
No respite for the politically driven
The evergreen Winston Peters keeps rolling on and on, and he tells political editor Mike Houlahan that he has no intention of quitting now.
Whatever you think of Winston Raymond Peters' politics, there is little denying he is the most remarkable politician in our House of Representatives.
At five weeks past his 80th birthday Mr Peters maintains a schedule which would daunt the young and healthy.
Just back from an overseas trip as minister of foreign affairs and due to head overseas again next week, Mr Peters on Monday last week plunged into a hectic week at Parliament before flying to Dunedin on Friday morning. After his interview with the Otago Daily Times he was to deliver keynote speeches to the Otago Regional Investment Summit and at the formal opening of KiwiRail's Hillside workshops — each packed full of his trademark pugnacity and humour — as well as attend a range of meetings.
The Hillside opening was a signal reminder of the central role played by a New Zealand First party which Mr Peters has always avowedly called centrist — even if at the time of writing it seems unlikely to work again with Labour.
Back in 2020, while in coalition with Labour, Mr Peters toured Hillside before telling its workforce the NZ First-created Provincial Growth Fund, and his party's belief in rail, had made possible a planned multimillion-dollar revitalisation of the workshop.
Five years later, this time as part of a coalition with National and Act New Zealand Mr Peters — once again the deputy prime minister — was back to officially open the new Hillside, and take his share of the credit.
"It's still the same party and it's all the same cause. New Zealand First was the driving generator here," Mr Peters said.
"I'll go there today, and there'll be a stack of other politicians there. The question is, 'what did you do about it?' Only one party said rebuild our workshops. We did. Only one party has put the level of money into KiwiRail as we did.
"I'm back a second time in charge of KiwiRail ... it's a nationwide, alternative, transport system. That is simply a no-brainer."
And, he was quick to remind people, that transport service includes the inter-island ferry ... another task the unflagging Mr Peters has taken on.
A quick run-down of the first 18 months of the coalition government suggests New Zealand First has already secured about 60%-70% of the commitments it secured as part of its agreements with its partner parties, albeit that some of them are "engagements", "investigations", "ensurings" or "progressings" which may, or may not, result in any tangible outcome.
Also, things such as reform of Pharmac, passing new resource management legislation and scrapping the Māori Health Authority were priorities shared by all three governing parties.
Nonetheless, NZ First had plenty of victories to claim, such as the Regional Infrastructure Fund, advancement of grocery sector reform and keeping the age of national superannuation at 65. Others, such as the pledged 500 extra frontline police in two years, are still promised but are taking longer than hoped to be achieved.
NZ First can also be more than satisfied that most public polls for the past 12 months have shown it well above the critical 5% MMP threshold, historically a level of support minor parties in coalition have found it difficult to achieve, let alone maintain.
"It [NZ First's achievements] would be higher than that, be much higher than that," Mr Peters said.
"I would put it at 75, 80%, and I'm glad you've raised it because we have had just recently in the last week reviewed all of our intentions to ensure that nothing falls by the wayside of this timetable.
"Some of our supporters want you to do it all in the first five minutes, but in the three years, we're going to do, to the max, what we promised to do, and to be able to demonstrate this, nobody keeps their promises as much as New Zealand First does."
One promise Mr Peters is adamant NZ First has kept is that the new Dunedin hospital will not be, to repeat his oft-used phrase, "nickel and dimed".
The ODT understands Mr Peters was an influential voice in the government's ultimate decision to go ahead with building on the former Cadbury's site, despite the cost blow-outs on the project, and he confirmed he had met a delegation from Otago and Southland to discuss the project.
"I did the best I could to make my party's representation on why this hospital [would go ahead], downsized in cost as it had to be, because I know what the costings look like," Mr Peters said.
"Dunedin is going to get a hospital. In time, it'll be a much better hospital too, because it's got room for improvement."
In some ways the hospital is a perfect illustration of what Mr Peters says is NZ First's role in government, of being both a handbrake and an accelerator.
The handbrake is reining in costs (which Mr Peters said had escalated "out of all proportion" to the rate of inflation) and the accelerator is getting the hospital built . . . just as Hillside was built.
Mr Peter is about to step aside as deputy prime minister, in keeping with the coalition agreement, but promises his party will be just as active after it shifts across the House to where Act New Zealand now sits,
"We will be making sure that our policy commitments are kept, doing our best to be a positive influence on the policies the government should be following and not experimenting on, and consolidating the lively support New Zealand First has got because of our focus on fundamental political principles," Mr Peters said.
"The common, ordinary, common-sense, plain-sense things is what distinguishes us from other parties. And that's what we're going to focus on, campaign real hard, starting real soon." Winston Peters, Foreign Minister On peace prospects in Ukraine
"People won't agree with me on this, but it largely depends upon what Donald Trump does.
It's in the fourth year of the war now; it was an absolutely illegal invasion.
They'll make a lot of excuses, Russia will, but they're all blandishments and propaganda ... [President Vladimir] Putin and others are caught by their duplicity of their actions." On the power of small states
"My message has always been that small states matter, that small states deserve the same respect as the big states.
It's the very foundation of our unity going forward.
Might is not right. The rules of war should apply. Democracy is important.
There are many things in which New Zealand has a tremendous record, and we should be proud of that and exhibit that, and seek to proselytise the advantage to other small countries of what we're doing." On Gaza
"It [Israeli aggression] is beyond the pale now, that here we've got the situations where the obstruction of aid is too apparent.
We've talked to the Palestinian Authority, we talked to the highest authorities in Egypt, in the Emirates, in Indonesia. We talked to a whole lot of countries, Turkey, which are largely or wholly Islamic, about this issue.
They understand New Zealand's position, but apparently back here, the New Zealand protesters do not." On surviving as foreign minister
"I have a seriously good, really focused diet. Then there are certain things that we do on the plane, drinking an extraordinary amount of apple juice — it's one of the best liquids to have — and I have a herbal sleeping tablet that's safe.
I try and stick to my domestic timetable back home, no matter what, because when you get back home, you'll be back on sync, but much faster.
It is an arduous, difficult job, but you don't realise how great it is to get 11 hours of peace with no phone going."
mike.houlahan@odt.co.nz
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Legislation Introduced To Restrict Farm-To-Forest Conversions
Press Release – New Zealand Government The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme – Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill will restrict wholesale conversions of farmland to exotic forestry by stopping LUC 1-5 land from entering the ETS and capping new ETS registrations on LUC 6 land. Minister of Agriculture Today Agriculture and Forestry Minister Todd McClay introduced long awaited legislation that will put a stop to large-scale farm-to-forestry conversions – delivering on a key election promise to protect the future of New Zealand food production. 'For too long, productive sheep and beef farms have been replaced by pine trees in the race for carbon credits. That ends under this Government,' Mr McClay says. 'The Climate Change Response (Emissions Trading Scheme – Forestry Conversions) Amendment Bill will restrict wholesale conversions of farmland to exotic forestry by stopping LUC 1-5 land from entering the ETS and capping new ETS registrations on LUC 6 land. 'It will also protect farmers' ability to diversify – allowing up to 25 per cent of a farm to go into trees, while stopping the kind of blanket ETS planting that's been gutting rural communities in places like the East Coast, Wairarapa, the King Country, and Southland.' As previously announced the new restrictions will take effect from 4 December 2024. The law will: Restrict farm conversions to exotic ETS forests on high-to-medium versatility farmland (LUC classes 1-6) A limit of 15,000 hectares per year for exotic conversions on medium versality farmland (LUC class 6) The annual limit of 15,000 hectares for LUC 6 farmland will be allocated by a ballot process, including a reserved quota for small block holders, with the first ballot proposed to be held in mid-2026. Allow for up to 25 per cent of a farm's LUC 1-6 land to still be planted in exotic forestry for the ETS, ensuring farmers retain flexibility and choice. Protect specific categories of Māori-owned land, in line with Treaty obligations The Bill proposes time-limited transitional exemptions in rare cases for people who were in the process of afforestation prior to these changes originally being announced on 4 December 2024. To be eligible for a transitional exemption, applicants need to show sufficient evidence that they made a qualifying forestry investment between 1 January 2021 and 4 December 2024. Transactions that commenced after this date will not be eligible to register in the ETS. The applicant will need to demonstrate that the investment relates to the specific Land Use Capability (LUC) class 1–6 land they are applying to register in the ETS. Registry of 25 per cent of LUC 1-6 land will be registered against the properties title to restrict further planting as a result of subdivision. 'Labour's careless ETS settings turbocharged the sell-off of our farming base. They let speculators put short-term profits ahead of long-term food production. That was careless – and it ends now,' Mr McClay says. 'This Government is backing farmers, restoring balance, and making sure the ETS doesn't come at the cost of New Zealand's rural economy. 'This policy is pro-farming, pro-food production, pro-commercial forestry and pro-rural New Zealand.' The legislation is now before Parliament and is to come into force October 2025.

NZ Herald
3 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Labour leader Chris Hipkins says farming emissions policy ‘under review'
'We are looking at the science as well, we're not just talking to farmers we are talking to the researchers who are doing the work in this area too,' he said. Hipkins made the remarks ahead of the agriculture trade show, Fieldays, which is this week. Hipkins said he remained committed to the overall goal of reducing emissions but Labour was 'not committed to a particular way of doing that at this point'. He said there were 'technological solutions as well' to fixing the agricultural emissions problem. 'There is fantastic science happening in New Zealand funded by the last Labour Government about how we can... reduce methane emissions through more sustainable farming practice,' he said. Labour has supported agriculture going into the ETS, or some form of agriculture being in the ETS, since it created the scheme in 2008. What is currently unclear is the extent to which the policy is under review. Labour, since being turfed out of government, has put its entire policy platform under review. Some policies may re-emerge from the review in a similar form to the 2023 manifesto, while others may be very different. The only guide is the party's policy platform, which acts as a constraint on what the party's candidates can campaign on. The Fifth Labour Government created the ETS in 2008. The responsible Minister David Parker, who retired from politics this year, structured the scheme so sectors of the economy entered it gradually. Agriculture was set to enter the scheme in 2013, but the Fifth National Government amended the legislation, keeping agriculture out. At the time, Prime Minister John Key cited concerns New Zealand's trading partners were not taking climate change seriously and putting agriculture in the ETS would make New Zealand farmers less competitive. Labour consistently tried to bring agriculture into the scheme, forcing the sector to pay a price for its emissions, although Labour only ever proposed a heavily discounted price. In 2017, Labour campaigned on slowly bringing the sector into the ETS, at a discounted rate of 90%, meaning farmers would only pay 10% of the prevailing emissions price. Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern with, from left, ministers James Shaw, Damien O'Connor and Kieran McAnulty, announcing the new farm emissions plan. Photo / Mark Mitchell In coalition negotiations with NZ First this discount was lifted to 95% along with other caveats. Later, the He Waka Eke Noa process was launched to work out a separate emissions pricing solution for agriculture to begin in 2025. If that work fell apart, agriculture would have entered the ETS as a backstop. The proposal the government decided on, accepted most of He Waka Eke Noa, but rejected some significant ideas, like giving the sector a large say in its own emissions price. National initially backed He Waka Eke Noa, but later pulled away. In 2023 National promised not to put agriculture in the ETS and no emissions price until 2030. The current coalition government ended He Waka Eke Noa and removed the backstop. The latest Greenhouse Gas Inventory, published by the Ministry for the Environment using StatsNZ figures showed agriculture was responsible for 53% of New Zealand's gross greenhouse gas emissions. The bulk of these are from methane, which is a short-lived gas. The fact it is short-lived has seen an argument mounted by the Government that it should be treated differently to long-lived gasses. The challenge for policymakers is that lifting the burden for emissions reduction from agriculture generally means pushing down more heavily on other sectors.


Otago Daily Times
9 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Distant noises of other voices
As Prime Minister, Christopher Luxon receives no shortage of advice. Quite apart from his Cabinet and caucus colleagues and coalition partners — let alone suggestions from the ever-helpful Opposition or media — he has several staff members whose entire role is to advise him on the issues of the day. Then there are the lobbyists, business leaders, interest groups, local government leaders and other influential people who are fortunate enough to capture the PM's attention and offer their two cents' worth. Even the general public can advise the prime minister — ultimately at the ballot box, but also through correspondence or even in person should they be lucky enough to be in the vicinity when Mr Luxon embarks on one of his weekly visits out to the regions. Not all advice is welcome, of course, and Mr Luxon may well have wished not to hear from former Labour prime minister Helen Clark and former National Party leader Don Brash when they chimed in last week with some salient words on New Zealand's relationship with China., There is little chance of Mr Luxon ignoring them, though, given that they chose to drop him a line via full-page advertisements in the nation's newspapers rather than sending him an email or letter. The nub of Miss Clark and Dr Brash's letter — which was also signed by former National MP and speaker Sir David Carter, former New Zealand ambassador to China Carl Worker, and Beijing-based New Zealand businessman David Mahon — was that they thought New Zealand's foreign policy was taking a concerning direction. "In recent months, you and Foreign Minister [Winston] Peters have made a number of statements which we consider to be positioning New Zealand alongside the United States as an adversary of China," they said. "We see no upside and very considerable downside in the situation which has developed... we do believe that a military relationship with the United States directed against China has many risks for New Zealand." The former politicians were, mainly, referring to Aukus Pillar Two, a defence arrangement with Australia, the United Kingdom and United States, which New Zealand is still mulling over whether to join. Signing up would no doubt please countries with which New Zealand has long-standing relationships and alliances and also allow the country access to modern defence and intelligence gathering technology. But Miss Clark, Dr Brash, et al, point out that the strategic grouping is "explicitly aimed at China" — a country with which New Zealand is also friendly, and which is, as no-one has forgotten, our biggest trading partner. A vital plank in Mr Luxon's "going for growth" agenda is increasing export sales, and the ready, waiting and able-to-buy Chinese market is a critical one. Mr Luxon met Chinese President Xi Jinping at last year's Apec meeting, and he is widely expected to visit the People's Republic sometime this year. Such visits always include an obligatory but delicately phrased reference to some of China's more questionable policies in terms of human rights, a topic quickly skimmed over before the parties turn to dollars and cents. New Zealand's attempts to become closer in step with the United States will already have been noted by Beijing, and this will no doubt be added to the awkward topics list when Mr Luxon does make it to the Chinese capital. No-one is suggesting that Miss Clark or Dr Brash, experienced operators in their own right, are acting as stalking horses for China in placing their advertisement: their views on this matter are backed by lengthy and independent track records, and they raise a legitimate argument. Mr Luxon will not have welcomed such high-profile questioning of his policies at a time when his staff may well be making final arrangements for what will be a vital trip — as all meetings between China's and New Zealand's leaders are for this country. Mr Peters, in typically colourful language, said that he saw "no value in indulging the tired arguments of various former politicians" — before defending the government's foreign policy approach. But indulge them Mr Luxon will likely have to do. In finding language to counter them, he may well find himself grateful that those varied notables raised their voices and offered their opinion.