ANC says it can't allow SACP members to sit in on election meetings as both parties to contest 2026 polls
JOHANNESBURG - The African National Congress (ANC) said it cannot allow members from the South African Communist Party (SACP) to sit in on its election meetings, as both organisations will be competing against each other.
In 2024, the SACP resolved to contest the upcoming local government elections alone and no longer under the ANC banner.
ALSO READ: SACP believes running for upcoming Limpopo by-election will be litmus test for 2026 polls
Following that decision, the ANC and SACP announced that they would not be asking their members to give up their dual memberships as the alliance was still intact.
However, at a recent election strategy session in Mpumalanga, ANC deputy secretary-general Nomvula Mokonyane allegedly kicked out SACP members.
Speaking at an ANC event in Kliptown, Soweto on Thursday, Mokonyane said the party respected the decision of the SACP to contest alone.
"We can't allow ourselves to be Zuma-fied, where you sit with people who are going to contest and target the same constituency as you, planning with you on how to make sure there is higher voter turnout, your candidate is the best candidate and most importantly, we win the coming elections. There is nothing untoward and we will continue doing it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
9 hours ago
- IOL News
Johannesburg's political landscape shifts as ActionSA targets new speaker following Mthembu's removal
The City of Johannesburg council in Braamfontein will vote for a new speaker after ActionSA's Nobuhle Mthembu was axed. Image: Nhlanhla Phillips / Independent Newspapers Political parties represented in the City of Johannesburg council are looking to replace speaker Nobuhle Mthembu after she was ousted this week. ActionSA's caucus leader Lebo Modukanene said the party was fully aware that its refusal to defend Mayor Dada Morero would likely prompt the ANC to retaliate, voting alongside the DA, to remove Mthembu. 'We made it clear that if taking a principled stance came at a political cost, then so be it. ActionSA does not make decisions based on threats or favours - we act on merit, principle, and in the best interests of Johannesburg's residents,' she said. Modukanene added that since joining the ANC-led Government of Local Unity in July last year, ActionSA has maintained an approach based on specific issues. 'We have never given the ANC a blank cheque. Our support must be earned, not assumed. This position was once again demonstrated yesterday (Wednesday). We could not, in good conscience, defend the ANC's Mayor Morero, whose leadership has failed Johannesburg,' she explained. According to Modukanene, ActionSA supported the ANC's chief whip, Sithembiso Zungu, whose work in promoting discipline and functionality in the council has been commendable. 'Speaker Mthembu served with exceptional integrity and fairness, and her deep commitment to public engagement set a standard for leadership in this city. Her removal has nothing to do with performance - it is a symptom of the political decay that continues to undermine governance in Johannesburg,' she added. ActionSA is consulting internally and its leadership will continue engaging the ANC on this and other matters of common interest. 'We will communicate our final position once those consultations have been concluded,' said Modukanene.
Daily Maverick
10 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Inside the political turmoil: What Whitfield's dismissal reveals about ANC dynamics
President Cyril Ramaphosa's public statement that he fired DA Deputy Department of Trade Industry and Competition minister Andrew Whitfield because he had travelled outside the country still leaves many questions unanswereed. The apparent mystery around this decision is what gives it so much power. And the DA is now in a difficult position where it cannot accept this, but cannot easily withdraw from the coalition either. There are many reasons why Whitfield's sacking is so politically potent. Among the most important is that Ramaphosa's explanation, that he 'was removed as a deputy minister because he undertook an international visit without the permission of the president' does not make sense. For a start, that trip was several months ago. What happened between then and now that took the president so long to act? If it is such a clear sacking offense, then why not act immediately? And if there was some reason for a delay, what was it about yesterday's specific date that then allowed him to act? The president says in his statement that: 'It is not common practice for the President of the Republic of South Africa to provide reasons either for the appointment or the dismissal of Members of the Executive.' Legally, there is no obligation for a president to give reasons for hirings and firings. But that does not make it democratic. Or morally correct. Or even politically wise. The president is not a god, or an absolute ruler or a king. He is accountable to the people. For him to follow the precedents of previous presidents who have also not given reasons, particularly Jacob Zuma and Thabo Mbeki, may not be wise. Both were recalled by the ANC. And while their stories are very different, both had fired someone under strange circumstances that they refused to explain, until the real reasons became obvious later. It is true, as Ramaphosa points to, that Mbeki fired Nozizwe Madlala-Routledge as deputy health minister in 2007, ostensibly because she travelled without permission. It is also true that it followed her being in a dispute with the health minister at the time, Manto Tshabalala-Msimang, about the causes of HIV/Aids. 'I'll fix you' Tshabalala-Msimang's comment to Madlala-Routledge, that 'I'll fix you' was surely a bigger factor than her recent travel. In the case of Zuma, he fired Nhlanhla Nene as finance minister one night in 2015, and refused to explain why. You may well remember how that ended. The other, fairly obvious point, is that nothing stopped the Presidency from announcing the reason for Whitfield's sacking yesterday. What changed between the public statement confirming he had been removed and Friday? Why could he make public the reason on Friday, but not on Thursday? Then of course there is Whitfield's public claim that he did ask the Presidency for permission to go on this trip, and was ignored. While that may be through a simple mistake, Whitfield says he followed up every day for nine days. While Ramaphosa may feel he does not have to respond to every request from a deputy minister, it certainly gives the appearance of being incredibly rude to not reply. It may well be politically unwise for the president to stick to this claim, when it appears irrational. It gives the appearance that there is another uncomfortable political fact that he is trying to hide. It must surely be that Ramaphosa fired Whitfield for some reason of which he is ashamed. Or something he'd prefer to keep hidden. This is why this issue is unlikely to disappear quickly. For the moment, the most likely real reason is that there is a faction in the ANC demanding Ramaphosa act against the DA. Or its members. But even that is problematic. Because the message that this may send to many voters is that Ramaphosa is prepared to act against a DA member for internal ANC reasons, but not against ANC ministers who have done much worse things than Whitfield. It does not appear to make sense to act against Whitfield while allowing Nobuhle Nkabinde to remain as higher education minister when it is clear she lied about her 'independent panel' to advise her appointing chairpersons to the Sector Education and Training Authorities. And, as DA leader John Steenhuisen was quick to point out, why fire Whitfield when Ramaphosa has kept David Mahlobo as deputy minister at Water Affairs when there is clear evidence he walked out of the State Security Agency with huge amounts of cash during the State Capture era? Internal ANC politics If this is about internal ANC politics it may also be another demonstration that ANC leaders are more focused on internal factions than on winning votes. This must be one of the big lessons from this. That the ANC is still not focused on winning back the support it has lost. This may well be because many of its decision-makers are much more comfortable dealing with internal dynamics. They are doing what they know, what they have always done — rather than focusing on the hard work of actually governing well enough to win votes. Meanwhile, the DA's leadership has some difficult decisions to make. Steenhuisen's threat that Ramaphosa has '48 hours' to act against ANC ministers may well demonstrate the difficulty of his position. As former strategist Ryan Coetzee and others have pointed out, the DA simply cannot accept having its members fired without any consultation. Even though the president has confirmed the DA will get to replace Whitfield with another of its members, this effectively gives the ANC a vet on DA appointments. This they surely cannot accept. The Freedom Front Plus or the Patriotic Alliance would not accept it either. The problem for Steenhuisen, of course, is what to do now. To leave the coalition is fraught with danger. That said, his constituency might well reward him for it. Some in the ANC might celebrate the DA's departure at first, but might then find that governance becomes virtually impossible. But any decisions made by the ANC or the DA might well be based on longer-term calculations, about whether voters will punish or reward them for pulling out of the coalition. And thus this may not be the last strange and deliberately unexplained event. DM
IOL News
11 hours ago
- IOL News
Former MK, EFF members to be part of Floyd Shivambu's Mayibuye consultation process
Former MK Party secretary general Fooyd Shivambu, has unveilled members of the national consultation that may lead to a new political party. Image: Floyd Shivambu/X Former members of the MK Party, including Patrick Sindane, Luther Lebelo, and Menzi Magubane, alongside former EFF members Vusi Khoza and Fana Mokoena, have been appointed as leaders of the Mayibuye Consultation Process. This announcement was made by Floyd Shivambu, the former secretary-general of the MK Party, during a press briefing held on Friday in Midrand, Johannesburg. Shivambu also announced that former ANC member Lazola Ndamase and the controversial Bishop Stephen Zondo, leader of the Rivers of Living Waters Ministries, are part of the leadership team. Zondo has faced serious allegations of sexual assault, with many of the accusers being members of his church. Additionally, veteran radio broadcaster Sydney Baloyi has joined the group. Shivambu announced that he will be the national convener of both the Mayibuye National Consultation Team and the Mayibuye Consultation Process. He said the group will engage in public consultations, after which a national convention will be held to decide the next steps. 'Then we will prepare - if the mandate is that we must contest the 2026 local government elections and the 2029 general elections, we're going to do so and win those elections decisively,' he said. Shivambu was recently removed from his position as deputy secretary-general of the MK Party and excluded from the list of new MPs sworn into Parliament. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Last week, he announced plans to launch a consultation committee to determine whether there is a need for a new political party. 'But all of that is dependent on the work we are going to do in different communities,' Shivambu said. 'The people of South Africa, you are all called upon with humility from us to be tolerant with the process we're engaged in and to make meaningful contributions - shape a movement, if it is a movement that we are going to pursue.' Shivambu added, 'Let us move away from organisations that are nothing but family projects. Let us constitute national movements that are representative of all our people, that are honest, that are transparent, and that will inspire hope.' He added that several political parties have expressed interest in the Mayibuye Consultation Process. 'More than 10 political parties, represented in various municipal councils, have approached us saying they would like to be part of the consultation process,' he said. 'These parties come from all corners of South Africa.'
