
PECA bill gets Senate's nod amid protest
Journalists on Tuesday erupted in protest across the country after the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N)-led ruling coalition managed to bulldoze the controversial Prevention of Electronic Crimes (PECA) Amendment Bill, 2025 also through the upper house.
The National Assembly has already passed the bill which, if enacted, can effectively muzzle the media.
On Tuesday, PML-N Senator Rana Tanveer Hussain presented the bill in a Senate sitting, chaired by Deputy Chairman Syedaal Khan amid a protest by opposition lawmakers.
Addressing the house, Hussain said no law or amendment is immutable and can be changed. "The PECA bill is for social media platforms, not for electronic media or newspapers, aiming to regulate civil society in a manner that prevents the misuse of social media," he said.
Opposition members, however, tore copies of the bill amid chaos in the house.
Leader of the Opposition Senator Shibli Faraz said his party, the PTI, does not support the bill. He said no one supports spreading fake news but criticized the flawed procedure adopted to pass the bill. There is a lack of necessary institutions, judges, and lawyers to handle cases related to fake news, he said.
Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam-Fazl (JUI-F) Senator Kamran Murtaza complained that his amendments to the PECA bill were neither approved nor rejected by the relevant committee. He called the standing committee's report incomplete.
The house later approved the bill amid a protest by opposition members.
During passage of the bill, journalists also walked out of the Senate press gallery in protest, joined by PPP Senator Sherry Rehman, who listened to their grievances.
The journalists later organized a protest march from Islamabad's National Press Club to D-Chowk. Lawyers and civil society representatives also actively participated in the protest.
To prevent the journalists' rally from reaching parliament, a heavy contingent of police was deployed, and barbed wire barriers were erected. However, the journalists managed to cross the barriers and reached the gates of D-Chowk, where they staged a sit-in.
Addressing the gathering, Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) President Afzal Butt termed the bill a 'black law'. He said the government passed the bill without consulting the media, the most significant stakeholder.
"This law is an attempt to suppress the voice of the media. Our movement against this draconian law has begun and will continue until its repeal," he said.
The joint action committee of media bodies staged a protest demonstration also in front of the Karachi Press Club in response to an appeal from the PFUJ against the PECA amendment bill.
Representatives from various media organizations, civil society groups, trade unions, lawyers' groups and teachers joined and supported the protest.
Prominent figures, including journalists, media owners, editors, and workers from organizations such as PFUJ, the Karachi Union of Journalists (KUJ), the Pakistan Broadcasters Association (PBA), the Council of Pakistan Newspaper Editors (CPNE), and others addressed the protesters.
"The government has to learn the lessons as it was earlier used against the same party, which had passed the law in a haste," said Mazhar Abbas, a senior member of PFUJ.
Mazhar Abbas characterized the situation as a 'civilian martial law'. He urged the joint action committee to advocate for the repeal of PECA, stating that they would not compromise on their rights.
Azhar Abbas called for unity among media organisations to demonstrate collective strength to the government. PBA representative Qazi Ather reaffirmed the commitment to safeguarding press freedom, stating that they would not allow their voices to be suppressed.
The Karachi Bar Council also issued a statement condemning the bill, describing it as comprising regressive amendments that constitute an assault on fundamental freedoms.
PECA, a law enacted in 2016 during the rule of the PML-N, was aimed at addressing cybercrime and regulating electronic communication in Pakistan. It was meant to combat online offences such as hacking, data theft, and cyberbullying. The law was continually amended by subsequent governments.
However, this time around, the PML-N government has attempted to make some drastic changes in the law which seeks to criminalize fake news which may land a person in jail for up to three years while also making liable for a fine of up to Rs2 million.
It stipulates penalties for sharing content expunged from the records of the National Assembly, Senate, and provincial assemblies on social media. The amended bill expands the definition of illegal content, including matters related to religion, national security, public order, and contempt of court.
It also criminalizes activities such as inciting crime or terrorism, spreading defamatory reports against constitutional institutions, blackmailing, and defamation. Illegal content also includes pornography, copyright violations, and material that undermines peace and morality or promotes criminal activity.
The bill broadens the definition of social media platforms to include tools, software, websites, applications, and communication channels used for social media access.
One of the key provisions of the new amendments is the establishment of the Digital Rights Protection Authority (DRPA), which will have the authority to remove prohibited content and take action against individuals who share such material.
The authority will also oversee the regulation of social media platforms and has been given the power to enforce compliance through directives and penalties.
The bill also proposes the dissolution of the Federal Investigation Agency's (FIA) Cyber Crime Wing, with its responsibilities transferring to the newly established National Cyber Crime Investigation Agency.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
13 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Provinces must be consulted on oil deals, says Raza Rabbani
Listen to article Former Senate chairman Mian Raza Rabbani has criticised the federal government for failing to maintain transparency in finalising an oil exploration deal with the United States, which was publicly revealed through a tweet by the US president on Wednesday night. In a press statement issued on Thursday, Rabbani said it was 'a sad day for transparency and good governance' when the people of Pakistan had to learn of such an agreement through social media rather than formal government channels. He reminded the federal government that under Article 172(3) of the Constitution of 1973, the provinces have a 50% ownership stake in all lands, minerals, and resources of value. 'Such deals and projects fall under constitutional provisions and cannot be finalised unilaterally,' he said. Calling for greater institutional oversight, Rabbani demanded that the government take Parliament into confidence over what he termed 'Western-oriented initiatives.' He further urged the federal authorities to convene a meeting of the Council of Common Interests (CCI) to engage all provinces in discussions about the oil deal and similar future projects. US struck a trade deal with Pakistan, US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday, hours after announcing 25% tariffs on imports from India in addition to unspecified "penalty" over New Delhi's purchases of Russian weapons and energy. Read: Pakistan, US seal trade deal Trump said that the deal with Pakistan included joint development of the country's "massive" oil reserves. The announcement came as talks continue with other nations, including South Korea, ahead of his self-imposed August 1 deadline. "We have just concluded a Deal with the Country of Pakistan, whereby Pakistan and the United States will work together on developing their massive Oil Reserves," Trump wrote in post on his social media platform of 'Truth Social'. Donald J. Trump Truth Social 07.30.25 03:44 AM EST — Fan Donald J. Trump Posts From Truth Social (@TrumpDailyPosts) July 30, 2025 "We are in the process of choosing the Oil Company that will lead this Partnership. Who knows, maybe they'll be selling Oil to India someday!" the US president wrote in his post, without giving additional details of the deal. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Thursday expressed his gratitude to US President Donald Trump for his role in finalising a 'historic' trade agreement between Pakistan and the United States. 'I wish to convey my profound thanks to President Trump for his leadership role in the finalization of the historic US-Pakistan trade agreement, successfully concluded by our two sides in Washington last night,' the prime minister wrote on his X timeline. I wish to convey my profound thanks to President Trump @realDonaldTrump for his leadership role in finalization of the historic US-Pakistan trade agreement, successfully concluded by our two sides in Washington, last night. This landmark deal will enhance our growing cooperation… — Shehbaz Sharif (@CMShehbaz) July 31, 2025 He said that the 'landmark' deal would enhance the growing bilateral cooperation to expand the frontiers of an enduring partnership in the days to come.


Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
PAC lambasts govt's faulty sugar policies
Listen to article As a sugar crisis persists in the country, officials on Tuesday shared with the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) the names of the 67 sugar mills that exported 750,000 tons of sugar worth Rs111 billion to 21 countries over the past year. During a PAC meeting chaired by Junaid Akbar, the industries and production secretary said in 2023-24 Pakistan had surplus sugar of 1.3 million tons, of which 790,000 tons were approved for export. He said that 1.9 million tons of sugar was still available in stock, which could last until November, adding that the sugar crushing season runs from November 15 to March 15. Despite these figures, several committee members expressed dissatisfaction with the situation. The secretary for national food security claimed that the average retail price of sugar was Rs173 per kg but members, including Omar Ayub, said sugar was sold for more than Rs200 in their constituencies. Senator Fauzia Arshad reported that sugar was nearly unavailable in the market and what was available was unaffordable for ordinary citizens. PAC members heavily criticized the government's inconsistent sugar policiesexporting sugar one year and importing it the next. MNA Khawaja Shehraz Mehmood called it a "daylight robbery" and said that the same companies making huge profits from exports are now benefiting from imports. MNA Amir Dogar made direct allegations against political leaders, claiming that the highest number of sugar mills are owned by President Asif Ali Zardari, politician Jahangir Tareen, and the Sharif family. He alleged that Rs287 billion had gone into the pockets of a few powerful individuals. The remarks caused heated arguments between Dogar and other members, including Senator Afnan Ullah of the PML-N and Shazia Marri of the PPP, who demanded that such serious claims be backed with evidence. Further tension arose when Chairman Akbar questioned why the list of sugar mill owners and directors had not been submitted to the committee earlier. Officials from the Federal Board of Revenue (FBR) assured that the list has now been obtained and will be presented soon. He questioned how long sugar remains usable in storage, to which the secretary of industries responded that sugar begins to spoil after 3-4 months unless special precautions are taken. The meeting was told that the government is planning to import 300,000 tons of sugar to meet demand before the next crushing season begins. Lawmakers demanded that the government ensure this import does not harm farmers and that sugar is not brought in from countries where it was earlier exported. The PAC directed all relevant ministries to submit detailed reports and warned that future briefings would not be accepted without complete documentation. According to documents seen by The Express Tribune, JDW Sugar Mills topped the list by exporting 73,000 metric tons of sugar worth Rs11.1 billion. Tandlianwala Sugar Mills came second with 41,412 metric tons worth Rs5.98 billion. Ramzan Sugar Mills exported sugar worth Rs2.41 billion. Chaudhry Sugar Mills exported sugar worth Rs1.49 billion while Al-Arabia Sugar Mills exported Rs1.2 billion worth of sugar. The Auditor General of Pakistan revealed that sugar mills earned over Rs300 billion from recent sugar price fluctuations.


Express Tribune
2 days ago
- Express Tribune
ECP out on a disqualification spree
The Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) appears to be increasingly under legal siege as a growing number of its lawmakers face disqualification on various charges, many arising from May 9-related cases. The wave of disqualifications has sparked concern among legal experts who argue the process may be circumventing constitutional procedures and eroding democratic norms. Though not unprecedented, the disqualifications are bypassing the route laid out in Article 225 of the Constitution, which states that no election of the national or provincial assembly can be challenged except through an election petition submitted before an election tribunal. Since the restoration of judges in March 2009, lawmakers have been unseated by the superior judiciary – particularly the Supreme Court under former chief justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry – on grounds such as holding fake degrees and dual nationalities. Even former prime minister Yousuf Raza Gilani was shown the door in a contempt case. During the tenure of former chief justice Mian Saqib Nisar, a string of PML-N lawmakers also faced disqualification. Notably, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif was disqualified under Article 62(1)(f) of the Constitution. Subsequently, PML-N leaders Nehal Hashmi, Talal Chaudhry and Daniyal Aziz were disqualified in contempt proceedings. Two PML-N senators were also de-seated for holding dual nationalities at the time of filing their nomination papers. Now, it is PTI's turn in the hot seat. So far, four PTI lawmakers – two MNAs, one senator, and one MPA – have been disqualified due to convictions related to the May 9 riots. PTI founder Imran Khan himself was convicted in three separate cases before the 2024 general election, effectively barring him from contesting the polls. Recently, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali Khan expressed concern that up to 39 more lawmakers could face disqualification over similar charges in the coming months. The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) has also jumped into the fray. Acting on references sent by the National Assembly speaker, it has begun the process of unseating PTI MNAs. Most recently, PTI's Jamshed Dasti was disqualified by the ECP for failing to disclose assets in his nomination papers. The commission is now reviewing the eligibility of the leader of the opposition in the NA, Omar Ayub. During the tenure of former chief justice Qazi Faez Isa, the ECP was permitted to conduct recounts in three constituencies, leading to the de-seating of two PTI lawmakers. 'Premature move' Former additional attorney general Waqar Rana criticised the ECP's move as premature. "The most appropriate interpretation of Article 63(1)(g) is that the election commission cannot do it on its own after a member has taken the oath of office." He argued that only upon a reference from the speaker can such a member be disqualified, and that too after the conviction is upheld by the highest court. "Indira Gandhi was disqualified by the court, but on appeal, the sentence was suspended by the Indian Supreme Court in 1975, and she continued to serve as both a member and prime minister," he pointed out. Waqar Rana posed a question: if, on appeal, the conviction is set aside, then how can you disqualify a person? The other question is: how has the ECP assumed that convictions will be maintained in appeal? "It is tragic that ECP continues to undermine the democratic process," he added. Another lawyer noted that Article 225 of the Constitution has become redundant, adding that only election tribunals have jurisdiction to take up such matters. Earlier, parliamentarians belonging to the PPP and PML-N were being sent home through superior courts by the exercise of quo warranto jurisdiction. Now, the same is being done with PTI lawmakers by the ECP, without conducting a trial. Likewise, PTI lawyer Abuzar Salman Niazi said that convictions of several PTI lawmakers by the Anti-Terrorism Court, Sargodha, are judgments delivered by a court of first instance and have not yet attained finality. It is settled law that an appeal constitutes a continuation of the trial and that the judgment of a trial court does not become final until all appellate remedies are exhausted. In Federation of Pakistan v. Gul Hameed Khan (PLD 1975 SC 254), the Supreme Court held that "the appellate process is integral to the administration of justice and a judgment in a trial court remains provisional until the conclusion of appeals". "Therefore, any action taken against the PTI lawmakers prior to the disposal of their appeals would be premature and legally unsustainable." Niazi said that the ECP's notification of disqualification, issued prior to final adjudication, constitutes a violation of the principles of natural justice and due process enshrined under Article 10A of the Constitution. Furthermore, the ECP's failure to provide the lawmakers an opportunity to hear before issuing the disqualification notifications is a grave breach of procedural fairness. "Article 10A guarantees the right to a fair trial, and the principle of audi alteram partem — that no person shall be condemned unheard — is a cornerstone of administrative and judicial proceedings. In Asad Ali Khan v. Province of Punjab (PLD 1986 SC 383), the Court emphasised that "the right to be heard is an essential part of the principle of natural justice and must be observed before any adverse order is passed." "The denial of such hearing rights renders the ECP's action not only unlawful but unconstitutional. Moreover, these convictions do not fall within the ambit of Article 63 of the Constitution; therefore, the procedure followed by the ECP reflects a manifest misreading and misapplication of the law." Lastly, he added, the ECP's selective enforcement of judicial decisions raises serious concerns about its impartiality and commitment to the rule of law. While the ECP rapidly acted to implement the trial court's decision against PTI lawmakers, it has failed to enforce the binding judgment of the Supreme Court's largest bench regarding reserved seats for over a year. He argued that such selective and inconsistent conduct undermines public confidence in the institution and violates the principle of equality before law as guaranteed under Article 25 of the Constitution. "As held in Justice Qazi Faez Isa v. Federation of Pakistan (2014 SCMR 1272), "the sanctity of constitutional bodies depends on their neutrality, fairness, and adherence to the rule of law." The current conduct of the ECP falls short of these constitutional expectations and requires immediate rectification," he added. A three-judge bench of the Lahore High Court will take up the Dasti disqualification case today (Wednesday). Meanwhile, May 9-related trials have accelerated following a Supreme Court directive mandating the conclusion of all such proceedings within four months. Legal observers argue that the courts have often allowed powerful circles to shape political outcomes by fast-tracking trials against selected parties — first the PML-N during the Panama Papers case, and now the PTI in May 9 cases. Once, the apex court ordered expedited NAB proceedings against the Sharif family; now the same court, under CJP Yahya Afridi, has directed ATCs to wrap up May 9 trials within a similar tight deadline.