Former Labour Leader Comes Up With Brutal Farage Nickname For New Corbyn-Led Party
Suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana quit the party this week and announced she was starting up a new group with former Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, who was expelled from the party in 2024.
Corbyn released his own statement on Friday suggesting discussions around the new party 'are ongoing' – while promising 'change is coming'.
On Sky News' Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips, the presenter asked Kinnock, now a Labour peer, 'how serious a threat' this new Corbyn-led group might be.
Kinnock noted they were already struggling to think up a name and so suggested one himself: 'Farage Assistance Group.'
Reform UK is currently leading in the polls as dissatisfaction with the Labour government rises.
He explained: 'The reality is, and everybody knows it, a division in the anti-conservative – capital C or small c – anti-right wing vote can only assist the parties of the right, the Conservatives especially now, and that is bad enough, and Farage's Reform party.
'The splintering, fragmentation offered by a new party of the left they say – I've got my doubts about that – of the left can only be of assistance to the enemies of Labour of the working class, people who have no means to sustain themselves, other than the sale of labour, by hand and by brain.
'It can be of benefit to the egos of those running the central party – and they haven't decide who should do that yet either!'
Kinnock, who led the opposition from 1983 to 1992, also said he does not think Starmer 'should worry himself too much' about Corbyn or Nigel Farage.
'He's the prime minister, he would be punching down,' he continued.
'But there are other people throughout the party who should be taking Corbyn and Reform very seriously.'
He warned there could be voter 'seepage' away from Labour unless these groups are addressed.
Kinnock went on to describe because Reform as the 'natural enemies of progressives'.
'You've just got to look at them and listen to them to know that they're following the classic pattern,' he said.
According to the Labour peer, the right-wingers have managed to first find and harvest division, then found someone to blame, and followed up with simplistic responses to complex problems.
#TrevorPhillips: How serious a threat do you think a Corbyn party is going to be? Lord Kinnock: I understand they're having a little difficulty over the name... I suggest they call themselves the Farage assistance group... #bbclaurakpic.twitter.com/PSCdiRG5Zn
— Haggis_UK 🇬🇧 🇪🇺 (@Haggis_UK) July 6, 2025
Labour MP Accuses Government Of Behaving Like Flat-Earthers Over Waspi Women
'I Strongly Disagree': Yvette Cooper Hits Back After Ex-Labour MP Attacks Government
Jeremy Corbyn 'To Set Up New Left-Wing Party' With Former Labour MP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
44 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Trump's 90-Day Tariff Pause Is Ending. What Happens Next?
Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take daily podcast today. In late April, shortly after President Trump's announcement of sweeping reciprocal tariffs sent markets reeling, the White House announced a 90-day pause on when those tariffs would go into effect. That pause is about to end and while the Trump administration has announced a few tentative trade agreements — including one with the UK and another with Vietnam — they're nowhere near 90. On today's Big Take podcast, Bloomberg's Brendan Murray and host David Gura discuss what the White House has accomplished, what it hasn't and where the trade war goes from here. Listen and follow The Big Take on Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Terminal clients: click here to subscribe. Here is a lightly edited transcript of the conversation:
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Before the government overhauls special educational needs, lessons must be learnt
Whatever else may be said about the government's plans for the education of children with special needs, they cannot be handled in the same, calamitous way as were the reforms to personal independence payments (PIP). As has been said with enormous force during the low-key commemoration of Labour's first year in office, lessons must be learnt. The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, is the lead minister in preparing the schools white paper in October, which will include proposals for changes to the special needs framework. She has already caused some concern by refusing to rule out changing the system of education, health and care plans (EHCPs), and the rights groups and backbench MPs in her party have mobilised in response. In fairness, Ms Phillipson and her colleagues have talked about changes to EHCPs in the past. However, the recent welfare reform bill fiasco has both sharpened anxieties and bolstered the confidence of Labour backbenchers that they can defy the party leadership and block reform. The Labour general election manifesto was also oblique on this point. An element of fear, if not paranoia, has entered the debate, and Ms Phillipson's task has been much more difficult because of the mistakes made by her colleagues – Rachel Reeves as chancellor, Liz Kendall as work and pensions secretary, and the prime minister, Sir Keir Starmer. Ms Phillipson is one of the brighter stars in the Labour firmament, but she will be fortunate if she emerges from this process with an improved EHCP regime or her reputation enhanced. Trust has been eroded. For any government of any party, reforming the special educational needs and disabilities (SEND) provision for children and young people presents particular challenges, and rightly so. These are among the most vulnerable of people, and they cannot be subject to discriminatory treatment, both as a matter of law and of morality. As a society, there is a duty to provide for children and young people with physical and learning disabilities, and to offer them the best start in life, maximising their independence and life chances. Their parents need and deserve support, and any failure to do so is unconscionable. In contrast to the PIP reforms, there must be no feeling that reform is solely or even primarily driven by the Treasury and the need for savings, though there is no escaping the financial realities. As Ms Reeves and Ms Kendall discovered to their cost, there are red lines that this generation of Labour MPs will not cross solely for the sake of meeting fiscal rules. Ms Phillipson, therefore, must win the arguments – and, as far as possible, carry all those concerned with her as she reshapes the regime and improves it. Therefore, the various groups representing SEND children and parents need to be closely involved in each stage of policy development. This is something she is now well placed to do, given recent events. In any case, because of what happened with PIP entitlements, she has no alternative. The parliamentary Labour Party, emboldened as it now is, will insist on being consulted. When the time comes to publish the white paper, there should be no nasty surprises. If there are, it will be just as doomed as the welfare reform bill. Secondly, this process cannot be rushed, or perceived to be rushed. The deadline of October for the schools white paper is a reasonable one but it should not take precedence over good policy. If the sections on SEND are not ready to be published, then they should be postponed. Indeed, there is a strong case for giving SEND policy a comprehensive study and white paper of its own, given the sensitivities and complexities involved. Again, the lesson of recent events is that a late policy is preferable to a bad policy. There is also a real need for a better understanding – entirely separate from the cost – of the merits of special schools or children's inclusion in the general school system, which will, of course, vary by individual cases. It is also wrong, as seems to be the case now, that variations in provision across different local authorities can be so stark – a postcode lottery. Thirdly, there does have to be some cognisance of the financial trends: why they are happening and how they will evolve. These are not all well understood even by the experts. Many more children are being given statutory rights under their hard-won EHCPs, but the reasons for the sharp increase of some 70 per cent in less than a decade are less transparent. Next year, the projected annual cost of support for children with learning difficulties or disabilities is set to reach £12bn. The system of finance also needs to be changed. At the moment, the costs of statutory SEND obligations are met by school managements and local authorities in the first instance, and they tend to squeeze other important, albeit less vital, priorities. This will put local councils into a large cumulative deficit of £8bn by 2027, according to the Institute for Fiscal Studies. In other words, more councils will go bust, which helps no one. It would be far more satisfactory if there were a national system of SEND funding based on consistent criteria. Finally – and, again, drawing on an important lesson – the system for SEND and EHCPs should be founded on a cross-party consensus. This, admittedly, is unlikely, but for obvious reasons it would help children and parents, as well as schools and local authorities, to plan ahead and avoid stigmatisation if those with special needs were 'weaponised' for political advantage. That may prove beyond Ms Phillipson's abilities, but she must surely know that she and her government cannot afford another such debacle. This time around, unlike Ms Kendall, she can remind Sir Keir and Ms Reeves of certain political realities.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
EU Rushes to Conclude a Framework Trade Deal With US This Week
(Bloomberg) -- The European Union is seeking to conclude a preliminary trade deal with the US this week that would allow it to lock in a 10% tariff rate beyond an Aug. 1 deadline as they negotiate a permanent agreement. Are Tourists Ruining Europe? How Locals Are Pushing Back Foreign Buyers Swoop on Cape Town Homes, Pricing Out Locals Trump's Gilded Design Style May Be Gaudy. But Don't Call it 'Rococo.' Denver City Hall Takes a Page From NASA In California, Pro-Housing 'Abundance' Fans Rewrite an Environmental Landmark The EU is seeking an exemption from the 10% rate for certain key products including aircrafts, aircraft parts as well as wine and spirits, according to people familiar with the matter. Some form of relief is expected as part of the agreement in principle. The European Commission, which handles trade matters for the EU, briefed member states Monday on the status of the negotiations. A spokesperson from the commission declined to comment on the ongoing talks. The US announced on Monday that universal tariffs that were due to kick in July 9 would be delayed until at least the beginning of August. For the EU, tariffs on nearly all its exports to the US will jump to 50% on that date if it doesn't strike a deal beforehand. Trump has imposed tariffs on almost all US trading partners, saying he wants to bring back domestic manufacturing, needs to pay for a tax-cut extension and stop other countries from taking advantage of the US. The EU is also pushing the US for quotas and exemptions to effectively lower Washington's 25% tariff on automobiles and car parts as well as its 50% tariff on steel and aluminum, according to the people. But a breakthrough on those levies is not immediately forthcoming. However, the two sides are discussing a so-called offsetting mechanism that would allow companies that make automobiles in the US to export a certain number tariff free, said the people. Some officials are concerned that such an arrangement could see investments and production shift across the Atlantic, Bloomberg previously reported. Any initial deal would likely be short and not legally binding. The two sides are also aiming for common ground on non-tariff barriers, digital trade and economic security. In addition to so-called reciprocal tariffs and sectoral levies on cars and metals, the US is working to introduce duties on other sectors, including pharmaceuticals and semiconductors. Member states are divided on how imbalanced a deal the bloc should accept, with some pushing for a quick agreement while others want the EU to impose countermeasures and negotiate from a position of strength. The EU will assess any end result and at that stage decide what level of asymmetry it's willing to accept and whether any rebalancing measures would be required, Bloomberg previously reported. The EU has approved tariffs on €21 billion ($24.6 billion) of US goods that can be quickly implemented in response to Trump's metals levies. They target politically sensitive US states and include products such as soybeans from Louisiana, home to House Speaker Mike Johnson, as well as agricultural products, poultry and motorcycles. The bloc has also prepared an additional list of tariffs on €95 billion of American products in response to Trump's so-called reciprocal levies and automotive duties. They would target industrial goods including Boeing Co. aircraft, US-made cars, and bourbon. The EU is also consulting member states to identify strategic areas where the US relies on the bloc, as well as potential measures that go beyond tariffs such as export controls and restrictions on procurement contracts. --With assistance from Andra Timu and Milda Seputyte. SNAP Cuts in Big Tax Bill Will Hit a Lot of Trump Voters Too For Brazil's Criminals, Coffee Beans Are the Target 'Telecom Is the New Tequila': Behind the Celebrity Wireless Boom Sperm Freezing Is a New Hot Market for Startups Pistachios Are Everywhere Right Now, Not Just in Dubai Chocolate ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
