Utah House majority leader to step down, take key role in Cox Cabinet
Utah House Majority Leader Rep. Jefferson Moss, R-Saratoga Springs, is stepping down to take a key position in Gov. Spencer Cox's Cabinet.
Cox named Moss his pick to oversee the Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity. Moss is slated to take over on May 30, helping oversee business development, innovation, and economic strategy promotion statewide. That's also when he'll resign from the Utah Legislature.
'Jefferson Moss brings a rare combination of public service, private sector experience and a deep understanding of innovation and education,' Cox said in a statement Friday. 'He's been a driving force behind many of Utah's most forward-thinking initiatives, and I'm confident he'll lead the Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity with the same vision, energy, and commitment to our state's future that have defined his career.'
Moss joined the Utah Legislature in 2017, rising in the House of Representatives before becoming the House majority leader, one of the top leadership positions in the chamber. He also serves as the associate commissioner of innovation, commercialization and economic development for the Utah System of Higher Education, a leadership role he will retain despite his new cabinet role.
Before that, he held roles at Utah Valley University and businesses like KeyBank and Credit Suisse. He was also a member of the Saratoga Springs City Council.
'It has been the honor of a lifetime to serve the people of House District 51 and the state of Utah,' he said in a statement. 'I'm incredibly proud of the work we've accomplished together to strengthen our economy, invest in education, and expand opportunity for Utah families. I look forward to continuing my work in a new capacity, helping lead Utah's economic future.'
The Governor's Office of Economic Opportunity oversees several state agencies, committees and programs, including the Utah Office of Tourism and Utah Film Commission. It's also the agency that gave final approval to the Capital City Convention Center Reinvestment Zone, a piece of the financing options for major downtown Salt Lake plans by the Delta Center, as it handles housing and transit reinvestment zones.
Moss will replace Ryan Starks, whose departure was announced last week. He has since been named the director of the Economic Development Corporation of Utah.
Meanwhile, the House Majority Caucus plans to hold a special leadership election 'in the coming weeks' to find a new House majority leader, according to the Utah Legislature.
'Rep. Moss is an extraordinary leader, a trusted colleague, and a loyal friend,' House Speaker Mike Schultz, R-Hooprt, said. 'While we'll miss his leadership in the House, I know he will continue to serve Utah with the same passion and purpose in his new role.'
Lawmakers are expected to meet in a special session the week of May 19, but a spokeswoman for the Legislature said a leadership vote won't take place during those interim meetings and will likely come in early June, after Moss's resignation is official. The caucus last elected new leaders in 2023 after then-Speaker Brad Wilson resigned to run for U.S. Senate. In that case, the three remaining members of GOP leadership each moved up to fill a more senior role.
Rep. Karianne Lisonbee, R-Syracuse, currently serves as majority whip, with Rep. Casey Snider, R-Paradise, as assistant whip.
Republican delegates from Utah County will vote to elect a replacement for Moss in House District 51, and Utah County Republican Party Chairwoman Cristy Henshaw told KSL.com the party would release a timeline for that convention Friday night or Saturday. The state GOP organizing convention is May 17.
Contributing: Bridger Beal-Cvetko
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
32 minutes ago
- Business Insider
What A-list economists are saying about Trump's tax bill as Musk rebels against it
Elon Musk has departed his role as a "special government employee" in Trump's White House — and he's using his time outside the administration to hammer the GOP spending bill that's a cornerstone of the president's agenda. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination," Musk wrote on X earlier this week. Trump responded by saying Musk's criticism of the legislation is "disappointing." President Trump's tax bill will likely face a vote in the Senate in the coming weeks after passing the House in May. It would reduce the tax rates of lower-income workers, particularly those earning less than $107,200, and eliminate taxes on tips, social security, and overtime. The bill would also cut spending on social programs like Medicaid and SNAP benefits, which provide food assistance to low-income Americans. Like Musk, investors and economists are seemingly concerned that the bill will cause the national debt to balloon and further widen the US budget deficit. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said this week that it would grow the deficit by $2.4 trillion over the next decade . Trump and his allies have pushed back, arguing that higher economic growth from lower taxes would help boost government revenue. Here's what top economists are saying about the bill. Phillip L. Swagel, director of the Congressional Budget Office Despite the lower tax rates for low earners, Swagel said in a May 20 letter that the bill would negatively impact poorer Americans. "CBO estimates that household resources would decrease by an amount equal to about 2 percent of income in the lowest decile (tenth) of the income distribution in 2027 and 4 percent in 2033, mainly as a result of losses of in-kind transfers, such as Medicaid and SNAP," he wrote. "By contrast, resources would increase by an amount equal to 4 percent for households in the highest decile in 2027 and 2 percent in 2033, mainly because of reductions in the taxes they owe." William McBride, chief economist at the Tax Foundation McBride, along with several colleagues at the non-partisan Tax Foundation think tank, said in a May 23 report that while the bill would support economic growth, it wouldn't be enough to offset the revenue loss from tax cuts. "Our preliminary analysis finds the tax provisions included in the House-passed bill would increase long-run GDP by 0.8 percent," the report said. "The bill's tax and spending changes would increase the 10-year budget deficit by $2.6 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the deficit would increase by $1.7 trillion over ten years before interest costs." It continued: "The bill's tax provisions alone would reduce federal tax revenue by $4.1 trillion from 2025 through 2034 on a conventional basis before added interest costs. On a dynamic basis, accounting for economic growth, the revenue reduction would fall by nearly 22 percent to $3.2 trillion over 10 years before added interest costs." 6 Nobel Laureates Six Nobel Prize-winning economists — including Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson, Peter Diamond, Paul Krugman, Oliver Hart, and Joseph Stiglitz — said in a June 2 letter that the bill would worsen wealth inequality in the US. "The combination of cuts to key safety net programs like Medicaid and SNAP and tax cuts disproportionately benefiting higher-income households means that the House budget constitutes an extremely large upward redistribution of income. Given how much this bill adds to the U.S. debt, it is shocking that it still imposes absolute losses on the bottom 40% of U.S households," the letter said. "The House bill addresses none of the nation's key economic challenges usefully and exacerbates many of them," it added. Ken Rogoff, professor of economics at Harvard University Rogoff, former chief economist at the IMF, cast doubt on the notion that the bill would boost growth in a piece for Project Syndicate this week. "Trump and his acolytes argue that his "big, beautiful bill" will supercharge economic growth, generating enough revenue to make up for sweeping tax cuts. But history offers little support for such claims," he wrote. "While both Democratic-led spending sprees and Republican-backed tax cuts have fueled the growth of US debt over the past two decades, tax reductions have accounted for the lion's share of the increase. Moreover, the notion that tax cuts pay for themselves was already discredited in the 1980s, when President Ronald Reagan's tax cuts led to soaring deficits rather than self-sustaining growth." He added: "Will America's rising debt ultimately trigger a full-blown crisis? Perhaps, but a continued upward drift in long-term interest rates is more likely." Desmond Lachman, senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute Lachman, a former IMF official who currently works for a conservative-leaning think tank, said in a June 4 post that rising bond yields, a declining dollar, and appreciating gold prices could be harbingers of an economic crisis brought on by Trump-driven policy volatility. Trump's tax bill is adding to investors' fears due to its inflationary implications. But one of its clauses undermines confidence in the reliability of the returns on Treasurys, he said. "That bill includes a clause that has to be sending shivers down foreign investors' spines. According to Section 899, the US Treasury can impose additional taxes of up to 20 percent on income earned by foreign entities from countries that enact taxes deemed 'unfair' to US interests."
Epoch Times
32 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
House Democrats Fall Short in Subpoenaing Elon Musk in 20–21 Vote
House Democrats on Thursday couldn't get enough votes to issue a subpoena to tech entrepreneur Elon Musk to testify before Congress. The House Oversight Committee rejected the Democrats' request for Musk, a Trump adviser and former head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), to appear before lawmakers in a 20–21 vote.
38 minutes ago
Here are taxes that Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' would repeal
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act that is now in the Senate would pay for President Donald Trump's campaign promises to make his 2017 tax cuts permanent, cut other taxes and boost spending for border security and defense. Republican fiscal hawks say they can't vote for the bill in its current state because it will add to the deficit -- by $2.4 trillion, according to a Congressional Budget estimate released Wednesday. In addition to no tax on tips and no tax on overtime, the bill would also repeal federal excise taxes on gun silencers and tanning services. Here's a breakdown of those cuts in the current form of the bill: Making Trump tax cuts permanent: Because this is an extension of cuts in place since 2017, the average taxpayer would largely not see a change, unless the cuts were not renewed. No tax on tips and overtime: This was one of Trump's major campaign promises -- exempting workers who receive tips from paying federal income taxes on them, as long as they make less than $160,000 a year. The same income threshold would apply to exemptions for overtime pay and there is no cap on how much OT pay workers could claim. Both tax breaks would expire at the end of 2028 after Trump leaves office. Trump savings accounts: The bill creates so-called 'Trump savings accounts' for parents to open for their newborn children. The contribution limit for any taxable year is $5,000. The government would provide an initial deposit of $1,000 for each newborn. Raising the SALT cap: The bill raises the tax deduction limit for state and local taxes from $10,000 to $40,000 for joint filers making less than $500,000 per year. The cap would increase by 1% each year. Republicans from states with high taxes like New York and California pushed House GOP leadership to further increase that cap to give their constituents a break. Fiscal hard-liners in the House warned that increasing the cap would increase the deficit. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has already signaled that the cap that came out of the House probably won't survive in the Senate. On the campaign trail, Trump promised to eliminate the SALT cap first imposed by the 2017 tax law he signed during his first term. Removing gun silencer tax: The bill would end the $200 excise tax imposed on the purchase or transfer of silencers and eliminate registration. The tax has been on the books since Congress passed the National Firearms Act in 1934. This is a major win for the National Rifle Association. Repealing tax on indoor tanning: The legislation would repeal the excise tax on indoor tanning services. The 10% tax was included in the Affordable Care Act and has been in place since 2010. Cuts to green energy incentives: The bill would reduce or eliminate green energy tax credits and other incentives that were hallmarks of President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. Tax credits for homeowners who purchase solar panels, wind turbines, geothermal heat pumps, energy efficient windows, and more would be eliminated. For solar and wind power, for example, homeowners are currently eligible for a tax credit worth 30% of the cost of the purchase. The bill also eliminates tax credits for those who purchase new or used electric vehicles -- up to $4,000 for a used EV and $7,500 for new. It also ends a tax incentive for homes and businesses to install EV charging stations. If the bill becomes law, these incentives and others would end at the end of this year. Slashing education programs: The bill would slash $330 billion from student loan spending over the next 10 years. An income-based 'Repayment Assistance Plan' will be the new standard for student loans. It also changes the Pell Grant program for low-income students by increasing the increasing the number of required credits per semester.
