Recapture in Texas: Push to reform school property tax revenue redistribution policy
The Brief
There is a push to reform the way funds are redistributed among school districts in Texas.
The practice is known as "recapture" or "Robin Hood".
Some district leaders say the amount they're paying to help other districts is leaving their own students at a disadvantage.
AUSTIN, Texas - Education is dominating the debate at the Texas Capitol this session, from school choice to teacher pay to increasing public school funding.
However, there is also a push to reform the way money is redistributed among districts though a policy known as "recapture" or "Robin Hood".
What we know
Recapture is a state policy designed to share the wealth among school districts.
In general, districts with high property values have to pay money back to the state, to help districts with less of a tax base.
By the numbers
Last year, Austin ISD's recapture payment was $699 million—the highest in Texas.
Other neighboring school districts didn't shell out quite that much, but still sent back millions in school property tax revenue to the state in 2024, including:
Eanes ISD - $95 million
Lake Travis ISD - $43 million
Leander ISD - $12 million
Round Rock ISD - $10 million
What they're saying
"I look around the state and I don't feel like Austin is so much more wealthy than some of these other areas," said state Rep. Vikki Goodwin (D-Austin).
"We want to do our part and we realize that we're a fortunate district," said Eanes ISD Superintendent Jeff Arnett. "But does it need to be two thirds of our local property tax revenues? There seems to be a significant imbalance there that we would certainly like for the legislature to revisit."
"People are rightfully upset about that," said Goodwin. "When a district is running a deficit, when a district is having to create larger class sizes and not being able to do all the things that they need to do to have the best education possible, and we're sending money away."
Goodwin questions where that money is actually going, and suggests funding districts in need should be up to the state, not other districts.
"You know, there's a big bucket of money. The state isn't paying its share, in our opinion," said Goodwin. "Honestly, if we weren't paying recapture, the state could make up that difference."
The other side
Roger Falk of the Travis County Taxpayers Union argues Robin Hood is necessary.
"The Constitution requires equal funding for all the school systems in Texas," said Falk. "It's like we're the billionaires saying, 'I don't like to pay that tax bill'."
Falk argues money coming from places like Austin is a vital lifeline for other districts.
"You look at like El Paso," said Falk. "It has a small fraction of the tax base, and consequently they need some help."
Local perspective
"When you talk about redistributing people's money, there's pros and cons to that," said taxpayer Ryan Waguespack.
People we spoke to in Austin say it may be time to rethink recapture.
"If they're not making enough money to cover their expenses and you're sending it out, that doesn't make a whole lot of economic sense," said Waguespack.
"I do own a home here and I pay high property taxes," said Stephanie Woo, an Austin homeowner. "I think we need to have some more being distributed here."
What's next
Goodwin says she's optimistic some changes can be made to lessen the burden.
"I'm absolutely hopeful. I have heard from Rep. Tom Oliver that he's putting forth a bill on the idea," said Goodwin. "I look forward to seeing that and I think it's a great idea. I think we should have a commission meet and talk about how we can improve our school funding formula."
The Source
Information in this report comes from reporting and interviews by FOX 7 Austin's 7 On Your Side reporter John Krinjak.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth Stumped by Law 101 Question About Marines in L.A.
Pete Hegseth was at a loss when a senator asked him to cite the part of the Constitution that authorized the deployment of 700 active-duty marines against anti-ICE protestors in Los Angeles. 'I'd have to pull up the specific provision,' Donald Trump's defense secretary, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee Wednesday, told Sen. Tammy Baldwin, a Democrat. 'But our Office of General Counsel, alongside our leadership, has reviewed and ensured, in the order that we set out, that it's completely constitutional for the president to use federal troops to defend federal law enforcement.' Baldwin wasn't appeased. 'Look, I'd like to know the specific constitutional, statutory authority,' she said. The senator observed that Trump had pointed to the law he invoked to send the National Guard into L.A. 'There's plenty of precedent of active-duty troops being used to support law enforcement—historical precedent,' Hegseth fired back. Baldwin said she was not trying to dispute this point and pressed Hegseth once more for a straight answer. 'It's in the order ma'am, but we'll make sure we get it to you as well,' Hegseth said. Trump sent in the marines on Monday, after previously deploying 2,000 national guardsmen over the weekend. While a state's governor typically signs off in the rare instance when troops are used against American citizens, California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, did not approve the decision. The governor has accused Trump of 'manufacturing a crisis' by sending in troops and said the move was 'purposely inflammatory and will only escalate tensions.' As Trump again went over his head to deploy marines, Newsom pleaded with a court to intervene. 'They must be stopped immediately,' read a court filing. Trump's deployment of the National Guard, which cited the Title 10 authority, was already a legal gray area. It says the president can only mobilize the guard against his own citizens in times of invasion or rebellion.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Political events in Southern Colorado this weekend
(COLORADO SPRINGS) — There are two very different political events in Southern Colorado this Saturday, June 14. People are protesting President Donald Trump in many locations, in light of the military parade at the nation's capital. At the same time, the El Paso County Young Republicans will host their second annual Summer Ranch Social. FOX21 News spoke with both groups. It's very important to note that these events are completely unrelated and just happen to fall on the same day. The protests stem from a global movement called 'No Kings'. If you check out their protest map by clicking here, you can see it's happening across America, but also overseas. 'When you have somebody who is making executive orders by the dozen, that is just, you know, bypassing Congress and bypassing the laws that we have, threatening the courts, threatening journalists, these important rights… you know, saying that protesters will be arrested. These are all part of the Constitution,' said Shawn Maddox, with 50501 Colorado Springs, 'these are our constitutional rights, and we respect and want to defend our Constitution.' In Southern Colorado, organizers have protests planned for Colorado Springs, Pueblo, Trinidad, and more. Local political organizations, 50501 Colorado Springs and Indivisible Colorado Springs, both decided to get involved. 'As an organization, we expect all of our supporters to conduct themselves lawfully and responsibly, and disavow anything advocating for disruption or violence,' said Maddox. 'We try to make sure that people stay out of the streets and don't block traffic. We, you know, are just there for the people and to keep the protests peaceful.' The Colorado Springs Police Department says it is aware of the event and prepared to respond to potential threats that may arise. The El Paso County Young Republicans Co-chair says its Summer Ranch Social is a day for connection, and only about 5% politics. 'Right now our focus is, to the extent that it's possible here in Colorado, forwarding President Trump's agenda and helping make the case for what he's doing… Protecting the rule of law,' said Joel Sorensen, the El Paso County Young Republicans Co-chair. Congressman Jeff Crank, who represents El Paso County, will attend as a special guest. 'One party domination doesn't do good things for the citizens of that community, especially here in El Paso, where we're really, you know, a red dot in a blue state… and then just making sure that that voice of resistance is there in the Denver capital,' said Sorensen. He says it's a time of unity within the party, and that President Trump is doing exactly what he was elected to do. 'Our parents' generation was able to afford a home. They were able to have a family… I think that there's a recognition that the Republican Party has come to, that there is something that we've lost and that we want to restore that,' said Sorensen. If you're interested in attending the Summer Ranch Social, an RSVP is required. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sen. Rand Paul Blasts Trump Over Revoked Invite To White House Picnic
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) on Wednesday slammed President Donald Trump for uninviting him and his family from the White House picnic. Paul has opposed the Trump administration's decision to 'actively' seek to suspend habeas corpus. Habeas corpus — the constitutional freedom that translates to 'you should have the body' in Latin — ensures that detained individuals, whether or not they are citizens, are able to physically appear in front of a judge. 'I think I'm the first senator in the history of the United States to be uninvited to the White House picnic,' Paul told reporters on Wednesday. 'I just find this incredibly petty. I mean — I have been, I think, nothing but polite to the president.' The picnic is an annual event held by the White House on the South Lawn, which members from both aisles of Congress typically attend. 'They've decided they want to declare war on my family and exclude us from the White House, and I just think it's incredibly petty,' Paul added on Wednesday, saying that White House staffers are 'running sort of a paid influencer campaign against me for two weeks on Twitter.' Paul said his son, daughter-in-law and infant grandson were supposed to attend the picnic with him. He also added that he did not receive an explanation as to why they all were no longer invited, and he's not sure if the revoked invitation came from Trump or his staffers. Habeas corpus is 'one most fundamental rights we have,' Paul said. 'And the same people that are directing this campaign are the same people that casually would throw out parts of the Constitution and suspend habeas corpus. So, I think what it tells it they don't like hearing me say stuff like that, and so they want to quiet me down. And it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me.' Paul has drawn Trump's ire on more than one occasion in recent days. Earlier this month, Paul voiced concerns about Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' prompting Trump to take jabs at him online. 'Rand Paul has very little understanding of the BBB, especially the tremendous GROWTH that is coming,' Trump said on his Truth Social platform. 'He loves voting 'NO' on everything, he thinks it's good politics, but it's not. The BBB is a big WINNER!!!' Paul also criticized Trump's upcoming military parade on Saturday, Trump's birthday. Paul told HuffPost the parade reminded him of the Soviet Union and North Korea. The White House did not immediately respond to HuffPost's request for comment. Trump Seethes Over Rand Paul Continuing To Oppose 'Big, Beautiful Bill' Trump Unironically Attends 'Les Misérables' As Protests Spread GOP Senators Freak Out When Asked About Trump's Military Parade Costing $45 Million