University staff ballot on strike action over job cuts
Workers at the University of the West of Scotland (UWS) are taking part in a ballot for industrial action after university senior management refused to rule out compulsory redundancies.
Members of the University and College Union (UCU) at UWS are being asked if they are prepared to take part in strike action and action short of strike.
Action short of strike could include working to contract and not covering for any absent colleagues. The ballot will run until 14 August.
The ballot follows the announcement in January this year of cuts by the university's senior management of £16.9 million.
Since then, £8 million has already been cut with the loss of over 112 staff positions.
Despite those staff having already left and savings already having been made, senior managers are pressing ahead with plans to cut another 75 jobs and are refusing unions' demands to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies.
'The principal and senior managers need to change course' - Jo Grady (Image: NQ) The union said that cuts at this scale and the loss of so many jobs in such a short space of time will be devastating both to the remaining staff and to the students at the university.
As well as the impact on staff being put out of work at a time when jobs are being lost across the higher education sector, the cuts will result in higher workload on the already hard-pressed staff who remain.
UCU UWS branch president, Jamie Hopkin , said: 'Management at UWS are pressing on with detrimental plans to make staff redundant that will do nothing other than diminish the university's standing, and harm the students that study here.
'Staff do not want to go on strike, but what is being proposed will damage UWS's crucial missions of teaching, research and widening access to higher education. I can see even in my own work that those staff that remain will be under increasing pressure with unmanageable workloads and will have less time to offer students in need of support with their studies.
'Members at UWS are genuinely angry at the actions of senior managers. Members need to return their ballots and force the principal to think again and to rule out the use of compulsory redundancies.'
READ MORE:
Staff to be balloted on strike action as university announces 75 job cuts
Edinburgh University staff to strike today as 1800 job losses threatened
'Eye-watering' university principal salaries may be distracting from bigger problems
UCU general secretary, Jo Grady, said: 'UWS is genuinely important to communities across the West of Scotland.
"Cutting staff on this scale doesn't sit with the university's responsibility and commitment to local communities in Paisley, Ayrshire, Lanarkshire and the South of Scotland.
"The principal and senior managers need to change course or else they face the prospects of industrial action and strikes.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Boston University Cuts 120 Staff After Trump Funding Squeeze
Boston University is eliminating staff and reducing spending as the school grapples with the Trump administration 's push to reshape higher education and a pullback in research funding. BU will cut 120 positions and another 120 vacancies as part of a broader effort to curb its budget by 5% for fiscal 2026, President Melissa Gilliam and other administrators wrote in a message to faculty and employees on Monday. The job cuts and spending reduction are necessary to respond to 'a national renegotiation of how the country's higher education model will be funded,' Gilliam wrote in the message.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Wealth tax may not be fully formed proposal - but could be put in the mix
I want to take you into the daily Downing Street briefing for political journalists to try and explain the likelihood of the government introducing a wealth tax. Referred to as 'lobby', the sessions are the main chance for reporters to grill the prime minister's official spokesperson about the big political issues of the day. Now, occasionally the spokesperson comes to these sessions with a clear and obvious update that will 'create news'. Most of the time though, we're left trying to read between the lines of what's being said, searching for hints or steers that could indicate whether Number 10 is trying to shut a story down or let it run. This isn't always straightforward, as was proven in this briefing. Politics latest: Take this first answer from the PM's spokesperson when asked if backed a wealth tax. "Those with the broadest shoulders carry the greatest burden and the choices we've made reflect that… our progressive tax system means the top 1% of taxpayers contribute nearly a third of income tax with revenue from wealth and asset taxes… going towards funding tens of billions of pounds for public services." Now, one way of interpreting that is Downing Street saying they're already hitting the wealthiest so there's no need to whack them with more taxes. But then again, he could also be saying that raising money from the super-rich is a preferred policy of this government and as such may happen again. So which is it? Well, we asked that, and this is the answer we got. "The has said that we are not going to be bringing in a wealth tax". Pointing to a previous on the record statement is a classic lobby method of shutting a story down without commenting on it directly. So a clear answer? Well in this instance, the spokesperson still seemed somewhat reluctant to throw his full weight behind this previous comment from Rachel Reeves. It all meant the few dozen journalists left the briefing room perplexed at where Downing Street stood on the policy with the only solid outcome being the fact that the government had certainly not ruled anything out. Read more:Government declines to rule out wealth tax For what it's worth, my read on the situation - based on other conversations and the many lobby briefings I've sat in over the years - is that the wealth tax idea hasn't (at this time) reached the point of becoming a formal proposal but may yet be put in the mix. The reason it's being talked about now is because the former Labour leader Neil Kinnock suggested on Sky News' that cabinet ministers may be sympathetic to it. Lord Kinnock, who was leader from 1983 to 1992, said that imposing a 2% tax on assets valued above £10m would bring in up to £11bn a year. Whether this party veteran is reflecting back chatter from within government or simply pitching fresh suggestions is unclear. But you can see how such a measure would slot into the existing crease hardening down the middle of the cabinet between those more inclined to tax and spend (Angela Rayner, Lisa Nandy, Ed Miliband) and others more concerned about making savings and investing (Rachel Reeves and Darren Jones). For now, three to four months from a budget that will need to raise a significant amount of money, we can probably think of this as something of a Schrodinger's tax - simultaneously on and off with its final state only revealed when the chancellor opens her red box come the autumn.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Media faces existential threat from ‘thieving' AI, ministers warned
Artificial intelligence poses an 'existential threat' to the free press by stealing content and so putting at risk quality news and thousands of reporter jobs, the Government has been warned at Westminster. Urgent reform was demanded in Parliament, as ministers were also tackled over Whitehall striking an agreement with a Canadian tech giant that faces legal action by media firms over accusations of large-scale copyright infringement. The call for swift action follows a bitter stand-off in the House of Lords over attempts to prevent the creative industries, including news outlets, being ripped off by machine-learning developers. The controversy centred on fears of AI companies using copyrighted work without permission, with the Government accused of 'supporting thieves'. Responding to a question on the issue in the upper chamber, media minister Baroness Twycross said: 'Trustworthy journalism plays a vital role in our democracy. 'Rapid recent developments in generative AI pose both significant risks and opportunities for news media. 'We are engaging with press stakeholders on this.' She added: 'The Government will support our news media to capitalise on the huge potential benefits of the technology while mitigating its risk.' But deputy chairman of the Telegraph Group, and Conservative peer, Lord Black of Brentwood said: 'AI poses an existential threat to independent media because of the way it scrapes their high quality content without either attribution or payment to those who create it, which is an act of theft, directly threatening the provision of quality news and the jobs of thousands of reporters. 'Is the minister aware that research by market leader, Cloudflare, shows that, for example, for every 73,000 pages of content scraped by Anthropic's AI crawlers from news providers, there's just one single referral back to publishers' websites? 'Does she realise that without this vital traffic, publishers can't sell advertising or subscriptions, and their businesses become unsustainable? 'The free press can't wait years for copyright reform… we were promised immediate action on this issue when the Data Act went through. When will we get some of it?' Responding, Lady Twycross said: 'We want to get this right and for AI to work for everyone. 'All of our work is around protecting rights that already exist for creatives and press and ensuring AI creates new revenue streams for them. 'We are carefully reviewing all the responses to our consultation to ensure any proposals taken forward properly support both AI and creative sectors, including the media.' Filmmaker Baroness Kidron, who has been a leading critic of the Labour administration on the issue, said: 'During the passage of the Data (Use and Access) Bill, the Government asked repeatedly that Parliament trust that they had the interest of UK copyright holders front and centre. 'So can the minister explain why the UK Government has now signed a memorandum of understanding with Canadian AI firm Cohere, when Cohere is facing legal action from 13 news media copyright holders, including The Guardian, Forbes and The Atlantic? 'Does she not agree with me that the Government might better earn Parliament's trust if, instead of rewarding AI companies which infringe copyright with opportunities, that it limited those opportunities and indeed future Government contracts to companies that lawfully license inputs?' Lady Twycross said: 'As I said, we do want to and need to make sure we get this right for everyone. I'm happy to have a conversation with her about the issue she raises.'
