Letters to the Editor: The answer to clean energy problems 'is better policy, not more pollution'
According to the most recent annual study by Clean Jobs California, clean energy already employs about 545,000 Californians — far more than the fossil fuel sector — and those jobs are growing faster. Yes, clean energy must be made more equitable, but the answer is better policy, not more pollution. Let's not forget that low-income families are affected more by pollution and climate change.
Kotkin also claims California's efforts don't have much impact but ignores the fact that we're not alone. The EU, Canada, Japan, South Korea and dozens of U.S. states have ambitious renewable energy and climate targets. The global transition is already underway. California's leadership helps drive that momentum, lower global prices and shape policy worldwide.
Brent Jacobson, Chino Hills
..
To the editor: Kotkin conveniently does not mention just how rapidly the price of solar panels and the battery storage of electricity have been coming down over the past few years. It is stunning. And if the recent past is any guide, the price collapse is not about to stop.
As environmentalist Bill McKibben once reminded us, 'We live on a planet where the cheapest way to produce power is to point a sheet of glass at the sun." The result is a "water-into-wine miracle." Coal, oil and natural gas are all history.
Peter L. Coye, Pomona
..
To the editor: Nowhere in Kotkin's article does he mention the cost of not doing anything. The price tag for not eliminating fossil fuels and building a renewable economy is bigger: more devastating fires, hurricanes, floods, tornadoes, systemic ecological collapse, warming oceans — basically, an unlivable planet.
J.J. Flowers, Dana Point
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
Gavin Newsom tops Harris in 2028 presidential poll of California Democrats
WASHINGTON ― In a battle between two Californians considering Democratic runs for president in 2028, Gov. Gavin Newsom holds a slight edge over former Vice President Kamala Harris, according to a new poll. The poll, conducted by Politico and The Citrin Center public opinion firm, found Newsom is the top choice of 25% of California's Democratic voters in the 2028 Democratic primary, leading all prospective candidates including Harris, the 2024 Democratic nominee, who is supported by 19% of the state's Democrats. The two high-profile Californians are followed in the poll by former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg (13%), Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (10%), Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (4%) and New Jersey U.S. Sen. Cory Booker (4%). U.S. Rep. Ro Khanna, D-California, Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer and Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear each has support from 3% of the state's Democratic voters, the poll found. More: California redistricting vote begins with overwhelming support, Newsom pollster says The Democratic breakdown was taken from a subset of 1,445 registered California voters polled between July 28 and Aug. 12. Although early in the 2028 presidential election cycle, the poll offers a glimpse into the thinking of Democrats in a state that is the party's power center and home to the largest number of Democratic voters. For both Newsom and Harris, winning their home state would be critical to secure the Democratic nomination in 2028 if they decide to run. More: Kamala Harris says she won't run for California governor Newsom, who has acknowledged he might run for president in 2028, has become one of the party's most forceful and visible critics of President Donald Trump. He recently launched a redistricting campaign in California with national implications to redraw the state's congressional maps to counter Republican redistricting efforts in Texas. Harris, the former Democratic nominee who lost to Trump in the 2024 election, on July 30 announced she would be passing on a 2026 run for governor to replace Newsom, whose term is set to end. Harris's decision opened the door for a possible presidential bid in 2028, though several other Democratic contenders have started to make moves toward their own runs. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
China's extension of EU dairy import probe linked to September talks
China will not conclude its anti-dumping investigation into EU dairy imports until at least early next year as talks are set to continue in September. In response to China's decision this week to extend its probe to February, the European Dairy Association (EDA) said it was not surprised by the decision given Chinese officials are due to make 'technical visits' to Belgium and the Netherlands next month, as well as hold talks with the European Commission (EC). China kicked off its investigation in August last year to ascertain whether the EU was guilty of exporting dairy products to the Asian country at prices that put local producers at an unfair advantage. The probe followed similar enquiries launched by China for pork and brandy shipped from the European trading bloc that commenced in June and January of 2024, respectively. The trade spat with China was sparked by the EU threatening to impose tariffs on imports of Chinese battery electric vehicles (BEV), with the EC claiming 'unfair subsidisation' by its Chinese counterparts that risked 'causing a threat of economic injury' to local manufacturers. Xinhua, China's state-run news agency and official government mouthpiece, reported on Monday (18 August) that the Ministry of Commerce had extended its investigation into 'certain dairy products' from the EU to February The news service, citing a Ministry statement, said the extension was due to the 'complexity of the case'. Similar language emerged from the EDA. Its Secretary General Alexander Anton said in a statement: 'This highlights the increasingly complex dynamics of global dairy trade and has required coordinated responses from the industry and policymakers, and EDA will continue to work closely with the EU Commission and the 'sampled' dairies that are most involved in the process.' In October last year, China's Ministry of Commerce identified Dutch dairy giant FrieslandCampina, Elvir (France) Co. and Sterilgarda Alimenti in Italy as three EU companies that would be subject to a sampling exercise as part of its anti-dumping probe. Meanwhile, the EC took its case to the World Trade Organization (WTO) last September under a 'commitment to firmly defend the interests of the EU dairy industry and the Common Agricultural Policy against abusive proceedings'. Anton at the EDA said today (20 August) in the statement, when asked for comment and an update on those proceedings by Just Food: 'With that, for the very first time in such an early state of the procedure, the EU has given a clear political sign to step up to defend our European interest. 'WTO procedures are not known for speed and so far, we have no signs for any progress at this level.' Just Food has asked the EC for an update on the status of proceedings regarding China's probe into dairy and pork imports from the bloc, and whether there has been any progress with the WTO. When China kicked off its dairy import investigation last August, Xinhua said the probe was launched on behalf of the Dairy Association of China and the China Dairy Industry Association. The news agency suggested at the time that the review would include fresh cheese, curd and blue cheese from the EU. It was expected that the enquiry would conclude on 21 August of this year but could be extended for six months 'under special circumstances'. "China's extension of EU dairy import probe linked to September talks" was originally created and published by Just Food, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Los Angeles Times
8 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Newsom says California needs to build a water tunnel. Opponents argue costs are too high
As Gov. Gavin Newsom pushes for building a giant water tunnel beneath the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, his administration is saying it's the 'single most effective' way for California to provide enough water as the warming climate brings deeper droughts and more intense storms. Environmental advocates and political leaders in the Delta, among other opponents, condemned a new state analysis that draws that conclusion, arguing that building the tunnel would harm the environment and several types of fish and would push water rates much higher for millions of Californians. The potential costs of building the 45-mile tunnel are generating heated debate. The state has estimated the project, if water agencies participate and contribute, would cost $20.1 billion. But in a separate analysis, economic research firm ECOnorthwest found the costs would probably range from about $60 billion to $100 billion or even more. 'Unfortunately, the Newsom administration is brushing over and leaving out the real costs of the tunnel, both to the ratepayers and taxpayers and the environment,' said Carolee Krieger, executive director of the California Water Impact Network, a nonprofit group that commissioned the economic analysis. She said the high costs would fall largely on people in Southern California through their water bills, and that there are better and more economical ways of securing water supplies for the region. The Newsom administration released the report Tuesday outlining actions it said would 'climate-proof' the state water system so that it can operate for generations in hotter, drier conditions. Department of Water Resources Director Karla Nemeth wrote that the State Water Project — the system of aqueducts, pipelines and pumping plants that delivers supplies from the Delta to farmlands and cities — now 'needs revitalization,' and that 'maintenance of the aging project and a modernized tunnel system to transport water under the Delta are the most valuable adaptations.' The department said in a written statement that the state's 2024 estimate was prepared according to industry standards and that the ECOnorthwest report appears to be based on unsupported assumptions that 'overestimate the cost.' Newsom, who is set to leave office after 2026, has said the tunnel plan, called the Delta Conveyance Project, is essential for the state's future and has made it a central priority. Since May, the governor has sought to fast-track the plan by short-cutting permitting for the project and limiting avenues for legal challenges, saying the effort should not be held back by delays and 'red tape.' But legislators representing areas around the Delta have fought attempts to adopt the governor's plan. The Newsom administration continues to advocate with legislators to accelerate the project, said Tara Gallegos, a spokesperson for the governor. She said in an email that the legislative proposal is 'aimed squarely at removing bureaucratic processes and pointless delays that create unnecessary costs to taxpayers — something Californians have been very loudly and clearly in support of preventing.' Meanwhile, the State Water Resources Control Board is considering a petition by the Newsom administration to amend water rights permits so that flows could be diverted from new points on the Sacramento River where the tunnel intakes would be built. The tunnel would create a second route to transport water to the south side of the Delta, where pumps send it into the aqueducts of the State Water Project and onward to cities and farmland. According to the state's plan, the tunnel would be about 36 feet wide on the interior and buried about 140 feet to 170 feet underground. Lawmakers who represent the Delta region criticized the state report as flawed, saying it overlooks the project's costs and their concerns that it would damage the ecosystem and harm communities and farms in the area. In a joint statement, state Sen. Jerry McNerney (D-Pleasanton) and Assemblymember Lori D. Wilson (D-Suisun City) said the Newsom administration has made false claims about what they view as an 'extremely costly and environmentally destructive project,' and that 'there are far more affordable alternatives to the tunnel project that are much better for the environment, including increasing water recycling and groundwater storage.' Communities in the Delta would be overtaken by extensive construction work for years, they said. Seeking to address those concerns, Newsom earlier this month announced a plan to create a $200 million program to address or minimize or address the effects of construction on local communities. Delta community advocates dismissed that as a hollow attempt to sway some local people, and said they believe the project would be disastrous for local farms and the estuary's struggling fish species, including Chinook salmon and steelhead trout. Some said they see political ambition driving the project. Newsom apparently 'wants to have something for his campaign when he runs for president,' said Brett Baker, a lawyer representing the Central Delta Water Agency and its agricultural landowners, who are challenging the project in court. Baker said the governor seems to be hoping to 'to put his name on it to say he did something. So I think he's become a little bit more desperate.' The project is in an extensive planning stage, and preliminary planning costs are being paid by 18 water districts, including agencies that supply farmland in the San Joaquin Valley as well as urban agencies in Southern California and Silicon Valley. The largest share of those costs, about $142 million, is being paid by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California, which delivers water for 19 million people. The MWD isn't expected to decide whether to invest in building the tunnel until 2027. Managers of the Eastern Municipal Water District, which serves about 1 million residents in western Riverside County and northern San Diego County, are among those supporting Newsom's plan. 'The existing conveyance system in the Delta is not sustainable and threatens water supply reliability,' said Joe Mouawad, Eastern Municipal's general manager. 'We've worked diligently over years and decades to diversify our water supply portfolio and provide resilient local water supply, but imported water is still going to be a critical source for our customers and for our communities.' Mouawad noted that the area has some of the fastest growth in California, and he said the Newsom administration's strategy is a 'well-thought-out approach' to meeting long-term water supply needs.
