Fashion startup founder charged with $300 million fraud
Christine Hunsicker, 48, of Lafayette, New Jersey, was charged with six counts, including fraud, aggravated identity theft and false statement charges in the indictment in Manhattan federal court.
U.S. Attorney Jay Clayton said in a release that Hunsicker forged documents, fabricated audits and made material misrepresentations about her company's financial condition to defraud investors in CaaStle Inc. and P180.
The indictment said she portrayed CaaStle as a high-growth, private company with substantial cash on hand when she knew it faced significant financial distress.
In a statement, defense lawyers Michael Levy and Anna Skotko said prosecutors 'have chosen to present to the public an incomplete and very distorted picture in today's indictment,' despite Hunsicker's efforts to be 'fully cooperative and transparent' with prosecutors and the Securities and Exchange Commission.
'There is much more to this story, and we look forward to telling it,' they said.
According to the indictment, Hunsicker continued her fraudulent scheme even after the CaaStle board of directors removed her and prohibited her from soliciting investments or taking other actions on the company's behalf.
She 'persisted in her scheme' even after law enforcement agents confronted her over the fraud, the indictment said.
Before the fraud allegations emerged, Hunsicker seemed to be a rising star in the fashion world after she was named to Crain's New York Business '40 under 40' lists, was selected as one of Inc.'s 'Most Impressive Women Entrepreneurs' and was recognized by the National Retail Federation as someone shaping the future of retail, the indictment noted.
At a time when the business was in financial distress with limited cash available and significant expenses, CaaStle was valued by Hunsicker at $1.4 billion, the indictment said.
Hunsicker was lying to investors in February 2019 and continued to do so through this March, prosecutors alleged.
They said she fed investors falsely inflated income statements, fake audited financial statements, fictitious bank account records and sham corporate records.
She allegedly told one investor in August 2023 that CaaStle reported an operating profit of nearly $24 million in the second quarter of 2023 when its operating profit that quarter was actually less than $30,000.
The indictment alleged that she carried out the majority of the fraud by bilking CaaStle investors of $275 million before forming P180 last year to infuse CaaStle with cash before its investors could discover her fraud.
Through misrepresentations and omissions, she cheated P180 investors out of about $30 million, the indictment said.
It said CaaStle filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy last month, leaving hundreds of investors holding now-worthless CaaStle shares.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
United Airlines quietly brings back their most hated rule that will cost you more money
United Airlines has quietly resumed charging single passengers more than those traveling in pairs or groups. The controversial policy, dubbed the 'single tax' by its critics, was exposed by a consumer rights website earlier this year. An investigation by Thrifty Traveler found that United, Delta and American were all charging solo fliers higher fares for the same route than those who booked two tickets or more together. After the report sparked backlash, United and Delta promised to scrap the pricing model and charge the same rates for singles and couples. American Airlines, however, kept the policy. Now United — the US's largest airline — has reneged, according to an analysis by The Economist. It is once again charging weekday solo travelers a premium on at least 8 percent of its flights. The data also showed that American Airlines applies the 'single tax' far more aggressively, charging solo travelers more on 57 percent of its routes. Critics say the system unfairly punishes passengers who travel alone, especially those flying midweek for work, while group travelers often enjoy lower per-ticket fares. Meanwhile, United has faced a string of controversies in recent months — from slashing flights to selling customer data. The legacy airline announced earlier this summer that it would cut four in every 100 domestic flights this year — blaming Americans not wanting to travel as much. The cuts are centered on late night and early morning flights following a drop in demand for off-peak travel. The reductions came as United rolled out a new business class experience, offering perks such as Ossetra caviar, Laurent‑Perrier Cuvée Rosé Champagne, plasma face masks and designer hoodie pajamas for premium passengers. In April, a 90‑second air traffic control blackout at United's Newark hub caused weeks of delays and forced the airline to to cut 35 daily flights. Adding to the backlash, an investigation revealed United was among the airlines that had sold sensitive passenger data to the federal government. United, Delta and American collectively own a data broker - the Airlines Reporting Corporation (ARC) - that collects their passenger's flight record information including their names, full flight itineraries and financial details. This broker then sold passenger data on to Customs and Border Protection in a contract that asked the agency not to reveal where the data had come from. The CBP, part of the Department of Homeland Security, claims the data is necessary to help authorities track people of interest. Immigration and Customs Enforcement also purchased the data, the publication reported. 'The big airlines — through a shady data broker that they own called ARC — are selling the government bulk access to Americans' sensitive information, revealing where they fly and the credit card they used,' Democrat Senator Ron Wyden told 404 Media. Southwest is also dealing with the ire of its customers after ditching its 50-year policy of free checked baggage. It come shortly after the budget airline also cut its first-come, first-serve seating in a bid to boost profits by offering flyers the chance to pay extra to pick their seats early or get coveted extra-legroom.
Geeky Gadgets
10 minutes ago
- Geeky Gadgets
Agent Swarm 2.0 : 90% of AI Coding is Now Unnecessary
What if 90% of the coding you do today could simply vanish from your to-do list? It sounds like a bold claim, but with the rise of AI-driven tools like Agent Swarm 2.0, this is no longer a distant dream—it's a reality reshaping how developers approach their craft. At the heart of this transformation lies the concept of sub-agents, specialized AI entities designed to handle specific tasks with precision and independence. Imagine delegating tedious debugging, UI design, or performance optimization to a network of intelligent agents, each working in perfect harmony. The result? A streamlined workflow that eliminates inefficiencies and frees developers to focus on creativity and strategy rather than repetitive grunt work. This overview by AI Labs explores how Agent Swarm 2.0 is redefining the boundaries of AI coding by introducing a new era of task-specific automation. You'll discover how sub-agents operate in isolated contexts to reduce errors, collaborate seamlessly to tackle complex workflows, and adapt to the unique demands of any project. From chaining agents for advanced automation to customizing their roles for precision, this innovation is poised to make traditional coding workflows feel obsolete. But is this the future of development or just another fleeting trend? Let's unpack the possibilities and challenges of this new shift. Sub-Agents in AI Coding Understanding Sub-Agents Sub-agents are purpose-built AI entities designed to handle distinct tasks within a coding workflow. Unlike traditional AI tools that attempt to manage multiple tasks simultaneously within a single context, sub-agents operate independently, each within its own isolated context window. This separation ensures cleaner task execution, reduces the likelihood of errors, and eliminates unnecessary clutter in the primary conversation thread. For instance, you can assign sub-agents to specific roles such as project manager, developer, UI designer, or QA engineer. Each agent focuses exclusively on its designated task, contributing to a more streamlined and cohesive development process. By isolating responsibilities, sub-agents enable developers to maintain clarity and focus throughout the workflow. The Importance of Sub-Agents Sub-agents bring a host of advantages to AI coding workflows, making them an essential tool for modern developers. Their benefits include: Task Specialization: Each sub-agent is optimized for a specific role, making sure precise and efficient task execution. Each sub-agent is optimized for a specific role, making sure precise and efficient task execution. Context Isolation: Isolated context windows prevent cross-task interference, maintaining clarity and reducing errors. Isolated context windows prevent cross-task interference, maintaining clarity and reducing errors. Enhanced Efficiency: Dedicated agents for individual tasks accelerate workflows and eliminate bottlenecks. Dedicated agents for individual tasks accelerate workflows and eliminate bottlenecks. Reusability: Sub-agents can be reused across multiple projects, saving time during setup and configuration. Sub-agents can be reused across multiple projects, saving time during setup and configuration. Controlled Tool Access: Developers can manage the tools and resources each agent uses, improving security and performance. This combination of task specialization, efficiency, and flexibility makes sub-agents a fantastic addition to AI-driven development workflows. Agent Swarm 2.0 Watch this video on YouTube. Explore further guides and articles from our vast library that you may find relevant to your interests in AI Agents. Setting Up Sub-Agents Configuring sub-agents is a straightforward process, offering both manual and autogenerated options. Developers can define agents for specific projects or personal use, depending on their requirements. The key to an effective setup lies in providing clear and detailed task descriptions, which enable the system to optimize each agent for its intended role. For example, if you require a UI design agent, you can specify parameters such as working with applications and integrating Shad CN components. The system will then configure the agent with the necessary tools and expertise to meet these requirements. This level of customization ensures that each sub-agent is perfectly suited to its assigned task, reducing setup time and improving overall efficiency. Practical Applications of Sub-Agents To illustrate the capabilities of sub-agents, consider a scenario where a UI design agent is tasked with creating a application. The agent can seamlessly integrate Shad CN components, apply custom themes using tools like Tweak CN, and connect to MCP servers for smooth execution. This level of automation significantly reduces the need for manual intervention, allowing developers to focus on higher-level tasks such as strategy and innovation. Sub-agents also excel in scenarios requiring collaboration between multiple agents. For instance, a performance analysis agent can work alongside an optimization agent to identify and resolve inefficiencies in a codebase. This collaborative approach ensures precision at every step of the workflow, delivering consistent and reliable results. Chaining Sub-Agents for Complex Workflows One of the most powerful features of sub-agents is their ability to work together in a chained sequence. By integrating custom commands, developers can automate complex workflows involving multiple agents. This approach is particularly useful for tasks that require input from various specialized agents. For example, you might chain a data analysis agent with a visualization agent to process raw data and generate insightful reports. Similarly, a testing agent can be chained with a debugging agent to identify and resolve issues in a software application. This flexibility allows developers to adapt workflows to the specific demands of their projects, making sure both efficiency and accuracy. Advantages of Sub-Agent Integration The adoption of sub-agents in AI coding workflows offers numerous benefits that enhance both productivity and precision: Reduced Manual Effort: Automating repetitive tasks allows developers to focus on strategic objectives and creative problem-solving. Automating repetitive tasks allows developers to focus on strategic objectives and creative problem-solving. Higher Accuracy: Task-specific agents minimize errors, delivering consistent and reliable results. Task-specific agents minimize errors, delivering consistent and reliable results. Flexibility: Sub-agents can be customized to meet the unique demands of each project, making sure optimal performance. Sub-agents can be customized to meet the unique demands of each project, making sure optimal performance. Scalability: The ability to chain multiple agents enables developers to tackle increasingly complex workflows with ease. These advantages make sub-agents an indispensable tool for developers seeking to optimize their workflows and achieve greater efficiency. Getting Started with Sub-Agents Claude Code provides extensive resources to help developers harness the full potential of sub-agents. These include detailed documentation, tutorials, and GitHub collections featuring pre-built agents. Developers can explore examples of chaining sub-agents with custom commands, allowing them to create advanced automation workflows with minimal effort. Whether you're building a application, optimizing performance, or managing complex workflows, sub-agents offer the tools and flexibility needed to succeed in today's fast-paced development landscape. Media Credit: AI LABS Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Daily Mirror
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
PGA Tour star responds after finding out huge sum Scottie Scheffler's caddie has earned
PGA star Ben Griffin has responded in disbelief after finding out just how much money Scottie Scheffler's trusted caddie, Ted Scott, has taken home in 2025 alone PGA Tour star Ben Griffin has spoken out after he discovered that Scottie Scheffler's caddie, Ted Scott, has earned more than most players on the tour in 2025. It's been an exceptionally successful year for Scheffler, 29, with the New Jersey-born icon snapping up the PGA Championship and The 153rd Open at Royal Portrush – taking his major tally to four. The player-caddie duo of Scheffler and Scott has been formidable since they started working together in 2022. But their payment agreement is largely under wraps, despite Scheffler briefly opening up on it. A caddie usually receives 10 per cent of the winning check, seven per cent for a top-10 finish, and five percent for anything else – yet they may also earn a weekly salary. Griffin, who has been open on his finances in the past, has won the Charles Schwab Challenge and Zurich Classic this year and has earned around £6m in 2025, one of his most lucrative years ever. He has won just over £11m in his career so far. Golf Digest took to X to announce that Scott's estimated earnings this year, £1.49m, are higher than those of the average PGA Tour player, which stand at £1.3m. Griffin playfully replied: "He [Scott] got me the last two years. I knew I had to step my game up…" Scott has pocketed a little over £5.5m over the last two years alone, with the 2025 season still yet to finish. Griffin earned £2.5m in 2024 – a year in which Scott sensationally bagged £4m. A fan then asked Griffin why, after two wins on the tour this year, he had not signed up a 'blue tick' on X – an extra feature users can pay for on the social media platform to add to give their profile more exposure. Griffin jokingly hit back: "Can't risk buying a blue check and Ted jumping me." Scheffler has won four championships this year and secured 13 top-10 finishes out of 16 events. His total earnings for 2025 stand at £14m so far. Scott's staggering sum this year would even see him surpass the earnings of two former Masters champions on the PGA money list with past Masters winners Zach Johnson and Danny Willett having banked £655k and £398k respectively. Famously, back in 2024, Scheffler took home a staggering £47m with Scott's earnings standing at around £4m. This would have put Scott around 20th in the PGA Tour's money list for that year. While Scott is currently the highest earning caddie, he's not the only bag man on tour to boast a more than credible bank balance. Rory McIlroy's long-term man Harry Diamond and Xander Schauffele's Austin Kaiser also raked in hefty amounts over the last few years. Speaking on the Pardon My Take podcast last year, Scheffler opened up on how he leaves paying Scott to his staff, despite the astronomical sums heading his caddie's way. "We have a girl that helps us pay bills basically because I'm a child and I can't keep track of all that stuff," Scheffler said. "She quickly took over that job and texts me at the end of each week saying, 'Hey, this is how much we're paying Ted?' I'm like, 'That's great.'" Scott, however, has nothing but praise for Scheffler and his seemingly unstoppable form. "Time and time again, when people get close, he seems to be able to step on the gas," Scott said following Scheffler's triumph at the PGA Championship in May. "He just has that ability to be like, 'Oh, no, you're not coming after me, bud.'"
