Clarksville City Council to hear a resolution to eliminate DEI from city government
On Thursday, the council will hear the resolution proposed by Travis Holleman, Ward 7.
In the resolution, Holleman says that "the Clarksville City Council wants the city of Clarksville workforce to serve the community to the best of their ability based on merit, and the people of Clarksville deserve a competent workforce to serve them ... regardless of race or sexual orientation.."
The resolution continues to say that the city "spends $120,000 of the taxpayers money annually on a DEI Communist Propaganda officer's salary." And based on election results, "there is overwhelming evidence that the people of Clarksville are tired of the DEI Communist push, as it contributes to the destruction and mismanagement of our society."
The resolution also cites other extra expenses that have arisen such as deploying firefighters to help with wildfires in Los Angeles, calculated into the fire department's budget.
DEI in the City of Clarksville
The City of Clarksville does have a Diversity, Equity and Inclusion officer.
According to the city, this is a stand-alone position in the Human Resources department focused on coordinating various human resources programs. Responsibilities include the development and implementation of citywide diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives, which encompass onboarding, employee retention, performance management, training and cultural change initiatives.
The officer monitors compliance with equal opportunity laws to ensure fair employment practices, regardless of race, religion, color, national origin, sex, age, disability or other protected statuses. Duties also involve data collection and analysis, making recommendations, providing guidance on employee relations, investigating EEO complaints, conducting training and preparing reports.
The officer also acts as the City's official EEO Officer and Title VI Coordinator.
In 2023, Michelle Lowe was appointed as the officer, but Leah Frazier currently holds that position.
Previous comments made by Holleman
This is not the first time Holleman has been vocal about DEI.
At the June 27 meeting, Holleman gave a presentation regarding "public policies and employee policies," where he criticized DEI training and programs implemented by many major corporations.
He called DEI efforts "training programs to help employees brainwash and indoctrinate," pushing "woke agendas," comparing DEI officers to communist officers before he continued to criticize actions of the LGBTQ community, drag shows and transgender issues, saying "Prince of Pride is Satan," and calling the city to "wake up and repent."
At the July meeting, Democratic and LGBTQIA+ leaders spoke during public comments to protest the comments made by Holleman.
"DEI isn't just about LGBT folks. It's about Juneteenth. It's about Emancipation Day. It's about the AAPI Festival. It's about Latino heritage," said Montgomery County Democratic Party Chair Charles Uffelman. "Clarksville is a beautiful city because it's diverse, not despite its diversity, and that's an American concept. Has nothing to do with Russia has nothing to do with communism."
"On my previous comments about DEI didn't exist, that homosexuals wouldn't exist, disabled people wouldn't exist. I mean, they existed before diversity equity inclusion, like diversity equity inclusion, is a new thing.
"Talking about my presentation, I mean, I never really cared until the LGBT (community) started targeting children," Holleman said, citing a law passed by California Gov. Gavin Newsom recently signed that prevents schools from revealing a student's sexual orientation or gender identity to any person without the student's consent.
"My whole objective is to protect children," Holleman said. "And so I'm sorry y'all feel attacked, but protecting children is more important. That's all I've got."
Holleman did not respond to The Leaf-Chronicle's request for comment.
Kenya Anderson is a reporter for The Leaf-Chronicle. She can be contacted at kanderson@gannett.com or on X at kenyaanderson32. Sign up for the Leaf-Chronicle to support local journalism at www.theleafchronicle.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Special Report-China's growing nuclear arsenal
By David Lague HONG KONG (Reuters) -Alongside a massive build-up in conventional military firepower, China has embarked on a rapid and sustained increase in the size and capability of its nuclear forces, according to the U.S. military and arms control experts. The commander of the U.S. Strategic Command, General Anthony Cotton, told Congress in March that the directive from Chinese leader Xi Jinping that China's military be ready to seize Taiwan by 2027 was driving a build-up of nuclear weapons that could be launched from land, air and sea. In its 2023 national defense policy, China renewed its longstanding pledge that it would not be the first to use nuclear weapons under any circumstances. The so-called 'no first use' policy also includes a promise that China will not use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against a non-nuclear armed state. In response to questions, the defense ministry in Beijing said 'a nuclear war cannot be won and must not be waged.' China, it said, adhered to a 'nuclear strategy of self-defense and pursues a no-first-use policy.' [Read the special report on Japan and South Korea's shifting nuclear policies.] In its annual report on Chinese military power, the Pentagon said despite China's public stance, its strategy probably includes a possible first use in response to conventional attacks that threaten the viability of its nuclear forces, command and control or that approximates the effect of a nuclear strike. Beijing would also probably consider nuclear first use if a conventional military defeat in Taiwan 'gravely threatened' the Communist regime's survival, the Pentagon said in the report published late last year. China's defense ministry said it opposed 'any attempt to hype up the so-called 'Chinese nuclear threat' in an effort to smear and defame China and deliberately mislead the international community.' China is expanding and modernizing its weapons stockpile faster than any other nuclear-armed power and has accumulated about 600 warheads, according to the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, a Chicago-based non-profit. It said China is building about 350 new missile silos and several new bases for road mobile launchers. It estimated that China's military, the People's Liberation Army, had about 712 launchers for land-based missiles but not all were assigned for nuclear weapons. Of those launchers, 462 can be loaded with missiles 'that can reach the continental United States,' it said. Many of the PLA's launchers are for shorter range missiles intended to attack regional targets but most of those were not assigned for a nuclear strike, the Bulletin's assessment said. In its report, the Pentagon estimated that the PLA would have more than 1,000 operational nuclear warheads by 2030, as it seeks to build a bigger force ranging from low-yield precision strike missiles to intercontinental ballistic missiles with multi-megaton explosive impact. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi DEI ban blocked by federal judge. Will IHL walk back its new campus policies?
U.S. District Court Judge Henry Wingate on Monday, Aug. 18, indefinitely blocked Mississippi's new law banning diversity, equity and inclusion, also known as DEI initiatives, in public education, calling the measure likely unconstitutional and overly vague. The ruling, issued Monday, stops the state from enforcing House Bill 1193 while the case plays out in court — raising questions about whether Mississippi's public universities will move forward with new policies meant to comply with the now-paused law. Wingate initially issued a temporary restraining order for the new law in July, and after an August hearing, he upgraded that to a preliminary injunction — blocking enforcement of key parts of the law while the lawsuit plays out. HB 1193 bans public schools from running DEI offices, requiring DEI training, or asking for 'diversity statements' in hiring. It also outlaws programs deemed 'divisive concepts,' allows formal complaints and lets the state cut funding for repeat violations. The bill passed the Mississippi Legislature this past session and was signed into law by Republican Gov. Tate Reeves in April. What IHL did in response to the law In July, Mississippi's Institutions of Higher Learning adopted one policy and introduced another in a closed, behind-doors session, both aimed at complying with House Bill 1193. Those two policies are: The 'Academic Responsibility' policy, which is currently in effect, prohibits public universities from requiring ideological or political statements in hiring, promotion or admissions processes. It affirms academic freedom while emphasizing that universities must remain ideologically neutral in their official operations. According to the policy, faculty and students are free to explore ideas, but instructors 'should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matters or divisive concepts which have no relation to their subject.' The policy also states that IHL institutions must provide learning environments free from requirements to conform to specific political or ideological beliefs — including those related to DEI. Universities are expected to maintain rigorous and relevant curricula, while faculty are encouraged to clarify when they speak as individuals, not as representatives of their institution. The 'Non-Discrimination' policy, still in draft form, goes further. It would bar universities from operating DEI offices, requiring DEI training or asking job applicants to submit diversity statements. It also prohibits giving preferential treatment in hiring or contracting based on race, sex or national origin, and protects individuals who disagree with DEI-related initiatives from being penalized. The policy remains under review and must complete the Administrative Procedures Act process before it can be finalized. How IHL is responding to the court's ruling In a statement Wednesday, IHL spokesperson John Sewell clarified the status of the two policies. 'The non-discrimination policy considered by the IHL Board of Trustees on July 18 remains in draft form and has not received final consideration by the Board,' Sewell said. 'The academic responsibility policy is in effect and provides guidance to universities in a way that does not conflict with the federal court's preliminary injunction.' Sewell also confirmed that Wingate's ruling does not jeopardize any other policies the board may be planning to implement in response to HB 1193. Why Wingate blocked HB 1193 In his 22-page ruling, Wingate said HB 1193 is likely unconstitutional, noting that it imposes vague and viewpoint-specific restrictions that could discourage free speech on college campuses. Wingate also criticized the statute for being poorly defined and prone to selective enforcement. "It (HB 1193) is unconstitutionally vague, fails to treat speech in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and carries with it serious risks of terrible consequences with respect to the chilling of expression and academic freedom," Wingate wrote. Who sued over the DEI law? The plaintiffs in the case are a coalition of civil rights groups and educators. That includes the Mississippi Center for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi and Legal Defense Fund attorneys, among others. They filed the lawsuit on behalf of several professors and students at public universities in Mississippi, arguing that House Bill 1193 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by restricting academic freedom and free speech. In a press release Tuesday, the groups applauded Wingate's ruling, calling it a win for public education: "We are please that this law is preliminarily enjoined," said Joshua Tom, legal director at the ACLU of Mississippi. "The State's attempt to impose its preferred views — and ban opposing views — on Mississippi's public education system is not only bad policy, it's illegal, as the Court has preliminarily found today.' Additionally, Rob McDuff, attorney and director of the Mississippi Center for Justice George Riley Impact Litigation Campaign, said Wingate's ruling offers a reprieve for Mississippi's teachers and students, who were left wondering how to keep teaching subjects like history and biology without running afoul of the law 'Thankfully, this puts to rest for now the concerns springing up among administrators, teachers, and students around the state, wondering how they could suddenly stop teaching and learning about issues that have long been essential to a complete education in courses like history, biology, literature, and many others,' McDuff said. Contact Charlie Drape at cdrape@ This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Mississippi's anti-DEI law blocked. What IHL plans to do next Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge blocks parts of Mississippi ban on DEI in public schools
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A federal judge has blocked portions of Mississippi's ban on diversity, equity and inclusion practices in public schools from being enforced while a lawsuit against it is underway. The provisions blocked by U.S. District Judge Henry Wingate on Monday seek to prohibit public schools from discussing a list of 'divisive concepts' related to race, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation and national origin. They would also prevent public schools from maintaining programs, courses or offices that promote DEI or endorse 'divisive concepts,' and ban diversity training requirements. The preliminary injunction does not block other portions of the law, including those that prevent schools from giving preferential treatment based on race, sex, color or national origin and that penalize students or staff for their refusal to embrace DEI concepts. The law, which took effect in April, aims to prevent public schools from 'engaging in discriminatory practices' by banning DEI offices, trainings and programs. Any school in violation of the act could lose state funding. A group of teachers, parents and students is suing the state, arguing that the law violates their First and Fourteenth Amendment rights. Wingate wrote in his ruling that he finds the law to be at odds with the First Amendment and the public interest of the state. 'It is unconstitutionally vague, fails to treat speech in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and carries with it serious risks of terrible consequences with respect to the chilling of expression and academic freedom,' he wrote. Wingate also granted the plaintiff's request to add class action claims to the lawsuit, meaning the injunction will apply to teachers, professors and students across the state. The plaintiff's lawyers sought the addition after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in June limited the ability of federal judges to grant sweeping injunctions. Jarvis Dortch, the executive director of the ACLU of Mississippi, which is helping litigate the case, said he was thankful for Wingate's stance. 'The Court sees the law for what it plainly is — an attempt to stop the proper exchange of ideas within the classroom," Dortch said in a statement. Wingate's ruling follows a temporary restraining order he granted to the plaintiffs in July. At an Aug. 5 hearing, lawyers representing the plaintiffs argued the law is too confusing, leaving parents, teachers and students wondering what they can and cannot say and whether they could face consequences as a result of their speech. Cliff Johnson, a professor at the University of Mississippi Law School and Mississippi director of the MacArthur Justice Center, testified that he and his students often discuss what could be considered 'divisive topics.' Johnson said he did not believe the law would allow him to teach about the First, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments; the court case that paved the way for the internment of Japanese citizens during WWII; portions of the Civil Rights Act; or the murders of Emmett Till and the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. 'I think I'm in a very difficult position. I can teach my class as usual and run the serious risk of being disciplined, or I could abandon something that's very important to me,' Johnson testified. 'I feel a bit paralyzed.' The Mississippi Attorney General's Office argued that public employees do not have First Amendment rights. 'They are speaking for the government and the government has every right to tell them what they need to say on its behalf,' said Lisa Reppeto, an attorney at the state attorney general's office. She added that the First Amendment does not give students the right to dictate what their school does or does not say. Reppeto also said the consequences of the law are aimed at the schools — not students or teachers — and that the plaintiffs' 'argument is not consistent with what is in the statute.' Solve the daily Crossword
