
UK to build up to 12 new attack submarines and invest £15bn in warheads
Significant investment in the UK nuclear warhead programme this parliament and maintaining the existing stockpile are among the 62 recommendations that the Government is expected to accept in full.
But questions were also raised about its commitment to defence spending after the Defence Secretary could not confirm the Treasury had guaranteed funding to bring it up to 3% of GDP by 2034.
Building the new submarines, which is part of the Aukus partnership with the US and Australia, will support 30,000 highly skilled jobs into the 2030s as well as 30,000 apprenticeships and 14,000 graduate roles across the next 10 years, the Ministry of Defence said.
Defence Secretary John Healey said: 'Our outstanding submariners patrol 24/7 to keep us and our allies safe, but we know that threats are increasing and we must act decisively to face down Russian aggression.
'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores, we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering on our Plan for Change with 30,000 highly skilled jobs across the country.'
The £15 billion investment into the warhead programme will back the Government's commitments to maintain the continuous-at-sea nuclear deterrent, build a new fleet of Dreadnought submarines and deliver all future upgrades.
From the late 2030s, the fleet of up to 12 SSN-Aukus conventionally armed, nuclear-powered submarines will replace seven astute class attack submarines the UK is due to start operating.
In response to the strategic defence review, the Government will also commit to:
– Getting the armed forces to a stage where it would be ready to fight a war
– Boosting weapons and equipment stockpiles and making sure there is capacity to scale up production if needed in a crisis or war
– Buying up to 7,000 UK-built long-range weapons in a move due to support 800 defence jobs
– Setting up a new cyber command and investing £1 billion in digital capabilities
– More than £1.5 billion of additional funding to repair and renew armed forces housing.
Sir Keir Starmer will say: 'From the supply lines to the front lines, this Government is foursquare behind the men and women upholding our nation's freedom and security.
'National security is the foundation of my Plan for Change, and this plan will ensure Britain is secure at home and strong abroad, while delivering a defence dividend of well-paid jobs up and down the country.
'This strategic defence review will ensure the UK rises to the challenge and our armed forces have the equipment they need that keeps us safe at home while driving greater opportunity for our engineers, shipbuilders and technicians of the future.'
The Conservatives and Lib Dems questioned Labour's commitment to funding the promises it was making.
The Government has previously set out its 'ambition to reach 3% in the next parliament', after meeting its pledge to ratchet up defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by April 2027.
Mr Healey had said there was 'no doubt' the UK would reach 3% in an interview with The Times.
But on Sunday, he sidestepped questions about whether he had any guarantee from the Treasury to provide the funding when asked on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg programme.
He said he does not expect to increase the number of people in the armed forces until the next Parliament amid a recruitment and retention crisis.
Asked when the Army would reach the target of 73,000, Mr Healey said: 'We've narrowed the gap, but we've still got more people leaving than joining.
'The first job is to reverse that trend and then I want to see in the next parliament our ability to start to increase the number.'
Shadow defence secretary James Cartlidge said: 'All of Labour's Strategic Defence Review promises will be taken with a pinch of salt unless they can show there will actually be enough money to pay for them.
'Whereas, far from guaranteeing the funding, John Healey has been hung out to dry by Rachel Reeves.
'As recently as Thursday, Healey promised that defence spending would definitely hit 3%, but today he's completely backtracked.
'These submarines are not due to enter service till the late 2030s, so how can we have any confidence Labour will actually deliver them when they can't even sustain a policy on defence spending for more than 48 hours?'
Lib Dem defence spokesperson Helen Maguire said: 'This signals absolutely the right intent about the need to bolster the UK's defences in the face of Putin's imperialism and Trump's unreliability.
'But this must come with a concrete commitment and detail on full funding.
'Labour's mere 'ambition' rather than commitment to reach 3% of GDP on defence leaves serious questions about whether the money for these projects will actually be forthcoming.
'The 2034 timeline suggests a worrying lack of urgency from the Government.
'Unless Labour commits to holding cross-party talks on how to reach 3% much more rapidly than the mid-2030s, this announcement risks becoming a damp squib.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ministers told to crackdown on illegal number plates that are invisible to speed and ANPR cameras
Experts will today meet with minsters to tell them to get tough on illegal number plates sold online that allow speeding drivers and criminals to evade prosecution. The Government is being urged to clampdown on the rise in availability and use of so-called 'ghost number plates'. These plates have a reflective coating, which prevents them from being identified by by speed cameras and roadside ANPR (Automatic Number Plate Recognition) cameras that enforce low emission zones, bus lanes, car parks, traffic light infringements and other forms of traffic management. Unscrupulous businesses online are also flogging self-adhesive laminate covers that can be stuck to existing plates rendering them invisible to enforcement cameras. The British Number Plate Manufacturers Association, which represents companies producing the vast majority of plates in the UK, wants tougher regulation of the sector to crackdown on illegal suppliers. Its chairman warned the products are 'enabling serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected'. As well as selling ghost plates, online retailers are also brazenly offering transparent films and reflective sprays that obscure a plate's letter and number combination under infrared light. Sprays are advertised by sellers on well-known online retailers for around £4. Some are also selling plates with subtly altered characters to disrupts camera software's ability to recognise them accurately. As well as listing on popular retail sites, companies offering these products are incredibly easy to find online - a quick search for 'ghost number plates' on a major search engine returns three different companies selling them. While highly sophisticated and used to enforce speeding and various types of traffic management - including enforcing clean air zones including the London ULEZ and Birmingham CAZ - infrared cameras are not foolproof and susceptible to illegal plate modifications. Reflective coating bounces the infrared light back to the camera to make plates unreadable to the high-resolution imaging software. Altered fonts, misaligned characters and non-standard designs intentionally confuse a camera's optical character recognition (OCR) software. Poor lighting, heavy rain and dirt and mud can also limit ANPR detection. According to the RAC Foundation, approximately one in 12 number plates is either obscured or damaged. However, others have reported that around one in 15 could be deliberately modified or altered for evasion purposes. In a letter sent to the Government ahead of Tuesday's parliamentary roundtable event, the BNMA claimed sellers who are not registered with the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency and therefore not following its rules are bringing the plates to market unchallenged. It warned that this has led to a rise in use of ghost plates as well as 'cloning' - when criminals purchase duplicate registration plates to those of a vehicle of the same make and colour they have spotted on the road or while scouring used car adverts. BNMA chairman Michael Flanagan said: 'Far from being the tightly regulated industry it should be, number plates are increasingly being sold by unscrupulous below-the-radar suppliers using non-compliant, untraceable materials. 'They rarely ask for the documentation that the DVLA require. 'This is a criminal offence and enables serious criminals and terrorists to move around the roads undetected. 'Motorists deserve to know they are buying a legal, compliant number plate from a legitimate supplier. 'Now is the time for Government to tighten the regulations.' RAC head of policy Simon Williams, who will also attend the roundtable with MPs today, added: 'Given the proliferation of number plate recognition cameras used for various types of enforcement, it simply isn't right that criminals can get away with these offences by easily purchasing illegal ghost plates. 'Together with the modern motoring menace that is cloned number plates, where blameless drivers have to prove their innocence for motoring offences they didn't commit, it's apparent these are serious and growing problems that need solutions.' A photo promoting another spray sold on Ebay with apparent 'high-tech flashing shielding' urges motorists to 'end your traffic ticket troubles now' and 'avoid the risk of being caught speeding' Licence plate sprays that 'block infrared signals and visible flashes emitted by speed cameras' are also being sold on Amazon Ghost plates cost less than a third of a speeding fine Sarah Coombes, Labour MP for West Bromwich, has already backed the calls. In February, she introduced the issue under a Ten Minute Rule Bill, which allows backbench MPs to make their case for a new bill within the set timeframe. She called for increased punishment for those caught with a ghost plate or using sprays and films, saying it should be hiked from a £100 fine and no penalty points to an on-the-spot £1,000 ticket and six points on an offender's licence. Earlier this year, she appeared on Good Morning Britain to showcase just how effective the products are as she continued her campaign to tackle the problem. Sarah Coombes (pictured), Labour MP for West Bromwich, laid down a Ten Minute Rule Bill in February to increase penalties for being caught with a ghost number plate to a £1,000 fine and six points 'There are a select minority of people who think they are above the law and that by using a ghost plate they can get away with running red lights, drink-driving, speeding and much worse,' Coombes said earlier this year. 'It cannot be right that these drivers are not facing the consequences of their actions and are creating so much danger for everyone else.' During the reading, she said the plates are 'widely known' on social media and online, where they can be purchased for as little as £30, which is less than a third of the cost of a speeding fine. Ahead of today's meeting, which she will host with industry experts, the DVLA and police forces, Coombes said: 'Dodgy number plates are no longer a fringe issue. They're everywhere and they're undermining the rule of law on our roads. 'I know this Government is committed to making our roads safer for everyone. Tightening the law on number plates will be a huge step in the right direction.' A DVLA spokesman added: 'DVLA is committed to ensuring all number plates are displayed correctly and legally. We work with the police and Trading Standards to take action against suppliers who do not comply with the law. 'A legitimate supplier will always ask to see ID and entitlement documents before selling a number plate. Where this doesn't happen, members of the public can report this directly to their local Trading Standards.'

South Wales Argus
17 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Interim water review ‘not the finishing line' to fix failures, campaigners warn
The independent commission, headed by Sir Jon Cunliffe, said the water sector in England and Wales needs a 'fundamental reset' as it published a report on Tuesday. The panel of experts called for a rebalancing of Ofwat's regulatory role, urged the Government to provide clearer direction, proposed greater regional decision-making around local water systems and a greater focus on long-term responsible investment and ownership in the sector. Reacting to the report, Wildlife And Countryside Link (WCL), a coalition of 89 nature organisations, said ministers must start work now on vital reforms that will cut pollution, restore nature and reform water companies' governance. The groups said the Government must not only follow the advice of the report but go further, highlighting that the review stops short of final recommendations. Richard Benwell, WCL's chief executive, said: 'This interim report is a clear signpost, not a finishing line. 'The public are rightly angry about pollution and regulatory failure, and nature is in crisis. 'Politicians must stop equivocating and set clear strategic direction for environmental recovery. 'Where in the past polluters have got away with profiteering, public interest tests must be built into every layer of operations and governance with consequences for failure.' Mark Lloyd, chief executive of The Rivers Trust, said: 'Water is fundamental for nature's recovery, for the growth of the economy, for the health and security of communities and for life itself. 'We will press the commission over the next month to shoot for the stars rather than the moon in its final report. 'We will then expect to see the Government move swiftly and boldly to realise this high level of ambition.' Ali Morse, water policy manager at The Wildlife Trusts, said: 'The commission's interim report emerges at a time when environmental protections are under threat from proposed planning laws, and budgets for nature look set to be slashed. 'This doesn't look like the actions of a Government that is serious about restoring our chalk streams, or averting the extinction of water vole and Atlantic salmon. 'To convince us otherwise, we need to see Government responding with measures that ensure water companies prioritise the health of rivers and seas, that past harms are made good, that other sectors too play their role, and that environmental regulators are equipped and supported to do their jobs.' Two organisations, River Action and Surfers Against Sewage, went further to say the interim review stops well short of real reform and offers few concrete solutions. They argued that it does not match up with the Government's manifesto commitments and speaks more about attracting investors than cleaning up pollution and serving the public. James Wallace, chief executive of River Action, said: 'This interim report signals some progress on regulation, but it reads more like a sales pitch to international investors and overpaid CEOs than the urgent restructuring of corrupted water companies. 'We ask the commission to learn from other countries how to ensure water companies are owned, financed and operated for public benefit.' Giles Bristow, chief executive of Surfers Against Sewage, said: 'The criminal behaviour, chronic lack of investment and woeful mismanagement which has led to sewage-filled seas is a direct result of our profit-driven system. 'This interim report begins to recognise this, but as yet does not spell out the need to end pollution for profit. 'The commission's final recommendations must reshape the water industry to put public health and the environment first.'

South Wales Argus
19 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Water sector suffering from ‘deep-rooted' failures, review warns
The Independent Water Commission was tasked by the UK and Welsh governments to carry out the largest review of the sector since privatisation in the face of widespread public anger over pollution, bills and bosses' bonuses although ministers ruled out nationalising water companies. Its interim report has been published as Britain's biggest water company Thames Water is again facing the spectre of temporary nationalisation after private equity firm KKR pulled out of plans for a £3 billion bailout. Another of England's private water firms, South West Water, reported widening financial losses after an outbreak of a parasite in water supplies cost it millions. Water supplies are under pressure from the dry spring (Owen Humphreys/PA) And water supplies are under pressure after the driest spring in decades has left farmers struggling and millions of households facing the possibility of hosepipe bans, while ministers have warned climate change, a rising population and crumbling infrastructure is putting future supplies at risk. In the interim report published on Tuesday, the commission said multiple issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust in the ailing sector. It called for regulator Ofwat's role to be strengthened and for the watchdog to adopt a more 'supervisory' approach to oversight of water firms. Former Bank of England deputy governor Sir Jon Cunliffe, who led the review into the water sector in England and Wales, told the BBC that more effective regulation was a huge part of solving the problem, with a regulator that could step in early before things got worse. He said: 'Because when they get worse, as you can see, they are very difficult to sort out, and we need an environmental regulator with the capability to monitor and enforce.' He also said that having regulators with different remits and responsibilities for different parts of the process had made the water system 'expensive and incoherent'. The interim review urges the Government to provide clearer long-term direction on what is needed from the water system, and warns key elements of current legislation are 'badly in need of review and rationalisation'. It proposes greater regional decision-making around local water systems, and emphasises the need for a greater focus on long-term, responsible investment and ownership within the industry. It is also considering new standards for the water sector's crumbling infrastructure, warning there is insufficient understanding of the health of assets such as pipes and water treatment plants. Companies should plan for long-term resilience of 'critical assets', not simply fix things when they fail, it warned. Sir Jon said: 'There is no simple, single change, no matter how radical, that will deliver the fundamental reset that is needed for the water sector. 'We have heard of deep-rooted, systemic and interlocking failures over the years – failure in Government's strategy and planning for the future, failure in regulation to protect both the billpayer and the environment and failure by some water companies and their owners to act in the public, as well as their private, interest. 'My view is that all of these issues need to be tackled to rebuild public trust and make the system fit for the future. We anticipate that this will require new legislation.' Anger has been growing over the polluted state of rivers, lakes and coastal waters, leaks and sewage spills at the same time as significant shareholder payouts and bosses' bonuses, and bills which were hiked in April to pay for investment to fix creaking infrastructure. On Tuesday, Thames Water announced private equity giant KKR has pulled out of plans to invest in the company, in the latest blow to the struggling and heavily indebted utility. Thames Water – which supplies 16 million customers – had hoped KKR would invest more than £3 billion of new equity amid fears the supplier was running out of cash, and its withdrawal from the deal raises the spectre of a temporary government nationalisation once more. And South West Water's owner Pennon has reported widening losses after a parasite outbreak in Brixham, South Devon, cost it around £21 million. The outbreak put some people in hospital and left thousands of homes without safe drinking water – some for weeks.