When Trump and Putin go head-to-head, who wins?
'We're going to have a meeting with Vladimir Putin,' he told a news conference at the White House. 'And at the end of that meeting – probably in the first two minutes – I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made. Cos that's what I do – I make deals.'
It's typical Trump: boastful, bereft of meaning and utterly unconvincing.
On Friday, when Trump welcomes the Russian president to talks in Alaska, like a python eyeing a particularly plump suckling piglet, Putin will squeeze the spirit out of him, and then eat him for breakfast, as he has on each and every occasion when this tragically unevenly matched pair have had cause to interact.
Steve Witkoff, Trump's equally hapless envoy, has already served as an amuse-bouche for the predatory Putin. The cunning and ruthless former KGB officer will soon get the better of this hapless real estate bumbler, too – because the central fact about Trump is hiding in plain sight and requires no detailed psychological profiling: The guy's all over the place.
When Trump heads to Alaska – he actually said he was going to Russia, but it makes no difference – we should be very, very nervous. It's strange, in a way, because Trump has indicated in recent weeks that he's 'disappointed' with Putin, and suspects he's being played – but he refuses to be 'done' with him.
The White House correspondent was right to ask Trump how he would 'probably' know whether a deal was possible within 120 seconds, hardly enough time for Trump to get the bottle of mineral water open. Does Trump really possess some infallible supernatural power that can sense how the immediate future will unfold? If so, where is the evidence for this extraordinary gift?
Certainly not in the mixed success he has had in business. Let us not dwell on the two supposed breakthrough summits with Kim Jong-un, which failed to deliver on Trump's bizarre desire to build another golf resort, on the North Korean coast.
The last Trump-Putin summit, in 2018, in then-neutral Finland, was marked by the grotesque spectacle of the American president deriding his own intelligence services in favour of taking the word of the Russian leader. There was no Russian interference in American elections, Trump declared: 'President Putin says it's not Russia. I don't see any reason why it would be.'
When the wilfully naive Trump had one-to-one talks with the Russian strongman, they were accompanied only by a Russian interpreter. Trump got nothing out of Putin on the crisis in Syria, was persuaded that the Russian secret service could interview their own spies caught by the Americans, and at the end of the summit no agreements were announced.
Such was the spectacle that there was much talk of the Russians having Kompromat – dirt – on Trump. The Russian dictator was even asked about it; he joked about what American businessmen get up to in Moscow. Given the pressure he is coming under for refusing to release the so-called Epstein files, Trump might be a distracted man as he negotiates Ukraine's freedom away.
In other words, it is Putin who understands the art of the deal. He knows what he wants, and he knows he cannot lose. He has already won the propaganda prize of transforming himself from the pariah leader of a rogue state into looking like a co-equal partner of the United States, carving Europe into spheres of influence as Stalin and Roosevelt once did. Then, as now, the smaller nations, and even the British represented by Winston Churchill, had to accept the fait accompli arrived at by Russia and America.
It is no surprise that, in the peace process, President Zelensky, President Macron, Chancellor Merz and Keir Starmer will play but a minor part, if any.
For all the speculation ahead of the meeting, we all know how it will play out. Putin will demand that most, if not all, of the eastern provinces of Ukraine, plus Crimea, become de facto parts of Russia. There will only be a ceasefire if this precondition is met by Trump, secretly or openly. In return, Zelensky might be offered the return of a bit of the Black Sea coast – 'oceanside prime real estate', in Trump-speak. Trump will bully Zelensky into accepting this easy Russian win.
If Zelensky or the Ukrainian people reject the 'deal', Trump will abandon them. Putin can then get on with his slow but unrelenting offensives and, eventually, the Russian meat-grinder will prevail. Ukraine will be extinguished, Putin will be ready for his next meal, and America might just wake up and realise what the hell is going on, even if Trump remains in denial.
Either way – deal or no deal in Alaska – Putin ends up with a lot of Ukrainian territory.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Channel 4
15 minutes ago
- Channel 4
Trump threatens severe consequences if Putin doesn't end war
Today's virtual summit was the last chance for Europeans to sway Donald Trump before the showdown in Anchorage with the Russian President. But while Europe's leaders emerged from the meeting optimistically restating Ukraine's goals, it may amount to very little. None of them are set to be in the room when Trump and Putin go face to face.
The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
A tale of two Chief Pams: Federal takeover brings confusion over command of DC police
Attorney General Pam Bondi is effectively in charge of the police department in Washington, D.C. — so says the White House. But the city's police force already has a Pam at the helm — Chief Pamela Smith — and she says she only reports to the mayor. D.C. and federal officials say they are working together after President Donald Trump announced he was placing the police department in the nation's capital under federal control to crack down on violent crime. But despite the unified tone, the unusual arrangement is raising questions about who gets to make decisions about D.C. police resources, personnel and policy and — in the event of a disagreement — which Pam gets the final say. According to D.C. leaders, the attorney general can request services of the mayor, but nothing has changed when it comes to the chain of command and the department's funding. And when pressed Tuesday about who she reports to in light of the federal takeover, Smith said: 'I answer to Mayor Muriel Bowser.' 'Let us not have any controversy with that, OK?' Smith told reporters outside the Justice Department after meeting with Bondi and other federal officials. 'Because I know people want to build upon and create division. We're here to work together with our federal partners, and that's what we're going to do.' Yet hours later, the White House struck a different tone, suggesting the ultimate authority lies in the hands of Bondi and Terry Cole, the Drug Enforcement Administration director whom Trump has tapped to serve as interim federal administrator of the police force. 'We plan to work with the Metropolitan Police Department, but ultimately, the chain of command is as such: the president of the United States, the attorney general of the United States, our DEA administrator, Terry Cole, who is now serving head of the chief of the Metropolitan Police Department,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters. Cole is working with Smith 'to ensure that law enforcement officers are allowed to do their jobs in the city,' Leavitt said. Justice Department officials have not answered questions about whether the Trump administration believes it has the authority to make decisions about D.C. personnel, and whether the attorney general has issued any new orders for the police force. Smith took on her role as police chief in the nation's capital in November 2023 and briefly served in other units, including the homeland security bureau. She also led the police force's diversity, equity and inclusion efforts and had served as chief of the United States Park Police after a long career in that federal force. The law allows Trump to take over the D.C. police for up to 30 days, though the White House has suggested it could last longer as authorities later 'reevaluate and reassess.' Extending federal control past that time would require congressional approval, something likely tough to achieve in the face of Democratic resistance. Hundreds of federal officers from the FBI, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and other agencies have been doing overnight patrols in Washington since last week. Cole said federal officers would be 'embedded' with D.C. police to patrol the streets, but did not offer specific details on what would change in the chain of command. Even so, he described Smith as 'very accommodating' and said she was sharing ideas, giving him an office at police headquarters, and introducing him to staff. 'We have tremendous cooperation, tremendous intel sharing, and what's most encouraging, the police are looking forward to doing their job again,' Cole said in a Fox News interview.
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump wants to extend federal control over Washington police
WASHINGTON, Aug 13 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday he would ask congressional Republicans to extend federal control of Washington's city police force beyond 30 days, escalating his campaign to exert presidential power over the nation's capital. Trump also asserted that any congressional action could serve as a model for other U.S. cities. He has previously threatened to expand his efforts to other Democratic-run cities such as Chicago that he claims have failed to address crime. It was not clear how Trump's takeover of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department could be replicated elsewhere. In seizing control on Monday, Trump took advantage of a federal law, the District of Columbia Home Rule Act, that permits the president to do so under emergency circumstances for up to 30 days. Trump also announced on Monday that he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to the city, a tactic he employed in Los Angeles in June when he mobilized thousands of Guard soldiers and hundreds of U.S. Marines in response to protests over his administration's immigration raids. Separately, hundreds of federal officers and agents from more than a dozen agencies have fanned out across Washington in recent days. Trump's extraordinary moves in Washington are reflective of how he has approached his second term in office, shattering political norms and legal concerns to test the limits of his office's power. The Republican president has claimed the U.S. capital is gripped by a wave of violent crime and pervasive homelessness, despite both federal and city crime statistics showing that violent crime has declined precipitously since a spike in 2023. The office of Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser, a Democrat, declined to respond on Trump's latest comments. Bowser has sought to strike a diplomatic tone, even as she has cited statistics showing the city's violent crime rate hit a 30-year low last year. More than 1,450 law enforcement personnel were on patrol in Washington on Tuesday night, a White House official said, including 30 National Guard troops and 750 city police officers assigned to the "anti-crime" operation. The official said the White House expects a "significantly higher" presence of Guard soldiers on Wednesday night. The effort has resulted in 103 arrests since Aug. 7, which includes 43 on Tuesday, the official said. The charges include one homicide charge, 33 firearms charges and 23 immigration charges, the official said, and have led to 24 seized firearms. During the same period in 2024, the Metropolitan Police Department arrested 364 people in total, police data shows, including traffic and liquor law violations as well as murder, prostitution, carjacking, assault, theft, burglary and robbery. The MPD data shows that police made 20,386 adult arrests in 2024, an average of 56 arrests a day. As of Tuesday, city officials said they were still in command of the department and had received no new orders from the administration, the Washington Post reported. The Metropolitan Police Department on Wednesday referred all questions about arrests involving federal agents to the White House. Asked for comment on Trump's call for congressional action, House Speaker Mike Johnson's office pointed to his social media response to the president's action on Monday: "President Trump is RIGHT. We can't allow crime to destroy our Nation's Capital." However, any legislation to extend Trump's control over the police department would likely fail in the Senate, where Democrats can use procedural rules to block most bills. Trump told reporters on Wednesday that if Congress fails to act, he can declare a "national emergency" to extend the 30-day limit, though legal experts expressed skepticism about that claim. "There's nothing about the president extending past 30 days unilaterally," Claire Finkelstein, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, said of the Home Rule Act. "If the 30 days are up, that's that." The president has used emergency declarations to justify numerous unprecedented executive actions, including historically high tariffs on foreign imports and his wide-ranging immigration crackdown. Many have drawn lawsuits challenging his authority. In both Washington and Los Angeles, Trump bypassed or ignored objections from elected local leaders. A federal trial on whether Trump violated the law in Los Angeles by calling up the National Guard over the objections of Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom is underway in San Francisco.
