logo
Legal action forces Trump administration to back down on W.Va. student deportation

Legal action forces Trump administration to back down on W.Va. student deportation

Yahoo26-04-2025

FAIRMONT — The Trump Administration's project of terminating student visas on specious grounds faced a major setback on Friday after massive legal pushback from international students nationwide.
Among the wave of lawsuits were two by students from West Virginia University and Marshall University. The schools notified Sajawal Ali Sohail and S.V. the federal government had restored their legal statuses.
'This is positive news not just for our two clients in West Virginia, but for international students across the country,' said ACLU-WV, which represents both students. 'We are continuing to monitor the situation closely, particularly the announcement that ICE will be developing new policies for revoking legal statuses.
Sohail, a 25 year-old-undergraduate student at West Virginia University, filed suit against the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the Attorney General of the United States, after the federal government revoked his visa and terminated his record in the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System.
Sohail's suit joined another filed by Marshall student S.V., who sued the federal government for the same reason earlier this week. The ACLU-WV was able to secure a temporary restraining order protecting S.V. this week. On Friday, Politico reported lawyers from the Justice Department announced in federal court it was reactivating visa registrations for terminated students in the SEVIS system. They also said ICE was developing a policy for SEVIS record termination.
Shauna Johnson, executive director of strategic communications at WVU, said there have been three reversals across the WVU system.
'We continue to work directly with our students affected by status decision changes at the federal level. Circumstances vary which is why we're focused on identifying ways to best support each student. As of now, we are aware of three reversals across the WVU System.'
Sohail's revocation came after the federal government found his name during a criminal record check. In 2022, WVU Police arrested Sohail on one felony count of taking identity of another person, according to magistrate court records. However, Sohail's attorney said WVU reversed the charge after it turned out Sohail and his family had been the victims of the scam.
According to Sohail's complaint, the family, who resides in Pakistan, was short on tuition money for Sohail. They turned to a business acquaintance, Mansoor Alam, who offered to pay Sohail's tuition upfront with the understanding the family would back the loan. However, after the family paid Alam thousands of dollars for tuition, magistrate court records show, Alam disputed the charge and the blame fell on Sohail for making an unauthorized payment.
After discovering the scam, magistrate court records show the state decided not to prosecute, and the judge dismissed the charges. Sparks wrote Sohail wasn't the perpetrator of a crime but the victim of one. Victims of a financial scam, the family ended up having to pay tuition twice.
Sparks wrote in the filing Alam had stolen from numerous individuals and was on the run from Pakistani law enforcement.
Despite the emotional harm from the scam and false accusations, Sohail continued on track for graduation in May 2025. On April 10, Sohail received an email from the school notifying him his SEVIS record had been terminated. The federal government alleged his name had been found in a criminal records check.
'Unfortunately, we cannot provide any further insight into the termination reason and are unable to reverse this decision by the U.S. federal government,' the email states.
Johnson, the school's communications officer, declined to comment on whether the school had confirmed on their own any of the government's claims.
The email goes on to urge Sohail to depart the country immediately, as he had lost both his immigration status and work authorization. The school offered to refer Sohail to outside legal resources such as the WVU Immigration Law Clinic, but cautioned Sohail against remaining in the country while he was out of status.
'Given this sudden notice and the approaching end of the semester, we encourage you to speak with your instructors about the possibility of completing your courses remotely,' the email states. 'We do realize the sudden impact this has on you, your academic career and your future plans. Carruth Center counselors are available to speak with you and to assist with what you may be feeling. Please consider reaching out to them if needed.'
The school also prohibited Sohail from attending class in-person.
Johnson did not elaborate on what the school was doing to support students on a case by case basis. The school's response from April 25 on this question did not change substantively from their response on April 10. Johnson said there 1,031 WVU students on F-1 visas, which is the visa required to pursue a degree at an American higher education institution.
Sohail's lawsuit accuses the federal government of disregard for widespread harm, accusing the administration of basing their actions on such specious grounds they defy credibly. According to Inside Higher Ed, 147 estimated terminations at 48 different schools had already taken place. The publication indicated the estimate was most certainly a fraction of the total, because colleges are reluctant to publicly confirm any student visa revocations because they are anxious to avoid federal scrutiny.
Billy Wolfe, communications director for ACLU-WV, said they are aware other students who have had their visas revoked had an experience similar to the students ACLU-WV represents. He urged students who are still having problems to contact the organization using the legal assistance tab at acluwv.org website. As for WVU's involvement, Wolfe said he wasn't sure what their role has been but that their issue is with the federal government, and not the school.
For now, both students are cleared to return to class.
'We want to be clear that the administration is backing down not because it's the right thing to do,' Wolfe said. 'But, because they have been dragged to court repeatedly and lost again and again.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The ACLU demands the US release and return a Dominican woman living legally in Puerto Rico

time7 minutes ago

The ACLU demands the US release and return a Dominican woman living legally in Puerto Rico

SAN JUAN, Puerto Rico -- In late May, a 47-year-old woman from the Dominican Republic was detained by police in Puerto Rico after she entered a municipal building seeking a permit to sell ice cream on the beach to support herself. Upon being turned over to federal agents, the Dominican woman presented her passport, driver's license and work permits that proved she was living in the U.S. territory legally, her attorney Ángel Robles and the American Civil Liberties Union of Puerto Rico, said Monday. Despite the documents presented, authorities recently transferred her to Texas as part of a federal crackdown on migrants living illegally in U.S. jurisdictions. The woman, whose first name is Aracelis, has not been fully identified because she is a victim of domestic violence. Aracelis is among hundreds of people who have been detained in Puerto Rico since large-scale arrests began in late January, surprising many in the U.S. territory that has long welcomed migrants. Robles and the ACLU demanded Aracelis' release and return to Puerto Rico. 'It's outrageous,' Robles said in a phone interview. 'No charges have been filed against her, and she is not in the system.' Because her name does not appear in a federal database, Robles' request for a bond hearing was denied. 'This case is one of unspeakable abuse,' said Annette Martínez Orabona, the ACLU director in Puerto Rico. The case has fueled already simmering anger against the administration of Puerto Rico Gov. Jenniffer González Colón and local authorities who have been working with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents to arrest those believed to be living illegally in the U.S. territory. In a letter sent Monday to the governor and the island's justice secretary, the ACLU accused Puerto Rico's government of violating the Constitution and local laws by providing ICE and U.S. Homeland Security with confidential information on nearly 6,000 immigrants. It also accused ICE of using that data to go on a 'fishing expedition' that it called 'arbitrary and abusive.' A spokesman for Homeland Security Investigations did not immediately respond to a request for comment. In Puerto Rico, undocumented immigrants are allowed to open bank accounts and obtain a special driver's license. The ACLU in Puerto Rico also accused González Colón's administration of not providing protocols to local government agencies for how to deal with such requests from the federal government. The ACLU requested, among other things, that Puerto Rico's government issue an executive order barring public agencies from collaborating with ICE subpoenas not accompanied by a court order. A spokeswoman for the governor did not immediately return a message for comment.

‘I never assaulted nobody': Former WVU player speaks following weekend arrest
‘I never assaulted nobody': Former WVU player speaks following weekend arrest

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘I never assaulted nobody': Former WVU player speaks following weekend arrest

COVINGTON, Ky. (WBOY) — Days after Adam 'Pacman' Jones was arrested in a Cincinnati suburb on charges including assaulting a police officer, the former WVU player issued a statement claiming the accusations are false. In a clip from 'Politely Raw! The Pacman Jones Show,' which Jones posted to his Instragram page Monday, the former Mountaineer refuted a police report, which claimed that he, while handcuffed, 'intentionally threw his elbow upwards and struck an officer in the bottom lip, causing inside of lip to bleed,' as read during the show by his co-host. Men arrested after multi-county pursuit believed to be members of Pagan Motorcycle Club Jones said the assault charge stemmed from him doing 'this,' which he said while demonstrating a light shoving motion. Jones also said he thinks he 'has a real lawsuit here,' but added that 'the people in the jail treated me unbelievable good.' 'Them people that was in there, they treated me how they treated everybody else,' Jones said. Jones is scheduled to appear in court on Wednesday at 8 a.m. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Florida Senate District 16 redistricting trial kicks off in federal court in Tampa
Florida Senate District 16 redistricting trial kicks off in federal court in Tampa

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Florida Senate District 16 redistricting trial kicks off in federal court in Tampa

State Senate Districts for the Tampa Bay region as drawn by the Florida Legislature. Source: ACLU lawsuit A federal lawsuit alleging that a Tampa Bay area state Senate district was racially gerrymandered kicked off in a Tampa federal courtroom on Monday. The suit, filed by the ACLU of Florida and the Civil Rights & Racial Justice Clinic at New York University on behalf of five residents of Tampa and St. Petersburg, alleges that the Legislature's plan in 2022 to connect Black populations from parts of Hillsborough and Pinellas counties into Senate District 16 violated their equal-protection rights by unjustifiably packing Black voters into District 16 and removing them from nearby District 18, reducing their influence there. The defendants are Senate President Ben Albritton and Florida Secretary of State Cord Byrd. The Senate district is represented by St. Petersburg Democrat Darryl Rouson. The suit originally challenged the creation of Senate District 18 in Pinellas County, represented by Republican Nick DiCeglie, but a three-judge panel rejected that charge earlier this year, saying the plaintiffs had not provided adequate evidence. District 16 includes parts of South St. Petersburg and then goes across Tampa Bay to encompass a large portion of Hillsborough County, beginning at the southernmost part just above Manatee County and spreading north, capturing the University of South Florida campus in North Tampa and ending at I-75 to the east. Testimony came from the plaintiffs (three from Hillsborough and two from St. Petersburg), who said that the drawing up of District 16 hurt their representation in Tallahassee. But the lead witness was actually Nicholas Warren, who took the stand for several hours. Warren happens to be the ACLU's lead attorney in the case. The defense is contending that he actively worked to create a partisan map that would help Democrats by having private exchanges with legislators and Democratic staffers regarding redistricting. Warren, who testified that he grew up as an aficionado of sorts on redistricting legislative and congressional seats, submitted redrawn maps for both the state Senate and the congressional redrawing in the fall of 2021, despite the fact that that he was told by the ACLU of Florida's then-executive director, Micah Kubic, not to do so. Warren submitted a Senate map that he said protected Black voters without having to cross Tampa Bay. Warren said on Monday that he never disclosed that he worked for the ACLU because the Senate form on which he submitted his map did not ask that question. Instead, he said he was submitting his maps an a citizen who cared about the process. However, after he submitted his maps, he was accused by the GOP Sen. Ray Rodrigues, who chaired that committee, of violating Senate rules when he presented his map without identifying himself as a staff attorney for the ACLU of Florida. Daniel Norby is lead attorney representing Albritton, while Mohammed Jazil represents Secretary of State Cord Byrd. They were able to admit into court dozens of pages of text messages that Warren exchanged during the redistricting process with Matthew Isbell, the Tallahassee data analyst who mostly works with Democrats, over the objections of ACLU attorney David Chen. Warren said while he is a Democrat, his submitted map was not designed to Democrats win more seats. The five plaintiffs contend that their rights have been violated because of how Senate District separates Pinellas and Hillsborough counties. Meiko Seymour, a St. Petersburg pastor, said (remotely) that the fact that the district includes just a part of St. Petersburg with a much bigger chunk in Hillsborough County made no sense, because 'the two sides just have completely different needs. He noted that Senate District 16 divides the city of St. Petersburg, with DiCeglie representing one half in District 18 and Rouson the other part in District 16. 'We do not get to vote with our majority counterparts,' he noted. Keto Nord Hodges resides in North Hillsborough County. He testified that the map did not represent his community, and listed access to public transportation and tax incentives for local businesses as some of the factors that make the two areas 'completely different.' 'We really don't see Sen. Rouson in Tampa,' he said, adding, 'I can't remember the last time I saw him.' However, under cross examination, Nord Hodges acknowledged he didn't know that Rouson had two district offices in Hillsborough, one in Tampa and one in Brandon. Yvette Lewis, head of the Hillsborough branch of the NAACP, answered 'Yes and no,' when asked whether she was aware that Rouson had satellite offices in Hillsborough County. She said that there were 'buildings' where Rouson could meet up with people, but not specifically offices. She mentioned how one year the lawmaker would celebrate the Martin Luther King Jr. holiday in Tampa, the next year in St. Petersburg, as an indication of how spread out his duties were and how he couldn't serve both of his constituencies in the district. Attorneys for the defense asked all of the plaintiffs who testified whether they were aware of the criteria lawmakers had to use when drawing up legislative districts. All admitted that they did not have all that information. Among the criteria is that, under the Fair District Amendments passed in 2010, the state's electoral maps must meet two-tier requirements. Tier-1 prohibits intentional partisan gerrymandering and requires districts to ensure racial and language minority voters have an equal opportunity to elect candidates of their choice and participate in the political process. Tier-2 standards require that the districts are compact and follow existing political and geographic boundaries. One witness for the plaintiffs who was missing in action on Monday was former Central Florida Democratic state Sen. Randolph Bracy, despite the fact that he was subpoenaed to testify. The case is being heard by a panel of three federal judges: U.S. Circuit Court Judge Andrew L. Basher, U.S. Senior District Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell, and U.S. District Judge Thomas P. Barber. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store