logo
Aussie residents devastated after 'beautiful' trees mysteriously die after property sale

Aussie residents devastated after 'beautiful' trees mysteriously die after property sale

Yahoo02-04-2025

Residents living along a tight-knit Aussie street are "devastated" after a clump of extremely important trees that had towered over their suburb began to die mysteriously. The leaves began to brown and the branches withered just weeks after the elderly couple who had lived at the large Sydney block for decades sold it to developers.
'They were in absolute perfect health. They were beautiful. They weren't dropping leaves or big branches,' local man Daryl told Yahoo News.
It was last month, while talking with a neighbour over the fence, that the 59-year-old noticed they were looking sick. 'He looked to me and said, oh my god, what's wrong with those trees?' he said.
Since the trees began to die, neighbours, many of them retirees, are battling a daily onslaught of small dead branches and leaves that fall onto their driveways. Some have had to pay for extra gardening services, and one woman reportedly cut her leg open on a fallen stick.
Most of the residents know each other, and the dying trees have been the talk of the neighbourhood. 'Everyone is devastated,' Daryl said.
Related: 🌳 Charming Aussie town split over future of 80-year-old trees
The eucalypts are located in leafy St Ives, on a side street off busy Mona Vale Road, in Sydney's north. The area has been undergoing rapid change, with large blocks along the arterial road worth millions because they can be converted from single to multiple dwellings.
Ku-ring-gai Council told Yahoo it became aware of the dying trees after a tip-off from residents on March 12 who documented large holes drilled into their trunks and sawdust on the ground. 'We found five Blackbutt trees that were displaying signs typical of toxic shock (that is likely poisoning),' it told Yahoo News.
Council confirmed it had not given permission for the trees to be killed or cut down. And while it's commonplace for councils around Sydney to investigate tree poisonings, in this case, action against the the damage appears to be outside its powers because the trees could be part of a very rare forest.
'Council does not have the power to investigate this matter. This is because the trees are part of a Critically Endangered Ecological Community,' a spokesperson told Yahoo.
Council suspects the trees belong to the Sydney Turpentine-Ironbark Forest in the Sydney Basin Bioregion, a type of habitat that's protected under the state's NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016. Less than 0.5 per cent of this landscape remains, and the state government is responsible for protecting it from threats, which it says include clearing for development, inappropriate treatment of weeds, invasive pests, and fire.
The NSW Department of Environment (DCCEEW) confirmed it was aware of the reports, but it was unable to provide details of its investigation.
'DCCEEW... has received a report of alleged poisoning of trees at this address but no further comment can be provided as the investigation is ongoing,' it said.
😳 Call for overhaul of Aussie council powers after controversial tree decision
🧑‍🌾 Aussie farmer sparks debate after boasting of controversial change to 'useless land'
🦜 Fears for rare bird as state reveals details of controversial hunt plan
Tree poisonings are a common occurrence across Sydney, but prosecutions are relatively rare as it can be difficult to identify those responsible. But few are investigated at a state government level.
Daryl believes penalties need to be increased to stop vandals from destroying trees in future. Because in his view, these trees that were loved by his community were 'murdered'.
'It's not as though these are just small trees. But you know, whoever did it will probably get away with it. The whole thing just frustrates me so much,' he said.
'When we moved here, the guy who lived there used to feed the cockatoos and the tree used to be full of them. They're gone now.'
Love Australia's weird and wonderful environment? 🐊🦘😳 Get our new newsletter showcasing the week's best stories.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Disgraced ex-pol Anthony Weiner heads crowded field of NYC Council candidates heading into June 24 primary
Disgraced ex-pol Anthony Weiner heads crowded field of NYC Council candidates heading into June 24 primary

New York Post

timea day ago

  • New York Post

Disgraced ex-pol Anthony Weiner heads crowded field of NYC Council candidates heading into June 24 primary

Political comeback bids by disgraced ex-Rep. Anthony Weiner and a grudge match pitting Republican rivals in southern Brooklyn highlight the 51 City Council races heading into the June 24 primary. The scandal-scarred Weiner is taking a stab at re-entering public life after being sentenced to 21 months in jail in 2017 for sexting with a minor, and he has his eyes set on replacing term-limited lefty Carlina Rivera in Manhattan's District 2 that includes the East Village and the Lower East Side. The 60-year-old former congressman — who was a frontrunner in the 2013 mayoral race before ultimately finishing fifth in the primary – heads a field of five Democratic candidates and admits trying to reinvent himself. 4 The disgraced ex-pol Anthony Weiner leads a crowded field of City Council candidates. J.C. Rice 'I'm trying to do a high-wire act blindfolded over a pond of angry alligators, you know?' he said. 'I got my scandal. I haven't run in a while, and I am running as a different kind of candidate.' The once-rising Democratic star told The Post he's 'not hiding' from his past and insists most voters haven't made it an issue on the campaign trail and that hopes his experience as an elected official will put him over the top. Still, he conceded the comeback bid won't be easy – especially in his uber-liberal district where he's running as a 'practical common-sense Democrat in a time that the party has lost its way.' He said his competitors – which include Assemblyman Harvey Epstein (D-Manhattan) and ex-Mayor Bill de Blasio aide and nonprofit leader Sarah Batchu – are too 'far left,' so he's banking on voters seeking more moderate leadership. 4 Weiner believes Assemblyman Harvey Epstein is too far left for most voters. Hans Pennink 'I consider myself a fairly progressive person, but I don't think it's progressive to think it's okay to pay $2.90 to get on the subway while five people are climbing [the turnstile] behind you and don't pay,' Weiner said. 'And I don't think it's a progressive value to spend a billion-and-a-half dollars on police overtime when we could be hiring more police officers.' Epstein hasn't had his own sex scandal, but he did inspire a 'Saturday Night Live' comedy sketch last year that goofed on him running for office while unfortunately having a comparable name to two notorious sexual predators: Harvey Weinstein and Jeffrey Epstein. He didn't return messages. Besides Weiner, three other Democratic candidates are also trying to write political redemption stories by winning back council seats: Andy King and Fernando Cabrera of The Bronx and Ruben Wills of Queens. Wills was bounced from the Council in 2017 after being found guilty in a corruption trial of stealing more than $30,000 in public funds, but the conviction was overturned four years ago. The Council voted to expel King in 2020 following a series of ethics charges alleging he misused government funds and mistreated his staff. Cabrera, an influential pastor who served as Mayor Eric Adams $227,786-a-year senior spiritual advisor from 2022 through mid-2023, came under fire repeatedly while a councilman the previous 12 years for making numerous anti-gay remarks, including praising the notoriously homophobic government of Uganda. 4 The race between Inna Vernikov and Ari Kagan has been nasty. Paul Martinka In Brooklyn's 48th District that includes Sheepshead Bay, incumbent Inna Vernikov is trying to fend off a challenge from ex-Councilman Ari Kagan in the Republican primary. The race has been nasty — despite both being ideologically indistinguishable, including vowing to fight to improve public safety, keep homeless shelters out of the district and combat antisemitism and illegal dumping., Kagan has boasted he's a 'harder worker' than Vernikov, who he ripped as an 'absentee councilwoman.' Vernikov says Kagan is a fraud — a Democrat at heart based on his voting record. Both candidates were previously Dems. 4 Kagan has painted Vernikov as an absentee official. Gabriella Bass As a councilwoman, Vernikov has been a lead voice for Zionists combating antisemitism since the start of the Israel-Hamas War, helped remove homeless encampments plaguing her district and has fought to preserve neighborhood parking access despite the city pushing an anti-car agenda. Her key endorsements include the city's police officers, correction officers and firefighters unions and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) Kagan, who works as a senior advisor to state Sen. Steve Chan (R-Brooklyn), is being endorsed by Assemblymen Michael Novakhov and Alec Brook-Krasny, who represent parts of southern Brooklyn. Other incumbents facing tough primary fights include Brooklyn Democrats Shahana Hanif and Alexa Aviles, both card carrying members of the Democratic Socialists of America, and fellow lefty Chris Marte of Lower Manhattan. The far-left, pro-Palestine Hanif began bending over backwards to show support for Jews earlier this year after momentum in her district that includes Park Slope continued to grow for her Jewish opponent Maya Kornberg, who works at NYU's Brennan Center. Hanif was singing a different tune before the primary challenge emerged. In April 2023, she was one of just two council members to vote against an 'End Jew Hatred Day' resolution — calling it a 'far right' idea. And in the days after Hamas' Oct. 7, 2023 terror attack on Israel, Hanif insisted in a since-deleted post on X 'the root cause of this war is the illegal, immoral, and unjust occupation of the Palestinian people,' and that 'no peace' should be expected. Although the scores of NYC Council candidates have raised more than $18 million combined in private and public matching funds for their respective races, the Council isn't expected to look significantly different next year with only eight races wide open because of term-limits and many incumbents running unopposed or against political novices.

Council votes to widen surveillance at city parks
Council votes to widen surveillance at city parks

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Council votes to widen surveillance at city parks

A one-year pilot program to install more video monitoring at city-owned parks prone to high crime was recently approved by the Hono ­lulu City Council. The Council voted unanimously to pass Resolution 128, which seeks to authorize the use of overt video surveillance at Oahu's public parks to deter crime and provide 'a safe environment for city residents, visitors and employees.' Introduced in April by Council member Radiant Cordero, the resolution says the Honolulu Police Department and other city agencies 'are currently utilizing video surveillance cameras and installing additional video surveillance cameras at various locations within the city, including but not limited to Waikiki, downtown Honolulu, East Oahu, and west side city parks.' The legislation also seeks to quell violent crime at city parks. 'There are multiple reports of violent crimes occurring in parks operated by the Department of Parks and Recreation, the most recent being reports of gunfire on April 20, 2025, at Ala Moana Regional Park, which is one of the busiest parks on Oahu and is frequently visited by tourists, ' the legislation states. Resolution 128 underscores HPD's vacancy of over 450 police officer positions as well. HPD 'is currently dealing with a staffing shortage that would impact the department's ability to maintain a physical presence at city parks in order to detect and deter criminal activity, ' the legislation says. To aid policing efforts, the resolution urges the city to implement 'a one-year pilot program, in order to achieve the legitimate public purposes and legitimate law enforcement objectives … including the detection and deterrence of criminal activity and ensuring the safety and security of the general public and its property.' It says the pilot program is authorized for 'at least one city park per Council district, to be identified by the Council member assigned to that Council district based on a pattern of high criminal activity or ongoing public safety concerns for the respective park.' The legislation states 'overt video monitoring devices authorized under this resolution must be overt and clearly visible, with appropriate public signage to inform the public as set forth pursuant to (city laws ).' Cordero—whose Council District 7 spans Kalihi Kai to Waimalu Kai—previously told the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that her resolution 'was prompted by a series of break-ins at one of my district parks, highlighting the urgent need for stronger security.' 'The need for video surveillance in Oahu's city parks is driven by growing concerns over public safety and rising violent crimes, ' she said. 'Notable incidents include gunfire at Ala Moana Regional Park, two break-ins in a District 7 city park, and the recent fire at the Wahiawa District Park Playground.' 'By testing this approach through a pilot program, we can assess its effectiveness and make data-driven decisions for future expansion, ' she added. Cordero said the projected cost of her park surveillance program was not determined. Before the Council's vote on June 4, Cordero noted a major amendment to her resolution—that video monitoring devices placed at parks must not face private property. During public testimony, Hawaii Kai resident Natalie Iwasa opposed Resolution 128. 'I think there's a segment of our population that is particularly sensitive to video monitoring, and that is the immigrants and legal nationals here, especially given the ICE actions, ' she told the Council. 'So we need to be cognizant of that.' Iwasa said surveillance cameras may not deter crime either. 'When you put cameras in one location it seems logical to me that crime is going to move right around the corner where the cameras are not visible, ' she asserted. 'So how does the placement of the cameras in certain areas impact crime in the neighboring areas ?' Chandra Kanemaru, an Aliamanu-Salt Lake-Foster Village-Airport Neighborhood Board member, backed the resolution. 'With the alarming increase in damage and break-in reports at our local district parks and the recent arson fire at the Wahiawa District Park, it is clear that our city's public facilities are under threat, ' she said via written testimony. 'We must act swiftly to protect and monitor these facilities and prevent the rising wave of vandalism and destruction affecting our community, particularly our youth.' Kanemaru added 'the destructive actions of these crimes are not just damaging property and costing thousands in funds to repair and replace equipment ; they are penalizing the youths who rely on these parks, pools, and municipal building structures for a safe outlet to exercise and participate in organized team sports activities.' DPR spokesperson Nate Serota confirmed there are currently 165 surveillance cameras installed at 16 city parks on Oahu. 'There have been cameras in city parks for well over a decade under a variety of initiatives, ' he previously told the Star-Advertiser. 'Our most recent batch of surveillance cameras installed included 25 new surveillance cameras within Ala Moana Regional Park.' Cameras are installed and maintained with in-house city staff, while costs depend on the particular cameras used as well as who paid for them, he said. Organizations, like the Hawai 'i Tourism Authority, sponsored 75 cameras, including at Kapiolani Regional Park. He added the 'footage from these cameras is not continuously monitored.' As far as park vandalism is concerned, Serota said the parks department will 'spend between $300, 000 to $400, 000 annually addressing vandalism through in-house maintenance.'

New laws with up to $80,000 fine that many don't know is illegal: 'Happening weekly'
New laws with up to $80,000 fine that many don't know is illegal: 'Happening weekly'

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

New laws with up to $80,000 fine that many don't know is illegal: 'Happening weekly'

A leading Aussie lawyer is urging the public to take note of a fast-growing trend he now sees on a "weekly" basis — warning it could cost you thousands in fines or even land you behind bars, with penalties climbing as high as $80,000 in some regions. Avinash Singh has seen firsthand how the growing trend is taking hold, particularly among young people and those involved in the drug trade. "Most of those carrying knives either wrongly believe they are allowed to for self-defence. Or, they know they cannot carry knives for self-defence but do so anyway, because the consequences of not carrying a knife are more severe than being caught with one," Singh told Yahoo News Australia. He said that while some young people claim they carry knives to feel safe, especially in certain areas, self-defence is not considered a reasonable excuse under the law. "People who carry knives should be aware that the new laws are intended to significantly increase the penalties for these offences, including jail time," Singh, Principal Lawyer at Astor Legal, warned. The warning comes after police arrested a 15-year-old boy in NSW this week, after an alleged knife incident at Macquarie Park on June 9. He stands accused of chasing three people with a machete near a shopping centre bus stop. On Wednesday, police shot a teen girl after she allegedly wielded a knife and made threats outside a Townsville pub in Queensland. Every Australian jurisdiction has laws prohibiting the carrying of knives without a lawful reason, and penalties have become significantly tougher in 2025. In New South Wales, carrying a knife without a lawful excuse carries a maximum penalty of four years' imprisonment and a fine of $4,400. From September, the penalties in Victoria will increase, with offenders facing up to two years behind bars and fines of $30,700. In Queensland, knife possession can land you a year in prison and a fine of up to $6,452. The state has also made it illegal to sell knives to anyone under 18, with the change coming into effect on September 1, 2024. Western Australia has some of the most severe monetary penalties, with individuals facing up to three years' imprisonment and fines reaching $36,000. In South Australia, knife carrying can lead to six months' imprisonment and a $2,500 fine, while Tasmania is moving to increase penalties to three years' imprisonment and fines of up to $20,100, up from the current $10,050. Meanwhile, in the Northern Territory, the maximum penalty is one year in prison or a $37,000 fine. But the Australian Capital Territory imposes the toughest sanctions of all. Those caught with a knife can be sentenced to five years' imprisonment and slapped with a fine of up to $80,000. Singh said the laws have tightened considerably in 2025, with most states now empowering police to conduct warrantless searches and use metal detectors "wanting" where they reasonably suspect someone may be carrying a knife. "Enhanced education, particularly for young people, would be a positive step. Schools should consider adding a course so that young people are aware of the consequences of carrying knives and that self-defence is not a legal defence," he said. Singh explained that under the law, the only reasonable excuses for carrying a knife include things like: needing it for work or training; using it for food preparation (such as camping or hunting); for religious purposes; for a lawful sport or recreational activity; for lawful exhibitions or collections; or as part of wearing an official uniform. "We have represented a number of minors accused of carrying knives — generally from lower socio-economic areas — carrying knives for self-defence. Unfortunately, a lot of these young people have been assaulted and/or threatened themselves," Singh said. "They feel that reporting the matter to police after the fact will do them little good, particularly if they are seriously injured or even killed. As such, they often feel that they have to carry a knife to protect themselves." But Singh says the legal system doesn't allow for this kind of reasoning. In the eyes of the law, a fear of harm — even if justified — is not a defence for possession. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store