PMQs review: Farage eclipses Badenoch as real opposition leader
Photo by House of Commons
Labour has decided (as reported by George Eaton) that, while the Conservatives may be the official opposition, the main threat comes from Nigel Farage and Reform UK. Today's PMQs demonstrated quite clearly who Keir Starmer sees as his biggest rival – and why.
Let's get Kemi Badenoch's performance out of the way first. There was a brief moment of solidarity at the start when she condemned the suspected arson attacks on the Prime Minister's family home, saying 'this wasn't just an attack on him, but on all of us and our democracy', after which Starmer thanked her for messaging him straight away. The issue of MP safety is one that genuinely unites the House.
It went downhill for Badenoch from there. The words lacklustre, unmemorable and irrelevant all come to mind. In a week where there is one obvious headline topic – immigration – the Conservative leader decided to swerve it. No doubt she was anxious to avoid giving Starmer the ammunition to repeat his well-rehearsed lines that the Tories lost control of the UK's borders with their 'failed free-market experiment'.
Still, a more adept leader could have homed in on the disquiet within Labour's ranks and accuse the government of being mired in infighting. They could also have congratulated the Prime Minister on taking a policy (increasing residency terms for those seeking Indefinite Leave to Remain) straight out of the opposition's book, thus proving the Tories' continued relevance in setting the policy agenda.
But no. Badenoch reverted to her usual attack lines on the economy. And as usual, they failed to land. There's no real point going through her questions one by one, but the classic Badenoch flair was on display. She cited the department store Beales which has said it is shutting its doors after 144 years as a result of Labour's tax policy and is holding a 'Rachel Reeves closing down sale'. This story comes straight from the right-wing papers, where Badenoch often searches for her PMQs ammunition. It misses out, for example, that Beales has been struggling for years, and talks of its likely collapse go back long before Labour were in power.
She also tried to get a dig in about Labour's 'tiny tariff deal', which just gave Starmer the opportunity to list all the jobs – from car manufactures in Solihull to steel-makers Scunthorpe to whisky distillers in Scotland – which the trade deals signed with India and the US will protect or create. What with that and calling Badenoch 'the only former trade minister who's against all trade deals', the PM was clearly having fun.
Badenoch's final gambit was to claim 'Labour isn't working' – citing the iconic 1978 poster, which helped win Margaret Thatcher her first election a year later. Like all Conservative leaders, Badenoch claims Thatcher as an inspiration, and no doubt hoped the parallels between now and the winter of discontent will help her cause. Alas, it is more likely to suggest that this Tory leader is out of ideas.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
The rest of PMQs was peppered with signs something has shifted. Nigel Farage, with new Reform MP Sarah Pochin at his side, stood up to declare that his was 'a party that is alive and kicking' (no prizes for guessing who he was sniping at there) and to claim Starmer seemed 'to be learning a very great deal from us'. There was some kerfuffle as Farage addressed his comments directly to the Prime Minister rather than to the Speaker as convention dictates, but even with that distraction you could sense the unease on the Labour benches at the Reformer leader claiming how much he enjoyed Starmer's immigration speech.
Farage noted that since the speech 'one thousand young undocumented males have crossed the English Channel' and called on the Prime Minister to declare the situation a national security emergency. Starmer had an answer ready in the form of the border security bill, saying it was 'extraordinary' that Farage had voted against it. The PM seemed visibly more alert and prepared than he had batting back Badenoch's questions.
There was more preparation on display elsewhere in the Commons too. Two Labour MPs – Melanie Onn and Nesil Caliskan – asked friendly question that were clearly aimed at Reform. Onn spoke of protecting thousands of renewable jobs in her Great Grimsby and Cleethorpes constituency now the new Reform mayor of Greater Lincolnshire (Andrea Jenkyns, if you're wondering) 'has declared war on renewables'. Caliskan focused on workers rights, inviting the PM to agree that 'Reform MPs working and voting against our employment rights bill show that they are no friend of workers in this country'. Both questions gave Starmer a chance to refute Farage's claim that his was the party of working people – something Labour strategists believe will be a key dividing line. 'We're backing British workers, they vote against them at every turn,' Starmer reiterated.
Lest anyone be in any doubt as to what the Prime Minister thinks of the official opposition, at another point Starmer claimed that a question from a Conservative MP was 'further evidence so far as I can see that the Tory project is just finished'. He also multiple times attacked 'the parties opposite' – plural – as though a party with five MPs is just as relevant as one with 121.
One final note about the potential risks of Labour's Farage strategy, demonstrated (as is so often the case at PMQs) by Ed Davey. The Lib Dem leader used his first question to call for a higher minimum wage for care workers, which is standard fare for him. But for his second, he turned to the humanitarian situation in Gaza and the urgent need to get food, water and medicine into the area. The war in Gaza is a potent issue on the left – Labour lost several seats in the last election to pro-Gaza Green and independent candidates. With Labour pivoting further towards Reform and potentially risking its left-wing base further since July, there is an opportunity for the Lib Dems to join the Greens in picking up votes from the left. Davey's question was carefully worded, as was Starmer's answer. But the fact he asked it at all hints at further challenges for Labour on its left-wing flank. Farage isn't the only threat in town.
[See more:
Related
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Kemi Badenoch refuses to kick Liz Truss out of Conservative Party
The Tory leader suggested such a move would be 'neither here nor there' for voters' perception of the party. In a speech on Thursday, shadow chancellor Sir Mel Stride sought to distance the Conservatives from Ms Truss's mini-budget, saying the party needed to show 'contrition' to restore its economic credibility. In a furious response, Ms Truss accused Sir Mel of having 'kowtowed to the failed Treasury orthodoxy' and being 'set on undermining my plan for growth'. Asked by the BBC on Friday whether she would consider throwing former prime minister Ms Truss out of the Conservatives in a symbolic break with her short-lived, turbulent time in No 10, Mrs Badenoch replied: 'Is she still in the party?' Ms Truss, the former Conservative MP for South West Norfolk, is understood to be a Tory party member still. Speaking to the BBC, Mrs Badenoch said: 'What is really important is what Mel was saying yesterday. What he was saying was that the mini-budget did not balance. It wasn't tax cuts, it was the … £150 billion of spending increases on energy bills that did not make sense.' Pressed whether she believed the mini-budget had damaged the Conservative brand, Mrs Badenoch said: 'Well, look at what happened, people didn't understand why we had done that, and so our reputation for economic competence was damaged.' Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said the party needed to 'focus on how we're going to get this country back on track' (Stefan Rousseau/PA) When asked again why she would not consider kicking Ms Truss out of the party, the Tory leader said: 'It is not about any particular individual. I don't want to be commenting on previous prime ministers. 'They've had their time. What am I going to do now? Removing people from a political party is neither here nor there in terms of what it is your viewers want to see.' After insisting Ms Truss was not in Parliament anymore, Mrs Badenoch said her party needed to 'focus on how we're going to get this country back on track'. 'What we have right now is a Labour Government, it's Keir Starmer. We need to stop talking about several prime ministers ago and talk about the Prime Minister we've got now and what he's doing to the country,' the Tory leader said. Ms Truss this week appeared in a video to promote the Irish whiskey brand of bare-knuckle fighter Dougie Joyce, who was once jailed for attacking a 78-year-old man in a pub in 2022.
Wales Online
an hour ago
- Wales Online
Everything we know about winter fuel payment U-turn
Everything we know about winter fuel payment U-turn Although the news is welcomed by many, there is still some confusion over what the announcement could mean Charities and MPs were among those who hit out at the move last year (Image: Getty Images/Image Source ) Huge changes have been announced to Labour's highly controversial policy, which limited how many pensioners could receive the Winter Fuel Payment. Rachel Reeves said more people would qualify for the allowance "this winter", and Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said he wanted to widen the threshold for winter fuel in a U-turn on one of his government's first major policies. However details of the changes and who will be eligible remain unclear, with Sir Starmer failing to confirm how many people will now get it during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. The payment - which is worth up to £300 to help with energy bills during the coldest months - was paid only to those on pension credit last year, but the policy was widely blamed for Labour's poor local election results. It saw 10 million fewer pensioners receive the money in 2024. Charities and MPs were among those who hit out at the move, showing concern for those whose income was slightly too high to qualify but then had expensive energy costs to pay. However, the restriction came in a bid to same save around £1.3 billion. Although the news is welcomed by many, there is still some confusion over what the announcement could mean. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here Here is everything we know about it so far. Article continues below Winter Fuel Payment means tested Last year, the Labour government introduced means-testing for the Winter Fuel Payment, meaning only certain pensioners over 66 would receive the money, rather than all pensioners. This resulted in over nine million UK pensioners losing the additional cash last winter. The move sparked significant backlash against Labour, which has persisted. Legal challenges have been launched against the government's decision, with charities warning it could push more elderly Brits into poverty. Research by Unite Union revealed that over two-thirds of its retired members had to reduce their heating last winter, a third took fewer baths or showers, and 16% had to cut back on hot meals due to the increased costs of trying to stay warm. The removal of the benefit was also linked to the rise in Reform Councillors in recent elections. Under the rules, you are eligible for the Winter Fuel Payment if you are over the state pension age of 66 and claiming one of the following benefits during the qualifying week: Income Support Income-based Jobseeker's Allowance Income-related Employment and Support Allowance Pension Credit Universal Credit What was announced this week? Although there have been no official announcements or changes today, one thing has been verified: Starmer's intention to increase the eligibility of pensioners for this winter's support payment. According to Jon Greer, Quilter's head of retirement policy, the Prime Minister's suggestion signifies a "notable shift in tone". Who will benefit from the U-turn? During Prime Minister's Questions, Sir Keir did not clarify who would benefit from the updated policy, despite acknowledging in a recent BBC interview that there was a pressing need for clarity. "We will look, again, as I said two weeks ago, at the eligibility for winter fuel, and of course, we'll set out how we pay for it," he responded when Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch queried about the number of pensioners, out of 10 million, who would have the allowance reinstated. The queries arose following Reeves' earlier statement that people "should be in no doubt that the means test will increase and more people will get winter fuel payment this winter". When will details be announced? Should the UK government wait until the Budget to announce the changes, it would be just prior to when payments are typically made. Eligible pensioners receive payments automatically in November or December. Under the current, short-lived system, individuals are required to claim pension credit - a top-up to the state pension for those on low incomes. Pressure from Welsh First Minister Eluned Morgan, who had previously urged the government to rethink the cuts to millions of retirees, welcomed the PM's surprise reversal on Wednesday. She says that Keir Starmer should now provide winter fuel payments to the "majority" of pensioners. Speaking to the BBC, Ms Morgan said millionaires shouldn't be getting the payment. She said: "I'm not sure if millionaires should be getting a winter fuel allowance. So let's just make sure that they don't get it." But Ms Morgan added: "People below that, that's where the conversation got to be. I do want the majority of pensioners - I think they made a massive contribution to the country." Martin Lewis comments The Money Saving Expert founder said he was "delighted" about the news, in a social media post.. He said it was worth "explaining" the two issues he had always had with the way that the Winter Fuel Payment means-test had been put in place. He said: "The first one is the level. Currently, for a single pensioner, only those earning under £11,800 a year get the £200 or £300 winter fuel help. Now with energy bills still high and other energy bill help being taken away, that really was a big hit to the pensioners who were just above that limit. "I'm hoping to see this limit increase from the current £11,800 up to £20,000 or more. Perhaps they might only do it and link it to higher-rate taxpayers." He added: "The means test that they linked Winter Fuel payment to was Pension Credit. Now, Pension Credit has long been a flawed benefit which has been critically underclaimed, and even now, after all the communication over Winter Fuel, there are still 700,000 eligible pensioners who should get Pension Credit and thus winter fuel payments who don't because they don't claim. "Often, it will be vulnerable people with onset dementia or people who just can't go through the complicated process, especially on forms, or the message hasn't been passed on to them as it's quite difficult to explain the level of income that you need to get it. "So let's just put that into perspective, 700,000 people who have a total income of under £11,800 a year are missing out on the Winter Fuel Payment, even though that's the level the government says they should get it. Article continues below "So my big message to the Chancellor is, don't just increase the threshold. You have to look at the means test mechanism to make sure that the most vulnerable pensioners in this country, if they have income below your threshold, actually get the Winter Fuel Payment. And my fingers are crossed they'll be listening."
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Kemi Badenoch's leadership confession as Tories struggle in polls
Kemi Badenoch admitted she is still learning how to lead the Conservatives after seven months, amid poor poll ratings for the party. Mrs Badenoch likened herself to Margaret Thatcher and David Cameron, saying it "takes quite a while" to learn the job of opposition leader and that she improves weekly. Mrs Badenoch shifted the Tory party towards potentially leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), claiming it hinders border control and deportation of criminals. She has tasked legal experts with examining the implications of leaving the ECHR, with plans to announce findings at the party conference in October. Mrs Badenoch dismissed Reform UK as a "protest party" and insisted the Conservatives were the main opposition to Labour, despite a poor showing in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse by-election.
