
The silent bloodbath that's tearing through the middle-class and rapidly flipping the US economy on its head
Elon Musk and hundreds of other tech mavens wrote an open letter two years ago about how AI was coming to 'automate away all the jobs' and upend society.
It looks like we should have listened to them.
Layoffs are sweeping America, nixing hundreds of thousands of jobs at Microsoft, Walmart, and other titans. The newly jobless speak of a 'bloodbath' on the scale of the pandemic.
This time, it's not blue-collar and factory workers getting whacked — it's college graduates with white-collar jobs in tech, finance, law, and consulting.
Entry-level jobs are vanishing the fastest — stoking fears of recession and a generation of disillusioned graduates left stranded with CVs no one wants.
College grads are now much more likely to be unemployed than others, official data show.
Chatbots have already taken over data entry and customer service jobs. Next-generation 'agentic' AI can solve problems, adapt, and work independently.
These 'smartbots' are already spotting market trends, running logistics operations, writing legal contracts, and diagnosing patients.
The markets have seen the future: AI investment funds are growing by as much as 60 percent a year.
'The AI layoffs have begun, and they're not stopping,' says tech entrepreneur Alex Finn.
Luddites who don't embrace the tech 'will be completely irrelevant in the next five years,' he posted on X.
Procter & Gamble, which makes diapers, laundry detergent, and other household items, this week said it would cut 7,000 jobs, or about 15 percent of non-manufacturing roles.
Its two-year restructuring plan involves shedding managers who can be automated away.
Microsoft last month announced a cull of 6,000 staff — about 3 percent of its workforce — targeting managerial flab, after a smaller round of performance-related cuts in January.
LA-based tech entrepreneur Jason Shafton said the software giant's layoffs spotlight a trend 'redefining' the job market.
'If AI saves each person 10 percent of their time (and let's be real, it's probably more), what does that mean for a company of 200,000?' he wrote.
Retail titan Walmart, America's biggest private employer, is slashing 1,500 tech, sales, and advertising jobs in a streamlining effort.
Citigroup, cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, Disney, online education firm Chegg, Amazon, and Warner Bros. Discovery have culled dozens or even hundreds of their workers in recent weeks.
Musk himself led a federal sacking spree during his 130-day stint at the Department of Government Efficiency, which ended on May 30.
Federal agencies lost some 135,000 to firings and voluntary resignation under his watch, and 150,000 more roles are set to be mothballed.
Memes like this being shared on social media reveal how badly white-collar jobs have been hit
Employers had already announced 220,000 job cuts by the end of February, the highest layoff rate seen since 2009.
In announcing cuts, executives often talk about restructuring and tough economic headwinds.
Many are spooked by US President Donald Trump's on-and-off tariffs, which sent stock markets into free-fall and prompted CEOs to second-guess their long-term plans.
Others say something deeper is happening, as companies embrace the next-generation models of chatbots and AI.
Robots and machines have for decades usurped factory workers.
AI chatbots have more recently replaced routine, repetitive, data entry and customer service roles.
A new and more sophisticated technology — called Agentic AI — now operates more independently: perceiving the environment, setting goals, making plans, and executing them.
AI-powered software now writes reports, analyses spreadsheets, creates legal contracts, designs logos, and even drafts press releases, all in seconds.
Banks are axing graduate recruitment schemes.
Law firms are replacing paralegals with AI-driven tools.
Even tech startups, the birthplace of innovation, are swapping junior developers for code-writing bots.
Managers increasingly seek to become 'AI first' and test whether tasks can be done by AI before hiring a human.
That's now company policy at Shopify. It's how fintech firm Klarna shrank its headcount by 40 percent, CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski told CNBC last month.
Experienced workers are encouraged to automate tasks and get more work done; recent graduates are struggling to get their foot in the door.
From a distance, the job market looks relatively buoyant, with unemployment holding steady at 4.2 percent for the third consecutive month, the Labor Department reported on Friday.
But it's unusually high — close to 6 percent — among recent graduates.
The Federal Reserve Bank of New York recently said job prospects for these workers had 'deteriorated noticeably.'
That spells trouble not just for young workers, but for the long-term health of businesses — and the economy.
Economists warn of an AI-induced downturn, as millions lose jobs, spending plummets, and social unrest festers.
It's been dubbed an industrial revolution for the modern era, but one that's measured in years, not decades.
Dario Amodei, CEO of Anthropic, one of the world's most powerful AI firms, says we're at the start of a storm.
AI could wipe out half of all entry-level white-collar jobs — and spike unemployment to 10-20 percent in the next one to five years, he told Axios.
Lawmakers have their heads in the sand and must stop 'sugar-coating' the grim reality of the late 2020s, Amodei said.
'Most of them are unaware that this is about to happen,' he said.
Sacked workers have taken to social media to vent their frustrations about the new tech crunch
'It sounds crazy, and people just don't believe it.'
Young people who've been culled are taking to social media to vent their anger as the door to a middle-class lifestyle closes on them.
Patrick Lyons calls it 'jarring and unexpected' how he lost his Austin-based program managing job in an 'emotionless business decision' by Microsoft.
'There's nothing the 6,000 of us could have done to prevent this,' he posted.
A young woman coder, known by her TikTok handle dotisinfluencing, posts a daily video diary about the 'f*****g massacre' of layoffs at her tech company as 'AI is taking over,' she says.
Her job search is going badly — one recruiter appeared more interested in taking her out for drinks than offering a paycheck, she said.
'I feel like s**t,' she added.
Ben Wolfson, a young Meta software engineer, says entry-level software jobs dried up in 2023.
'Big tech doesn't want you, bro,' he says.
Critics say universities are churning out graduates into a market that simply doesn't need them.
A growing number of young professionals say they feel betrayed — promised opportunity, but handed a future of 'AI-enhanced' redundancy.
Others are eyeing an opportunity for a payout to try something different.
Donald King posted a recording of the meeting in which he was unceremoniously laid off from his data science job at consulting firm PwC.
'RIP my AI factory job,' he said. 'I built the thing that destroyed me.'
He now posts from Porto, in Portugal — a popular spot for digital nomads — where he's founded a marketing startup.
Industry insiders say it won't be long before another generation of AI arrives to automate new sectors.
As AI improves, the difference between 'safe' and 'automatable' work gets blurrier by the day.
Human workers are advised to stay one step ahead and build AI into their own jobs to increase productivity.
Optimists point to such careers as radiology — where humans initially looked set to be outmoded by machines that could speedily read medical scans and pinpoint tumors.
But the layoffs didn't happen.
The technology has been adopted — but radiologists adapted, using AI to sharpen images and automate some tasks, and boost productivity.
Some radiology units even expanded their increasingly efficient human workforce.
Others say AI is a scapegoat for 2025's job cuts — that executives are downsizing for economic reasons, and blaming technology so as not to panic shareholders.
But for those who have lost their jobs, the future looks bleak.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
31 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE We spent $150k transforming two shipping containers into our dream home... but made a devastating oversight
A couple who spent $150,000 transforming two 40-foot shipping containers into their dream home have opened up about the lengthy process and revealed the one devastating oversight that nearly destroyed the whole project. Lexi, 25, and Diego Newkirk, 26, from Texas, have always loved to travel and enjoyed staying in 'unique' homes on their trips.


BreakingNews.ie
33 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Trump says Elon Musk could face ‘serious consequences' if he backs Democrats
US President Donald Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Elon Musk, and warned that his former ally and campaign benefactor could face 'serious consequences' if he tries to help Democrats in upcoming elections. Mr Trump told NBC's Kristen Welker in a phone interview that he has no plans to make up with tech entrepreneur Mr Musk. Advertisement Asked specifically if he thought his relationship with the mega-billionaire chief executive of Tesla and SpaceX was over, Mr Trump responded: 'I would assume so, yeah.' 'I'm too busy doing other things,' Mr Trump continued. 'You know, I won an election in a landslide. I gave him (Mr Musk) a lot of breaks, long before this happened, I gave him breaks in my first administration, and saved his life in my first administration, I have no intention of speaking to him.' The US President also issued a warning amid speculation that Mr Musk could back Democratic legislators and candidates in the 2026 mid-term elections. Advertisement 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Mr Trump told NBC, though he declined to share what those consequences would be. Mr Musk's businesses have many lucrative federal contracts. The US President's latest comments suggest Mr Musk is moving from close ally to a potential new target for Mr Trump, who has aggressively wielded the powers of his office to crack down on critics and punish perceived enemies. As a major government contractor, Mr Musk's businesses could be particularly vulnerable to retribution. Mr Trump has already threatened to cut Mr Musk's contracts, calling it an easy way to save money. The dramatic rupture between the President and the world's richest man began this week with Mr Musk's public criticism of Mr Trump's 'big beautiful bill' pending on Capitol Hill. Advertisement Mr Musk has warned that the bill will increase the federal deficit and called it a 'disgusting abomination'. Mr Trump criticised Mr Musk in the Oval Office, and before long, he and Mr Musk began trading bitterly personal attacks on social media, sending the White House and Republican congressional leaders scrambling to assess the fallout. As the back-and-forth intensified, Mr Musk suggested Mr Trump should be impeached and claimed without evidence that the government was concealing information about the President's association with infamous paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Mr Trump's spending plans appeared to cause the rift initially (AP) Mr Musk appeared by Saturday morning to have deleted his posts about Epstein. Advertisement In an interview, US vice president JD Vance tried to downplay the feud. He said Mr Musk was making a 'huge mistake' going after Mr Trump, but called him an 'emotional guy' who was becoming frustrated. 'I hope that eventually Elon comes back into the fold. Maybe that's not possible now because he's gone so nuclear,' Mr Vance said. Mr Vance called Mr Musk an 'incredible entrepreneur,' and said that Mr Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which sought to cut US government spending and laid off or pushed out thousands of workers, was 'really good'. Mr Vance made the comments in an interview with 'manosphere' comedian Theo Von, who last month joked about snorting drugs off a mixed-race baby and the sexuality of men in the US Navy when he opened for Mr Trump at a military base in Qatar. Advertisement The Vance interview was taped on Thursday as Musk's posts were unfurling on X, the social media network the billionaire owns. During the interview, Mr Von showed the vice president Mr Musk's claim that Mr Trump's administration has not released all the records related to Epstein because Mr Trump is mentioned in them. Mr Vance responded to that, saying: 'Absolutely not. Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong with Jeffrey Epstein.' 'This stuff is just not helpful,' Mr Vance said in response to another post shared by Mr Musk calling for Mr Trump to be impeached and replaced with Mr Vance. 'It's totally insane. The President is doing a good job.' Vance also defended the bill that has drawn Mr Musk's ire, and said its central goal was not to cut spending but to extend the 2017 tax cuts approved in Mr Trump's first term. The bill would slash spending and taxes but also leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance and spike deficits by 2.4 trillion dollars (£1.77 trillion) over the decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. 'It's a good bill,' Mr Vance said. 'It's not a perfect bill.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE All the ways that Trump blocked Elon Musk's agenda and Cabinet picks despite spending MAGA millions
President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk shared a delicate political dance in the 130 days that the president's one-time 'first buddy' who professed to love him 'as much as a straight man can love another man.' It appeared to be the beginning of a beautiful friendship that sparked fascination as the world's richest man enjoyed the company of the world's soon-to-be inaugurated world's most powerful man. After Trump won the presidential election with historic margins, Musk was among the euphoric crowd that gathered at Mar-a-lago and began plotting the future of the administration. The eclectic billionaire was gleeful as a he hung around Mar-a-lago with his son 'Little X,' even renting one of the cottages at the club and appeared with the president frequently throughout the holidays. Trump was grateful for Musk's support and allowed him to attend meetings where they discussed cabinet nominees. He sat on calls with foreign leaders, attended personal meetings and even helped vet potential candidates. Musk's presence and unfamiliarity with politics frustrated some of the president's staffers as he tried to insert his preferred choices ahead of other potential candidates, according to reports. But Trump appreciated having Musk around, as they celebrated his election victory. 'Elon won't go home. I can't get rid of him. Until I don't like him,' Trump told Republicans during a speech after the election. Just weeks after the election, Musk openly solicited social media reaction for Trump's choice for Secretary of Treasury describing Scott Bessent as a 'business-as-usual' candidate and said that Howard Lutnick would 'actually enact change.' 'Business-as-usual is driving America bankrupt, so we need change one way or another,' he wrote. Musk was personally closer with Lutnick, but Trump ultimately chose Bessent, despite lobbying from Musk. Trump ultimately directed Musk to the DOGE effort, as the billionaire famously claimed he could save the federal government up to $2 trillion dollars. But putting Musk in charge of government cuts was a headache for cabinet members as Musk tried to control their agencies. 'Rubio never liked him, but a lot of them did not like him,' a person familiar with the dynamics of the president's cabinet told the Daily Mail. The State Department dismissed the claim. 'Nobody has time for silly gossip. Secretary Rubio is completely focused on carrying out the President's agenda on behalf of the American people,' a senior State Department official told the Daily Mail. Bessent clashed with Musk after he convinced Trump to drop Musk's choice as acting Internal Revenue Service commissioner for a nominee of his own choosing. Details of the disagreement leaked into the media, as both men reportedly shouted at each other as reports described the scene as 'quite loud.' A March incident with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Musk was also reported, as the New York Times reported he was 'incensed' after Musk said he had fired 'nobody' in his agency. The pair debated in front of the president, but Trump conceded that secretaries would be in charge of firing employees in their agencies. Transportation secretary Sean Duffy also debated with Musk, complaining he was trying to fire his air traffic controllers at a time of multiple plane crashes in the. United States. Trump remained patient with Elon despite criticisms behind the scenes about his efforts, and publicly supported him in front of the press. 'Is anybody unhappy with Elon? If you are, we will throw him out of here,' Trump said after a cabinet meeting in February. Trump's cabinet members laughed but nobody voiced any dissent from Musk's presence in the meeting. Elon's efforts to insert himself into major government policy and infrastructure deals were also frustrated. Musk's dream, a person familiar told the Daily Mail, was to implement his xAI throughout the entire federal government in an effort to both make the government more efficient, but to also make his AI stronger with the federal government's data. But Trump continued to work with other major tech billionaires on the AI issue, even some of Musk's enemies. In February, Trump sidestepped Musk to announce a major AI infrastructure deal branded as Stargate with OpenAI's Sam Altman, Musk's former business partner and current nemesis. After Trump appeared with Altman to announce the $500,000 billion project, Musk was left fuming on social media asserting 'they actually don't have the money.' Elon also tried to block the Stargate investment partnership in the United Arab Emirates after learning his xAI company would be excluded. Despite Musk's protests, the deal was announced when Trump visited the UAE. Musk was also opposed to Trump's Big Beautiful Bill after learning included a ten-year ban on state regulations, a provision sought by Altman to boost the development of AI, according to a source. Musk was also thwarted when he tried to convince Duffy and Republican lawmakers to use his Starlink satellite internet system to modernize and replace the current FAA air traffic control system. Although Musk claimed he had no interest in saving government subsidies for electric cars, the Republican Big Beautiful Bill passed in the House of Representatives included provisions to repeal tax credits for the purchase of electric cars, as administration officials posited it might be why he was upset by the bill. The most crippling blow in the Trump/Musk relationship happened after details leaked to the New York Times in March that the Pentagon set up a briefing for Musk that would include plans for any war that could break out with China. Behind the scenes, Trump reacted quickly. 'What the f**k is Elon doing there? Make sure he doesn't go,' he said, according to Axios. He later insisted on social media that 'China will not even be mentioned or discussed' in the briefing with Musk. 'Once that leaked, it really had a dramatic transformation on Trump's opinion of him,' it was really a big turning point,' a person familiar with the administration told the Daily Mail. Trump remained patient with Musk although support for him started to fray within the administration as they waited for his 130 day period as a special advisor to the president. Even after Musk voiced concerns with the Republican bill making its way through the House of Representatives, Trump wanted to make sure they were leaving on good terms. Together they defended Musk's efforts to slash government waste, fraud, and abuse even as the billionaire appeared wistful as he prepared to leave the White House. Trump even gave Musk an elaborate golden key to the White House, as a sign he valued his service. When reporters asked if Musk would remain an informal advisor to Trump, the billionaire replied, 'I mean, yeah, I expect to remain a friend and an advisor, and certainly if there's anything the president wants me to do, I'm at the President's service.' Six days later, he erupted on social media, marking another chapter in the long history of frustrated business and political leaders failing to work together.