Fantasy Premier League: Analysing the major rule changes to the game for the 2025-26 season
On Friday, the makers of everyone's favourite Premier League companion game announced two pretty major changes to the rules for the 2025-26 season, which will almost certainly affect strategies across the board.
The first is that outfield players can now be rewarded with two FPL points for 'defensive contributions'.
Advertisement
Defenders who reach a combined total of 10 clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles (known as CBIT) in a single match will score two points, as will midfielders and forwards who reach 12 CBIT points – but in addition, they can also rack these up via 'ball recoveries'.
The second major change is that FPL users will now have access to two super-powered sets of chips: the Wildcard, Free Hit, Triple Captain and Bench Boost.
The initial four chips must be used before the Gameweek 19 deadline on December 30, 2025, and cannot be carried over into the second half of the season.
Here, our FPL experts Holly Shand and Abdul Rehman explore how these rule changes may impact the game and how you can take advantage of the new status quo.
Holly: Doubling the number of chips for the season has definitely caught my eye and left me feeling excited about the season ahead.
As an engaged manager, in the past I have often felt restricted by having to save chips for the second half of the season, where we typically see more blanks and double gameweeks — these have traditionally been the best time to use these chips 'on paper'. This time around, we will have an opportunity to use the our chips in the first half of the season, with the freedom to go on instinct and gut feeling, and without being punished in the second half of the campaign.
Since the introduction of the chips in 2015-16, they have been the most exciting part of the game, with the power to make or break your season, and so to have those opportunities doubled provides plenty of hope. I think it will also encourage a greater variety of strategies and team differences, which is only a good thing in my eyes.
Abdul: The double set of chips for sure. I am all for any changes that make the game more fun but at the same time, don't change the core scoring in the game. Having more chips means we don't need to wait until the second half of the season to use them around doubles and blanks. We can have a bit of fun using them in single weeks and chase upside. It also means more varied strategies which is a great thing.
Advertisement
Of course, we were free to use the chips in the first half of the season before but you would have to get quite lucky to outscore those managers using it around double and blank gameweeks.
I think this will also keep more FPL managers engaged for longer, which is probably why they have introduced the change.
Holly: We often see players new to the game using chips in the opening gameweeks of the season without realising their worth later in the campaign, and then being punished for this lack of knowledge.
These changes will allow them to remain on an even keel with more experienced managers in the long term, instead of dropping off. As a content creator in FPL, a strong start is definitely helpful and so I'm absolutely open to using the chips early, too.
Bench Boost has plenty of constraints on your team and could be something best played in Gameweek 1 or shortly after your first Wildcard. I'll personally be waiting to gather information on the worst defences in the league before committing to using a Triple Captain chip in the first half of the season, but it will likely be used on one of the big premium players like Erling Haaland or Mohamed Salah.
Free Hit can be used as a 'get out of jail free card' if injuries or suspensions leave your team in bad shape, or alternatively could be used to attack a gameweek with alternative picks when you have lots of players facing each other in your main squad.
Abdul: I don't think it will change much for the second half of the season as it will still be optimal to use them around blanks and doubles — but it will mean planning more meticulously in the first half of the season now.
A Bench Boost in Gameweek 1 becomes much more viable as you can set your team up for an early wildcard afterwards and get that chip 'out of the way'. You are effectively wildcarding in Gameweek 1, so it's not a bad time to play it at all now that we have another available to us.
Advertisement
Triple Captain and Free Hit can be used on a whim for as and when your team needs, and there will be less need for long-term strategy as we are not planning for doubles and blanks. The Free Hit might come in really handy actually, with so many teams competing in Europe and with the extra games.
Having two sets of chips might even encourage FPL managers to be a bit more maverick with their first ones. Chasing differentials and unconventional times to use the chip is a lot easier when you know you have another set to use in the second half of the season.
Holly: The removal of the Assistant Manager chip is another major positive for me, as the introduction of this chip in the 2024-25 season felt flawed on a number of levels.
For starters, it felt far too complicated for casual managers to understand and the one-chip-per-gameweek rule will have caught many out. In addition, the chip had too much power in the game, with massive swings of 50-plus points if activated to perfection, which could cause a huge swing in overall rank and mini leagues come the end of the season.
It was also frustrating to spend half the season looking at a 'Mystery Chip' with no idea of what it was or what it would do, and how that could impact strategy later in the season and so avoiding that eventuality is another positive in my book.
Abdul: I enjoyed the Assistant Manager chip from a selfish point of view, simply because I gained around 45 points from it. But from a game-state perspective, I think it was the right decision to remove it from the game as it was too powerful.
I also feel it was maybe a bit too complicated for the average manager to take advantage of it. It really advantaged the hardcore managers who were able to research the best time to use it.
Advertisement
There should be a nice balance of luck and skill in FPL, and at the moment, I think they have it right, even with the two sets of chips. The Assistant Manager chip tipped it too much into the luck category due to how the scoring was structured. You could literally come away with zero points while others were getting near 50.
Holly: The introduction of defensive contribution points brings FPL in line with other popular fantasy games that we've seen from alternative providers, and those from major international tournaments.
I'm not surprised of its inclusion given that it's been something well discussed in the FPL community for many years. I'm a little sceptical of the form in which it's been introduced, with a variety of actions all being pooled together in one metric known as clearances, blocks, interceptions and tackles (CBIT) for defenders, and then ball recoveries also for attacking players — it might have been neater to have those actions counting individually.
It will change the way FPL managers watch games and scout players, and there will almost certainly be some frustrations along the way of exactly which actions are credited towards the tally of 10 or 12 respectively to activate the two point bonus.
Brand new for the 2025/26 season 🤩
Introducing defensive contribution points 🛡️#FPL pic.twitter.com/LAseSwN2DO
— Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025
Abdul: I am not a big fan of the points for defensive contributions. There is only an extra two points on offer per game and player, so it's not overpowered and won't cause a huge shift in the viable player pool.
However, the reason I love FPL is due to its simplicity and this change is leading towards taking that out of the game. I am not totally against it though, and I'm willing to see how it goes this season.
Also, there is already at least one controversy per gameweek as to what counts as an assist according to the game's rules, which can cause frustrating changes to points scored.
Advertisement
It feels like this is going to cause similar issues in terms of what constitutes as a block, clearance, tackle etc.
It's fun watching your FPL players and cheering them to score or assist. I am not sure I want to be sitting there counting how many tackles or interceptions they have made.
Holly: Without the context of player prices, it's hard to categorically say how the new defensive contribution points will impact team construction. If player prices stay widely similar to the past, then I don't think it will have a big impact in terms of team construction, but it will give certain players more utility.
Traditionally, we've always targeted attacking full-backs in FPL but centre-backs will now carry more appeal. We've also tried to avoid defenders from newly promoted teams or against tough opposition, but both of these situations invite pressure on defences which could allow centre-backs to rack up CBIT actions more frequently. We may also choose a fifth midfielder differently, with holding midfield players also rewarded in this system.
Abdul: I think it will impact our defence a lot more than the attack. The likes of James Tarkowski and other similar cheaper centre-backs will become more popular. Choosing players who play 90 minutes will be even more important now, with full-backs getting subbed off much more often than centre-backs.
They also generally make more blocks, interceptions and tackles, although there definitely will be some full-backs who will breach the threshold regularly but that will become more apparent once the season kicks off.
For the attack, I reckon it only really makes a difference to our fifth or possibly fourth midfielder. We are still going to pick the likes of Mohamed Salah, Cole Palmer and Bukayo Saka etc. However, when it comes to the cheaper mids at £5.0m and below, defensive contributions will become a lot more important.
Advertisement
Holly: My thoughts immediately went to attack-minded forwards and midfielders who press for their team and get involved in defensive actions too, with Manchester United's Bruno Fernandes immediately on my radar.
I think he could be set for a deeper role this season, especially with the expected arrival of Bryan Mbeumo in the summer transfer window to follow that of Matheus Cunha.
I'll also be keeping a close eye on the prices of Arsenal's Declan Rice and Chelsea's Enzo Fernandez, who are no strangers to attacking returns and have some set-piece involvement, while also providing plenty of defensive contributions. Backing assets who play 90 minutes regularly could be an important consideration.
When it comes to defenders, centre-backs from defences who typically don't have plenty of possession fit the bill — we know that Everton's Tarkowski was the top performer in this metric last season. There may also be merit to picking central defenders from those sides who keep consistent clean sheets, like Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk and Arsenal's Gabriel.
Abdul: The official FPL X page put out a graphic showing the defenders and midfielders who would have picked up the most points from the defensive contributions last season. Tarkowski, Jan Bednarek and Dean Huijsen (all centre-backs) led the way, so the Everton man is definitely on my radar.
David Moyes' team are a solid defensive side and will pick up a fair few clean sheets. Tarkowski is nailed to start, plays 90 minutes and has a bit of goal threat too.
James Tarkowski tops the charts 📊
No defender would have picked up as many defensive contribution points as the Everton defender if they were available in FPL last season 🔵#FPL pic.twitter.com/c5yQS9QeUT
— Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025
Moses Caicedo would have picked up the most defensive contribution points among midfielders, followed by Elliot Andersen and Joao Gomes.
Moises Caicedo would have picked up the most defensive contribution points among midfielders last season 👊
With the new defensive contributions points coming in 2025/26, will any of these players be in your squad? 👀#FPL pic.twitter.com/qjP2bg51qP
— Fantasy Premier League (@OfficialFPL) July 18, 2025
Caicedo picked up an extra 42 points, which is quite significant, so his price is something I will be keeping an eye on. Also, defensive midfielders like Rice, Rodri, Bruno Guimaraes and Fernandez might be interesting, too. They all have a fair bit of attacking threat.
Manchester United's Fernandes could be the one who benefits the most from this. We all know he's one of the most nailed players in the league and on penalties, but he's also really involved and played deep quite a lot last season.
Overall though, a fair bit of research is still needed pre-season to try and find those gems before the pack.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Delayed start at Belgian Grand Prix highlights Formula 1's challenge with racing in the rain
Of all the thousands of pieces of equipment that Formula 1 hauls around the world, few are used less often than the full wet tire. They stayed piled up in stacks, not on the cars, on Sunday as drivers sat out a rain delay of more than an hour to the start of the Belgian Grand Prix. It wasn't because F1 cars lack grip in heavy rain. Manufacturer Pirelli says the full wet tires can cope with that. The problem is that drivers behind can't see through the spray, and the first attempt to start Sunday's race on time illustrated the problem. Even crawling around at formation lap pace with only Lando Norris and the safety car ahead, eventual winner Oscar Piastri said he 'couldn't see a thing,' adding, 'you can only imagine what it's like for the guys at the back.' When the race started, it was behind the safety car at low speed before the all-clear to go racing. Like all of the drivers, Piastri was using the intermediate tires, which are recommended for light rain or a drying track, when he eventually passed Norris for the win. 'The past few years, particularly here, we've given the (governing body) FIA feedback that we would much rather be on the safe side than risk anything,' Piastri said. 'If you were to be picky, maybe we could have done one less formation lap (behind the safety car), but in the grand scheme of things, if that's one lap too early, is it worth it? No.' Visibility is a particular concern at Spa, a fast track with a history of serious accidents. They include Anthoine Hubert's death in a Formula 2 crash in dry conditions in 2019 and another fatal accident claiming the life of Dutch teenage driver Dilano van 't Hoff in a junior series in the rain in 2023. 'I have to say that on a track like this, with what happened historically, I think you cannot forget about it. For that reason I would rather be safe than (start) too early," said Charles Leclerc, who finished third Sunday and who was friends with Hubert since childhood. Under the current F1 design regulations in place since 2022, cars have ground-effect aerodynamics which use the floor to generate grip but can also throw up more spray. If there's enough rain for the full wet tires to be faster than the intermediates, it's likely the race will be stopped because of poor visibility anyway. There was a reminder of the importance of visibility this month at the British Grand Prix when Isack Hadjar collided with Kimi Antonelli's car from behind while driving in the Italian's trail of spray. 'I didn't see him,' Hadjar said. 'He just appeared out of nowhere, man. Oh my God.' ___ AP auto racing:
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Niemann breezes to fifth LIV Golf success of season
Joaquin Niemann captured his fifth victory of the season with a three- stroke win at LIV Golf United Kingdom. Niemann carded a three-under 68 on Sunday to finish with a 17-under 196 for the tournament at the JCB Golf and Country Club in Rocester, England. The Torque GC captain collected five birdies against two bogeys to add his to his titles at Adelaide, Singapore, Mexico City and Virginia. Sunday's victory served as a $4 million payday for Niemann, who began the week by firing his caddie and coach after missing the cut at the 2025 Open Championship. .@joaconiemann wins for the 5th time this season🏆👏#LIVGolfUK @TorqueGC_ — LIV Golf (@livgolf_league) July 27, 2025 Niemann's Torque GC, however, were unable to hold their three-stroke lead over Legion XIII in their bid for a first team title since 2023. Legion XIII shot a staggering 14-under on Sunday to finish at 35-under for the tournament, eight strokes better than Torque GC. Niemann wasn't too interested in talking about his individual play on Sunday. He said: "Well, I'm going to talk for the first two days because today I didn't feel like I had my best. Yeah, it was great. I was able to flow on tough situations. "I felt like today I was pretty calm, pretty chill, until Bubba (Watson) started playing golf. He made it tough for me. I was actually feeling the pressure on 13, 14, but, yeah, just stay in the present. Yeah, was able to hit a great shot on 15. After that put me back into my place." Watson had a stretch of four birdies and two eagles from No.9 to No.14. He rolled in six birdies overall to finish in second place at 14-under after a third-round 65. .@joaconiemann made the shot on 15 when it mattered most 🙌#LIVGolfUK @torquegc_ — LIV Golf (@livgolf_league) July 27, 2025 Niemann put a halt to his charge after sending a shot within five feet of the cup on the 15th hole. "I was pretty happy to see that ball go in that close, and making that birdie I think was huge for the next three holes," he said. Caleb Surratt (65 on Sunday) sank six birdies during his bogey-free round to finish at 13-under for the tournament, followed by Talor Gooch (66) at 11-under. As for team play, Legion XIII captain Jon Rahm was thrilled after his team captured their fourth title of the season. "With all four scores counting this year I thought we played to our advantage. It showed early on and it's showing now," Rahm said. Cameron Smith was the highest placed Australian, finishing 10th, nine shots off the lead. Marc Leishman was a shot behind with Lucas Herbert 34th and Matt Jones 40th.
Forbes
18 minutes ago
- Forbes
Women's Sport Is Delivering For Fans. Now It's Delivering For Business, Too
Millions await the players of England's victorious team - and about time too! Chloe Kelly of England ... More celebrates with the UEFA Women's EURO trophy after her team's victory in the UEFA Women's EURO 2025 Final match between England and Spain at St. Jakob-Park on July 27, 2025 in Basel, Switzerland. (Photo by Molly Darlington - UEFA/UEFA via Getty Images) England's Lionesses are champions once again. A dramatic penalty shootout in Basel secured their second consecutive UEFA Women's Euro title, this time defeating the reigning world champions, Spain. It was a historic win. But while the nation celebrated the result, another equally significant shift was underway: women's football is no longer just delivering for fans, it's clear it is delivering for business too. This tournament was not a campaign about potential. It was a fully formed commercial product. A live demonstration of what happens when talent is properly supported - players truly live their values, audiences are given access, and brands approach women's sport not as a side project, but as a serious investment. As someone who has spent 15 years supporting across every level of women's sport, from championing grassroots access to advising major global brands and retailers on this opportunity, I've long argued that women's sport isn't a PR play. It's a commercial opportunity hiding in plain sight. And this summer, the viewing numbers finally caught up with the belief. England's win wasn't just a sporting success. It delivered some of the strongest business metrics we've seen in sport this year: record TV audiences in the UK, significant increases in merchandise sales, and a projected £800 million in wider economic impact. But perhaps most tellingly, sponsors involved in the tournament are reporting significantly higher consumer affinity than their equivalents in the men's game. This shift has been years in the making. Brands like EA Sports, PlayStation, Heineken, and Just Eat have all backed the Lionesses with increasing levels of uplift and success. Meanwhile, newer partners like Volkswagen have supported the UEFA Women's EURO games in line with the work in diversity. Christine Wolburg, Chief Brand Officer of Volkswagen Passenger Cars, explains: "The promotion of women's football and women in football are central to our commitment to female empowerment and equality in sport. For many years, we have been committed to this with deep conviction and on a broad corporate basis, both nationally and internationally. Sponsoring UEFA Women's EURO this summer is therefore a further commitment to visibility, fairness and real participation." These partnerships are no longer symbolic. They are strategic. And the women's game is evolving just as rapidly off the pitch as it is on it. Players today are not only exceptional athletes, they're commercial catalysts. No one exemplifies that better right now than Michelle Agyemang. Princely sponsorships await: Prince William, Prince of Wales, shakes hands with Michelle Agyemang of ... More England after the team's victory in the UEFA Women's EURO 2025 Final match between England and Spain at St. Jakob-Park on July 27, 2025 in Basel, Switzerland. (Photo by) At just 19 years old, Agyemang emerged as the breakout star of the tournament. Until this month, she had only 14 minutes of senior international football. But by the final whistle in Basel, she had become Player of the Tournament, scoring crucial goals, handling media appearances with composure, and embodying the authenticity that consumers increasingly demand. Born in South Ockendon, of Ghanaian descent, and a lifelong Arsenal supporter, Agyemang was introduced to football through her grassroots coach father. She joined Arsenal's academy at six, initially playing in defence before developing into a dynamic forward. Her family supports a range of Premier League teams, Manchester United, Chelsea, West Ham, but she stayed loyal to the club she loved. That kind of personal story, that kind of connection to community, isn't manufactured. It's magnetic. And it's why she will become one of the most sought-after brand partners of her generation. But Agyemang is just one example. The wider value proposition of women's football lies in its depth, its ability to connect. Audiences believe in these players not just because they're talented, but because they represent something real. In a crowded, sometimes cynical marketing environment, that kind of trust is priceless. BASEL, SWITZERLAND - JULY 27: Goalkeeper Hannah Hampton of England, Lucy Bronze of England, Niamh ... More Charles of England, Keira Walsh of England, Alex Greenwood of England, Leah Williamson of England, Lauren James of England, Georgia Stanway of England, Beth Mead of England, Ella Toone of England, Lauren Hemp of England, Maya Le Tissier of England, Goalkeeper Anna Moorhouse of England, Grace Clinton of England, Esme Morgan of England, Jessica Carter of England, Michelle Agyemang of England, Chloe Kelly of England, Agnes Beever-Jones of England, Jessica Park of England, Goalkeeper Khiara Keating of England, Lotte Wubben-Moy of England, Alessia Russo of England and Head coach Sarina Wiegman of England celebrating their sides win after the UEFA Women's EURO 2025 Final match between England and Spain at St. Jakob-Park on July 27, 2025 in Basel, Switzerland. (Photo by Leiting Gao/) According to recent research from the Women's Sport Trust, fans of women's sport are more likely to take action after seeing a sponsor than fans of men's sport, whether that's seeking out more information, engaging with a campaign, or changing their purchase behaviour. And yet, brand saturation remains low. For those willing to invest now, the cut-through is unmatched. Based on the momentum already in motion, the UK women's football ecosystem, from sponsorship and media rights to merchandising and adjacent consumer spend could exceed £1 billion annually by 2030. That projection isn't rooted in hope; it's based on rising audience numbers, expanding media deals, and growing commercial appetite. This year's tournament alone generated hundreds of millions in retail and hospitality impact & that's without factoring in the halo effect across merchandise, digital content, and cultural engagement. But the question now is not whether women's football has earned its place. It has. The real question is what we do with that spotlight and how we ensure it extends far beyond major finals. This cannot be a victory moment that fades until the next tournament. The focus now must be on embedding legacy on ensuring this isn't just peak-time coverage for peak-time players, but part of a long-term commitment to women's sport at every level. From school sports to club academies, from WSL to League One, from football to rugby (Rugby Union and Rugby League) cricket and beyond the pipeline is where the real potential lies. Women's football has proven its commercial strength. But many other women's sports equally rich in talent and community, remain underexposed and underfunded. If we want to future-proof the sector, we need to broaden our lens and invest across the spectrum, not just at the summit. Brands have a real opportunity here. Not simply to be seen, but to be part of something lasting. The partnerships that will hold value are those rooted in credibility, consistency, and contribution. That could mean deeper support for training infrastructure. It could mean more year-round storytelling. It could simply mean staying present when the cameras aren't. This is the time to move from campaign to commitment. Women's football may have opened the door but if we want to see the full value of women's sport, we need to push it wider. England's win was a powerful statement. Now the responsibility and the opportunity, sits with us. This is not the end of the story. It's the start of what could be the most valuable era in the business of sport.
