logo
Trump Has A New Plan To Get Women To Have More Babies. What Could Go Wrong?

Trump Has A New Plan To Get Women To Have More Babies. What Could Go Wrong?

Yahoo5 hours ago

In an effort to get Americans to have more children, the Trump administration has proposed ideas such as a $5,000 'baby bonus' or a $1,000 tax-deferred investment account for children born between 2025 and 2029. It's as if we're suddenly in a game of Monopoly: Have a baby, pass go and collect cash!
Their concern is that declining birth rates may lead to a smaller workforce amid an aging population, potentially straining economic stability and the social safety net. But having children can be a swift way into debt. According to the Brookings Institution, a financial think tank, the average middle-income family with two children — median income $80,610 ―spends $310,605 on each child by the time they reach 17.
Additionally, having children in the U.S. comes with risks that go well beyond economics. Maternal morbidity is significantly higher in the U.S. than in other developed countries, and since abortion bans came into effect in some states, deaths have risen — inTexas, maternal death shot up 56%, according to the Gender Policy Equity Institute. For white women, the rate doubled from 20 per 100,000 to 39.1; for Black women, who are historically at greater risk, rates jumped from 31.6 to 43.6 per 100,000 live births.
And those are just the implications for mothers; there are risks to babies as well. I made it through birth without too many complications, but my second son nearly didn't. He was born with VACTERL syndrome, a birth defect which affects multiple body systems. In the U.S., birth defects affect 1 in 33 babies and are the leading cause of infant death, making up 1 in 5 of all infant deaths. Racial disparities persist here, too,Black infants are over twice as likely to die relative to those born to parents of other races according to KFF.
My son has a 'rare' disease — fewer than 200,000 people in the U.S. have it. Collectively, however, rare diseases aren't as 'rare' as they may seem. An estimated 25 to 30 million Americans have one, and birth defects like gastroschisis — a condition in which an infant is born with its intestines protruding outside the body — carry higher risk factors for younger women.
Having a child with serious medical issues is like having a bomb explode in the heart of your family. After my son's birth, I was stuck at a hospital in Greenwich, Connecticut — my doctor refused to release me — as my newborn was sent via ambulance to a hospital in New York City for surgery. Emotionally, this was devastating.
My family was lucky; my son survived. My spouse had insurance coverage through his job. Our boy got the immediate and ongoing medical attention he needed. But out-of-pocket copays for the three surgeries that marked my son's first 100 days of life came to $10,000 per month.
Instead of staring into our baby's eyes, we were staring into a dark abyss that foretold possible bankruptcy. As exhausted as I was nursing, pumping, tending to a very sick child and his older brother, I also lay awake at night, terrified at the possibility of losing our health insurance.
We made it through that first year by the skin of our teeth. Others aren't so fortunate. With high premiums and higher deductibles, health insurance becomes prohibitive to many if not most Americans. Today, 41% of adults in the US have health care debt, according to KFF.
Those without health care coverage, and possibly even those with it, are only one accident or unfortunate circumstance away from bankruptcy. The inequities in health care grow the gap between wealthy and poor.
According to the Center for American Progress,congressional Republicans' plans to slash Medicaid funding and allow Affordable Care Act tax credits to expire, ACA health insurance marketplace premiums may increase by thousands of dollars each year. If the GOP dismantles the ACA, those with preexisting conditions — like my son ― could be denied coverage.
The Trump administration suggests that individuals who need help are lazy; that they must earn their keep. But women and families are trying — and it's clearly not possible. Young families can't afford children. Yet conservatives insist women have them anyway. The Biden administration was criticized as elitist for forgiving student loan debt, butstudent loan debt actually delays fertility for women, especially at the higher levels.
Granted, it's easy for me to suggest not having children — I have two, both nearly grown. But women deserve to know the risks that can alter their lives. As a mother, I felt helpless watching my child endure so much suffering. More recently, I regret bringing my children into a world in which abundant resources are shared as if they were scant. It's terrifying to know my sons may not have access to the support they need when they need it.
In countrieslike Japan, parents get a child allowance.In Italy, working women with two or more children receive additional pension contributions.In Hungary, women below the age of 40 who marry for the first time are eligible to receive an interest-free general-purpose loan worth $36,000 — which is forgiven in full for those with three offspring. The program was so successful that 2,400 families applied for the loan within the first two weeks.
But offering financial incentives to having children has had lukewarm success over the long term. For example,Hungary's birth rate in 2019 was 1.55 babies per woman. In 2024, it was 1.38 and declining.
The underlying assumption these countries and the Trump administration make is that individuals — both women and men — inherently want children. For whatever reasons, we may not. We may have goals exclusive to family and babies. Just because a government or country 'needs' them, it doesn't mean individuals do; and just because women can biologically have them, it doesn't mean they aspire to.
If the Trump administration truly wants women to have children, it should support them in real and practical ways. Offer child care facilities, adequate financial aid and programs to help families and children. Provide affordable health care that's accessible to everyone. Reinstate Medicare funding. Protect the Affordable Care Act. Recognize abortion as a part of maternal health care.
Knowing it is safe to have a child, and that the child will be safe in the world it is coming into, would be much more effective and persuasive than any one-time bonus.
Do you have a compelling personal story you'd like to see published on HuffPost? Find out what we're looking for here and send us a pitch at pitch@huffpost.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fidelity Says This ‘Stable' Investment Is Surprisingly Risky — What's Really the Safest Buy?
Fidelity Says This ‘Stable' Investment Is Surprisingly Risky — What's Really the Safest Buy?

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Fidelity Says This ‘Stable' Investment Is Surprisingly Risky — What's Really the Safest Buy?

Newer investors are often looking for the next big growth vehicle that can skyrocket your wealth the quickest. But slow, stable and predictable growth is a sweet spot investors should not overlook, such as that offered through both Treasurys and certificates of deposit (CDs). Find Out: Read Next: Both of these investment options have the potential to yield a guaranteed income without risking your initial investment if you keep them invested for a set time or 'maturity' period. However, just because an investment is stable, that doesn't actually mean it's without risk. Fidelity broke down the difference between the two investment options, to determine which one is truly the safest investment. Here are the key factors you need to consider. While earnings on any kind of investment are great, they feel a bit less so when you have to pay taxes on those earnings. Here's an area where Treasurys have a benefit over CDs. While the interest from any earnings on CDs are taxable, Treasurys are exempt from state income tax. So, investing in a Treasury can actually play into a tax protective strategy if you live in a high-tax state, particularly if you are in a high tax-bracket. From a tax perspective, if deciding between a Treasury and a CD yielding about the same APY, it probably makes more sense to go with the Treasury. Learn More: If you're making great earnings on an investment but don't have access to the funds, known as liquidity, this can be an issue. Both Treasurys and CDs share the same problem of locking in your funds until a 'maturity' date, which can be anywhere from a few months to a couple of years, on average. You can potentially sell both products before their maturity dates and receive a lower amount than what you'd get if you remained invested, but Treasurys have a more liquid market, according to Fidelity, making them easier to sell before their time if you need the funds faster. Once again, this gives the Treasury a slight edge over a CD. People often choose both CDs and Treasurys because of their low risks, so long as you stick with the maturity period. They both come with a fair amount of security in how they're backed. CDs are issued by banks and insured by the federal government's FDIC insurance (up to $250,000 per bank, per person). Plus, you can purchase them from different banks to increase the maximum protection — meaning if you bought one for $250,000 from Bank A and another $250,000 from Bank B, you'd be covered for $500,000. Treasurys are backed by the U.S. government with no limit. That means the government will do whatever it must to make sure they can pay you back at the time of your maturity. Thus, Fidelity suggested that Treasurys are a better choice for those who have large amounts of money they want to put in low-risk investments. If you have smaller amounts of money, it's probably about equal in terms of risk and safety to do a CD or a Treasury. The last deciding factor is when and how these investment products pay out. CDs have different rates and payment intervals, often between several months and a few years, so you could receive your payout in as little as six months, say. Treasury bills, on the other hand, can be invested for longer periods of time, as many as 10 to 30 years, which CDs do not offer. And, Fidelity pointed out, the Treasury market offers another product known as Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS), which also offer protection against inflation, something CDs don't do. While CDs are still a safe and stable option, especially for those investing smaller amounts, Treasurys have advantages that make them better for those with larger amounts to invest. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 Are You Rich or Middle Class? 8 Ways To Tell That Go Beyond Your Paycheck Clever Ways To Save Money That Actually Work in 2025 This article originally appeared on Fidelity Says This 'Stable' Investment Is Surprisingly Risky — What's Really the Safest Buy?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store