Letters to the Editor: The answer to clean energy problems 'is better policy, not more pollution'
To the editor: Contributing writer Joel Kotkin argues that California is harming itself by pushing renewable energy while leaving oil and gas in the ground ('The high cost of California's green energy policies,' May 7). But that's like saying a smoker is harming himself by quitting too early. The real damage comes from continuing to burn fossil fuels, which are driving wildfires, heat waves and drought across the state.
According to the most recent annual study by Clean Jobs California, clean energy already employs about 545,000 Californians — far more than the fossil fuel sector — and those jobs are growing faster. Yes, clean energy must be made more equitable, but the answer is better policy, not more pollution. Let's not forget that low-income families are affected more by pollution and climate change.
Kotkin also claims California's efforts don't have much impact but ignores the fact that we're not alone. The EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea and dozens of U.S. states have ambitious renewable energy and climate targets. The global transition is already underway. California's leadership helps drive that momentum, lower global prices and shape policy worldwide.
Brent Jacobson, Chino Hills
..
To the editor: Kotkin conveniently does not mention just how rapidly the price of solar panels and the battery storage of electricity have been coming down over the past few years. It is stunning. And if the recent past is any guide, the price collapse is not about to stop.
As environmentalist Bill McKibben once reminded us, 'We live on a planet where the cheapest way to produce power is to point a sheet of glass at the sun." The result is a "water-into-wine miracle." Coal, oil and natural gas are all history.
Peter L. Coye, Pomona
..
To the editor: Nowhere in Kotkin's article does he mention the cost of not doing anything. The price tag for not eliminating fossil fuels and building a renewable economy is bigger: more devastating fires, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, systemic ecological collapse, warming oceans — basically, an unlivable planet.
J.J. Flowers, Dana Point
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
33 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why fly the Mexican flag at rallys in the United States?
With the recent rallies and protests in Los Angeles over immigration raids, you've probably seen a number of flags representing Mexico and other Latin counries being waved. Los Angeles Times columnist Gustavo Arellano talks about why you tend to see these flags at immigration rallies.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Europe heaps harsh sanctions on Russia, saying ‘strength is the only language' Moscow understands
The European Union announced a new package of sanctions against Russia on Tuesday, saying that Moscow's daily deadly attacks against Ukraine show that it is not interested in peace – despite recent diplomatic efforts. The new package – the 18th since Russia launched its full-scale unprovoked invasion against its neighbor in 2022 – is designed to further target the Kremlin's ability to make money from its oil and gas production. The proposal includes lowering the price cap on Russian oil exports from $60 to $45 per barrel and introducing a full transaction ban on Russian banks and financial institutions in third countries that help Russia circumvent existing sanctions. The EU said it is also proposing a ban on the use of Russian energy infrastructure, forbidding any EU operator from engaging directly or indirectly in any transactions that involve the Nord Stream pipelines. The new package will need to be approved by the EU's 27 member states. That could be complicated given previous concerns raised by some more pro-Kremlin governments, such as Hungary and Slovakia, about further sanctions targeting Russia. While both those countries have previously threatened to block new rounds of sanctions, so far they have ultimately voted in favor of them. The President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen said the sanctions were necessary 'because strength is the only language that Russia will understand.' 'We want peace for Ukraine. Despite weeks of diplomatic attempts, despite (Ukraine's) President (Volodymyr) Zelensky's offer of an unconditional ceasefire, Russia continues to bring death and destruction to Ukraine. Russia's goal is not peace, it is to impose the rule of might. Therefore, we are ramping up pressure on Russia,' von der Leyen said at a news conference in Brussels. The leaders of Germany, France, the United Kingdom and Poland last month told Russian leader Vladimir Putin to agree to a 30-day ceasefire or face possible 'massive' sanctions. Putin ignored the ultimatum, proposing instead 'direct talks' between Moscow and Kyiv. But two rounds of talks in Istanbul, Turkey, have made it clear Russia is sticking to its maximalist demands that would essentially equate to Ukraine's capitulation. 'Russia's ability to continue the war is equal to its ability to sell their oil and bypass financial barriers,' Zelensky said Tuesday night, calling the European sanctions package 'an important step' and also condemning the lack of similar measures from the United States. 'Russia has been constantly increasing the number of munitions in its strikes. This is a steady trend, and it means that Moscow is not afraid of anyone in the world,' the Ukrainian leader added. 'Putin wants to continue killing and is taking advantage of the fact that he is not getting a strong response. He does not hear Washington. And this speaks volumes to the world, to everyone.' Explaining why the EU has targeted Russia's energy sector, the Commission chief said oil exports still represent one third of Russian government revenues. 'We need to cut this source of revenue,' she said. The oil price cap was introduced by the EU and G7 countries in December 2022. The cap, which applies to Russia's seaborne oil exports, prohibits Western companies from providing shipping, insurance and other services needed to export the fuel unless it is priced below the threshold. By enforcing a price cap, the EU and its allies have tried to diminish a key source of revenue for the Kremlin while still allowing its oil to flow to the global energy market – because cutting Russia's supplies completely could destabilize the market and cause prices to shoot up. Von der Leyen said on Tuesday that the price cap needs lowering because global oil prices had fallen since the cap was first introduced and now trade 'very close' to the $60 level. The price of a barrel of Brent crude, the global oil benchmark, has dropped 18% since the price cap on Russian crude took effect on December 5, 2022. It was trading at almost $68 a barrel late morning Eastern Time (ET) on Tuesday. The bloc also wants to harden sanctions on Russia's banking sector. Shortly after the invasion, the United States, EU, Britain and Canada jointly banned some Russian banks from the SWIFT messaging service – a high-security network connecting thousands of financial institutions around the world. That has made it far more difficult for those banks to send and receive money from abroad. Now, the Commission wants to go a step further and prevent any EU operator, such a a business, from conducting a transaction with a list of sanctioned Russian banks. It also plans to add another 22 of Moscow's banks to that list. Additionally, the bloc wants to extend the transaction ban to financial institutions in third countries that help Russia circumvent existing sanctions. Von der Leyen said the latest package of sanctions will also broaden the current ban on materials and technologies that can be exported to Russia, adding: 'We want to make sure that Russia does not find ways to modernize its weapons with European technologies.' The sanctions will also include new measures against 22 Russian and foreign companies providing direct or indirect support to Russia's military and industrial complex. CNN's Victoria Butenko contributed to this report.
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Files Emergency Motion to Block Trump's ‘Unlawful Militarization' of LA
Gov. Gavin Newsom filed a temporary restraining order on Tuesday to block President Trump from dispatching National Guard and U.S. Marine troops to patrol Los Angeles amid the ongoing ICE protests. The motion, filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and obtained by TheWrap, seeks 'to preserve (in part) the status quo by temporarily enjoining Defendants from ordering or deploying the activeduty members of the military and federalized National Guard soldiers to patrol communities or otherwise engage in general law enforcement activities beyond the immediate vicinity of federal buildings or other federal real property.' 'The federal government is now turning the military against American citizens. Sending trained warfighters onto the streets is unprecedented and threatens the very core of our democracy,' Newsom said in a statement. 'Donald Trump is behaving like a tyrant, not a President. We ask the court to immediately block these unlawful actions.' The request claims Trump and Hegseth's actions violates the U.S. Constitution and the President's Title 10 authority, 'not only because the takeover occurred without the consent or input of the Governor, as federal law requires, but also because it was unwarranted.' The protests against the Trump administration's federal arrests of undocumented individuals began Friday and continued through the weekend – sparking in intensity after the president sent National Guard and U.S. Marine troops into the city. Trump's decision to deploy marked the first time a president sent the National Guard to a state without a request from that state's governor since the 1960s. Protestors and officers clashed off and on all weekend, with most of the intensity coming Sunday. The motion slammed the 'use of the military and the federalized National Guard' and said it 'deprives the State of vital resources, escalates tensions andpromotes (rather than quells) civil unrest.' Newsom also said that the ICE officers inflamed tensions with violent actions including arresting children, community advocates and people without a criminal record. The governor said ICE resorted to 'military-style' operations which sparked a panic that led to understandable opposition to the violent tactics. Newsom also said this makes clear the President's heavy-handed immigration agenda. The motion is the next step in rising disputes between Trump and Newsom over the ICE protests with Newsom slamming Trump's 'unlawful militarization' of Los Angeles. On Sunday, the California Governor formally requested that Donald Trump recall the National Guard from Los Angeles and other areas where Californians are protesting the ongoing immigration raids, calling the federal deployment 'a serious breach of state sovereignty.' The president took no action to remove troops instead sending an additional 2,000 troops on Monday. 'I was just informed Trump is deploying another 2,000 Guard troops to L.A.,' Newsom tweeted. 'The first 2,000? Given no food or water. Only approx. 300 are deployed — the rest are sitting, unused, in federal buildings without orders. This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego. This is Reckless. Pointless. And Disrespectful to our troops.' No word yet on if the court will approve Newsom's temporary restraining order that prevents federal troops from enforcing the laws in a civilian city. The post Gavin Newsom Files Emergency Motion to Block Trump's 'Unlawful Militarization' of LA appeared first on TheWrap.
