state's Energy, Minerals and Natural Resources Department. But of that, he said, the state has only collected $8 million, which went to the general fund.
That's because a goal of the Oil Conservation Division, under the purview of EMNRD, is to bring operators into compliance, Shelton said. The OCD negotiates with operators willing to correct their violations, he said.
"We basically trade dollars for compliance," Shelton said. "It is important to have this cap raised because currently too many violations, too many polluting actions, are seen as a business proposition."
In other words, operators are willing to cough up $200,000 because oil sales will make more than that anyway.
Legislators asked a few times how many operators ignore the penalty assessments and continue operating anyway. Shelton said not many, but when it does happen, it's very costly and harmful to New Mexico. About 5% of operators are repeat offenders, he added.
Lobbyists for operators, including the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association and the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico, spoke against the bill.
"$200,000 is already enough to limit or significantly hurt, if not threaten, solvency of many independent operators," said Jim Winchester, executive director of the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico. "Let's not continue to send a message to operators that this administration does not want oil and gas here."
Rep. Rod Montoya, R-Farmington, called the numbers arbitrary and said the bill didn't include considerations from the oil and gas industry. He added that while the industry is thriving now, it won't always be flush with cash.
"I'm not saying ... that increasing fees is not necessarily somehow warranted. I just know how we got to where our fees are now, and there was input on the industry," he said.
Under the measure, drilling application fees would increase from $500 to $1,500 — a 200% increase.
Bill sponsor Rep. Matthew McQueen, D-Galisteo, encouraged legislators and advocates not to play "the percentage game" and instead "look at the fee, the penalty, whatever it is, in relation to the economic activity, and is it appropriate in today's market? Not, 'Is it a certain percentage compared to an artificially low amount we had before?'"
Travis Kellerman, senior climate policy adviser for the governor, spoke in support of the bill, saying it's about modernization. It would streamline administrative and regulatory responsibilities at OCD and reduce general fund dependency, he said.
"It makes sense," he said. "This update is overdue."
Rep. Meredith Dixon, D-Albuquerque, said she wants more specifics on this bill, like the exact number of operators who refuse to correct their violations, before it goes to the House Appropriations and Finance Committee, which Dixon is the vice chair of.
"I don't disagree with the premise or what we're trying to do, but I find that it's very challenging to change statute without actual facts and figures," she said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas Democrats say they're ending a two-week walkout over gerrymandered US House map plan
Texas Democrats say they're ending a two-week walkout over gerrymandered US House map plan

New York Post

time17 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Texas Democrats say they're ending a two-week walkout over gerrymandered US House map plan

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas Democrats say they are ending a two-week walkout that stalled Republican efforts to redraw congressional districts to satisfy President Donald Trump's demands for a greater GOP advantage. Democratic leaders say they will return for a second special legislative session after seeing California Democratic leaders proceed with plans to redraw their own U.S. House maps to neutralize Republican gains in Texas. 3 Texas Rep. Gene Wu speaks at a rally on August 16, 2025. AP 3 Protesters demonstrate outside the State Capitol in Austin, Texas, on August 16, 2025. AP The nation's two most populous states have been at the forefront of a national fight to reshape the congressional landscape ahead of the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has sought to shore up Republicans' narrow House majority and avoid a repeat of the 2018 midterms during his first presidency, when Democrats regained House control and used their majority to stymie his agenda and twice impeach him. 3 Greg Abbott is the governor of Texas. REUTERS Dozens of Texas House Democrats left the state more than two weeks ago to deny the GOP majority the attendance necessary to vote on redrawn maps intended to send five more Texas Republicans to Washington. They declared victory after Republicans adjourned that first session and Democrats around the country rallied in opposition to the Trump-led gerrymandering effort.

Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP
Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Texas Democrats return home, ending redistricting standoff against GOP

Democrats' exit from Texas two weeks ago stalled a Republican plan to re-draw congressional maps in the GOP's favor. But their return means it's now expected to move forward. Democrats in the Texas House of Representatives returned to Austin this morning after leaving the state two weeks ago in protest of a Republican plan to re-draw congressional maps to help the party gain seats in 2026. The protest temporarily blocked House Republicans from having a quorum to move the redistricting plan forward and drew national attention to President Donald Trump's effort to avoid losing the Republican majority in Congress next year. The Texas House Democratic Caucus announced Aug. 18 that its members refused to return to work until Republicans adjourned its first special session in the state House on Aug. 14, and California moved forward with a retaliatory plan to re-draw its own maps in favor of Democrats. "We killed the corrupt special session, withstood unprecedented surveillance and intimidation, and rallied Democrats nationwide to join this existential fight for fair representation — reshaping the entire 2026 landscape," State Rep. Gene Wu, the Texas House Minority Leader, said in a news release. He said Democrats will now move to "build the legal record necessary to defeat this racist map in court" and "inspire legislators across the country (on) how to fight these undemocratic redistricting schemes in their own statehouses." "The Great Golden State": California governor announces Nov. 4 special election to re-draw maps California, the only state with more congressional seats than Texas, will hold a special election on Nov. 4 so voters can approve a plan to re-draw congressional maps in favor of Democrats in time for the 2026 election. Additional Democratic-led and Republican-led states have planned or discussed redistricting.

Trump threatens executive order to end mail-in voting; says Putin agrees
Trump threatens executive order to end mail-in voting; says Putin agrees

USA Today

timean hour ago

  • USA Today

Trump threatens executive order to end mail-in voting; says Putin agrees

Trump's opposition to mail-in balloting intensified after his 2020 election loss, when the 'red mirage' of a lead on Election Day evaporated when mail-in ballots were counted. WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump said he would sign an executive order to abolish mail-in voting, a move he said Russia's President Vladimir Putin supported. Mailing ballots is a popular option for voters to avoid waiting in line at polling places on Election Day. Election-security officials say voting has never been more secure. But Trump has long railed against mail-in voting as vulnerable to fraud – despite election experts, including those in his first administration, who said mail-in voting is secure. 'THE MAIL-IN BALLOT HOAX, USING VOTING MACHINES THAT ARE A COMPLETE AND TOTAL DISASTER, MUST END, NOW!!!' Trump said on social media Aug. 18. The post came after Trump told Sean Hannity on Fox News on Aug. 15 that Putin, 'smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail-in voting.' Trump's announcement came while special House races are pending in Arizona and Tennessee; New Jersey and Virginia will be choosing governors in November this year and some big-city mayors will be chosen in New York and elsewhere. The whole country will be voting on House races and one-third of the Senate 2026, and for president in 2028. Mail-in voting is popular. Out of 155 million votes cast in 2024, nearly 47 million were mailed in, according to the Election Assistance Commission. Not all states track mail-in ballots by party. But among those reporting, about 41% of the ballots were cast by Democrats and 38% by Republicans, according to a report by the Council on Foreign Relations. Trump's opposition to mail-in voting became more aggressive after his 2020 election loss. His campaign aides told Congress that his lead on election day was a "red mirage" before absentee ballots were counted and tipped the victory to former President Joe Biden. A major looming dispute is over who runs elections. States traditionally set their own election rules and federal authorities monitor the accuracy of the results, with the Justice Department potentially prosecuting fraud. Trump contends states are 'merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes.' 'I, AND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY, WILL FIGHT LIKE HELL TO BRING HONESTY AND INTEGRITY BACK TO OUR ELECTIONS,' Trump said on social media. But Joyce Vance White, a former U.S. attorney in Alabama, said Trump was 'spewing lies about elections.' 'Each state runs its own election,' White said on social media. 'We don't owe the president. It's the president who owes us a duty to take care that the laws are faithfully executed.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store