
SC upholds environment ministry notification, junks exemption clause for big projects
A bench comprising Chief Justice B R Gavai and Justice K Vinod Chandran held projects with a built-up area above 20,000 square meter, whether industrial, educational, or otherwise, cannot be exempted from the environment impact assessment (EIA) 2006 regime.
The court clarified that the notification would also apply to Kerala.
Dictating the order, the CJI said, 'It has been consistently held that natural resources are to be held in trust for the next generation. At the same time, courts have always taken note of development activities and the country cannot progress without it.'
Observing the apex court had always focused on sustainable development, the CJI said, 'The court while ensuring that development is permitted has also required precaution to be taken so that least damage is caused to the environment and has even ordered costs to be paid for such development activities.'
Also Read: Over 70,000 housing units stalled across MMR amid green clearance hurdle
The order said it would not be possible for the union ministry to consider projects across the country and therefore the issue could be considered on a state-to-state basis.
'If any construction activity in any area more than 20,000 sq km is carried out it will have environmental impact even if it's for industrial or educational purposes and discrimination cannot be made with similar such institutes,' it said.
It also said that no exemption can be granted to the education sector in this regard.
Also Read: Mumbai sees redevelopment projects worth ₹18,000 crore amid signs of softening sales: Here's what you need to know
'Nowadays education has also become a flourishing industry and thus no reason to exempt such projects from the 2006 notification,' the CJI said.
The bench upheld the notification except clause 8 of the January 29 notification which grants exemptions to industrial sheds, schools, colleges, and hostels with built-up areas up to 150,000 square meter.
The bench said it was impractical for the MoEFCC to appraise every project nationwide, noting the Central Expert Appraisal Committee (CEA) could handle state-wise evaluations.
On February 25, the top court stayed the notification on a PIL filed by Mumbai-based NGO Vanashakti, which argued that the exemption diluted the EIA's safeguards and threatened eco-sensitive zones.
Senior advocate Gopal Sankaranarayanan, appearing for the NGO, said similar attempts in 2014, 2016, and 2018 had been struck down or stayed by courts, including the Kerala High Court, the National Green Tribunal, and the Delhi High Court.
The petition claimed that bypassing EC for projects of such magnitude, exceeding 1.6 million square feet, would cause irreversible damage to land, water, and air quality, violating the precautionary principle entrenched in Indian environmental law.
Also Read: Over 25,000 buildings in Mumbai Metropolitan Region eligible for redevelopment with ₹30,000 cr value: CREDAI-MCHI
Before the January 29 amendment, EIA 2006 required EC for all construction projects above 20,000 sq m The impugned notification raised the threshold to 150,000 sq m for certain categories and also removed 'general conditions' applicable in eco-sensitive and polluted areas.
A follow-up office memorandum on January 30 expanded the scope of exemptions to include private universities, warehouses, and industrial sheds housing machinery or raw material.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
Green Clearances Stuck As Authorities Remain Defunct
New Delhi: The dissolution of the State Level Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA) and the State Level Expert Appraisal Committee (SEAC) has led to delays in issuing environmental clearances, a builder informed the National Green Tribunal (NGT) on July 31. In an affidavit submitted to NGT, Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) stated that environmental clearances cannot currently be issued by the state as the two authorities remain defunct. In the absence of the state bodies, the Union environment ministry is granting clearances. NGT is considering a plea by a builder who approached the tribunal in May after applying for environmental clearance (EC) in Feb last year. The plea highlighted that the tenure of SEIAA and SEAC ended in Sept 2024 before the EC process could be completed. The builder was seeking permission for a group housing project in Kirti Nagar. You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi In its reply dated July 31, the DPCC stated, "The tenure of the two bodies came to an end on Sep 5, 2024. No further notification has been issued till date by the Union govt. After Sept 5, the matters relating to consideration of applications for EC, which ordinarily would fall within the jurisdiction of these authorities in Delhi, are being dealt by the Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEFCC)." by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like A Teaspoon Before Bed Burns Body Fat - Fit Into Your Clothes Again! Health & Family Click Here Undo Before their terms ended, DPCC provided financial and logistic support to the two bodies. Formed in 2021 through a notification by the Union environment ministry, SEIAA and SEAC were responsible for reviewing all construction projects requiring an EC under the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) notification of 2006. These projects included large apartment complexes, hotels, commercial developments and infrastructure works exceeding a certain built-up area. Former members of the dissolved bodies mentioned that while MoEFCC or Delhi government can initiate the reconstitution process, there has been no progress since their terms ended. "Often, there is a lot of back and forth before EC is granted. With the Centre overseeing the process, the process may take longer," said a former member, requesting anonymity. State Level Expert Appraisal Committee, comprising three members, was headed by a former Public Works Department chief, Delhi's former environment special secretary and a functionary appointed by the previous Aam Aadmi Party govt. SEIAA had 11 members and was chaired by a former Delhi Development Authority commissioner.


Time of India
39 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC taught lesson to those who engage in puerile talk: PM Modi
NEW DELHI: PM Narendra Modi on Tuesday termed the embarrassment caused to Rahul Gandhi by the Supreme Court 's rebuke a slap in the face of those who engage in puerile talk about the country's borders and the armed forces, reports Akhilesh Singh. "People make childish and unsubstantiated comments about Indian territory and security, and the court has served him a lesson," PM Modi is learnt to have remarked at the meeting of the NDA parliamentary party a day after SC came down hard on the leader of opposition in Lok Sabha for his statement about Indian soldiers having been bashed up by the Chinese during the 2020 stand off in Galwan. He, however, did not mention Rahul by name.


Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
SC remarks on Rahul Gandhi 'extraordinary, unwarranted': Opposition
NEW DELHI: The opposition INDIA bloc on Tuesday termed as "unwarranted" Supreme Court 's remarks on Rahul Gandhi , asserting that they encroach on the democratic rights of political parties, which have a responsibility to speak on issues of national interest. Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said the Supreme Court cannot decide who is a "true Indian", stressing that Rahul holds the Army in the highest regard. A joint statement issued by the bloc said, "All the leaders of the INDIA parties agreed that the sitting judge has made an extraordinary observation, which is unwarranted given the democratic rights of political parties. It is the responsibility of political parties, especially the leader of opposition, to comment on issues of national interest". It added, "When a govt fails so spectacularly to defend our borders, it is every citizen's moral duty to hold it accountable". INDIA bloc discussed the apex court's remarks at the morning meeting of floor leaders in Parliament, which was attended by Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge and Rahul Gandhi. After RSP MP NK Premachandran raised the issue, questioning SC's remarks, the same was endorsed by John Brittas (CPM), Kanimozhi (DMK), Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar (TMC), Ramgopal Yadav (SP), Arvind Sawant (SS-UBT), Supriya Sule (NCP-SP), Rajkumar Roat (BAP). by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo Best Software Categories Undo A decision was then made to issue a joint statement . Later, speaking to reporters, Priyanka Gandhi Vadra said, "With due respect to the honourable judges of the Supreme Court, they do not decide who is a true Indian. It is the job of the opposition leader; it is his duty to ask questions and to challenge the govt". She added, "My brother would never say anything against the Army."