Former Danville Superintendent's settlement agreement up for a vote
DANVILLE, Ill. (WCIA) — The Danville School Board may discuss a settlement agreement with former Superintendent Alicia Geddis at this week's meeting.
A motion to consider the settlement agreement is on the agenda for the board's Wednesday meeting. In February, WCIA reported that Geddis was placed on paid administrative leave, and that John Hart, who was the Assistant Superintendent at the time, would assume the role of interim superintendent.
Former Danville Police officer, Korean War vet dies at 92
WCIA also reported that the school board passed an unspecified settlement with Geddis that would see both parties part ways.
After Geddis was placed on leave, WCIA talked to Board Counsel Stephanie Jones. Jones said the teacher retirement system requires the district to review the agreement and approve it before it's executed. This applies when the settlement falls within the employee's retirement age.
The school board will meet at 5:30 p.m. on Wednesday in a closed session. They are expected to begin the open meeting at 6:30 p.m. It'll take place at the Dr. David L. Fields Administrative Service Center.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bill banning AI therapy bots in Illinois awaits signature
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) — Illinois could soon require humans to be in charge of all therapy sessions. The Illinois Legislature passed a bill to the governor's desk that would ban the use of therapy offered by Artificial Intelligence. Mental health professionals would also only be able to use AI transcriptions of sessions if the patient consents to it. Illinois bill ending scam gym membership tactic heads to governor's desk The National Association for Social Workers said while artificial intelligence could be a promising tool in the future, right now it is not bound by ethics. 'These AI chat bots, even though you can try to program as best as you can, they're not human,' said Kyle Hillman, the legislative director for NASW-IL. 'They don't have that interaction they don't have that kind of response. And so, they're influenced by what kind of data comes into those products and that influence is changing the biases towards, I think, dangerous conservations.' Durbin pushes to pass DACA bill ahead of 13th anniversary The bill's House sponsor said guardrails need to be set in stone before technology advances too far. 'Our behavioral healthcare system cannot afford to be replaced by unqualified chatbots with no malpractice liability,' Rep. Bob Morgan (D-Deerfield) said in a news release. 'By explicitly laying out what AI technology can and cannot be used for, patients are better protected, providers can continue delivering critical access to care, and treatment plans remain transparent between the client and professional.' If signed into law, Illinois would be the first state to ban these chatbots. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Durbin pushes to pass DACA bill ahead of 13th anniversary
SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (WCIA) — Sunday is the 13th anniversary of the DACA program. Senator Dick Durbin is spearheading the movement to turn the executive order into law. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals allows undocumented immigrants who entered the country as children protection from deportation. The program has helped more than 800,000 young people. 'They've gone to our schools, they've stood up every morning in the classroom and pledged allegiance to the same flag we pledge allegiance, and they aspire to be great and make America a greater country,' Durbin (D-IL) said at a news conference Wednesday. Illinois bill ending scam gym membership tactic heads to governor's desk The senior senator from Illinois is one of the biggest supporters of the program. He first introduced a bill on the senate floor in 2001 but has not been successful codifying it into law.'Sometimes we'd pass it in the Senate, but the House wouldn't,' Durbin said. 'Sometimes we couldn't get 60 votes, sometimes we could.' President Barack Obama enacted the program with an executive order in 2012. Critics said implementing it was an overreach of Obama's powers. 'The program essentially rewards parents for bringing their children to the United States illegally,' Ira Mehlman, the Media Director for Federation for American Immigration Reform, said. 'And anytime you reward illegal activity, the inevitable result is you're going to get more of it.' Immigrant advocates say Dreamers serve many essential roles in their communities. 'There's a lot of doctors, nurses, individuals like myself doing advocacy based work, and pretty much any career you can think of here, there are DACA workers in our community,' Maria Jimenez, the Executive Director of Immigrant Services of Champaign-Urbana, said. Illinois bill on governor's desk would require law enforcement to work with federal gun tracing database But as the Supreme Court debates the constitutionality of the program, they're facing anxiety over a possible future without the program. 'It would mean a great deal of instability for my family,' Jimenez said. 'I have a partner, I have two young kids I provide for, it would mean myself, my brother, my family members would all of a sudden not have the stability and safety from deportation.' The proposed legislation, American Dream and Promise Act of 2025, would give anyone who is 18 or younger who's been in the U.S. since 2021 protected status. It would also provide a pathway to permanent legal status if dreamers get a degree or serve in the military for at least two years. The full bill can be found here. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Baldwin ‘disappointed' Hegseth focused on renaming of USNS Harvey Milk over global threats
Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) on Wednesday questioned Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over his decision to choose Pride Month as the time to direct the Navy to rename a ship named for gay rights activist Harvey Milk. Speaking during a Senate Appropriations defense subcommittee hearing, Baldwin said she was 'disappointed' Hegseth was choosing to focus his time on renaming a John Lewis class of oil replenishment ships named for civil rights leaders, including the USNS Harvey Milk. 'I think we can all agree that we are at a critical point in our history with respect to global threats, the need to counter adversaries like China and Iran — you've gotten a number of questions along those lines — and I'm disappointed that you are instead focusing on a class of ships named for civil rights leaders,' Baldwin said. 'This committee will continue to pursue serious work in the interests of American national security, and I ask you to choose to join us in that endeavor,' she added. Hegseth replied that the Defense Department is 'not interested in naming ships after activists. That's the stance we're taking.' A former Navy lieutenant who served during the Korean War, Milk in 1977 became the first openly gay man elected to public office in California. He was assassinated a year later and posthumously was awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2009. But Hegseth has ordered the Navy to strip USNS Harvey Milk of its moniker, prompting outcry from Democrat lawmakers and former Navy officials, who have called the move 'spiteful' and 'shameful.' Other ships could also soon see their names stripped — including the John Lewis class vessels named for Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Harriet Tubman — as part of Hegseth's dismantling of any military program or reading material dealing with or referencing diversity, anti-racism or gender issues. Baldwin, who was the first openly gay candidate to be elected to the Senate, also questioned Hegseth over the analysis used to justify booting transgender service members from the military. President Trump in a Jan. 27 executive order sought to remove transgender people from the military, stating they cannot satisfy the 'rigorous standards' needed to serve, and that allowing their participation threatens military readiness and unit cohesion. But that argument has long been used to keep marginalized groups — including Black, gay or female Americans — from serving. Transgender active-duty service members on Friday had to decide whether to leave the military on their own or be forced out under a 30-day deadline announced last month by Hegseth. Baldwin wanted to know the specific assessment the Defense Department conducted on the ban's impact on U.S. national security prior to its implementation, which Hegseth could not immediately name. 'The department is planning to separate several 1,000 service members due to your partisan beliefs about troops who are transgender,' Baldwin. 'Mr. Secretary, I've seen your speeches and social media posts, but what I'm interested in is the sound policy analysis that we would expect from the Secretary of Defense and how this misguided decision will impact military readiness.' 'We did extensive analysis,' Hegseth replied. 'We agree with the assessment of the executive order that was issued by the White House that there are mental health issues associated with gender dysphoria that complicate military service and readiness, and as a result, we made the decision.' Baldwin again pressed that she has 'asked for that analysis. Please provide it for me and the committee,' to which Hegseth said he would. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
