Police Scotland to carry out searches 'based on biological sex'
Assistant Chief Constable Catriona Paton said the new guidance was designed to provide clarity around a 'complex and important area' of policing.
READ MORE: SNP Government 'to cut spending by £2.6 billion per year', Finance Secretary says
Police Scotland, the UK's second largest force after the Met, said it must ensure it is acting in line with its duties under the Equality Act and the Human Rights Act and that officers and staff must feel confident that they are conducting searches lawfully.
Guidance from the force states that officers and staff will undertake all searches, whether in custody or as part of a stop and search interaction, which involve the removal of more than a jacket, gloves, headgear, or footwear, on the basis of biological sex.
If an individual whose gender differs from their biological sex is subject to search and asks to be searched by an officer of their gender identity, guidelines state that efforts will be made to ensure an appropriate officer conducts the search 'where this is operationally viable'.
The guidelines added that in these circumstances, the search will require the written consent of the authorising officer, the transgender person to be searched, and the officer who will conduct the search.
Police Scotland officers can refuse to search a transgender detainee under the guidance.
Transgender detainees will also be given the option to ask for a separate area search depending on their anatomical presentation and if there are no officers willing to conduct a search in line with the person's gender identity, the detainee will be supervised until a suitable officer is found.
(Image: Andrew Milligan/PA Wire)
The guidance added that if a willing officer is not found within a 'reasonable time' or the 'risk is deemed to be too great', a search will be carried out by an officer of the same biological sex of the detainee.
Transgender officers will only search in line with their biological sex and can also be exempt from searching.
A transgender officer can search a transgender detainee if they are of the same biological sex, but if they are of different biological sexes, both parties would need to consent to the search.
Detainees can refuse to be searched by a transgender officer, in which case the officer would be swapped out.
Assistant Chief Constable Paton said it is crucial that Police Scotland continues to fulfil its legal duties while ensuring officers and staff feel confident in conducting searches lawfully.
She said: 'This is a complex and important area of policing, and searching members of the public is a significant intrusion of their personal liberty and privacy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
20 minutes ago
- Spectator
Is the Met finally getting tough on pro-Palestine protests?
It was airily pleasant to walk round Parliament Square on Monday morning. I had come up to London to go to parliament and to interview Kemi Badenoch at a Policy Exchange event across the square. Palestine Action had announced a protest march against Donald Trump's and Israel's 'genocide' for that time. Although the Met had banned it from the area, I had recently witnessed so many ill-contained and threatening protests there – almost all for Palestinian causes – that I fully expected delay, disruption and occasional harassment. This time, however, it turned out that the Met meant business. The protest was well-contained in the designated streets round Trafalgar Square. May this mark the permanent change many of us have long been calling for. The delightful absence of trouble that day brought home to me how oppressive those past protests had become. The Met's blind commitment to 'the right to protest' effectively ceded control of the streets, public spaces and Tube stations, giving the extremists a preposterous media salience. That right kept cancelling more important rights – those of MPs, peers and parliamentary staff to get on with their work and of the ordinary public to attend parliament as they please or go about their normal business. The constant threat to the security of parliament has increasingly cut it off, created ugly physical barriers and intimidated the parliamentary authorities. By besieging parliament, you subtly delegitimate it. The Met Commissioner, Sir Mark Rowley, justified his new toughness by saying that Palestine Action is 'an organised extremist criminal group', as witness the expensive damage it claims to have done to RAF planes at Brize Norton. It is, but he could have said much the same 18 months ago of the endless semi-violent anti-Semitic elements which so often march against Israel without a word to say against Hamas's 7 October massacres or Iran's bomb. Theirs have not been what Sir Mark calls 'protests of a different character' from those of Palestine Action. They have been cut from the same keffiyeh. He says the charges against Palestine Action 'represent a form of extremism that I believe the overwhelming majority of the public reject'. What forms of extremism do the overwhelming majority not reject? Anyway, there is joy over the sinner that repenteth. If Palestine Action is to be proscribed, this is the time to pursue its other boasted achievements. In March last year, in my Cambridge college, Trinity, it claimed responsibility for the slashing and spray-painting of de Laszlo's portrait of Arthur Balfour, prime minister, chancellor of Cambridge University and author of the Balfour Declaration. The incident was filmed and posted by the perpetrators, but a year later the police said that 'the investigation has now been filed'. It is hard to believe that these outrages are untraceable, once you identify their Islamist/far-left political motivation and therefore know where to look. By chance, it is 50 years ago this autumn that I matriculated at Trinity. There is a half-century dinner there next month for all of us, but not for me, due to a clerical error in the college's email records. This error has now been corrected with a vengeance and I have since received eight invitations to the Trinity Giving Days in which alumni contribute to bursaries. What is more exciting, however, is that the period in question has also been marked in verse. Four years ago, I drew attention (see Notes, 10 July 2021) to The Examined Life, James Harpur's book of poetry about his time at Cranleigh, his public school in Surrey, which in its 160-year existence has achieved respectability rather than celebrity and is therefore a tricky subject for the muse. The book was a brilliant success, doing what good poetry does uniquely well – suggesting the general from the minutely observed particular. Now Harpur has done this again with Trinity, where he was a year below me, in a new volume called The Magic Theatre. Cambridge has been the subject of rather more poems than Cranleigh, so the bar is higher. But I think Harpur clears it. In my first year at Trinity, I was thrilled to hear that the set I was sharing with Oliver Letwin – G3 New Court – was the same to which Tennyson returns in 'In Memoriam'. It had been occupied by his beloved Arthur Hallam, whom the poem mourns: Up that long walk of limes I past To see the rooms in which he dwelt. Another name was on the door: I linger'd; all within was noise Of songs, and clapping hands, and boys That crash'd the glass and beat the floor; Where once we held debate, a band Of youthful friends, on mind and art, And labour, and the changing mart, And all the framework of the land; When one would aim an arrow fair, But send it slackly from the string; And one would pierce an outer ring, And one an inner, here and there; And last the master-bowman, he, Would cleave the mark.' That could have been an exact description of Oliver's debating prowess, displayed in those very rooms. The trouble with 'In Memoriam', however, is that such exactness is mostly absent. It is a great poem, but more about grief and 'the unquiet heart' ('in words, like weeds, I'll wrap me o'er') than one rooted in the specific. In this sense, I get more out of Harpur's Cambridge than Tennyson's. Whether he writes about revising or punting or amateur acting ('the tinnitus of humiliation') or lost love, he places his young self in those strange three years granted to you in that (then) small town where your life is more imagined than real, and the better for it. On one tiny point I must correct James Harpur. In a poem which turns out to be about me, I have 'a sleeve of navy velvet'. No; it was only corduroy. We were poor students, after all.
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Consultation on scrapped national park in Galloway cost £160,000
A government body spent more than £160,000 on a consultation process which ultimately ended in plans for a new national park in Galloway being sum spent by NatureScot was revealed through a freedom of information (FOI) request by the BBC - and is only a fraction of the overall spend on the park said the total spent on the consultation had not been finalised, and final invoices would see the total rise "very slightly".The consultation was held between November and February and its findings were used to help deliver a final decision on whether or not a new national park should be created. The Scottish government said it was "absolutely correct" to support the nomination process. Plans for a new national park - to join the Cairngorms and Loch Lomond and the Trossachs - were part of a power-sharing deal between the SNP and the Scottish that agreement collapsed last year, the process Scottish government revealed in May last year that it had spent more than £300,000 in the earlier stages of the search for a national spent a further £28,000 after Galloway was announced as the preferred potential location for a new national park in July it stressed that civil servants worked "flexibly" across a range of matters making it impossible to specify exact costs in terms of their time. The final stage of the process was the extended consultation - both in person and online - across 14 weeks which was carried out by is a full breakdown of how much this cost:Licence for online engagement platform - £23,220Leaflets (printing and posting) - £20,438Gaelic translation - £215.55Event and other materials - £908.39Consultation events (hall bookings etc) - £5,695.96Facilitation consultants - £62,244.92Analysis consultants - £21,808.80Independent review of consultation - £9,900Board costs and subsistence - £7,982.35Staff costs and subsistence - £11,082.58Total spend (at 20 June 2025) - £163,496.55NatureScot said there were still some outstanding costs which would see the figure rise said it intended to put the final cost on its website by early July. The consultation ultimately led to a recommendation not to take forward the plan for a new national park, which proved a contentious in the concluded - in its role as reporter - that from the views expressed the proposal had "not garnered sufficient support locally to proceed".Instead, it recommended the strengthening of the likes of the Galloway and Southern Ayrshire Biosphere, Galloway Forest Park and national scenic described the consultation as the "largest and most challenging" it had ever Affairs Secretary Mairi Gougeon said the Scottish government had weighed up the arguments for and against and agreed not to welcomed the decision, saying the area did not need another "layer of bureaucracy".Campaigners in favour, however, said it was a "huge missed opportunity" and a "big loss" for the region. 'Absolutely correct' The Scottish government said the Galloway nomination had met all the selection criteria to be confirmed as the proposed location for the country's third national said the designation process required a "thorough consultation process" which had been independently reviewed by the Scottish Community Development Centre which found it achieved "very impressive levels of public involvement".A spokesperson said: "The consultation collected more than 5,000 surveys and more than 1,000 people attended events to share their opinion."Based on this engagement and the reporter's recommendations we took the decision not to designate Galloway and Ayrshire as a national park."But it was absolutely correct to support the nomination process, thoroughly consider the application and meet the statutory consultation requirements that such a process demands."
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Global crisis poses defence dilemma for John Swinney
In the aftermath of the recent US strikes on Iran, Holyrood politicians wanted to know if Scottish facilities such as the government-owned Prestwick Airport were excluded from use in such Scottish government's External Affairs Secretary Angus Robertson assured MSPs that Prestwick had not played any part in this particular also pointed out that the airport is regularly used by the air forces of the UK's allies such as the US and Canada - an important revenue stream for doesn't quite answer the question, but it does help clarify the careful balance the Scottish government is trying to find amid wars in the Middle East and Ukraine and President Donald Trump's uncertain position on the defence of Europe. The Holyrood administration seems keen to avoid undermining the UK's positions on defence and foreign affairs at such a sensitive time of international Minister John Swinney echoed the prime minister's call for "de-escalation" in Iran following the US strikes while warning of the potential dangers of the military did not openly condemn President Trump for taking the decision to bomb Iran's nuclear ministers want to be seen as reliable partners to the UK's allies in Nato in the event that one day they might be seeking independent Scottish membership of that the same time they are sensitive to opinion in their own party, and beyond that, favour a diplomatic rather than a military approach to conflict resolution. The SNP's Westminster leader Stephen Flynn tends to be less nuanced in his contributions, at one point comparing the current situation with the build up to the Iraq certainly seems fair to observe a difference in the tone of comments from Scottish ministers and some other SNP be clear, international relations are under UK government control. The Scottish government does not have a formal role in decision-making but can express its views and potentially lobby UK Scotland, the most obvious policy clash is over nuclear UK government is committed to maintaining the Trident nuclear weapons system and the four Clyde-based submarines designed to deploy nuclear armed ministers believe this is essential to deter Russia and other states with nuclear weapons from pointing them in our SNP is fundamentally opposed to the possession of nuclear weapons, which they believe could encourage the party's 2024 election manifesto makes clear, the SNP "has never and will never support retention or renewal of Trident".Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer recently described this policy as "wrong-headed". More generally, the SNP's opponents consider their anti-nuclear stance to be in direct conflict with their support for Scottish membership of Nato in the event of is a 32-country military alliance underpinned by the potential use of nuclear SNP point out that most Nato countries do not have nuclear weapons and that Finland has just joined as a non-nuclear member. Finland is not, however, seeking the removal of nuclear weapons from its the UK and Scottish governments agree that there is a need to increase UK defence spending as a share of national economic output or prime minister is not only seeking to present this as a commitment to protecting UK interests but as an economic opportunity that could bring good jobs to all corners of the idea of a defence dividend was underlined by his decision to launch the UK's strategic defence review at the BAE Systems naval shipyard in suggested a longer term commitment to Scottish shipbuilding. There was also the hint that proposals for a UK-wide network of munitions factories could include new or expanded facilities in Scotland. The Scottish government has not objected to increased UK defence spending north of the border, although the first minister made clear to me in a recent interview that he favours the cash being used for conventional rather than nuclear has used this extra spending to raise questions about how the Scottish government deploys its economic and skills development resources to support the defence UK defence secretary, John Healey, accused SNP ministers of "student union politics" when it emerged that a specialist welding centre planned by Rolls Royce for Glasgow could be under threat because it was being denied a £2.5m grant from the economic development agency Scottish Scottish government said the facility to support the construction and maintenance of submarines was not eligible for funding because of a longstanding policy of not allowing public money to support the manufacture of munitions. In a Holyrood debate, the Conservatives urged the SNP to change this stance - which seemed to draw sympathy from the SNP's former defence spokesman Stewart on social media, he said that "it pains me to see we are not evolving with the serious times we live in".Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes defended the policy and pointed to other financial support the Scottish government had given to defence firms for diversification and a BBC interview, she also described the ban on backing munitions production as the "current position", which seemed to hint at the potential for is supposed to be an update on a review of the human rights criteria to be applied when considering applications for devolved public support before Holyrood breaks for the are certainly those who want the Scottish government to do more to help grow the defence industries based in Scotland that support growth is after all supposed to be one of the Scottish government's four are also those such as the Scottish Greens who want them to do less. They believe it is morally wrong to subsidise bomb making and the firms that carry out the SNP's manifesto called for a ban on arms sales to Israel. In power, Labour has suspended some arms export SNP supports the recognition of a Palestinian state, which Labour has said it would do as part of a renewed peace process with Israel towards a two state former first minister, Humza Yousaf, criticised the UK's decision to use anti-terror laws to proscribe a pro-Palestinian group for vandalising RAF planes. He said this was a ludicrous over-reaction. There has been a further row about a donation of NHS equipment from the Scottish government to was given on a humanitarian basis which under rules that are followed by the UK and other countries prevents its use in a military have argued that this gift should have been made in a different way so that it could have gone to the frontline if issues do not just draw dividing lines between the SNP and its rivals to the left and right of the political spectrum in the run up to the Holyrood election in and foreign policy is also a sensitive political issue within the Labour prime minister's commitment to boost spending is welcomed by defence unions who see improved prospects for their are those on the Labour left like the former Scottish party leader Richard Leonard who have publicly expressed concern that the UK government is prioritising weapons over initial increase in defence spending is principally being funded by a raid on the overseas aid increases might squeeze the cash available for public services which would inevitably cause significant rows within the Labour party never mind with its rivals including the SNP.A Labour rebellion is already underway at Westminster over the government's attempts to slow the growth in welfare spending by cutting some is not of course possible to spend the same money twice and choices must be UK defence spending rises, so do the tensions within Scottish politics over how best to use public resources to meet the challenges of an unstable world.
