South Africa 2025 economic growth forecast cut to 1.5% on tariff worries
JOHANNESBURG, April 25 (Reuters) - South African economic growth will be a bit weaker this year than thought a month ago partly due to trade tensions, with U.S. President Donald Trump having paused a 31% tariff for 90 days imposed on imports from Africa's most industrialized nation.
Economists polled by Reuters April 16-24 trimmed their forecasts by a median 0.2 percentage point to 1.5% for this year. Forecasts were in a 1.0%-2.1% range compared with 1.3%-2.3% in a March poll. But the forecast for 2026 was unchanged at 1.8%.
The latest 2025 consensus from the survey of 25 economists was much more optimistic than the International Monetary Fund's latest view of 1.0%, cut from 1.5% in January.
Nicky Weimar, chief economist at Nedbank, lowered her GDP forecast for 2025 to 1.1%, 0.3 percentage point lower than her previous view.
She said that was based on expectations for higher global tariff barriers, although she expects them to be ultimately less extreme than what the White House proposed on April 2.
"Another reason for our downward revision is that the production side of the economy fared poorly in Q1. So, even before the tariff chaos hit, local producers and exporters were struggling," said Weimar.
South Africa currently benefits from the African Growth and Opportunity Act, U.S. legislation that gives preferential tariff-free access to its markets to some countries. But renewal of the legislation, which expires later this year, is unlikely, according to analysts.
In better news for South Africans struggling with the cost of living, inflation fell for the first time in five months in March to its lowest since June 2020, due to a drop in fuel costs and softer price rises for tuition.
Price pressures got a further reprieve on Thursday after the government scrapped plans to raise value-added tax following a political backlash that threatened the stability of its ruling coalition.
The proposal to raise VAT by 1 percentage point over two years, intended to boost state revenue, met resistance as Africa's biggest economy grapples with sluggish growth and public discontent over rising living costs.
Inflation is now expected to average 3.7% this year, lower than the 4.0% forecast in the previous poll. The 4.5% consensus for 2026 inflation, however, was unchanged.
That near-term reprieve has reignited debate around more interest rate cuts from the South African Reserve Bank, which targets inflation between 3%-6%.
Rates were held steady last month.
South Africa's repo rate, currently 7.50%, is expected to hold steady in May, the survey found, with policymakers waiting until either July or September for the next cut to 7.25%.
The SARB will then hold the repo rate steady for the remainder of the year, with another cut to 7.00% in early 2026, according to median forecasts.
(Other stories from the April Reuters global economic poll)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump aims to slash Pell Grants, which may limit low-income students' college access
For many students and their families, federal student aid is key for college access. And yet, the Trump administration's budget proposal for fiscal year 2026 calls for significant cuts to higher education funding, including reducing the maximum federal Pell Grant award to $5,710 a year from $7,395, as well as scaling back the federal work-study program. The proposed cuts would help pay for the landmark tax and spending bill Republicans in the U.S. Congress hope to enact. Roughly 40% of undergraduate students rely on Pell Grants, a type of federal aid available to low-income families who demonstrate financial need on the Free Application for Federal Student Aid. Work study funds, which are earned through part-time jobs, often help cover additional education expenses. President Donald Trump 's 'skinny' budget request said changes to the Pell Grant program were necessary due to a looming shortfall, but top-ranking Democrats and college advocates say cuts could have been made elsewhere and students will pay the price. 'The money we invest in post-high school education isn't charity — it helps Americans get good jobs, start businesses, and contribute to our economy,' Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told CNBC. 'No kid's education should be defunded to pay for giant tax giveaways for billionaires.' Pell Grants are 'the foundation for financial support' Nearly 75% of all undergraduates receive some type of financial aid, according to the National Center for Education Statistics. 'Historically the Pell Grant was viewed as the foundation for financial support for low-income students,' said Lesley Turner, an associate professor at the University of Chicago Harris School of Public Policy and a research fellow of the National Bureau of Economic Research. 'It's the first dollar, regardless of other types of aid you have access to.' Under Trump's proposal, the maximum Pell Grant for the 2026-2027 academic year would be at its lowest level in more than a decade. 'The Pell reduction would impact the lowest-income families,' said Betsy Mayotte, president of The Institute of Student Loan Advisors, a nonprofit. More than 92% of Pell Grant recipients in 2019-2020 came from families with household incomes below $60,000, according to higher education expert Mark Kantrowitz. How Pell Grant cuts could affect college students If the president's cuts were enacted and then persisted for four years, the average student debt at graduation will be about $6,500 higher among those with a bachelor's degree who received Pell Grants, according to Kantrowitz's own calculations. 'If adopted, [the proposed cuts] would require millions of enrolled students to drop out or take on more debt to complete their degrees — likely denying countless prospective low- and moderate-income students the opportunity to go to college altogether,' Sameer Gadkaree, president and CEO of The Institute for College Access & Success, said in a statement. Already, those grants have not kept up with the rising cost of a four-year degree. Tuition and fees plus room and board for a four-year private college averaged $58,600 in the 2024-25 school year, up from $56,390 a year earlier. At four-year, in-state public colleges, the average was $24,920, up from $24,080, according to the College Board. The Pell program functions like other entitlement programs, such as Social Security or Medicare, where every eligible student is entitled to receive a Pell award. However, unlike those other programs, the Pell program does not rely solely on mandatory funding that is set in the federal budget. Rather, it is also dependent on some discretionary funding, which is appropriated by Congress. The Congressional Budget Office projected a shortfall this year in part because more students now qualify for a Pell Grant due to changes to the financial aid application, and, as a result, more students are enrolling in college. Cutting the Pell Grant is 'extreme' Although there have been other times when the Pell program operated with a deficit, slashing the award amount is an 'extreme' measure, according to Kantrowitz. 'Every past shortfall has been followed by Congress providing additional funding,' he said. 'Even the current House budget reconciliation bill proposes additional funding to eliminate the shortfall.' However, the bill also reduces eligibility for the grants by raising the number of credits students need to take per semester to qualify for the aid. There's a concern those more stringent requirements will harm students who need to work while they're in school and those who are parents balancing classes and child care. 'These are students that could use it the most,' said the University of Chicago's Turner. 'Single parents, for example, that have to work to cover the bills won't be able to take on additional credits,' Mayotte said. 'If their Pell is also reduced, they may have to withdraw from school rather than complete their degree,' Mayotte said.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
Senator Cory Booker says he will not accept any donations from Elon Musk
A leading elected Democrat rejected the idea of taking campaign donations from tech billionaire Elon Musk, whose spectacular fallout with former ally Donald Trump has roiled American politics. Trump on Saturday said Musk will face 'serious consequences' if he moves to support Democratic political candidates in any upcoming elections, following a public rift between the two men over Musk's staunch opposition to the cost of US president's planned piece of landmark domestic legislation. But Cory Booker, a senator for New Jersey, scotched any idea he would take any Musk cash. 'I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign,' Booker told NBC's Meet the Press on Sunday. But Booker added, referring to the Republicans budget bill that Musk has criticized, 'I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know, sound the alarm, treat this like a Paul Revere moment.' Booker added: 'More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans.' The senator's comments come as Democrats wrestle with the how to turn the dramatic fallout between Musk and Trump into opportunity. Musk turned his back on the party in 2022 and contributed $270m to Trump's re-election campaign in 2024, providing crucial help in the Republican's eventual victory. As the Trump-Musk feud intensified on Thursday, Musk posted on X: 'In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people.,' clearly referring to any politician who supported Trump's budget bill. Ro Khanna, a Democratic congressman, reportedly talked with one of Musk's 'senior confidants' on last week about whether Musk might now want to help the Democrats in the midterm elections next year. 'Having Elon speak out against the irrational tariff policy, against the deficit exploding Trump bill, and the anti-science and anti-immigrant agenda can help check Trump's unconstitutional administration,' Khanna told Semafor. 'I look forward to Elon turning his fire against Maga Republicans instead of Democrats in 2026,' Khanna, who has argued that his party was unwise to alienate Musk, told the outlet. However, leftwing politicians, including Vermont senator Bernie Sanders and New York congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have publicly pictured Musk as what voters should be against: powerful wealthy billionaires seeking influence through politics. Sanders told CNN's State of the Union Sunday that Musk had 'evolved' into an extremist since he voted for Obama in 2008. 'Over the years he has developed into a rightwing extremist. The issue and drama over what happened last week is that we are living, increasingly, in an oligarchic society. Musk said: 'Hey listen, I spent $270m dollars to get you elected. I bought you the presidency …' 'This is a fight between oligarchs. It's a fight about power among the few, and it's really an embarrassment for those of us who believe in democracy and the rule of law,' Sanders added. Musk said last month that he planned to spend 'a lot less' on political campaigns as he scaled back and ultimately exited his time in government, where Trump had tasked him with massively slashing federal spending and jobs. 'In terms of political spending I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk told a Bloomberg forum in Doha. Asked why, he responded: 'I think I've done enough.' But Musk's opposition to Trump's 'One Big Beautiful' bill budget proposal, calling it an 'disgusting abomination', by definition puts him in relative proximity to Democratic positions on that issue. Booker was asked if agreed with Musk about the planned legislation that Trump has made a centerpiece of his administration. 'I agree that it's going to saddle this country with trillions of dollars of debt, endanger our entire economy … This is a morally wrong bill. And it's definitely, definitely an economically wrong bill as well.' 'This is not about right or left, it's about right or wrong,' he added. 'And I welcome Elon Musk, not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, to get involved right now in a more substantive way and putting pressure on congresspeople and senators to not do this.'
Daily Mail
5 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Trump golfs with college sports' most influential figures as president weighs move days after groundbreaking ruling
President Donald Trump is reportedly on the golf course with a pair of college sports' most influential figures on Sunday days after a judge approved the settlement in the House v. NCAA case. Southeastern Conference Commissioner Greg Sankey and Notre Dame athletic director Pete Bevacqua are the college-sports duo getting facetime with Trump on Sunday. At Trump's request, Bevacqua and Sankey are joining the president to discuss the future of college sports, per Yahoo! Sports. Judge Claudia Wilken's ruling paves a pathway to allow colleges and universities to directly pay their athletes and changes the dynamic of American collegiate athletics forever. A decade ago, college athletes were treated as amateurs and were not directly compensated for their contributions to athletic departments, nor were they able to be paid by outside companies. With the rise of name, image, and likeness agreements in 2021, athletes could sign endorsement deals with companies and collectives of donors could pool money which could be given to athletes. Some of the highest earning college athletes via NIL deals have been Arch Manning with an estimated $6.5 million alone with Livvy Dunne who earned $4.1 million. Now, with this landmark 'House settlement', the NCAA's member institutions will be allowed to pay their athletes directly in the form of revenue sharing agreements. As part of the agreement, the NCAA will give up more than $2.7billion in back pay to thousands of former athletes who were barred from earning revenue over the years. Over the next year, the House settlement will allow each school to share up to $20.5m a year with their athletes. The focal point of this case began with Arizona State swimmer Grant House, who sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences at the time - the SEC, Big Ten, Big XII, ACC, and Pac-12 - to lift restrictions on revenue sharing. Wilken gave approval to a final proposal after months of negotiating multiple finer points of the deal - including roster limits. How exactly Sankey and Bevacqua were chosen to represent the sport is unclear. However, Sankey runs the most prestigious college conference and Bevacqua is on top of one of the most profitable athletic programs in the nation.
