Trump says he ended friendship with Epstein because he ‘stole people that worked for me'
WASHINGTON — WASHINGTON -- U.S. President Donald Trump said Monday that he ended his friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and threw the now-disgraced financier out of his private club in Florida after Epstein betrayed him more than once by hiring people who had worked for him.
Trump did not say what his employees did or where they worked, and the White House declined further comment. But the White House had previously offered a different explanation for the falling-out. Steven Cheung, the White House communications director, said in a statement last week: 'The fact is that the President kicked him out of his club for being a creep.'
Epstein killed himself, authorities say, in a New York jail cell in 2019 as he awaited trial on sex trafficking charges. Trump and his top allies stoked conspiracy theories about Epstein's death before Trump returned to power and are now struggling to manage the fallout after the Justice Department said Epstein did in fact die by suicide and that it would not release additional documents about the case.
The president and his allies, some of whom are now in the administration, had promised to release the files.
The case has dogged Trump at home and abroad and even followed Vice President JD Vance during an appearance in his home state of Ohio on Monday. A small group of protesters assembled outside a factory in Canton that Vance toured, holding signs that spelled out 'JD Protects Pedophiles' and indicating that 'GOP' stands for 'Guardians Of Pedophiles.'
The Republican president spoke at his golf property in Turnberry, Scotland, as he sat with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer after the leaders had met and were answering questions from U.S. and U.K. journalists. Asked to explain why the relationship had faltered, Trump said, 'That's such old history, very easy to explain, but I don't want to waste your time by explaining it.'
He then explained, saying he stopped talking to Epstein after 'he did something that was inappropriate.'
'He hired help and I said, `Don't ever do that again,'' Trump said. 'He stole people that worked for me. I said, `Don't ever do that again.' He did it again, and I threw him out of the place, persona non grata.'
'I threw him out and that was it. I'm glad I did, if you want to know the truth,' Trump added.
Trump recently directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek the public release of sealed grand jury transcripts in the case. One federal judge has denied that request; a second judge has yet to rule.
Vance on Monday visited the factory to promote Trump's tax cut and border bill, but also addressed the Epstein matter, saying the president wants 'full transparency' in the case.
'The president has been very clear. We're not shielding anything,' Vance said in response to a reporter's question. 'The president has directed the attorney general to release all credible information and, frankly, to go and find additional credible information related to the Jeffrey Epstein case.'
'Some of that stuff takes time,' Vance said, adding that Trump has been 'very clear. He wants full transparency.'
Trump had said back in 2019 that Epstein was a fixture in Palm Beach but that the two had had a falling-out a long time ago and he hadn't spoken with Epstein for 15 years.
Trump on Monday also denied contributing to a compilation of letters and drawings to mark Epstein's 50th birthday, first reported on by the Wall Street Journal. The newspaper said the letter believed to be from Trump included a drawing of a woman's body.
'I don't do drawings of women, that I can tell you,' Trump said.
------
Associated Press writer Julie Carr Smyth in Canton, Ohio, contributed to this report.
Darlene Superville, The Associated Press
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
23 minutes ago
- National Post
NYC gunman named an ex-Steeler in his suicide note. Who was Terry Long?
In the aftermath of Monday's fatal shooting at a Manhattan office building, investigating authorities have focused on a note left by the gunman, Shane Tamura. The letter, which the New York Police Department has described as a suicide note, referenced the NFL and the brain disease chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE). Article content Also in the letter was a mention of Terry Long, a former NFL player who died by suicide in 2005 after drinking antifreeze. 'Terry Long football gave me CTE and it caused me to drink a gallon of antifreeze. You can't go against the NFL, they'll squash you,' the shooter wrote in the note, according to a CNN report. Article content Article content Article content Tamura's connection to Long is unclear. Tamura was a standout high school running back who does not appear to have played beyond that level. Authorities believe he was targeting the NFL, whose league offices are housed in the building where the shooting occurred. Conversely, Long played eight years in the NFL as an offensive lineman for the Pittsburgh Steelers. Article content Article content Who was Terry Long? Article content A fourth-round draft pick by the Steelers in 1984, Long became the team's starting right guard in his rookie season and remained a fixture up front through the rest of the decade, when Pittsburgh's offensive lines regularly ranked among the NFL's best at protecting its quarterback. Long was short at 5-foot-11, but strong, having dabbled as a powerlifter. Article content In July 1991, weeks ahead of his final NFL season, Long faced a suspension for violating the league's steroids policy. He subsequently attempted suicide by taking sleeping pills, then swallowing rat poison. He remained hospitalized for a week following the incident and underwent counselling. That season, he started three games at left guard. He was suspended four games after losing his appeal following the steroid violation and missed more time after tearing the triceps muscle in his right arm. After Bill Cowher succeeded Chuck Noll as coach of the Steelers in 1992, the team did not re-sign Long. Article content In 2003, a fire damaged Long's chicken processing plant in Pittsburgh. In 2005, Long was indicted on federal fraud and arson charges and filed for bankruptcy for Terry Long Enterprises on the same day. Prosecutors argued he defrauded the state of nearly $1.2 million in business loans for the plant, which they claimed he set ablaze for the insurance money. Article content Article content Three months after the indictment, in June 2005, Long died in a hospital after he was found unresponsive in his suburban Pittsburgh home. He was 45. Article content 'I'm stunned and sick,' former teammate Craig Wolfley told the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette following Long's death. 'Lots of great memories of him. He was just a great guy. A very hard worker.' Article content The Allegheny County (Pennsylvania) coroner's office first ruled Long died of meningitis, but a revised death certificate filed one month later listed the manner of Long's death as suicide from drinking antifreeze. The coroner's office changed its ruling after outside laboratory tests showed Long's tissue and urine contained ethylene glycol, the active ingredient in antifreeze. The medical examiner's office said Long's football-related brain injuries, including CTE, were a contributing factor to his death but said he did not die as a direct result of them, according to a 2006 report by the Associated Press. Article content
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump says U.S. will set 15% tariff on South Korean imports under new deal
WASHINGTON/SEOUL — U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. will charge a 15 per cent tariff on imports from South Korea, down from a threatened 25 per cent, as part of a deal that eases tensions with a top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally. South Korea also agreed to invest US$350 billion in the United States in projects selected by Trump and to purchase energy products worth $100 billion. The arrangement, announced after Trump met with Korean officials at the White House, came during a blizzard of trade policy announcements. Many countries are rushing to cut deals ahead of Aug. 1, when Trump has promised higher tariffs will kick in. 'I am pleased to announce that the United States of America has agreed to a Full and Complete Trade Deal with the Republic of Korea,' Trump wrote on Truth Social. The negotiations were an early test for South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, who took office in June after a snap election. He said the deal eliminated uncertainty and set U.S. tariffs lower than or at the same level as major competitors. 'We have crossed a big hurdle,' Lee said in a Facebook post. Trump said Lee would visit the White House 'within the next two weeks' for his first meeting with the U.S. president. South Korea will accept American products, including autos and agricultural goods into its markets and impose no import duties on them, Trump added. South Korea's top officials said the country's rice and beef markets would not be opened further, and discussions over U.S. demands on food regulations continue. Seoul appeared to have defended its non-tariff barriers while keeping its tariff rate on par with Japan and the European Union, said Citi economist Kim Jin-wook. 'While the headline figure looks like a huge win for the U.S., details appear to be favorable for South Korea,' he said. Devil in the details South Korea seems to have avoided the worst, agreed Cheong In-kyo, a former South Korean trade minister. But he also said opinions about the deal could change if the $350 billion was not well spent. It was not clear what the investment would involve, where the financing would come from, over what time frame deals would be implemented and to what extent their terms would be binding. Trump said additional South Korean investments would be announced later. Of the total, $150 billion is aimed at a shipbuilding partnership, while $200 billion would include chips, nuclear power, batteries, and biotechnology, Kim Yong-beom, the South Korean presidential office's policy chief, told a briefing. He said 'ambiguity is good,' while adding that negotiators had ensured there would be safeguards over how the funds were used. Existing investment plans by South Korean companies would be part of the fund, according to another presidential official. U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a post on X that 90 per cent of the profits from the $350 billion fund were 'going to the American people.' Kim said South Korea understands that to mean that some profits could be reinvested. The energy purchases would include LNG, LPG, crude oil, and a small amount of coal, he added. 'This is within our usual import volume,' he said, noting it might lead to a 'slight shift' in the country's mix of imports from the Middle East to more American sources. Lutnick said the energy purchases would happen 'over the next 3.5 years.' The tariff rate on South Korean autos would also be 15%, Lutnick said, which is down from the current rate of 25%. Lutnick also said semiconductor and pharmaceutical exports would not be treated more harshly than those from other countries. Steel, aluminum, and copper were not covered by the new deal. Scramble in South Korea South Korea is one of three Asia-Pacific countries that had a comprehensive free trade agreement with the United States, but that did not spare it from new tariffs. Negotiations took place in a turbulent political environment in South Korea with former President Yoon Suk Yeol removed in April after he was impeached for trying to impose martial law. Pressure on negotiators increased after Japan clinched its deal earlier this month. South Korea has been a particular target of Trump for its trade surplus and the cost of maintaining some 28,500 U.S. troops in the country to defend against North Korea. Last year South Korea posted a record $55.7 billion trade surplus with the United States, up 25 per cent from a year earlier. South Korean companies welcomed the deal, saying it would reduce uncertainty. Amid the last-minute push to reach a tariff agreement, Samsung Electronics inked a $16.5 billion chip deal with Tesla. LG Energy Solution also signed a $4.3 billion deal to supply Tesla with energy storage system batteries, a person familiar with the matter said. What we know about South Korea's trade deal with the US (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt and Ju-min Park; Additional reporting by Joyce Lee, Jihoon Lee, Hyunjoo Jin, Josh Smith, Ed Davies, and Jack Kim in Seoul; Writing by Trevor Hunnicutt and Josh Smith; Editing by Stephen Coates and Edwina Gibbs)
CTV News
23 minutes ago
- CTV News
Trump tariffs face key test at U.S. appeals court
A U.S. appeals court on Thursday will review U.S. President Donald Trump's power to impose tariffs, after a lower court said he exceeded his authority with sweeping levies on imported goods. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., will consider the legality of 'reciprocal' tariffs that Trump imposed on a broad range of U.S. trading partners in April, as well as tariffs imposed in February against China, Canada and Mexico. A panel of all of the court's active judges, eight appointed by Democratic presidents and three appointed by former Republican presidents, will hear arguments scheduled to begin at 10 a.m. ET in two cases brought by five small U.S. businesses and 12 Democratic-led U.S. states. The arguments - one day before Trump plans to increase tariff rates on imported goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners - mark the first test before a U.S. appeals court of the scope of his tariff authority. The president has made tariffs a central instrument of his foreign policy, wielding them aggressively in his second term as leverage in trade negotiations and to push back against what he has called unfair practices. The states and businesses challenging the tariffs argued that they are not permissible under emergency presidential powers that Trump cited to justify them. They say the U.S. Constitution grants Congress, and not the president, authority over tariffs and other taxes. Trump claimed broad authority to set tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), a 1977 law historically used for sanctioning enemies or freezing their assets. Trump is the first president to use it to impose tariffs. Trump has said the April tariffs were a response to persistent U.S. trade imbalances and declining U.S. manufacturing power. He said the tariffs against China, Canada and Mexico were appropriate because those countries were not doing enough to stop illegal fentanyl from crossing U.S. borders. The countries have denied that claim. On May 28, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of International Trade sided with the Democratic states and small businesses that challenged Trump. It said that the IEEPA, a law intended to address 'unusual and extraordinary' threats during national emergencies, did not authorize tariffs related to longstanding trade deficits. The Federal Circuit has allowed the tariffs to remain in place while it considers the administration's appeal. The timing of the court's decision is uncertain, and the losing side will likely appeal quickly to the U.S. Supreme Court. The case will have no impact on tariffs levied under more traditional legal authority, such as duties on steel and aluminum imports. Trump's on-again, off-again tariff threats have roiled financial markets and disrupted U.S. companies' ability to manage supply chains, production, staffing and prices. The president recently announced trade deals that set tariff rates on goods from the European Union and Japan, following smaller trade agreements with Britain, Indonesia and Vietnam. Trump's Department of Justice has argued that limiting the president's tariff authority could undermine ongoing trade negotiations, while other Trump officials have said that negotiations have continued with little change after the initial setback in court. Trump has set an Aug. 1 date for higher tariffs on countries that don't negotiate new trade deals. There are at least seven other lawsuits challenging Trump's invocation of IEEPA, including cases brought by other small businesses and California. A federal judge in Washington, D.C., ruled against Trump in one of those cases, and no judge has yet backed Trump's claim of unlimited emergency tariff authority. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth; Editing by David Bario, Noeleen Walder and Leslie Adler)
