CNN and HBO owner Warner Bros Discovery announces breakup plan
Warner Bros Discovery will split into two public companies by next year, calving off its cable operations from its streaming service.
Warner Bros Discovery said on Monday that Streaming & Studios will include Warner Bros Television, Warner Bros Motion Picture Group, DC Studios, HBO and HBO Max, as well as their film and television libraries.
The Global Networks company will include CNN, TNT Sports in the US, and Discovery, top free-to-air channels across Europe, and digital products such as the Discovery+ streaming service and Bleacher Report.
Shares jumped more than 9% before the market open.
Warner Bros Discovery's CEO, David Zaslav, will serve as CEO of Streaming & Studios. Gunnar Wiedenfels, chief financial officer of Warner Bros Discovery, will serve as CEO of Global Networks. Both will continue in their current roles until the separation.
'By operating as two distinct and optimized companies in the future, we are empowering these iconic brands with the sharper focus and strategic flexibility they need to compete most effectively in today's evolving media landscape,' Zaslav said in a statement.
The split is expected to be completed by the middle of next year. It still needs final approval from the Warner Bros Discovery board.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Britons ‘better learn to speak Russian' without major defence spending hike, Nato chief warns
British people 'better learn to speak Russian' if Sir Keir Starmer does not massively ramp up defence spending, the Nato secretary general has warned. Mark Rutte said he was 'really impressed' by the prime minister 's strategic defence review unveiled last week. And he called for Nato countries to set a 'credible path' towards spending 5 per cent of their national incomes on defence amid the growing threat from Russia. Speaking at London's Chatham House, Mr Rutte said it is 'not up to me' whether that means Rachel Reeves should consider tax hikes to pay for the commitment. He added: 'I mean, what I know is that if we want to keep our societies safe... look, if you do not do this, if you would not go to the 5%, including the 3.5% core defence spending, you could still have the National Health Service, or in other countries their health systems, the pension system, etcetera, but you had better learn to speak Russian.' He did not set out a deadline by which Nato countries will have to reach the 5 per cent target, more than double what the UK currently spends on defence. 'I have a clear view on when we should achieve that,' he said. But he added: 'I keep that to myself, because we are having these consultations now with allies, and these discussions are ongoing, and we will in the end agree on a date when we have to be there.' His plans would see a return to Cold War levels of defence spending, with Russia's war on Ukraine still raging and rising tensions around the world. Nato chief Mr Rutte is in London to see Sir Keir ahead of a Nato summit in the Netherlands this month. The visit comes just days after the PM promised to make Britain 'battle ready', outlining Labour's plans to overhaul the country's defence capabilities. Defence secretary John Healey meanwhile said Britain's army needed to become '10 times more lethal' in the face of the 'immediate and pressing threat" from Russia and the rise of China. 'We are in a new era of threat, which demands a new era for UK defence,' he told MPs. But the announcement descended into a row over funding, with Sir Keir refusing to commit to hiking defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP by 2034. The PM was boosted on monday as Mr Rutte said the his plans to spend 2.5 per cent of GDP on defence from April 2027, with an aim to rise to 3 per cent over the next parliament, were not at odds with his own proposed target for the bloc. The 5 per cent goal is not "some figure plucked from the air", he said. "The fact is we need a quantum leap in our defence. The fact is we must have more forces and capability to implement our defence plans in full." While he said the "exact details are classified", Mr Rutte said there needed to be a 400 per cent increase in air and missile defence. He said Russia could be ready to use force against Nato within five years. "The new generation of Russian missiles travel at many times the speed of sound. The distance between European capitals is only a matter of minutes. There is no longer east or west. There is just Nato." As he met with Sir Keir in the White Room of No 10, he commended the Prime Minister on the "very good stuff" in the defence review. "It is not only about the traditional things, of course we need them, like ammunition... there is also drones, innovation, building the defence industrial base. It is really broad, it is really making a big impression in Brussels I can tell you," he said. Sir Keir called Nato the "cornerstone of our defence" and the "most effective military alliance the world has ever seen", adding that the task of the upcoming summit was to make sure it serves that purpose for decades to come. Sir Keir also spoke to German chancellor Friedrich Merz on Monday and the two leaders welcomed efforts by Nato allies to step up defence spending as well as Mr Rutte's suggestions to further boost it, a Downing Street spokeswoman said. The boost to the defence budget announced last week will be confirmed by chancellor Ms Reeves in her spending review on Wednesday, when she will set out the government's priorities for the next three years.
Finextra
21 minutes ago
- Finextra
How The History of Payments Has Always Been Modernisation
While attending EBA Day 2025, Phoebe Zhou, Head of Emerging Payments, HSBC joined the FinextraTV studio. Helping to contextualise the conversation, Zhou gave a historical reflection on how the payments industry has evolved before setting out the key modern innovations. From cryptocurrency to instant payments and fraud, Zhou provides a clear and broad overview of our current state of payments and how, when we reflect, we can see that payments has always been in a state of digital transformation
Finextra
22 minutes ago
- Finextra
Beyond the binary: Fixing KYC for the LGBTQ+ economy
0 This content has been selected, created and edited by the Finextra editorial team based upon its relevance and interest to our community. This Finextra long read series will focus on how the fintech industry can serve underrepresented LGBTQ+ customers during and after Pride Month – a celebration of the LGBTQ+ community and the contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer culture. By recognising that many individuals within the LGBTQ+ community, particularly transgender and non-binary individuals, may face challenges obtaining or updating official identification that accurately reflects their affirmed name and gender, financial services players can be supportive. Further, by removing legal barriers, complex procedures, and high costs associated with name and gender marker changes – and prioritising reconciliation of chosen names with legal names – financial institutions and fintech firms can work towards developing identity verification solutions that are inclusive of diverse gender identities and expressions. By addressing this challenge and others, organisations can create more inclusive and equitable experiences for LGBTQ+ individuals and families. Creating identity systems that respect chosen names and gender identity The biggest technical challenges in creating inclusive identity systems that respect chosen names and gender identity include ensuring system-wide consistency, updating existing systems and databases, and addressing potential biases in facial recognition and other technologies. In conversation with Meri Williams, CTO, Pleo, integrating these changes are 'just not that hard.' They continue to explain that 'technical issues should never get in the way of basic human dignity, and I genuinely think when people hide behind 'it's hard technically' they usually haven't even properly investigated how to do it. They are of course some archaic legacy systems with gender and names hard-coded, but those are just as likely to cause problems for international customers (e.g. not everyone in the world has a surname!) as they are for trans customers.' Williams also references how many cultures have different concepts of family names or preferred names – calling out how in South Africa, because of noemnaam, which means 'the name you are called', systems are accustomed to accommodating this. Pri Nagashima, VP of data, analytics and AI, Pleo, advises that data collection must also be respectful of users' gender identity and sexual orientation – while still enabling strong analytics. 'We really do keep data collection to what's absolutely essential, always giving people clear choices and respecting their privacy. If we do need something related to identity for a legitimate business reason, we make it optional and are crystal clear about why we're asking. We want to empower users, removing needless stress to set teams free, so it's about helping them visualise a better way to work, rather than just hammering them with information,' Nagashima explores. Balancing KYC/AML with the need for inclusion in identity verification processes A risk-based approach that prioritises user experience requires careful consideration of the specific context and the needs of the individuals being verified, while also ensuring that compliance obligation are met. Financial players, even in these circumstances, must implement more stringent verification processes for higher value transactions, allowing for more streamlined processes for lower risk cases. Alongside this, leveraging automation and technology can simplify the verification process, providing options, protecting customer data and remaining compliant with KYC and AML regulations. As Monzo CTO, Williams explains that the early engineering team happened to have a number of trans engineers and 'they were brave enough to share how it felt to have their 'deadnames' used by official systems and banks and similar. So a couple of our most senior engineers in Security and FinCrime took it on as a challenge: how could we respect people's gender and accommodate the fact we needed government-issued ID that often didn't reflect it accurately? 'The answer was a combination of technical and training. For instance, Customer Operations were trained to never ask what someone's 'real gender' was but instead to be clear when we needed to know what gender was on their ID documents. And we made the systems ensure that people were never called by their ID document name, but always by the name they told us they wanted to be known as. This can seem small, but like so many acts of inclusion, it benefits people far beyond the initial group, even if you're just like me and used to your full name only being used when your grandma is angry! (I'm Meri to everyone, only Meredith if I'm in trouble!!).' Embedding inclusivity into the product development lifecycle In their current role at Pleo, Williams explains that user research with diverse participants must be prioritised in order to foster a culture of belonging within the team, and embrace accessibility-first design principles. 'First of all, we try to have a team that is as representative as possible. If we reflect our customers, we are more likely to be able to understand and meet their needs. We supplement that with a real focus on user research and understanding – what we don't immediately know from our own experiences we have to get from well-designed research. We also have a Product Development Lifecycle which defines how we go from assessing opportunities → discovery → development → testing → deployment, and have peppered this with reminders to consider different needs and users, not just from an LGBTQ+ point of view, but also e.g. accessibility for disabled users,' Williams says. Being aware of individual and group biases and actively working to mitigate their impact on the design process can encourage organisations to embrace human-centred design, accessibility-first design and one that regularly assesses and iterates. Also, employee resource groups (ERGs) being involved in the product development process and help to gain diverse perspectives. Rethinking data policies to avoid reinforcing exclusion Fintech firms must take the time to audit for bias in AI models too, particularly where identity data intersects with risk scoring or onboarding decisions. Nagashima mentions that Pleo are 'big believers in speaking the truth and not hiding things. For AI, that means rigorous, ongoing audits and a strong emphasis on transparency and accountability. We're constantly checking our models with diverse datasets, looking for any hidden biases that might creep in from historical data.' Data collection also requires a fine balance. Nagashima adds: 'Over-collecting can alienate people, raise privacy concerns, and just add unnecessary complexity. Under-collecting, on the other hand, means you might miss important insights needed to build truly inclusive products or might not meet regulatory requirements.' In the context of KYC/AML, financial institutions must rethink their data policies to avoid reinforcing exclusion, particularly for transgender and nonbinary users. 'We talk to our customers the way we talk to each other, and that means being genuine and empathetic. For KYC/AML, it's about being flexible and understanding, especially when dealing with identity. We need to ensure our policies accommodate diverse identity documents and names, rather than forcing people into restrictive categories. This means often collaborating with regulators to establish frameworks that guide ethical and responsible AI use, ensuring transparency and inclusivity. Our focus is on removing needless stress to set teams free, making the process as smooth and inclusive as possible,' Nagashima says. Williams adds that CTOs can help normalise the integration of inclusive UX practices across the fintech ecosystem by making it 'part of the 'definition of done' i.e. a feature or product is not complete or ready for production usage until it meets ALL user needs, not just a subset of able-bodied people.'
