India's top general responds to Pakistan's claim that it downed six jets
In his first interview with international media since the four-day military standoff with Islamabad last month, Chief of Defense Staff (CDS) General Anil Chauhan said on Saturday that India had changed its tactics after an initial "mistake" and established an advantage over Pakistan.
'What is important is not a jet being downed but why they were being downed. The good part is that we were able to understand the tactical mistakes that we've made, remediate, and rectify them, and implement them again — we flew all our jets, again targeting [sites in Pakistan] at long range,' General Chauhan told Bloomberg on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue security forum in Singapore, without providing any details regarding military losses.
When asked to respond to the Pakistani military's claim that it had downed six Indian jets, he said it was 'absolutely incorrect.'
India's military confirmed for the first time that it lost an unspecified number of fighter jets in clashes with Pakistan in May.Anil Chauhan, chief of defense staff of the Indian Armed Forces, spoke to Bloomberg TV on Saturday, while attending the Shangri-La Dialogue in… pic.twitter.com/9y3GW6WJfn
In another interview with Reuters, General Chauhan reiterated that India had switched tactics after suffering losses on the first day of the conflict, when it launched strikes against what it called 'terrorist infrastructure' sites in Pakistan on May 7.
'What was important is, why did these losses occur, and what will we do after that?' he told Reuters. 'So we rectified tactics and then went back on the 7th, 8th, and 10th in large numbers to hit air bases deep inside Pakistan, penetrated all their air defenses with impunity, and carried out precision strikes,' he added.New Delhi has previously rejected Islamabad's claims while refraining from commenting on alleged losses on its side.
'We are in a combat scenario; losses are a part of combat. The question you must ask us is... have we achieved our objective of decimating the terrorist camps? And the answer is a thumping yes. The results are for the whole world to see,' the Indian Air Force's Director General of Air Operations (DGAO) Air Marshal Bharti said, commenting on allegations that warplanes were lost during the media briefing on May 11, a day after New Delhi and Islamabad announced a ceasefire.
India launched military action against targets in Pakistan on May 7 in response to the April 22 massacre of 26 people in Pahalgam, in India's Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir, which New Delhi blamed on an Islamabad-sponsored terrorist organization.
Islamabad denied any involvement in the attack, with top Pakistani officials claiming the country was itself a 'victim of terrorism.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Truce or trap? Ukraine makes sure peace talks go nowhere
On Sunday, in the Russian regions of Bryansk and Kursk, both bordering Ukraine, bridges collapsed on and under trains, killing seven and injuring dozens of civilians. These, however, were no accidents and no extraordinary force of nature was involved either. Instead, it is certain that these catastrophes were acts of sabotage, which is also how Russian authorities are classifying them. Since it is virtually certain that the perpetrators acted on behalf of Kiev, Western media have hardly reported these attacks. Moscow meanwhile rightly considers these attacks terrorism. On the same day, Ukraine also carried out a wave of drone attacks on important Russian military airfields. That story, trumpeted as a great success by Ukraine's SBU intelligence service, has been touted in the West. The usual diehard Western bellicists, long starved of good news, have pounced on Ukraine's probably exaggerated account of these assaults to fantasize once more about how Ukraine has 'genius,' while Russia is 'vulnerable' and really almost defeated. Despair makes imaginative. In the wrong way. The reality of Ukraine's drone strikes on the airfields is not entirely clear yet. What is certain is that Ukraine targeted locations in five regions, including in northern and central Russia as well as Siberia and the Far East. Kiev's drone swarms were launched not from Ukraine but from inside Russia, using subterfuge and civilian trucks. Under International Humanitarian War (aka the Law of Armed Conflict), this is likely to constitute not a legitimate 'ruse of war' but the war crime of perfidy, a rather obvious point somehow never mentioned in Western commentary. Yet at least, in this instance the targets were military: This was either an act of special-ops sabotage involving a war crime (the most generous possible reading) or plain terrorism or both, depending on your point of view. Three of the attacked airbases, it seems, successfully fended off the Ukrainian first-person-view kamikaze drones. In two locations, enough drones got through to cause what appears to be substantial damage. Ukrainian officials and, therefore, Western mainstream media claim that more than 40 Russian aircraft were destroyed, including large strategic bombers and an early-warning-and-control aircraft. Official Russian sources have admitted losses but not detailed them. Russian military bloggers, often well-informed, have quoted much lower figures ('in the single digits,' thirteen), while noting that even they still constitute a 'tragic loss,' especially as Russia does not make these types of aircraft anymore. In financial terms, Ukrainian officials claim that they have inflicted the equivalent of 'at least 2 billion' dollars in damage. Even if it should turn out that they have been less effective than that, there can be little doubt that, on this occasion, Kiev has achieved a lot of bang for the buck: even if 'Operation Spiderweb' took a long time to prepare and involved various resources, including a warehouse, trucks, and the cheap drones themselves, it is certain that Kiev's expenses must have been much less than Moscow's losses. In political terms, Russia's vibrant social media-based sphere of military-political commentators has revealed a sense of appalled shock and anger, and not only at Kiev but also at Russian officials and officers accused of still not taking seriously the threat of Ukrainian strikes even deep inside Russia. One important Telegram 'mil-blogger' let his readers know that he would welcome dismissals among the air force command. But he also felt that the weak spots exploited by Kiev's sneak drone attack have systemic reasons. Another very popular mil-blogger has written of 'criminal negligence.' Whatever the eventual Russian political fall-out of these Ukrainian attacks, beware Western commentators' incorrigible tendency to overestimate it. German newspaper Welt, for instance, is hyperventilating about the attack's 'monumental significance.' In reality, with all the frustration inside Russia, this incident will not shake the government or even dent its ability to wage the war. Probably, its real net effect will be to support the mobilization of Russia. Remember that Wagner revolt that saw exactly the same Western commentators predicting the imminent implosion not merely of the Russian government but the whole country? You don't? Exactly. In the case of the terrorist attacks on civilian trains, the consequences are even easier to predict. They will definitely only harden Moscow's resolve and that of almost all Russians, elite and 'ordinary.' With both types of attacks, on the military airfields and on the civilian trains, the same puzzling question arises: What is Kiev even trying to do here? At this point, we can only speculate. My guess: Kiev's rather desperate regime was after four things: First, a propaganda success for domestic consumption. Given that Zelensky's Ukraine is a de facto authoritarian state with obedient media, this may actually work, for a moment. Until, that is, the tragedy of mobilization, all too often forced, for a losing proxy war on behalf of a fairly demented West, sinks in again, that is, in a day or so. Second, with its combination of atrocities against civilians and an assault on Russia's nuclear defenses, this was Kiev's umpteenth attempt to provoke Russia into a response so harsh that it would escalate the war to a direct clash between NATO (now probably minus the US) and Russia. This is a Ukrainian tactic as old as this war, if not older. Call it the attack's routine aspect. Equally routinely, that plan went nowhere. Then there was the attempt to torpedo the second round of the revived Istanbul talks, scheduled for Monday, 2 June, by provoking Russia to cancel or launch such a rapid and fierce retaliation strike that Kiev could have used it as a pretext to do the same. That is, as it were, the tactical dimension, and it also failed. While the above is devious, it is also run-of-the-mill. States will be states, sigh. The fourth likely purpose of Kiev's wave of sabotage and terror strikes – the strategic aspect, as it were – however, is much more disturbing: The Zelensky regime – and at least some of its Western backers (my guess: Britain in the lead) – are signaling that they are ready to wage a prolonged campaign of escalating terrorist attacks inside Russia, even if the fighting in Ukraine should end. Think of the Chechen Wars, but much worse again. This, too, would not succeed. One lesson of the Chechen Wars is precisely that Moscow has made up its mind not to bend to terrorism but instead eliminate its source, whatever the cost. Regarding those Istanbul talks, they have taken place. Ukraine was not able to make Russia abandon them. Otherwise, the results of this second round of the second attempt at peace in Istanbul seem to have been very modest, as many observers predicted. Kiev, while losing, did its usual grimly comedic thing and offered Moscow a chance to surrender. Moscow handed over its terms in turn; and they have not changed and reflect that it is winning the war. Kiev has promised to study them. Given that the gap between Ukrainian delusions and Russian demands seems unbridgeable at this point, even a large-scale ceasefire is out of reach. And that may be, after all, what both the Zelensky regime and its European backers want. As to Moscow, it has long made clear that it will fight until it reaches its war aims. In that sense, the new talks confirmed what the attacks had signaled already: peace is not in sight. Russia's chief negotiator Vladimir Medinsky did, however, offer smaller, local ceasefires of 'two to three days' that, he explained, would serve to retrieve the bodies of the fallen for decent burial. In the same spirit, Russia has committed to hand over 6,000 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers and officers. There was something for the living as well: more prisoner exchanges, for those severely ill or injured as well as for the young, have been agreed. Figures are not clear yet, but the fact that they will take place on an 'all-for-all' basis reflects a Russian gesture of good will. Finally, Medinsky also revealed that the Ukrainian side handed over a list of 339 children that Russia has evacuated from the war zone. He promised that, as in previous cases, Russian officials will trace them and do their best to return the children to Ukraine. Medinsky pointed out that the number of children on Kiev's list massively contradicts Ukrainian and Western stories – as well as lawfare – about an immense, 'genocidal' Russian kidnapping operation. In that sense, the talks at least helped to deflate an old piece of Western information war. Perhaps that is all that is possible for now: truly incremental humanitarian progress and a very gradual, very slow working toward a more reasonable manner of talking to each other. Better than nothing. But that's a low bar, admittedly.
Russia Today
5 hours ago
- Russia Today
Russian civilians who tried to down Ukrainian drones to be rewarded – governor (VIDEO)
A group of men who were filmed throwing stones at incoming Ukrainian drones in Irkutsk Region in Siberia will be rewarded for their actions, local governor Igor Kobzev has said. On Sunday, military airfields in five Russian regions, including Irkutsk, came under coordinated drone attacks orchestrated by Ukraine, the Defense Ministry in Moscow said. Most of the incoming UAVs were destroyed, but some made it through and caused damage, the ministry said, adding that several aircraft caught fire in Murmansk and Irkutsk Region. According to both Ukrainian and Russian media, the explosive-laden drones were launched from trucks parked near the bases. Following the attack, a video went viral on social media showing civilians in the Usolsky District of Irkutsk Region risking their lives in an attempt to stop the UAVs from taking off. The footage captured several men, who have been described in the media as truck drivers, climbing atop the tractor-trailer that had been releasing the drones and throwing stones at them. Kobzev wrote in a post on Telegram on Monday that the regional authorities had also taken notice of 'the footage of concerned citizens, who tried to prevent the drones from operating.' 'The operational headquarters will assess their actions and make a decision on how to reward them,' he said. The situation in Usolsky District is currently under the control of the authorities, with no threat to the population, the governor added. The Ukrainian drone attack came a day ahead of the second round of talks between Russian and Ukrainian delegations in Istanbul, Türkiye on Monday, during which the sides are expected to discuss each other's proposals on ways to settle the conflict. Russian officials suggested earlier that the intensification of Ukrainian UAV incursions into Russia in recent weeks are an attempt to derail the US-brokered peace process between Moscow and Kiev.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
UK preparing for war
Britain is going on a war footing with the launch of a major rearmament campaign, Prime Minister Keir Starmer said in a keynote address on Monday. Starmer unveiled his cabinet's Strategic Defense Review, which includes an expansive armaments program mirroring similar efforts across NATO. Last week, UK Defense Secretary John Healey said London was sending 'a message to Moscow' by allocating billions of pounds for new munitions plants, long-range missile systems, and other capabilities. Russia has accused Western nations of using alarmist rhetoric to justify shifting public funds toward military spending. 'We are moving to war-fighting readiness,' Starmer said at a shipyard in Govan, Glasgow, adding that 'our defense policy will always be NATO first.' He vowed to transform the UK into 'a battle-ready, armor-clad nation with the strongest alliances and the most advanced capabilities equipped for the decades to come.' According to Starmer, the overhaul will enable Britain to make its 'biggest contribution to NATO since its creation.' He also pledged that the country would become 'the fastest innovator in NATO,' with defense research operating at a 'wartime pace.' The reforms are expected to make the British military 'ten times more lethal by 2035,' he claimed. The prime minister reaffirmed his government's goal to increase defense spending to 3% of GDP. He framed the effort as replacing the post-Cold War 'peace dividend' with a 'defense dividend' through the creation of thousands of new jobs in weapons manufacturing, including production of nuclear arms. Starmer blamed Moscow for what he called a series of provocations, accusing Russia of 'menacing' the UK, demonstrating 'aggression' in British waters, and 'driving up the cost of living here at home,' harming British workers. Russian lawmaker Aleksey Pushkov has accused the UK of planning an 'ice war' with Russia, noting that 'there is no difference between the Labour Party and the Conservative Party' in their attitude. Commenting on Starmer's pledge to build additional nuclear submarines, Pushkov asserted that no British investments could bring the country to an equal footing with Russia, the US, and China. However, 'Starmer needs them [those boats] to report his achievements' to domestic and international players who stand to benefit financially from the project, Pushkov claimed.
