logo
In Iraq, being a Jew made me a target. Now I feel unsafe at home.

In Iraq, being a Jew made me a target. Now I feel unsafe at home.

USA Today2 days ago

In Iraq, being a Jew made me a target. Now I feel unsafe at home. | Opinion The threats I confronted and precautions I took as a soldier in Iraq are now a new reality in America. It is no secret that hatred for Jews is on the rise.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Nathan Fielder slams Paramount+ for cutting antisemitism episode
Nathan Fielder didn't hold back on 'The Rehearsal,' using his HBO platform to call out Paramount+ for removing a controversial episode of 'Nathan for You'.
unbranded - Entertainment
The horrific attack June 1 in Boulder, Colorado, against predominantly Jews marching to raise awareness for the hostages held in Gaza is yet another sad example that there is no safe place to be a Jew.
The irony is that as an American Jew deployed as an Army officer to Iraq, I understood the risks of my service. I knew that if I were captured by al-Qaida and my religion became known, I would assuredly be publicly and brutally tortured and killed. For this reason, I was careful who I shared this information with while in combat. Even the military dog tags that I wore for casualty identification omitted my religious preference. All of these precautions made sense given I was in a war zone fighting a vicious terrorist organization that would kill me simply for being Jewish.
When I left the Army, I strongly believed that America was a haven from this type of intolerance and extremism. I grew up in a predominantly Jewish suburb of Chicago, openly wore my Judaism and went to synagogue without any fear of harm. Sadly, the surprise attacks by Hamas against Israelis on Oct. 7, 2023, and the war that has ensued provided a false narrative justifying the targeting and killing of Jews wherever they live and without any regard to their connection to Israel.
Shockingly, the threats I confronted and precautions I took as a soldier in Iraq are now a new reality in America. It is no secret that hatred for Jews is on the rise. The Anti-Defamation League reported that in the three months following the Israel-Hamas war, antisemitic incidents in the United States skyrocketed by 361%.
Due to this increase, 56% of American Jews say they have altered their behavior and the way they live their lives out of fear, according to the American Jewish Committee.
Opinion: Imagine surviving the Holocaust only to be attacked in America. It happened in Colorado.
My family had close calls with Jew-hating gunmen. The global intifada is in America.
There are countless stories behind these troubling figures. Even my own family has had several close encounters with Jew-hating gunmen.
On July 4, 2022, my family was moments away from the Independence Day parade in Highland Park, Illinois, when the far-right Nazi sympathizer Robert Crimo III opened fire on the large Jewish gathering, where five of the seven people killed were Jewish or members of Jewish families.
And just on May 22, my wife attended the event at the Capital Jewish Museum where police say far-left gunman Elias Rodriguez fatally shot two attendees presumably because he believed they were Jewish. According to court document filed by the FBI, he said he killed 'for Palestine ... for Gaza.'
Jews understand the message. We are targets – in our homes and at schools, synagogues and even parades.
Opinion: 2 Israeli Embassy staff were killed. It's not about 'free Palestine.'
The Palestinian intifada is patently a terrorists' playbook. There have been two previous intifadas, in 1987 and 2000 – both were grotesque in that they targeted passenger buses, children, cafes and clubs in Israel to strike fear among the population.
The latest Palestinian intifada is now globalized, but the concept is identical to its predecessors. All Jews are fair game – killing under the guise of Palestinian liberation and justice. These domestic extremists are cut from the same cloth as Hamas terrorists – whom they openly praise.
In fact, they have embraced the same ideology that killed my wife's first cousin, Dani Levi, during the surprise attack on Kibbutz Be'eri on Oct. 7, 2023. Dani served as an emergency room doctor providing lifesaving care to injured Israelis until Hamas attacked his clinic.
Jews cannot fight this battle alone. We all must take a stand against antisemitism.
What can be done to address the harmful rhetoric and violence directed against Jews?
First, American Jews must continue to live as Jews. For example: Openly wear the Magen David necklace, attend Jewish events, vocally advocate for truth and, most important, do not fear their identity. Jews must make it a point that we are here to stay and even adopt the U.S. Army's motto: 'This We'll Defend.'
Second, the world runs on alliances. American Jews can't fight this battle alone. Just as the Jews marched shoulder-to-shoulder with marginalized people during the 1960s Civil Rights Movement for equal rights, so too will the Jews need the help of non-Jews to advocate and call out antisemitism, however it manifests.
Last, Jews must continue to speak truth to power whether to our own government or regarding the Israeli government's policies. Like any group, Jews are not a monolith. It's important that we express diversity of thought on Israel, Gaza and the future of peace in the region.
All people deserve empathy, and we should do so with a dose of humility – understanding that the issues at play are complex and that people are suffering, including Palestinians.
However, where there is no nuance and room for compromise is in calls for global violence against Jews, or to free Palestine from all Jews. This is rank terrorism and a call for genocide against the Jewish people living in Israel. America is free, but we should never tolerate the intolerable.
Steven Katz was an active-duty Army officer from 2003-09. He served two combat tours in Iraq in ground combat leadership positions, receiving the Bronze Star medal. He also served as defense and intelligence adviser to Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colorado. He is co-director of the Celiz Antisemitism Taskforce for the Jewish War Veterans of America (JWV).

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NYC mayoral candidates see who can promise more than upstart socialist Mamdani — while Cuomo ducks and dodges debate attacks
NYC mayoral candidates see who can promise more than upstart socialist Mamdani — while Cuomo ducks and dodges debate attacks

New York Post

time34 minutes ago

  • New York Post

NYC mayoral candidates see who can promise more than upstart socialist Mamdani — while Cuomo ducks and dodges debate attacks

Zohran Mamdani might or might not win the Dems' mayoral primary, but the first debate showed he's already won the argument. The two-hour showdown turned into a bidding war to see who could promise to deliver more government giveaways than the 33-year-old Queens assemblyman. It's a lost cause when the trend setter is an admitted socialist who promises free everything, from food to rent to bus service. Free except, of course, for the evil top 1 percent, who would be taxed to pay for it all. Unless they pack up and join the huge exodus of people who already have given up on New York ever fixing itself. The debate showed how deeply the rot runs and why pessimism about the city's future is the only sane response. The sickening pandering to the left amounts to a race to the bottom, and re-affirmed for me why I don't have a candidate yet. I didn't see anyone on that stage whom I can envision doing even an average job in City Hall, let alone turning around a declining city the way Ed Koch, Rudy Giuliani and Mike Bloomberg did. Democratic mayoral candidates Andrew Cuomo, left, shakes hands with Zohran Mamdani, center, as Whitney Tilson reacts after participating in a Democratic mayoral primary debate, Wednesday, June 4, 2025, in New York. AP Mamdani is the flavor of the moment for many young voters, but his socialist ideas are dead-enders. Is he really that ignorant about the history of the world and the countries that have gone full socialist? Additionally, his refusal again to say Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state is disqualifying. If it talks and walks like an antisemite, it's an antisemite. Mayor Adams, whom I supported four years ago, is such a wounded incumbent that he saw no path forward in his party, so he's running as an independent. Targeting Cuo The other major theme of the evening was the gang-up on Andrew Cuomo. Polls have consistently shown him as the clear front-runner, with Mamdani running a solid second and most of the others stuck in single digits. While I expected that Cuomo, the former governor who resigned in August of 2021 before he could be impeached and convicted over a slew of sexual harassment allegations, would be a target, I was surprised at how frequently even the also-rans found a way to attack him in their answers to most questions. They clearly calculated that the only way to pull themselves up is to pull him down. Even more surprising was that Cuomo often appeared unprepared for the onslaught. He hemmed and hawed, cleared his throat and seemed to be trying to run out the clock on the brief time moderators allotted for answers rather than give sharp, clear responses. His hesitancy could be seen as playing it safe with his lead, but I believe it's also possible his heart is really not in the race. His low-energy is a sharp contrast to his past habits, when he was the consummate pugnacious pol. Now he seems to be running on auto pilot, as if he'd rather be in Albany or running for president. Or maybe just home watching TV. One sign I see is that, after all this time, he still doesn't have a clear, credible answer on the nursing home debacle he caused and can't bring himself to acknowledge mistakes. When the topic turned to reports of a federal probe of whether Cuomo lied to Congress about his role in a state report downplaying the number of deaths, Mamdani seized the opening to say bluntly: 'Andrew Cuomo did lie to Congress.' Comptroller Brad Lander seconded the point, saying Cuomo 'lied to nursing home families to get a $5 million book deal.' Cuomo denied the charges, but seemed to get lost in the weeds of his answer. The bottom line is that the exchanges showed that the topic remains a major weak spot for him, as it should be. Similarly, his claim, which he has made in an ad, that New York 'led during COVID' seems like a very dated pitch. While he did receive huge plaudits for his daily briefings during the pandemic, the events that followed and his forced resignation have overshadowed nearly everything that came before. That he hasn't used his time out of office to at least try to repair that damage and express remorse reveals a heartlessness unbecoming of someone who aims to lead America's largest and most important city. A dominant theme of the evening was how to handle the Trump administration, and the four moderators are to blame for making it a consistent, negative focus. They made it their second round of rapid-fire questions and kept stirring the pot by essentially asking who had the toughest plan on how to resist. They got what they asked for, and the answers grew increasingly bizarre. Scott Stringer, the former comptroller, claimed the president is 'hell bent on destroying the social safety net,' while Michael Blake, a former state assemblyman who is black, tried to milk a racial angle. Council Speaker Adrienne Adams declared she would stop Trump, saying 'not in my New York.' The competition to give the most radical answer grew so intense and bitter that some of the responses verged on the bizarre. Two candidates actually suggested New York could withhold federal income taxes from the administration, with state Sen. Zellnor Myrie saying 'that gives us the tax base so we can be independent of the White House.' None dared to suggest cooperation. This is malpractice. The president can be a great help to his hometown, as he has shown with a plan for a new Penn Station. Or, he can be a huge problem to a mayor and governor who think they can hoodwink him. The mayoral candidates uniformly decided that they would show how tough they are by resisting him, which is a fool's errand. Unfortunately, it's becoming typical of the Democratic Party nationally and in deep blue states. Harboring of criminal migrants and refusing to crack down on ­antisemitism are just two elements of what they call resistance to a president they don't like. The talk is so radical that it sometimes sounds like the beginnings of a secession movement. They can't be that stupid — can they?

New York City Democratic mayoral rivals clash in first TV debate
New York City Democratic mayoral rivals clash in first TV debate

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

New York City Democratic mayoral rivals clash in first TV debate

NEW YORK — Two main targets emerged by the end of the two-hour New York City mayoral debate: Frontrunner Andrew Cuomo and Donald Trump. Cuomo's eight opponents — desperate to cut into his consistent polling advantage — attacked him throughout Wednesday night by seizing on the controversies that preceded his fall from power four years ago: Allegations of sexual harassment and a Covid record that's reportedly under federal investigation. Former Assemblymember Michael Blake — polling in the single digits — leveled one of the sharpest barbs at Cuomo linking those controversies: 'The people who don't feel safe are the young women, mothers and grandmothers around Andrew Cuomo — that's the greatest threat to public safety.' The attacks on Cuomo during the first televised debate of the boisterous Big Apple Democratic mayoral primary underscored the strategic need of his opponents to swing hard and fast against the prohibitive favorite to win the party's nomination. They parried with early voting set to begin in 10 days. Nine candidates — Cuomo, Blake, City Comptroller Brad Lander, state Sens. Zellnor Myrie and Jessica Ramos, former City Comptroller Scott Stringer, Assemblymember Zohran Mamdani, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams and businessperson Whitney Tilson — squared off in the debate co-sponsored by POLITICO and WNBC. The crowded forum was marked by periods of extensive crosstalk from the candidates mostly trying to pile on Cuomo, who is mounting a comeback bid after scandal-induced resignation four years ago. The candidates all pledged to tackle issues that have resonated with voters, like affordability and housing, while vowing to fight Trump's meddling in his native city — especially with targeting undocumented people for deportation. They uniformly condemned Trump's threats against Columbia University over charges the school failed to protect Jewish students. Lander turned the Trump talk back to Cuomo. 'With all the corruption that's in Washington, we can't have corruption back here in New York City as well,' he said before blasting Cuomo's controversial $5 million contract for a Covid-era memoir. The criticisms of Cuomo flowed forth from there. Attacking Cuomo, who has largely shied away from speaking with reporters and attending candidate forums, was an imperative for his opponents Wednesday as voting fast approaches. But it was the longshot Blake, a former Democratic National Committee vice chair, who frequently laced into Cuomo with cutting criticism. Mamdani accused the former governor of being 'allergic to accountability' when Blake re-surfaced a 2008 Cuomo quote who criticized candidates who 'shuck and jive' as Barack Obama was running for president. Adrienne Adams was incredulous when Cuomo could not name a 'personal regret' in politics, summoning a cinematic rebuke: 'No regrets when it comes to cutting Medicaid or health care? No regrets when it comes to cutting child care? No regrets when it comes to slow walking PPE and vaccinations in the season of Covid in Black and brown communities?' Stringer blasted the former governor's approval of a controversial cashless bail law. The ex-governor counterpunched at points. He accused his opponents of supporting defunding the police and attacked Mamdani's lack of experience in government — saying that it would hinder the democratic socialist's ability to fight Trump. 'Mr. Trump would go through Mr. Mamdani like a hot knife through butter,' Cuomo said. 'He would be Trump's delight.' Hitting back at Lander, Cuomo asserted the city comptroller approved contracts for organizations with ties to Lander's wife. 'Mr. Lander knows corruption,' Cuomo said. Lander called the claim 'a lie.' Trump, who is highly unpopular in this deep blue city, has affected the race during the last several months. Stringer has called him 'a schmuck' while Cuomo — who's been accused of his own overbearing behavior — has said the president is 'a bully.' Democratic Mayor Eric Adams is skipping his party's primary after he announced in April he would run as an independent in the general election. Eric Adams' perceived coziness with Trump before and after the Department of Justice dropped its corruption case against him earlier this year made it politically untenable to seek his party's nomination for a second term. Eric Adams was victorious four years ago running on a public safety platform as voters became preoccupied with Covid-era crime concerns. The mayor was barely mentioned Wednesday night, though Adrienne Adams, who is no relation, said she regretted supporting him in 2021. The Eric Adams-Trump saga has threatened to torch Cuomo as well. The reported Department of Justice probe of Cuomo followed a House GOP criminal referral that alleged the ex-governor lied during congressional testimony about his administration's report on Covid nursing home deaths. Cuomo insisted on the debate stage he didn't lie in his testimony. But asked directly if he had reviewed or edited the report, Cuomo dodged. 'I was very aware of the report,' Cuomo said to groans from several of his opponents. 'I stand by the report.' Cuomo's order to require that nursing homes admit Covid-positive patients has been a long running controversy for him. He's maintained that the state followed federal guidance, but reports by the state attorney general and comptroller found Cuomo's gubernatorial administration undercounted thousands of nursing home deaths. Cuomo's campaign has tried to leverage the federal probe into a political benefit to distance himself from Trump — even though as of Sunday he has yet to receive a subpoena or be contacted by investigators. He released an ad last month that highlighted fellow Democrats — including his foe, state Attorney General Letitia James — who are also under investigation by Trump's DOJ. Cuomo resigned in 2021 after James' office released a bombshell report that determined he sexually harassed 11 women. He has subsequently denied any wrongdoing after initially apologizing for his behavior. And he has expressed remorse for resigning — most recently with The New York Times — as the state Assembly was preparing to impeach him. On Wednesday, Cuomo denied the allegations were true: 'I said at the time it was political and it was false.' His name recognition, early endorsements and position in voter surveys — including surveys paid for by a lobbying firm that has provided free services to the ex-governor's campaign — have stoked a Cuomo narrative that his victory is inevitable. But polls have shown the former governor is highly unpopular. And critics have tried to undermine his claim of being a capable manager, pointing to his policies while governor on homelessness and mass transit — policies they assert have hurt the city. Cuomo's advantages remain numerous. A super PAC boosting Cuomo's candidacy, Fix the City, has spent more than $8 million on TV advertising, easily outpacing the other campaigns. The former governor has also received crucial endorsements from politically influential unions like 32BJ SEIU and the Hotel Trades and Gaming Council. The PAC has received donations from Trump supporters like William Ackman and DoorDash, a food delivery app that has lobbied on city regulations. Cuomo defended the support to Fix the City, which has come under scrutiny from campaign finance regulators who have accused him of illegally coordinating with the PAC. 'I work for the people of the state of New York, the people of the city of New York. I don't care who gave me what,' he said. 'I do what is right.' His campaign has portrayed New York as a city in crisis, beset with crime and homelessness that the former governor will be able to solve. Cuomo has leaned on a base that overlaps with Eric Adams: Blue-collar people of color and Jewish New Yorkers — blocs that are crucial to win citywide office. Mamdani, a state assemblymember, has emerged as Cuomo's most persistent electoral threat, placing second in most polls. An Emerson College survey found Cuomo defeating Mamdani by single digits in the final round of a ranked-choice voter simulation. Mamdani has gained attention through slickly produced videos on social media, though his proposals like government-run grocery stores, no-cost child care and free buses would run into cost realities at City Hall. The Queens state lawmaker wants to generate $10 billion in new taxes on rich New Yorkers and businesses, which would require Albany's approval. Mamdani has called for a rent freeze — and faulted Cuomo in the Wednesday debate for less-than-fulsome support for taxing the rich when he was governor. The democratic socialist has also come under scrutiny for his staunch criticisms of Israel and support for the boycott, divest and sanction movement. Courting Jewish voters, Cuomo has criticized Mamdani, along with opponents Lander and Adrienne Adams for what he has framed as less-than-fervent support for Israel. There was a carnival-like atmosphere outside of NBC's studios at 30 Rockefeller Center, where supporters of the candidates cheered their arrival. Mamdani walked in, backed by a brass band dubbed 'Horns for Zohran,' playing 'This Land is Your Land.' Cuomo had the biggest cheering section made up of union members from Laborers Local 79, the Hotel and Gaming Trades Council and the carpenters union. But the former governor kept them waiting. 'You sure he's coming? We're waiting for him,' an HTC member said. Candidates were asked to show up before 5:30 — Cuomo rolled up in his Dodge Charger almost an hour late and greeted the cheering crowd. Jeff Coltin contributed to this report.

Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia
Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia

President Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against top US universities Wednesday, banning visas for all foreign students coming to attend Harvard and threatening to strip Columbia of its academic accreditation. Trump is seeking to bring the universities to heel with claims their international students pose a national security threat, and that they ignored anti-Semitism on campus, and perpetuate liberal bias. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday declared that the entrance of international students to begin a course at Harvard would be "suspended and limited" for six months, and that existing overseas enrollees could have their visas terminated. "Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers," said the order. "I'm trembling. This is outrageous," Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, told AFP. "He is abusing his executive power to harm Harvard as much as he can." "My god!" said another international student at Harvard, who declined to be named for fear of retribution, on learning of the executive order. "This is such a disgrace." - 'Retaliatory' - The announcement came after the Trump administration's earlier efforts to terminate Harvard's right to enroll and host foreign students were stalled by a judge. The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and "viewpoint diversity." Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who in the 2024-2025 academic year accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment, and a major source of income. "This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights," a university spokesman said. "Harvard will continue to protect its international students." The latest sweeping action against Harvard came as Trump's education secretary threatened Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions -- including Columbia -- have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left-wing. - 'Combating anti-Semitism' - But Wednesday's official action suggested it was not enough for Trump. "Columbia University looked the other way as Jewish students faced harassment," US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on X. She accused the school of breaking rules prohibiting recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin. "After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus," McMahon said in a statement. "This is not only immoral, but also unlawful." In the statement, the US Education Department said its civil rights office had contacted Columbia's accreditation body about the alleged violation. Withdrawing Columbia's accreditation would see it lose access to all federal funding -- a very significant proportion of the university's income. Students attending the university would also not be able to receive federal grants and loans towards tuition. Critics accuse the Trump administration of using allegations of anti-Semitism to target educational elites and bring universities to their knees. The administration has already put $400 million of Columbia's funding under review, prompting the university in March to announce a package of concessions to the government around defining anti-Semitism, policing protests and conducting oversight for specific academic departments. Following Wednesday's announcement, a Columbia spokesperson said the university "aware of the concerns" raised by the government with its accreditation body. "We have addressed those concerns directly with Middle States," the spokesperson said, adding that "Columbia is deeply committed to combating anti-Semitism on our campus." "We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it." bur-gw/st

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store