logo
'Nobody Cared, Nobody Listened'—the US Expulsion of Third-Country Nationals to Panama

'Nobody Cared, Nobody Listened'—the US Expulsion of Third-Country Nationals to Panama

Newsweek24-04-2025

I went to Panama recently to talk to people the Trump administration had deported there. People are normally deported to their home countries, but none of the 299 people expelled in February were Panamanians. They came from Iran, Russia, China, Eritrea, Cameroon, Afghanistan, and other countries with serious human rights problems. Held for weeks in incommunicado detention, 180 opted to return to their home countries, but their repatriation can hardly be called voluntary. We interviewed 48 of the people who refused to go and are now stuck in limbo in Panama.
One of them was 28-year-old Sara (a pseudonym), who fled abuse in Iran and turned to the United States out of desperation and hope, only to have her dreams of freedom and safety dashed and her trauma deepen.
She is a Christian convert from a country where converts to Christianity are subjected to serious human rights violations and can even be sentenced to death and where the authorities consistently fail to protect women against violence. After fleeing from Iran to Turkey, her father and uncle pursued her there; she felt she had no choice but to flee Turkey.
Migrants deported from the U.S. place papers with a written message in the window of the Decapolis Hotel where they are temporarily staying in Panama City, February 18, 2025.
Migrants deported from the U.S. place papers with a written message in the window of the Decapolis Hotel where they are temporarily staying in Panama City, February 18, 2025.
ARNULFO FRANCO/AFP via Getty Images
The only country willing to give her a tourist visa was Brazil, where she had no connections or familiarity. She traveled through the dangers of the Darién Gap northward to Mexico. There, she made an appointment to apply for asylum in the United States using CBP One, a phone application established by U.S. Customs and Border Protection to provide people like her a safe, orderly, and legal pathway to seek asylum.
She showed me her appointment slip for 4:30 pm on January 31, 2025, at the Nogales, Arizona port of entry. She could have tried crossing the border without permission before President Donald Trump's inauguration, but she waited, as she was promised, to enter legally.
On Jan. 20, by executive order, Trump cancelled her appointment, and shut down CBP One. That same day a flurry of executive orders closed down refugee resettlement and other regular pathways for protection. Trump proclaimed an "invasion" of "illegal aliens" at the southern border, claiming authority to explicitly exclude people from the right to seek asylum if doing so would permit their continued presence in the United States. Trump's proclamation purports to cancel the asylum provision in U.S. law, which guarantees the right to seek asylum to anyone arriving at the border regardless of their status or method of arrival.
She did not want to cross the border without permission but reluctantly made the decision to cross irregularly on February 4 as the only possible way to seek asylum in the United States. She did not try to evade capture but waited on the other side of the wall for the Border Patrol. The agent handcuffed her and put her on a bus. She kept waiting for the chance to tell any official her story.
"No U.S. official at any point asked me any questions," Sara told Newsweek. "I had no interview in the United States. I talked to no lawyers, no officials. I was given no document to sign. I wanted to become a refugee, but they never talked to me."
The Border Patrol detained her in San Diego. She was told she was being transferred to Texas, but was ushered onto a military plane, which landed in Panama five hours later.
The next three weeks were a nightmare—a week of incommunicado detention in a hotel in Panama City, where a U.N. agency told her that her only option was to return "voluntarily" to her home country, followed by two weeks in a sweltering, filthy detention center back in Darién, then suddenly bused back to Panama City, dumped on the streets, and told she had 30 days to leave the country. The permit has since been extended for another 60 days; she remains in Panama, but the clock is ticking.
Despite their varied backgrounds, all of the people interviewed had this in common—each had crossed into the United States after January 20; all wanted to seek asylum in the U.S. and expressed to us a fear of return to their home countries; none had an asylum pre-screening "credible fear" interview; none saw an immigration judge or were given so much as a slip of paper saying why and under what legal basis they were being removed from the United States; in fact, none knew they were being sent to Panama.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the Trump administration should "facilitate the return" of a man wrongfully deported to El Salvador. But there are at least hundreds of others, among them the 299 sent to Panama and 200 to Costa Rica, who have been deported without basic due process and denied the right to seek asylum. The U.S. should also facilitate the return of the young woman I interviewed and make good on her long overdue appointment.
Bill Frelick is the director of Human Rights Watch Refugee and Migrant Rights Division and the author of an upcoming report on the expulsions.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment
Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment

The Hill

time6 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsom: Pentagon lying over LA to justify National Guard deployment

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Monday accused the Defense Department of 'lying to the American people' in justifying deploying National Guard troops to the state to quell Los Angeles protests against federal immigration raids, asserting that the situation intensified only when the Pentagon deployed troops. 'The situation became escalated when THEY deployed troops,' Newsom posted to X, referring to the Pentagon. 'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions. He clearly can't solve this, so California will.' Newsom was responding to a post from DOD Rapid Response on X, a Pentagon-run account, which claimed that 'Los Angeles is burning, and local leaders are refusing to respond.' President Trump on Saturday deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the Los Angeles area amid the ICE protests, with White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt saying the decision was made due to 'violent mobs' attacking 'Federal Law Enforcement Agents carrying out basic deportation operations.' While protests have intensified in recent days, devolving at times into violence, the majority of gatherings have been largely peaceful. Still, California National Guard troops began arriving in Los Angeles on Sunday morning, with some 300 deployed on the ground later that day at three locations: Los Angeles proper, Paramount and Compton. White House officials have sought to highlight images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control. 'The people that are causing the problem are professional agitators. They're insurrectionists. They're bad people. They should be in jail,' Trump told reporters on Monday. In addition, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has threatened to deploy approximately 500 U.S. Marines to the city, with U.S. Northern Command on Sunday confirming the service members were 'prepared to deploy.' The use of American troops has rankled California officials, who have said the federal response 'inflammatory' and said the deployment of soldiers 'will erode public trust.' Newsom also has traded insults with Hegseth, calling him 'a joke,' and that the idea of deploying active duty Marines in California was 'deranged behavior.' 'Pete Hegseth's a joke. He's a joke. Everybody knows he's so in over his head. What an embarrassment. That guy's weakness masquerading as strength. . . . It's a serious moment,' Newsom said in an interview with podcaster Brian Tyler Cohen. The tit-for-tat continued when chief Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell then took to X on Monday to attack Newsom. 'LA is on FIRE right now, but instead of tackling the issue, Gavin Newsom is spending his time attacking Secretary Hegseth,' Parnell wrote. 'Unlike Newsom, [Hegseth] isn't afraid to lead.' Newsom, who has formally demanded the Trump administration pull the National Guard troops off the streets, has declared the deployment 'unlawful' and said California will sue the Trump administration over its actions. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' David Sapp, Newsom's legal affairs secretary, wrote in a letter to Hegseth on Sunday. 'Accordingly, we ask that you immediately rescind your order and return the National Guard to its rightful control by the State of California, to be deployed as appropriate when necessary.' In the past 60 years, a U.S. president has only on one occasion mobilized a state's National Guard troops without the consent of its governor to quell unrest or enforce the law. That was in 1965, when former President Lyndon Johnson sent Guard members to Selma, Ala., to protect civil rights protesters there.

AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest
AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest

San Francisco Chronicle​

time7 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

AP PHOTOS: Trump's new travel ban takes effect, and some protest

President Donald Trump's ban on travel to the United States took effect Monday. Demonstrators outside Los Angeles International Airport held signs protesting the ban affecting citizens from 12 mainly African and Middle Eastern countries. At Miami International Airport, passengers moved steadily through an area for international arrivals. Tensions are escalating over the Trump administration's campaign of immigration enforcement. The new ban applies to citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. It also imposes heightened restrictions on people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela who are outside the U.S. and don't hold a valid visa. This is a photo gallery curated by AP photo editors.

Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe
Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Mass. Sen. Warren: DOGE accessed ‘sensitive' student loan data at Education Dept., calls for probe

U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren says she wants to know how the quasi-governmental Department of Government Efficiency gained access to 'sensitive' student loan information at the U.S. Department of Education. On Monday, Warren and U.S. Sen. Ed Markey, both Democrats, called for the agency's acting inspector general to find out how that breach happened. They were joined by Democratic senators from eight states, including U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut. Warren said lawmakers learned of the potential breach of systems at Federal Student Aid after DOGE, which was helmed until recently by tech titan Elon Musk, infiltrated the agency. In response, Education Department officials revealed that DOGE workers 'supported' a review of the FSA's contracts. As a part of that review, one employee was granted 'read-only' access to two internal systems that held sensitive personal information about borrowers. The agency said it had since revoked that access. But, according to Warren, it did not explain why that access had been revoked, or whether the employee had continued access to other databases. 'Because of the [Education] department's refusal to provide full and complete information, the full extent of DOGE's role and influence at ED remains unknown,' the lawmakers wrote in a June 8 letter to René L. Rocque, the agency's acting inspector general. That 'lack of clarity is not only frustrating for borrowers but also dangerous for the future of an agency that handles an extensive student loan portfolio and a range of federal aid programs for higher education,' the lawmakers continued. Warren, Markey and their colleagues have called on Roque's office to determine whether the department adhered to the Federal Privacy Act, which dictates how the government can collect and use personal information. They also asked Roque to 'determine the impact of DOGE's new plans to consolidate Americans' personal information across government databases.' 'It won't end well for Trump' if he does this amid LA protests, ex-GOP rep says All Ivy League schools are supporting Harvard lawsuit — except these 2 Embassies directed to resume processing Harvard University student visas Over 12,000 Harvard alums lend weight to court battle with Trump in new filing Markey: Trump using National Guard in LA to distract from big cuts in 'Big Beautiful Bill' Read the original article on MassLive.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store