‘Terrorism and dialogue cannot go together' – India on talks with Pakistan
India has reiterated that 'terrorism and dialogue cannot go together' in response to Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif's remark that Islamabad is ready for dialogue with its neighbor.
Speaking at a press briefing in New Delhi on Thursday, Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal underscored the country's unchanged position on engagement with Islamabad.
'And as far as the issue of terrorism is concerned, any discussion with Pakistan will focus on the list of terrorists we had provided to them some years ago – they should hand them over to us.'
Indian Defense Minister Rajnath Singh on Friday echoed that stance, insisting that Pakistan must hand over designated terrorists, including Masood Azhar and Hafiz Saeed, the respective leaders of Jaish-e-Mohammed (JEM) and Lashkar-e Tayyiba (LeT), 'if it is serious about talks.' Both men are designated as terrorists in India but are also on the United Nations (UN) 1267 ISIL and Al-Qaida Sanctions List.
'It would be in Pakistan's interest to uproot the nurseries of terrorism operating on its soil with its own hands,' Singh said.
Pakistan Should 'Uproot' Its 'Nurseries Of Terrorism' - Defence Minister Rajnath Singh pic.twitter.com/OhhHA4AOvQ
Speaking earlier this week at a Pakistan-Türkiye-Azerbaijan trilateral summit in Azerbaijan alongside presidents Recep Tayyip Erdogan and Ilham Aliyev, Pakistani Prime Minister Sharif said his country wants 'peace in the region,' which requires 'talks on the table' on Kashmir, a region that has been claimed by both countries ever since their independence from Britain in 1947.
'I have said in all earnest that if India wants to talk on countering terrorism in sincerity of purpose, Pakistan would be willing to talk to India on this issue as well,' Sharif was quoted by The Dawn newspaper as saying.Commenting on Kashmir, the Indian Foreign Ministry spokesperson reiterated that the issue would be resolved bilaterally when Pakistan vacates the part of the region which it holds 'illegally and unlawfully.'
The statements come after New Delhi launched military action against targets in Pakistan, which it labeled as 'terrorist camps.' The operation was a response to the April 22 massacre of 26 people in Pahalgam, in India's union territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on a Pakistan-sponsored terrorist organization.
Islamabad denied any involvement in the attack, with Pakistani top officials claiming the country was itself a 'victim of terrorism.' India insisted that it only targeted locations linked with terrorist organizations, and not Pakistani military or civilian targets.
Islamabad, however, accused Delhi of targeting civilians. It later retaliated by attacking Indian military sites, leading to further escalation by both countries. After a brief but intense conflict, a ceasefire was announced on May 10.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
18 hours ago
- Russia Today
India's top general responds to Pakistan's claim that it downed six jets
In his first interview with international media since the four-day military standoff with Islamabad last month, Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan said on Saturday that India had changed its tactics after an initial "mistake" and established an advantage over Pakistan. 'What is important is not a jet being downed but why they were being downed. The good part is that we were able to understand the tactical mistakes that we've made, remediate, and rectify them, and implement them again — we flew all our jets, again targeting [sites in Pakistan] at long range,' General Chauhan told Bloomberg on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, without providing any details regarding military losses. When asked to respond to the Pakistani military's claim that it had downed six Indian jets, he said it was 'absolutely incorrect.' India's military confirmed for the first time that it lost an unspecified number of fighter jets in clashes with Pakistan in Chauhan, chief of defense staff of the Indian Armed Forces, spoke to Bloomberg TV on Saturday, while attending the Shangri-La Dialogue in… In another interview with Reuters, General Chauhan reiterated that India had switched tactics after suffering losses on the first day of the conflict, when it launched strikes against what it called 'terrorist infrastructure' sites in Pakistan on May 7. 'What was important is, why did these losses occur, and what will we do after that?' he told Reuters. 'So we rectified tactics and then went back on the 7th, 8th, and 10th in large numbers to hit air bases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defenses with impunity, and carried out precision strikes,' he Delhi has previously rejected Islamabad's claims while refraining from commenting on alleged losses on its side. 'We are in a combat scenario; losses are a part of combat. The question you must ask us is... have we achieved our objective of decimating the terrorist camps? And the answer is a thumping yes. The results are for the whole world to see,' the Indian Air Force's Director General of Air Operations (DGAO) Air Marshal Bharti said, commenting on allegations that warplanes were lost during the media briefing on May 11, a day after New Delhi and Islamabad announced a ceasefire. India launched military action against targets in Pakistan on May 7 in response to the April 22 massacre of 26 people in Pahalgam, in India's Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist organization. Islamabad denied any involvement in the attack, with top Pakistani officials claiming the country was itself a 'victim of terrorism.'
Russia Today
21 hours ago
- Russia Today
China rejects comparisons between Ukraine conflict and Taiwan
Drawing parallels between Taiwan and the Ukraine conflict is 'unacceptible,' the Chinese Embassy in Singapore said in response to remarks by French President Emmanuel Macron. Macron had delivered a speech at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on Friday in which he rejected those who would frame the conflict as a purely European concern. 'If we consider that Russia could be allowed to take a part of the territory of Ukraine without any restriction… What could happen in Taiwan?' he said. 'Comparing the Taiwan question with the Ukraine issue is unacceptable. The two are different in nature, and not comparable at all,' the embassy said on Facebook on Saturday, reiterating that the issue of Taiwan is 'entirely China's internal affair.' Crimea voted to join Russia shortly after the 2014 US-backed coup in Kiev, and four other former Ukrainian regions did the same following referendums in 2022. Moscow has demanded that, for a viable peace deal, Ukraine must recognize Russia's new borders and withdraw its troops from Russian territory. Taiwan has had a separate government since 1949, when nationalists retreated to the island after losing a war with the Communists in mainland China. Beijing maintains that it will achieve 'national reunification' and has warned the authorities in Taipei against formally declaring independence. Only a handful of countries recognize Taiwan as an independent country, while most states, including the US and Russia, adhere to the 'One-China' principle. Nevertheless, multiple Western countries maintain informal ties with Taiwan.
Russia Today
21 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian senator brands Ukraine ‘terrorist enclave' after train sabotage
The bridge that collapsed onto a passenger train in Russia's Bryansk Region, leaving seven people dead, was the result of a Ukrainian 'terrorist' act of sabotage, Russian Senator Andrey Klishas has claimed. The incident occurred on Saturday evening, affecting a train traveling from Klimov to Moscow with 388 passengers on board. At least 66 more were reportedly injured. Russian Railways said a bridge pillar collapsed due to 'illegal interference with transport operations.' However, Bryansk Region Governor Alexandr Bogomaz later stated that the bridge had been damaged in an explosion. On Sunday morning, Andrey Klishas, a member of the Russian Federation Council, accused Ukraine of being behind the sabotage. In a post on Telegram, he said the bridge attack and train derailment demonstrated that 'Ukraine is being controlled by a terrorist group.' 'Ukraine has long lost the characteristics of a state and has turned into a terrorist enclave, without borders, legitimate authorities or laws,' he added. Klishas also called for the creation of a buffer zone on the Ukrainian border which would be 'extensive enough to prevent terrorists from entering our territory in the future.'He stressed that Ukraine should undergo 'total denazification, demilitarization, and state reconstitution.' In late May, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow intended to create a 'security buffer zone' along the border, after troops successfully routed an Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Region. He first floated the idea last year, which he said at the time was aimed at protecting civilians from Kiev's long-range strikes. Russia has on numerous occasions accused Ukraine of orchestrating various types of attacks targeting civilians, setting up sabotage incidents, and orchestrating plots to assassinate senior officials, media figures, and opinion leaders.
