We keep an eye on Pakistan and India every day: Marco Rubio says ‘ceasefires can fall apart very quickly'
'…the only way to have a ceasefire is for both sides to agree to stop firing at one another. And the Russians just haven't agreed to that. Beyond that, I would say that one of the complications about ceasefires is they have to be maintained, which is very difficult. I mean, every single day we keep an eye on what's happening between Pakistan and India, what's happening between Cambodia and Thailand,' Rubio said while speaking to NBC News.
'Ceasefires can fall apart very quickly, especially after a three-and-a-half-year war (in Ukraine) like what we're facing now, but I don't think anyone disagrees that the ideal here, what we're aiming for is not some permanent ceasefire. What we're aiming for here is a peace deal so there's not a war now and there's not a war in the future.'
In a separate conversation with Fox Business, Rubio once again brought up the recent India-Pakistan conflict, which President Donald Trump has often asserted he resolved.
'And I think we are very fortunate and blessed and should be thankful to have a President who has made peace and the achievement of peace a priority of his administration. We've seen it in Cambodia and Thailand. We've seen it in India-Pakistan. We've seen it in Rwanda and the DRC. And we're going to continue to pursue any opportunities we can find to bring about peace in the world,' Rubio said.
Since May 10, when Trump declared on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a 'full and immediate' ceasefire after the US-mediated talks, he has repeated nearly 40 times that he 'helped settle' their tensions, even linking it to promises of increased trade. But Prime Minister Narendra Modi told Parliament that no foreign leader asked India to halt Operation Sindoor. External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar also dismissed Trump's claim, stating there was no third-party role and the ceasefire had nothing to do with trade.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
27 minutes ago
- First Post
Why Trump hiked India tariffs but extended truce with China for Russian oil: Rubio cites Beijing's supply chain role
Rubio has defended Washington's decision to impose additional tariffs on India for continuing to import Russian oil, while sparing China from similar measures, warning that sanctioning Beijing could push up global energy prices. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has acknowledged that targeting China with s econdary sanctions for refining Russian oil could drive up global energy prices, defending Washington's decision to impose additional tariffs on India for continuing to import crude from Moscow while granting Beijing an extended reprieve. Speaking to Fox News on Sunday (August 17), Rubio explained why China, Russia's largest oil buyer, has been spared from punitive measures, while India faces a 50 per cent tariff, including a 25 per cent additional penalty for oil trade with Moscow. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He said much of the Russian oil purchased by Beijing is refined and sold into the global market, and imposing sanctions could disrupt supplies and raise prices. 'Well, if you look at the oil that's going to China and being refined, a lot of that is then being sold back into Europe. Europe's also buying natural gas still. Now, there are countries trying to wean themselves off it, but there's more Europe can do with regard to their own sanctions,' Rubio said in an interview with Fox News. Sanctions could drive up prices Rubio cautioned that sanctioning Chinese refiners would have disruptive consequences. 'If you put secondary sanctions on a country, let's say you were to go after the oil sales of Russian oil to China, well, China just refines that oil. That oil is then sold into the global marketplace, and anyone who's buying that oil would be paying more for it or, if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it,' he explained. He added that European nations purchasing Russian oil via China have already expressed concern over potential punitive measures. 'We have heard, when you talk about the Senate bill that was being proposed — where there was a hundred per cent tariff on China and India, we did hear from a number of European countries… some concern about what that could mean,' Rubio said. Secondary sanctions on Europe? Asked whether Europe could face sanctions for continuing to buy Russian energy, Rubio said, 'Well, I don't know about (sanctions) on Europe directly, obviously, but certainly there are implications to secondary sanctions. If you impose secondary sanctions on a country, as in the case of Russian oil shipments to China, China will simply refine that oil and it will return to the global market. Anyone buying this oil will pay a higher price, or if it is unavailable, they will have to look for alternative sources.' He reiterated that European nations have already voiced unease over such measures. 'When we discussed the Senate bill proposing a 100 percent tariff on China and India, we heard from a number of European countries that they were unhappy with that possibility,' he added. India-US tensions over Russian oil Rubio's comments come after he highlighted India's energy trade with Moscow as a long-standing irritant in Washington. Speaking to Fox Radio, he said India's continued purchases of Russian oil were 'helping to sustain the Russian war effort in Ukraine' and were 'most certainly a point of irritation' in US-India relations, though not the only one. 'India has huge energy needs and that includes the ability to buy oil and coal and gas and things that it needs to power its economy like every country does, and it buys it from Russia, because Russian oil is sanctioned and cheap. In many cases, they're selling it under the global price because of the sanctions,' Rubio said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Unfortunately, that is helping to sustain the Russian war effort. So it is most certainly a point of irritation in our relationship with India, not the only point of irritation. We also have many other points of cooperation with them.' While the US has refrained from sanctioning China, it has acted aggressively against India. After initially imposing a 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods, President Donald Trump recently doubled it to 50 per cent, penalising New Delhi for persisting with Russian oil imports. The White House also warned that secondary sanctions could follow if India did not alter course. The move has drawn accusations of double standards, as China continues to import large volumes of Russian oil without facing similar punitive measures. Despite Trump's repeated threats, India has maintained that its Russian oil purchases have continued and accused Washington of hypocrisy.
Scroll.in
27 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Guwahati Police summons ‘The Wire' editor despite Supreme Court protection
The Crime Branch in Guwahati has issued a summons to The Wire 's founding editor Siddharth Varadarajan in a first information report pertaining to an article on Operation Sindoor. The summons, issued on August 12, came despite the Supreme Court granting protection from arrest to Varadarajan and members of the foundation running the news outlet in another FIR filed by the Assam Police. Ankur Jain, the joint commissioner of police in Guwahati, told Scroll that the summons was issued as the Supreme Court order had come on a case filed in 'some other district'. In the latest notice, Varadarajan has been directed to appear before the investigating officer at the Crime Branch Police Station in Panbazar on August 22 at 11.30 am. The earlier case against Varadarajan was registered at Morigaon police station on July 11 under Section 152 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, which pertains to acts endangering the sovereignty, unity and integrity of India. It followed the publication of an article about Operation Sindoor titled ''IAF Lost Fighter Jets to Pak Because of Political Leadership's Constraints': Indian Defence Attache'. The fresh summons issued to Varadarajan cites the same charges, in addition to the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita sections pertaining to promoting enmity between different groups, publishing false or misleading information and criminal conspiracy. On August 12, a Supreme Court bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi granted protection from arrest to Vardarajan while hearing a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of Section 152. The petition was filed by the Foundation for Independent Journalism, which owns The Wire, and Varadarajan. The petitioners argued that the law was a repackaged version of the colonial sedition law. The bench issued a notice to the Union government and tagged the plea with another petition challenging the validity of the provision. Advocate Nitya Ramakrishnan, appearing for the petitioners, argued that the news article was a factual report of a seminar organised by a university in Indonesia and statements made by an Indian defence attaché on the military tactics used during Operation Sindoor. She added that the article also carried the Indian embassy's response to the defence attaché's remarks, which had also been reported by several other news outlets. In May 2022, the Supreme Court had ordered proceedings and criminal prosecutions for sedition under Section 124A of the erstwhile Indian Penal Code to be kept in abeyance. Critics have argued in the Supreme Court, in a separate matter, that Section 124A was slipped in again into the law in the guise of Section 152 when the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita replaced the Indian Penal Code in July 2024.
Time of India
27 minutes ago
- Time of India
Army Jawan Pinned To Pole, Beaten By Toll Plaza Workers On Meerut-Karnal Highway; 4 Arrested
Zelensky Does It AGAIN! From EU HQ, He Rejects Trump Plan, Lists His Own Conditions For Peace Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky pushed for a ceasefire before a peace deal with Russia, ahead of his meeting tomorrow with US President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, DC. Speaking alongside the chief of the European Commission, Ursula Von Der Leyen, Zelensky said it is 'impossible' to give up territory under Ukraine's Constitution. He also called on the Russian President Vladimir Putin to end the killings in Ukraine. Watch this video to know more. 5.8K views | 12 hours ago
