
NC DMV problems will get worse without reform, state audit finds
Why it matters: The state's DMV — which handles issues including driver's license renewals, vehicle registrations and license plates — has come under fire from politicians and residents in recent years due to long waits and limited appointment availability.
Driving the news: The audit of the DMV's performance comes with several improvement recommendations from the state's recently elected auditor, Dave Boliek, a Republican who is becoming increasingly powerful in Raleigh.
"I can't stress enough: Fixing the DMV is going to take buy-in from all levels of the government," Boliek said at a press conference Monday, per WRAL. "It's not going to happen tomorrow, it's not going to happen next month. But it can happen quick."
Between the lines: The audit of the DMV was part of a campaign promise for Boliek, who said more reports on the agency would come.
Zoom in: The 435-page audit found that the DMV has been hamstrung by several barriers, including:
No direct control over its budget or ability to advocate for resources from the state's General Assembly.
A lack of internal performance data to guide decisions.
Exclusion from modernization efforts that improved other parts of the state government.
State of play: All of this has resulted in an average wait time exceeding one hour and 15 minutes and in 14% of residents traveling more than an hour for an appointment, according to the audit.
The audit also found that the number of driver's license examiners has not increased as fast as the state's rapid population growth, according to the audit.
At the same time, employee morale has cratered at the agency, potentially leading to more turnover and worse outcomes.
What's inside: One of the biggest proposals from Boliek is a potential separation of the DMV from the state's Department of Transportation, to give the DMV more autonomy.
It also suggests:
That the DMV delivers a new strategic plan within nine months, with clear performance measures.
The creation of a new staffing plan that prioritizes high-need offices, like Lillington where there is one examiner for 56,639 residents.
Improving customer service through service pilots like pop-up DMV events and improved online technology, like document upload systems and translation tools or a "fast pass" option that allows customers to move to the front of the line for a fee.
What they're saying: In response to the audit, Department of Transportation Secretary Joey Hopkins and DMV commissioner Paul Tine said they were "committed to addressing the findings of the audit and look forward to continued collaboration ... to implement meaningful changes."
The two agreed with most of the recommendations, except for potentially separating the DMV from the DOT.
Instead, Tine and Hopkins suggested potentially changing how the DMV is funded by the Legislature, from a biennial appropriations model to a "percentage of fees" funding model.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

24 minutes ago
How gerrymandering has reshaped the political map for red and blue states
The redistricting battle gripping Texas has put a spotlight on the ongoing debate over gerrymandering and its long-term effects on the electorate. Sam Wang, the founding director of the Electoral Innovation Lab and the creator of the Gerrymandering Project , a research lab focused on creating the most fair district maps, told ABC News that state leaders from both sides of the aisle have changed election boundaries to make it stacked with constituents who vote in their favor. In the last 20 years, with access to advanced computer algorithms, those gerrymandering attempts have become more egregious as whole counties have been divided up with pinpoint precision, resulting in districts with areas with outlandish shapes, he said. "Gerrymander is partisanship maximized above all of the other things," Wang said. The practice was first identified and coined in 1812 when Massachusetts Gov. Elbridge Gerry signed a bill that redrew the state's congressional maps to benefit the Democratic-Republican party. Maps are typically redrawn at the beginning of each decade to reflect changes in the population from the latest census. Kareem Crayton, the vice president of the Washington D.C. office of the Brennan Center for Justice, who has spent years researching redistricting, told ABC News the redistricting campaigns since the 2000s have led to a systemic cycle of gerrymandering, especially in the South. "States like Florida and Texas have the worst examples of gerrymandering," he said. But Crayton also pointed out that states with Democratic majorities, like Illinois, have responded with their own maps that also skew districts in their favor, leading to an endless cycle. "All of these states are looking around at each other like 'The Good, the Bad and the Ugly' thinking who's going to fire first," he said, referring to the Western film. "There is no sheriff in town saying this is not helping everyone." While Republican and Democratic leaders in those states have contended they are redrawing their maps to adequately reflect their communities, Wang said the math and geography aren't backing their arguments. Wang's lab created a mathematical algorithm that creates district maps using key demographic factors. Racial demographics from the Census, environmental and geographic information from local data and other public sources are used to create district maps that remove political bias. Those maps are then compared to the district maps currently in place. "That tells us what someone who didn't care about political parties would do," he explained. "We have harnessed the power of computer simulation to see what would be neutral." Texas is one of the 15 states in the map that earned an F grade based on the Gerrymander Project's formula. Although the state legislature and congressional delegation are led by a Republican majority, Texas's current districting map is divided in a way that gives the GOP an advantage, according to the project. The analysis shows that the redistricting negates a challenging vote. Travis County, for example, includes the city of Austin, which has leaned Democratic, but the county includes five congressional districts around it. By not including Austin in the suburban areas, the congressional district will lean Republican, according to the analysis. The Gerrymander Project's analysis found that the county splits in Texas, which is the number of districts within a single county, are higher than the average split per state, based on its analysis. For example, more dense Dallas County is home to five congressional districts, and two of the districts' boundaries extend into the next county. Such division leads to confusion among voters as to what their district is, according to Crayton. Crayton said that such county splits have led to more examples of elected officials running unopposed. "If you're a candidate from an opposing party, you're going to have an uphill battle trying to run in a district where the majority of the voters are registered to the majority," he said. "We've seen it happen all of the time where a Democrat or Republican simply won't put the time and effort to run because the gerrymandered district puts the odds against them," Crayton said. Although the majority of the states that got the project's F grade are in the South and show more of a Republican advantage, the experts warned that blue states in other parts of the country have used gerrymandering as well. Illinois, which is one of the Midwest states with an F grade, is the prime example, they said. Its current map, which was adopted in 2021, contains non-compact districts, which leads to unequal voter density per area, and more county splits than the average, according to the Gerrymander Project. One egregious example is the state's 13th congressional district, which covers a nearly 2,300 square mile boundary that extends from its southern point near the border with Missouri to Springfield, right in the center of the state, and then east to the city of Champaign. The boundaries keep a huge concentration of Democratic leaning voters, according to the Gerrymander Project. Wang noted that the Supreme Court's 2019 decision that ruled gerrymandering for party advantage cannot be challenged in federal court has removed key guardrails for preventing states from taking part in severe party redistricting. The case involved gerrymandering allegations in North Carolina, and while the court's majority ruled that the practice may be "incompatible with democratic principles," federal courts had no jurisdiction in reviewing those cases. Wang said that most states have taken gerrymandering to their limit and made it extremely hard for state legislatures to revert their boundaries to more fair areas. "The lemon has been squeezed dry," he said. However, Wang noted that gerrymandering cases have prompted the public to speak out and take action to turn the tide and rein in gerrymandering in some key states. Virginia, for example, used a special master in 2022 to draw up its current maps following a court case brought by the state's constituents and some local elected officials. The court ordered the special master to create district maps to adhere to federal requirements of population equality, the Voting Rights Act mandates, state constitution and statutes in its districting process. As a result of its changes, the state, which has a slight Democratic majority in its state legislature, has no partisan competitiveness in its congressional districts, according to the Gerrymander Project, which awarded Virigina an A rating. The district's geography is "Fairly compact" and has the national average number of county splits, according to the project's analysis. Wang said ballot initiatives that removed the legislature from the districting process have risen in popularity in many states and have made a huge difference. Arizona, which also has an A rating by the project, has been using an independent redistricting commission after voters passed a ballot initiative in 2000 that changed state regulations. The state, which has a Republican majority in its state legislature, does not have a partisan advantage in its state districts, according to the Gerrymandering Project. Its districts are seen as "fairly compact" and are the average number of county splits, according to the analysis. Crayton and Wang said the state-run solutions to redistricting are a good step forward, but ultimately, it is going to take Congressional legislation to end partisan influence in these maps. Wang said that public opinion has consistently shown that constituents seek fair maps regardless of their political affiliations. "If Congress were to really pursue it, it could be bipartisan and get a lot of support," he said of legislation that prohibited gerrymandering tactics. "And we've seen it work."

USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump is calling for Intel's CEO to step down. Here's why.
President Donald Trump called for the immediate resignation of Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan after a Republican lawmaker aired concerns over Tan's reported ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving the executive's former company. The president wrote on his social media platform Truth Social on Thursday, Aug. 7, that Tan 'is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem.' Trump's comments came a day after Republican Sen. Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel's board chair with questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and a recent criminal case involving his former firm Cadence Design. The Arkansas lawmaker cited Reuters' exclusive reporting in April of Tan's investments, some of which were made via venture firm or holding companies, of at least $200 million in hundreds of Chinese advanced manufacturing and chip firms, some linked to the Chinese military. Cotton said in the letter he has concerns about the "security and integrity of Intel's operations and its potential impact on U.S. national security" related to Tan's reported investments. Ohio Republican Sen. Bernie Moreno joined in on the calls questioning the CEO, posting on X Aug. 7 that it is "pretty obvious" that Intel failed its commitments to the state and that Ohio should start a fraud investigation. Intel has invested billions into building microchip factories in the state. USA TODAY has not received an immediate response for a request for comment from Intel or Tan. Intel's stock price slipped by more than 3% by early afternoon Thursday, Aug. 7, in wake of the lawmakers' calls earlier that day. More: Exemption in Trump's chip tariff helps US stocks open higher Chip manufacturing has become a key sticking point for the Republican president since taking office in January, singling out the industry in his effort to bolster U.S. manufacturing. During a White House event Wednesday, Aug. 6, Trump threatened to impose a 100% tariff on foreign semiconductors in an effort to ground supply chains in the U.S. Tan took the top job at the struggling company in March, replacing two interim co-CEOs after the ousting of Pat Gelsinger in December 2024. Tan, a Malaysian-born Chinese American, is a semiconductor-industry veteran who once served as CEO of Cadence Design Systems from 2009 to 2021. The company agreed to plead guilty in July over charges it committed criminal violations of export controls, after it sold products to a Chinese military university believed to be involved in simulating nuclear explosions. Tan was CEO during the time of these sales, Reuters reports. Some analysts and investors said Tan's deep knowledge of the Chinese semiconductor landscape is a strategic asset. Others see the political pressure as a sign of growing uncertainty around Intel. Intel was once the globe's leading chipmaker. But the company has struggled to regain its foothold in recent years, as its server chip business took a hit amid a rush of spending and interest on AI chips, a sector that Intel's competitor Nvidia currently dominates. A change in leadership at Intel could pile pressure on the company, which is also a pillar of U.S. efforts to boost domestic chipmaking. Last year it secured $8 billion in subsidies from former President Joe Biden's administration, the largest under the 2022 CHIPS and Science Act. Kathryn Palmer is a national trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@ and on X @KathrynPlmr.

26 minutes ago
Arnold Schwarzenegger weighs ramping up anti-gerrymandering efforts
Arnold Schwarzenegger, who served as California's governor from 2003-2011, said he is "monitoring" the unfolding Republican-led redistricting efforts in Texas. Schwarzenegger, who governed California as a Republican, has long championed anti-gerrymandering efforts and is "monitoring the situation [in Texas] right now," according to his spokesperson Daniel Ketchell. His comments come as Texas House Democrats have fled the state in protest of GOP-led redistricting efforts. The Texas House of Representatives failed again on Tuesday to move forward on enacting the GOP's new congressional map, which could net Republicans between three and five seats in next year's midterm elections -- seats that could make a difference as Republican work to maintain their small majority in the U.S. House. "He believes gerrymandering is evil, no matter which party does it, and he has opposed it everywhere since his first unsuccessful campaign in 2005 in California. He considers the successful campaigns in 2008 and 2010 some of his proudest moments. For the politicians, this is about the next election. For him, this is a 20-year battle to 'terminate gerrymandering' regardless of the party at fault," said Ketchell, referencing the actor's well-known role in "The Terminator." As governor, Schwarzenegger pioneered Proposition 11, which set up the state's nonpartisan redistricting commission. He continued to push for similar measures in states across the country after he left office. In 2022, he even filed an amicus brief when the Supreme Court took up major gerrymandering case Moore v. Harper, arguing skewing congressional districts for partisan gains threatens democracy. Last Friday, the Schwarzenegger Institute for State and Global Policy, his University of Southern California public policy outpost, hosted a webinar with political scholars and key players in the fight -- including Texas House Rep. Gene Wu, the chair of the Texas House Democrats. Wu is among the group of Texas House Democrats who faces threats of expulsion from Gov. Greg Abbott after leaving the state. According to a source familiar with last week's panel, Wu said one of the dangers of gerrymandering is that elected officials don't feel obligated to listen to their constituents because their districts have been drawn very safe -- echoing national frustrations. "Nobody will be listened to," Wu said. "Everything will just be party politics." Even still, Wu, and much of his cohort, is standing behind Democratic governors who are floating the potential of redrawing their congressional districts a little bluer. In response to Texas' efforts, current California Gov. Gavin Newsom said last week that he had spoken with state legislators and members of Congress about holding a special statewide election on Nov. 4 for Californians to vote on new congressional maps -- ones that would likely favor Democrats. A potential anti-gerrymandering campaign from Schwarzenegger tees up a potential face-off between the former and current governor -- an added adversary as Newsom battles Texas Republicans and the White House head on. Rob Stutzman, a Republican strategist who worked for Schwarzenegger, said he doesn't anticipate his former boss' passion has waned, he doesn't think any clash would be personal. "He's passionate about fighting gerrymandering. I'm sure he finds the partisan gerrymandering machinations of both parties an affront to healthy Democracy," Stutzman said. "Arnold's not shy about anything, but I doubt it would be personal."