Iran has ‘legitimate' right to self-defence, says Erdogan
ISTANBUL: Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said on Wednesday Iran had the "legitimate" right to defend itself in the face of Israel's ongoing bombing campaign, now in its sixth day. "It is a very natural, legitimate and legal right for Iran to defend itself against Israel's thuggery and state terrorism," the Turkish leader said, a day after referring to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as "the biggest threat to the security of the region".
The long-range blitz began early on Friday, when Israel launched a massive bombing campaign that prompted Iran to hit back with missiles and drones, including hypersonic missiles. "These attacks were organised while the Iranian nuclear negotiations were taking place," Erdogan said. "Israel, which possesses nuclear weapons and does not recognise any international rules... did not wait for the negotiations to end, but carried out a terrorist act without waiting for the result," he added.
Iran says at least 224 people have been killed in the Israeli attacks, which have targeted nuclear and military facilities, while Iranian fire on Israel has claimed at least 24 lives and wounded hundreds more, Netanyahu's office said. "We are closely following Israel's terrorist attacks on Iran. All our institutions are on high alert regarding the possible effects of these attacks on Türkiye," Erdogan said. "We are making preparations for every kind of scenario," he said. "Nobody should dare to test us."
On Monday, Erdogan said he had ordered the defence industry to increase production of medium and long-range missiles to "increase its level of deterrence" in light of the air war between Israel and Iran. — AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Muscat Daily
3 hours ago
- Muscat Daily
Oman condemns violations in Palestinian Territories
Geneva, Switzerland – Oman has strongly condemned the systematic practices carried out by Israeli forces in the occupied Palestinian Territories, particularly the extensive targeting of civilian infrastructure, including educational and cultural centres. This was reaffirmed during Oman's participation in the 59th session of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, during the interactive dialogue on the report of the Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Delivering the sultanate's statement, Sara al Balushi, First Secretary in Oman's Permanent Delegation to the United Nations in Geneva, expressed the sultanate's gratitude to the commission for its efforts in preparing the report, despite the serious challenges posed by the Israeli authorities' continued refusal to grant access to the occupied territories. Sara noted that the report outlines a series of grave violations by Israeli forces, including the deliberate targeting of schools, cultural centres and religious sites. She said such systematic destruction represents an attempt to erase Palestinian identity and heritage and constitutes a war of annihilation under international law. She stressed that these actions fall within the framework of crimes aimed at the total eradication of Palestinian national presence and identity.
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
Iran's Khamenei rejects Trump's call for unconditional surrender
DUBAI/JERUSALEM: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement read by a television presenter on Wednesday that his country will not accept U.S. President Donald Trump's call for an unconditional surrender. In his first remarks since Friday, when he delivered a speech broadcast on state media after Israel began bombarding Iran, Khamenei said peace or war could not be imposed on the Islamic Republic. "Intelligent people who know Iran, the Iranian nation, and its history will never speak to this nation in threatening language because the Iranian nation will not surrender," he said. "The Americans should know that any U.S. military intervention will undoubtedly be accompanied by irreparable damage." Thousands of people were fleeing Tehran on Wednesday after Israeli warplanes bombed the city overnight, and a source said Trump was considering options that include joining Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear sites. Israel's military said 50 Israeli jets had struck around 20 targets in Tehran overnight, including sites producing raw materials, components and manufacturing systems for missiles. A source familiar with internal discussions said Trump and his team were considering a number of options, which included joining Israel in strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. Iran had conveyed to Washington that it would retaliate against the United States for any direct participation, its ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Ali Bahreini, said. He said he already saw the U.S. as "complicit in what Israel is doing".
Observer
6 hours ago
- Observer
I have a right to defend myself and my family
As a British man married to an Omani woman, currently living in Oman on a citizen's visa, I find myself in a paradoxical and deeply troubling situation. My own government, the United Kingdom, has taken actions that now threaten not only my life, but the lives of my wife, my daughters and my extended Omani family. The British government's and US support of Israel's attack on Iran's nuclear facilities by continuing to supply arms and giving it political justification has placed all of us and millions more, in grave danger. Let me be clear: this is not an abstract or distant threat. My daughters' Omani cousins, aunties and uncles are now at risk because of the British and US government's support for Israel unprovoked aggression against Iran. The world, and especially Oman and the Middle East, should have no illusions about the magnitude of this danger. Consider the precedent set by Chernobyl. When the nuclear facility in what is now Ukraine (then part of the Soviet Union) suffered a catastrophic meltdown in 1986, the region became uninhabitable. The disaster was not contained to the immediate area; radioactive fallout drifted across Europe, contaminating land, water and food supplies. Even today, nearly forty years later, the area around Chernobyl remains a radioactive wasteland, a stark reminder of the enduring consequences of nuclear disaster. Now imagine the consequences if a nuclear facility in Iran was struck by an Israeli missile powerful enough to penetrate its underground defences. The Sea of Oman, so vital to the livelihoods and well-being of everyone in this region, would be contaminated by radioactive fallout. Oman's fishing industry would be destroyed overnight. Home-grown vegetables would become inedible. The water supply — essential for drinking, cooking and even showering — would be poisoned. For all of us living in Oman, life as we know it would end in an instant. Radiation fallout does not respect borders. Being so close to Iran, Oman would be among the first and worst affected. The lives of Omanis and all residents — including myself, my family and my wife's Omani family, would be irreversibly changed. Decades of progress and development since 1970 would be put at risk in a single moment. In the aftermath of such a disaster, our only recourse would be to hide in our homes, sealing windows and doors to keep out the radioactive dust. We might survive for a time on bottled water and whatever food we had stockpiled. Some might try to shelter in their cars, parked in sealed garages, in a desperate attempt to avoid contamination. But the sea would remain poisoned for months, if not longer. The land, where farmers grow the fruit and vegetables that feed us, would be contaminated for years. Many would die slow, agonising deaths from radiation sickness. This is not scaremongering. This is the reality of nuclear fallout. Look to Chernobyl. Look further back to Japan in 1945, when the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The descendants of those exposed to the radiation still suffer from increased rates of cancer and other illnesses, nearly eighty years later. My own government, and the US, are fully aware of these possibilities. Yet they continue to support Israel's unprovoked attack on Iran and its people. The consequences of such actions will not be confined to Iran alone, they will ripple outward, endangering everyone in the region, including innocent families like mine. So I ask: do I not have the right to defend myself, my family and my wife's family? When my own government's policies put us in harm's way, what recourse do I have? The right to self-defence is fundamental, and it is time for the world to recognise the catastrophic risks we all face if nuclear facilities become targets in this conflict. The time for illusions is over. The world must act to prevent disaster — before it is too late.
