logo
Flint's still-unfinished lead pipe replacement serves as cautionary tale to other cities

Flint's still-unfinished lead pipe replacement serves as cautionary tale to other cities

Independenta day ago

Jeffrey Bell watched as crews dug up and replaced neighbors' lead water pipes, hoping his mother's house would be next. Workers told him it wasn't on their list but probably assigned to another contractor.
With Flint 's lead pipe replacement program winding down this year, Bell and his elderly mother worried the home they share was forgotten. Betty Bell repeatedly called the city while continuing to buy bottled drinking water, as she had for years. Finally someone called to say the water line was fine — records indicate it was checked in 2017. But the Bells hadn't known that, exemplifying residents' confusion over a process marred by delays and poor communication.
'I have even more questions now,' Jeffrey Bell said.
About a decade after Flint's water crisis caused national outrage, replacement of lead water pipes still isn't finished. Although the city recently said it completed work required under a legal settlement, the agreement didn't cover vacant homes and allowed owners to refuse, potentially leaving hundreds of pipes in the ground. The state agreed to oversee work on those properties and says it's determined to finish by fall.
Flint's missteps offer lessons for municipalities that face a recently imposed federal mandate to replace their own lead service lines. The Trump administration is expected to soon tell a federal appeals court if it will stand by that mandate.
'I think other cities are racing not to be Flint,' said Margie Kelly, a spokesperson with the environmental nonprofit Natural Resources Defense Council, which reached a settlement with the city to force it to replace lead pipes.
Flint falters
Flint's crisis was set in motion in 2014, when a state-appointed emergency manager ended a contract with Detroit's water system and switched to the Flint River to save money. But the state didn't require treatment to prevent corrosion that caused lead to leach into the water.
High levels of lead eventually were detected in drinking water and children's blood. Outbreaks of Legionnaires' disease that killed a dozen people were also linked, in part, to the city's water.
In 2017, Flint entered into a settlement requiring it to replace all lead pipes and fix dug-up yards for free within three years. Funds were directed first toward homes with known lead lines at the NRDC's insistence, which meant workers couldn't tackle neighborhoods systematically. And finding those homes proved challenging because many records were missing or inaccurate — some handwritten on notecards dating to the early 1900s.
'The city's overall management of the program was ineffective,' and it could have better coordinated work geographically, said Sarah Tallman, an attorney with the NRDC.
That stalled the program and, ultimately, the city had to check every pipe anyway. COVID-19 also slowed work.
Flint Department of Public Works Director Kenneth Miller, who was hired last year, said the city didn't know how many homeowners had opted out of lead pipe replacement or how many properties had simply been missed as contractors came and went.
'Just like any other organization, people get lax, people stop doing things, people get laid off and the person that used to do it doesn't do it anymore,' he said.
Because the city didn't keep accurate records of repairs, a judge ordered officials to visually check thousands of properties that had been excavated.
Yards torn up by contractors sometimes sat that way for months or years. For months, Danyele Darrough's lawn was a mess and the sidewalk and driveway were covered, she said. Grass seed that workers applied never grew. Finally this spring, nearly three years later, she bought bags of topsoil and seed to fix her lawn herself.
'It was like, yeah, we knew it; we couldn't trust them,' said Darrough.
Miller said the city now has robust data management, which he recommends to other communities tackling lead lines.
Steep population loss left thousands of vacant homes that will require contractors to cap lead lines where they're found, said Eric Oswald, drinking water director at Michigan's Department of Environment, Great Lakes and Energy.
'The state and the city wanted to absolutely make sure that ... we leave no stone unturned,' he said.
Trust is key
In Flint, government at every level caused the lead crisis or delayed fixing it, according to an EPA inspector general report. The scandal damaged trust in government — nearly 700 Flint homeowners declined free lead pipe replacement, the NRDC said.
Flint finally adopted an ordinance last year to prevent homeowners from opting out.
'It's very difficult to get across the finish line unless you've got something to enforce,' Oswald said. Benton Harbor, across the state, implemented a similar provision early on, helping its work move smoothly.
Now officials are working from a list of more than 4,000 properties where there could be a lead line, sending letters and making in-person visits to homes, if needed. Miller said he hopes the outreach will show that customer service is now a priority, but it will take time to rebuild trust.
Some also distrust the Environmental Protection Agency, which in May lifted a long-standing emergency order for Flint water. The agency said it's now safe to drink from the tap after years of tests showing sharply reduced lead levels.
'We don't know what to believe,' resident Aonie Gilcreast said at a recent community gathering. 'We don't trust the system' because officials have said 'time after time after time .... that everything was fine.'
As other cities and towns start replacing their own lead pipes — there are roughly 9 million in the U.S. — one thing should be top of mind, experts say: Digging them up isn't just a construction job, but also a test of community trust.
To replace the lines that connect the water main in the street to homes, workers usually must dig in the street and yard, and enter the home. When residents trust local government, they're more willing to grant that access.
'With lead, as with everything else, the first time people hear from their water utility can't be when there is a concern,' said Greg Kail, spokesperson at utility industry group American Water Works Association. Instead, it is important for utilities to reach out to residents about what they plan to do and enlist trusted community groups in the effort.
Newark charges forward
Newark, New Jersey, avoided Flint's pitfalls when facing its own lead crisis.
In 2019, about two years after elevated levels were revealed and with funds available, the mayor said the city would replace more than 20,000 lead pipes at no cost to residents — and do it within three years. But a challenge soon emerged: Newark has lots of renters who couldn't approve the work.
'We couldn't get into the houses. We couldn't find the owners,' said Kareem Adeem, Newark's water and sewer director. 'They don't live there. They had no interest in taking care of the lead service line.'
So the city passed an ordinance making lead pipe removals mandatory and giving renters permission to approve the work.
Then contractors moved quickly through the city block by block — a lesson learned from Flint.
For the most stubborn holdouts, officials told them when they'd start replacement work and said they'd turn the water off until the resident allowed them to complete it. The threat was enough. They never had to actually turn off anybody's water, Adeem said.
Sometimes, people would recognize Adeem from TV and he could start a conversation — a crack in a resident's determination to say no. He worked with trusted community groups, too.
And the decision that ensured people's property was cleaned up afterward? The contractors weren't fully paid until they finished the work and fixed any damage.
___

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India wants ‘big beautiful' trade deal with US after Trump tariff threats
India wants ‘big beautiful' trade deal with US after Trump tariff threats

The Independent

time15 minutes ago

  • The Independent

India wants ‘big beautiful' trade deal with US after Trump tariff threats

Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman revealed India 's strong desire for a 'big, beautiful' trade deal with the US, even as negotiations face challenges. A critical 9 July deadline approaches, after which the US could impose additional tariffs of up to 26 per cent on Indian goods. India has established clear red lines in the Bilateral Trade Agreement talks, primarily concerning the protection of its agriculture and dairy sectors. Trump has accused India of being a 'tariff king' and seeks greater market access for its agricultural exports, while India defends its tariffs as necessary and WTO -compliant. Negotiators have extended their discussions in Washington, indicating efforts to bridge differences and secure an agreement before the deadline.

Supreme court to hear case that could further erode campaign spending limits
Supreme court to hear case that could further erode campaign spending limits

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Supreme court to hear case that could further erode campaign spending limits

The US supreme court agreed on Monday to hear a case that could further erode restrictions on money in politics, in a challenge that comes in part from Vice-President JD Vance. The National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee, Vance and Steve Chabot, a former Republican congressman from Ohio, are challenging limits set on how much political parties can spend in coordination with candidates. The case was filed when Vance was a senatorial candidate, in 2022. The court's landmark Citizens United ruling in 2010 threw away limits on outside spending on elections, allowing corporations and unions to inject unlimited money into elections as a matter of free speech. The current challenge from Republicans makes a similar argument, claiming that limits on how much spending can be coordinated with a campaign impede their first amendment rights. It also comes at a time where unfettered outside spending has become a norm in US politics. The case is challenging limits to what's called 'coordinated' spending between a party and the campaign, while independent expenditures, those often made by political action committees, have been unlimited since Citizens United. The limits themselves vary depending on population and which office a candidate is seeking. On the low end, a candidate for the US House of Representatives in a state with multiple representatives would be limited to $63,600, while a Senatecandidate in a state with a large voting age population would be nearly $4m. The US court of appeals for the sixth circuit upheld the limits based on a prior supreme court ruling in 2001 on coordinated spending, but the plaintiffs have argued this 2001 decision is outdated given other more recent campaign finance decisions. The Trump administration filed a brief in the case that aligned with Republicans, and the justice department called on the supreme court to consider the case. Democratic groups have asked to intervene to defend the existing limits. The case will be heard in the court's next term, which starts in October. ScotusBlog, the much-watched website written by lawyers and legal scholars, says the case 'may be the first potential blockbuster of October term 2025'.

Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights
Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights

The Guardian

time18 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Trump administration reportedly decides Harvard violated civil rights

The Trump administration has concluded that Harvard University violated federal civil rights law in its handling of Jewish and Israeli students, and it threatened the school with a potential 'loss of all federal financial resources' as a result, according to the Wall Street Journal. In a Monday letter addressed to the Harvard president, Alan Garber, administration attorneys stated that the university was aware Jewish and Israeli students felt unsafe on campus but failed to take meaningful action. The letter, obtained by the Journal, accused Harvard of 'deliberate indifference' toward those concerns. 'Failure to institute adequate changes immediately will result in the loss of all federal financial resources and continue to affect Harvard's relationship with the federal government,' the letter warned. The reported letter marks the latest move in the Trump administration's broader effort to target elite academic institutions it says have ignored antisemitism and pushed diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives at the expense of student safety. Harvard, the oldest university in the US, has become a central focus of this campaign. Typically, a formal notice of civil-rights violations can precede legal action by the US justice department or end in a negotiated settlement. Previous administrations often opted for voluntary resolution agreements rather than pursuing lawsuits in similar cases. According to the letter, the university stood by for two years while Jewish and Israeli students were 'assaulted and spit on', leading many to hide their identities out of fear. The letter also says that antisemitic imagery, including a dollar sign inside a Star of David, circulated on campus – and that antisemitic vandalism included an Israeli flag defaced with a swastika replacing the Star of David. In April, Harvard released internal reviews that described a campus disunited by tensions after the 7 October 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel. The reports acknowledged that both Jewish and Muslim students felt threatened and outlined steps the university had taken or planned to take to address campus bias. Trump has made several previous moves against Harvard, including trying to block the university's ability to admit international students and threatening its tax-exempt status. In response, Harvard has filed a lawsuit accusing the administration of violating its constitutional free speech and due-process rights. Despite the conflict, Trump recently suggested progress had been made. Earlier in June, he wrote on social media: 'We have been working closely with Harvard, and it is very possible that a Deal will be announced over the next week or so. They have acted extremely appropriately during these negotiations and appear to be committed to doing what is right.' Trump has also launched ongoing attacks against other universities, among the University of Virginia (UVA), which recently received 'explicit' notification from the Trump administration that the school would endure cuts to university jobs, research funding and student aid as well as visas if the institution's president, Jim Ryan, did not resign, according to the US senator Mark Warner. Ryan resigned from his position on Friday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store