The key PIP changes and what they mean for your benefit payments
Disabled people will miss out on vital disability benefits after the government announced it would be overhauling the welfare system on Tuesday.
Personal independence payments — PIP — will undergo a series of changes that will limit who will be eligible for the payments.
The government said the reforms are part of its plan "sets out decisive action to fix the broken benefits system". It added that those with the most severe disabilities will be protected.
Read our live coverage of reaction to Labour's cuts to disability benefits here
The Disability Benefits Consortium, an umbrella body representing more than 100 charities and organisations, condemned the 'cruel cuts'. and said they would push more disabled people into poverty, and worsen people's health.'
PIP eligibility criteria tightened for those claiming daily living support will be tightened
Assessment overhaul: Assessments will be now recorded to "establish trust" as part of an overhaul of the assessment system
PIP voucher plans scrapped. These had been potentially mooted as part of a government consultation
PIP will not be frozen or means-tested, as per previous reports, and will instead rise with inflation
Here's a more detailed breakdown of what this could mean for claimants.
From November 2026, those claiming the daily living element of PIP will need to score a minimum of four points during their assessment for the benefit in one single activity to qualify for support.
Currently, claimants need to score a minimum of eight points across multiple activities to reach the threshold for support.
Kendall has said this will only affect the daily living element of PIP, not the mobility element.
According to i news, the new thresholds will exclude, among others, many autistic people, those with ADHD and mental health difficulties
The charity Sense has called the cut "draconian", and said it is "deeply concerned" about the plans.
"Personal independence payment (PIP) was never designed to help people find work," the charity's chief executive James Watson-O'Neill told Yahoo News. "It's about helping disabled people cover the extra costs of living with a disability, which often enables them to stay in employment."
The PIP assessment is used to figure out how much financial support someone claiming PIP needs.
The process has been a bone of contention for a lot of claimants, who find it undignified, inaccessible, and sometimes inaccurate.
In response, the government will review the assessment to make sure "it is fit for purpose", and to "re-establish trust". It will also record assessments to "give people the confidence they're being done properly".
In addition, if you claim PIP and universal credit, you will only need to go through one assessment in the future after the government confirmed the work capability assessment (WCA) for universal credit will be scrapped from 2028.
Currently, PIP payments are made as direct bank transfers to a person's account.
The Conservatives considered changing these payments to vouchers, so that people would have to use them in certain shops as a replacement for cash.
At the time, the Disability Poverty Campaign Group branded the vouchers 'dehumanising' and said it would 'use all possible avenues to challenge the implication that disabled people eligible for PIP lack the capacity to manage cash-based income'.
The Labour government has refused to rule out whether it will be continuing with those plans, up until this point.
Now, it has said it will be scrapping the plans to make these voucher payments.
Charities have repeatedly emphasised that PIP is a benefit that helps people with the extra costs of living with a disability, whether they have a job or not.
The government has scrapped its plans to freeze or means-test PIP, which means the amount claimants receive will still rise in line with inflation. The amount you receive will also not be linked to how much you earn.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘I'm a millionaire fleeing Britain – a Reeves U-turn would stop me leaving'
I have a spreadsheet open in front of me on my computer, detailing the exact number of days I have left to stay in the UK this tax year. The reason? Labour's changes to non-doms inheritance tax rules. The changes are so costly that they have forced me to reconsider where I live. When my days in the UK run out, I will not spend time in some tax haven; I'll just go back home to South Africa and work out the next steps. If Rachel Reeves reverses the inheritance tax change for non-doms, I would unequivocally stay and grow my venture capital business in the UK. I know so many other millionaires in my situation. Many have left but still have properties here and have not yet completely settled in their new homes. Half of these people would rush back if the rules around paying inheritance tax on worldwide assets changed, because we are all upset to leave and feel forced. But the Chancellor must act quickly before it is too late. I want to keep investing in growth companies like I did with quantum computing start-up Oxford Ionics, which last week sold for $1.1bn (£820m) to a US firm. But after raising £500m to invest in Britain's most exciting start-ups since I arrived here in 2019, my future investment will now be elsewhere. This money will likely help grow companies in mainland Europe instead. It is a shame, as Oxford and Cambridge are where the most exciting cutting-edge projects are happening. But I am sadly certainly not going to bring any more money to the UK if I cannot stay. I know people will say: 'It's just inheritance tax. What does it matter if you are dead?' My businesses are my life's work. I want them to secure my sons' futures. I grew up with very little, fleeing communist Poland as a child refugee with my parents and two siblings when the country started running out of food in the early 1980s. The only way to get out was to flee with fake papers. We spent the whole of 1981 in a migrant camp in Austria, where my parents applied to countries accepting refugees. We ended up in South Africa without knowing anything about the country or the apartheid regime. We didn't speak English and had $500 to our name. In the next years, we were just about surviving. I studied actuarial science at university because that was the only way to get a bursary, and we had no money for schooling. After working for a couple of insurance companies, I realised I'm not diplomatic enough to be a corporate employee. So I ended up in the world of start-ups and decided to start my own company. I gambled everything on it, putting my house up as collateral. It is today one of South Africa's large financial services groups. I came to the UK for security reasons in 2019, after speaking out against corruption in Jacob Zuma's government and being left fearing for my life. London has become my home. I had hoped to live here for the rest of my life. Being forced to leave for reasons outside my control feels much like grief. The impact goes beyond just my own personal circumstances. I have had to let 12 casual household staff go – gardeners, cleaners, builders. While I still have a venture capital firm, Braavos, in Britain, I will not hire anyone new here. Over time, I may have to think about relocating it. I put my flat in Kensington on the market five months ago, but because so many like me are leaving there are hardly any buyers. I'm considering putting my house that I love up for sale too, but for now I am holding out for a miracle. If there is none, I will be forced to go once my 90 days in Britain this tax year are up. I'm leaving on the strong advice of my tax advisers, as the new rules around inheritance are unworkable for me. For one, South Africa has foreign exchange controls. That means if I were to die under current rules, South Africa may refuse to release the funds to settle a huge inheritance tax bill in Britain. Even ignoring the difficulty of getting the money out, my wealth is mainly held in the form of shares in the financial services company Sygnia, which I founded and built in South Africa. My sons would be forced to sell those shares quickly. If you want to sell anything fast, you'll have to do so with a big discount, which would devalue the company. How can this be good for the economy? If Reeves changes her mind, I would immediately cancel my plans to leave. I could rehire all of my household staff, take my property off the market and focus on raising funds for another investment fund to boost British growth companies. My message to the Chancellor is this: you came into power to fix the economy, so don't destroy growth by putting politics before economics. As told to Eir Nolsøe Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Refinery29
4 hours ago
- Refinery29
Abortion Has Now Been Decriminalised — But Our Fight Is Not Over Yet
'I'm just going to leave you for a moment to process your thoughts and feelings,' my partner said to me after he'd gleefully waved at the news on his phone. 'Let's pop some fizz!' The breaking news: On Tuesday evening, MPs had voted — 379 votes to 137 — to decriminalise abortion in England and Wales. MP Tonia Antoniazzi proposed amendment NC1 to the Criminal Justice Bill. In short: women can no longer be prosecuted at any stage for having an abortion. I needed a moment, just like many other women and people with uteruses across the country. A moment to feel the exhaustion of fighting for our reproductive rights lift slightly. A moment to feel in charge of our own bodies, finally. Until this week, abortion was still technically a criminal offence under a Victorian law called the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. Although, in practice, termination is allowed under the Abortion Act 1967. Access to abortion involves the requirement of two doctors' signatures and carried out within the first 24 weeks of pregnancy. This will remain the same and doctors who act outside of the law will still face the threat of prosecution but now, thanks to this law change, women will not. It marks the biggest step forward in reproductive rights in nearly 60 years. But it's not over yet. Labour MP Stella Creasy had proposed a different change which if passed instead would've meant abortion in England and Wales, just like in Northern Ireland, would be a human right. It would've meant protection to all of those involved. It would've protected access for all and in every form. It would've meant full decriminalisation under amendment NC20. Back in 2019, Refinery29 journalists — Vicky Spratt, Natalie Gil and Gillian Orr, to name but a few — started an I'm A Criminal campaign, pushing for decriminalisation. Since then, we've seen prosecutions increase tenfold. Up until 2022, only three women had ever been convicted of having an illegal abortion. In the last four years, six women had been called up to court accused of ending their pregnancy. According to data obtained by The Guardian from the Crown Prosecution Service, 13 people were called to court charged with abortion-related offences in 2022, compared with four people in 2019 and three in both 2020 and 2021. Some known cases haven't been included in this data. But the most recent high profile case that had women up in arms was cleared by a jury only a few weeks ago: Nicola Parker was found not guilty after nearly five years of facing the threat of prison. Like Nicola Parker, these women faced scrutiny that should never have happened. Some faced intrusive personal questions on the stand like a criminal. Some faced the paparazzi snapping them outside of court like a criminal. Their lives were completely upended by a choice they made about their own bodies. We can only imagine how unbelievably difficult and traumatic it must've been for them then and now. So here's to all the women across England and Wales who, this week, no longer feel like criminals. Since 2019, we've seen reproductive rights being rolled back across Europe — in Poland abortion has been banned since 2020 and in Hungary women who seek an abortion must listen to the foetal heartbeat first. And we've watched from afar the overturning of Roe v. Wade in the States, and subsequently state by state remove access to abortions or make it increasingly difficult to get one. These removals have only happened in the space of a couple of years, what will the next couple bring? Complacency is not an option for us. Action can mean success. Remember when women and men across Ireland pushed to Repeal the 8th in 2018? The referendum successfully resulted in the majority of Irish citizens voting to repeal the Eighth Amendment, so abortion is now legal. So Scotland, here's looking at you now. My beloved home country needs to pass a similar amendment through Holyrood in Edinburgh. Currently, we still follow the same requirements under the Abortion Act 1967. Women can still be called a criminal for having an abortion. Let's change that. The time is now. I've now processed my thoughts and feelings on it, and the fight for our reproductive rights isn't over yet. In truth, it never will be because we know that a person's right to bodily autonomy can never be taken for granted. We also know that you can never be complacent about the right not to be pregnant.


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Labour Budget Squeezing Middle-Class Workers, BOE Report Finds
By and Tom Rees Save UK Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves' decision to push up taxes for employers and increase the minimum wage is squeezing pay for middle earners, moving work overseas and inflating food prices. That's the conclusion of the local network that feeds on-the-ground intelligence to the Bank of England, in a report that will make uncomfortable reading for the Labour government.