logo
Gmail, Android, iPhone Attacks — FBI Says: Do Not Click Anything

Gmail, Android, iPhone Attacks — FBI Says: Do Not Click Anything

Forbes26-04-2025

Do. Not. Click.
Security experts have revealed that it takes, on average, just 60 seconds from getting attacked to being hacked. Malicious actors use everything from convincingly impersonating Google in Gmail attacks, deploying infostealer malware to compromise your passwords and 2FA codes, and AI increasingly fueling the threat fire. And that's before we get to the use of dedicated smartphone farms to launch attacks against Android and iPhone users. No wonder the Federal Bureau of Investigation has reported that 859,532 complaints of internet crime in 2024 led to losses of $16 billion. 'Reporting is one of the first and most important steps in fighting crime so law enforcement can use this information to combat a variety of frauds and scams,' FBI Director, Kash Patel, said. Another way to combat the cybercrime pandemic is, as the FBI has also warned, do not click anything.
Phishing is such a hard cyber nut to crack, given that it plays on fear, urgency, and a whole bunch of other emotional levers. These communications often arrive from what appear to be legitimate sources, some impersonate big brands and manage to use their genuine domains to send the malicious emails; they can be hard to spot, and blaming victims for falling for such scams helps nobody. Especially when all it takes is one click for the barrier between your online and offline worlds to start crumbling in the worst possible way.
One-click attacks can take the form of drive-by downloads where malware is automatically downloaded onto your device as a result of visiting a compromised website. Maybe they will employ an attacker-in-the-middle process to steal your browser session cookies and, by so doing, gain ongoing access to whatever account you were accessing at the time and without knowing your 2FA codes.
'You might receive an email that appears to be from a legitimate business and is asking you to update or verify your personal information by replying to the email or visiting a website,' the FBI has warned. 'The email may be convincing enough to get you to take the action requested.' The FBI's advice for all users is simple: Don't click on anything in an unsolicited email or text message. Of course, out here in the real-world, that's a lot easier said than done. Attackers are clever, they know which strings to pull and how to get you to click even when the do not click message has been rammed home. So, while 'do not click' is a great baseline message, it shouldn't be seen in isolation.
Paul Walsh, co-founder of the W3C Mobile Web Initiative in 2004 and currently CEO of MetaCert, was responsible for the creation of internet standards used to protect companies from malicious web links. The answer to the phishing problem, Walsh said, is the authentication of URLs before delivery, and not doing so represents 'the single biggest problem in cybersecurity.' That's certainly true when it comes to the average user being able to spot suspicious links. But until such a time that every carrier, every email platform, every user can employ this kind of protection by default, I'm afraid that the FBI 'do not click' warning is about as good as it gets. Ignore it at your peril or, at least, take a breath and think twice before letting your clicking finger loose on that email.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-aide to New York governor pleads not guilty to new pandemic fraud charge
Ex-aide to New York governor pleads not guilty to new pandemic fraud charge

Hamilton Spectator

time22 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

Ex-aide to New York governor pleads not guilty to new pandemic fraud charge

NEW YORK (AP) — A former aide to two New York governors already facing charges of acting as an illicit agent of China pleaded not guilty on Monday to additional charges that she improperly profited from the state's purchase of face masks and other key medical supplies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Linda Sun, 41, and her husband, Chris Hu, 40, — who is also charged — entered not guilty pleas to charges of wire fraud, bribery and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Hu also faces tax evasion charges. The two remain free on bond and are due back in court Aug. 25 ahead of an expected November trial. Sun's lawyer Jarrod Schaeffer declined to comment following Monday's proceedings but has previously dismissed the new charges as 'feverish accusations unmoored from the facts.' Hu's lawyers didn't immediately respond Monday but have also similarly denied the charges. Prosecutors say the couple collected millions of dollars in kickbacks by exploiting Sun's role in helping New York procure personal protective equipment, or PPE, during the pandemic in 2020. They say Sun, a naturalized U.S. citizen, used connections in her native China to secure PPE for the state, though she didn't disclose her family's ties to two vendors that received more than $44 million, prosecutors say. Sun previously pleaded not guilty to charges she used her position in state government to advance Chinese government priorities in exchange for financial rewards, including assistance with Hu's business ventures in China. The lucrative benefits helped the Long Island couple live a lavish lifestyle with multimillion-dollar properties and luxury cars, prosecutors have said. Sun worked for former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and his successor, Gov. Kathy Hochul, until she was fired in 2023. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17
It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17

Yahoo

time32 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the mercury rises in the Northern Hemisphere, so does anticipation for the next iPhone, which we're currently calling the iPhone 17. But as temperatures increase, I also get hot under the collar. The thing that piqued my temper is kinda not a thing at all... it's the lack of any rumors of a high-refresh rate display for the iPhone 17 and its Plus compadre. It's been literally years that I've bemoaned the lack of a 90Hz or 120Hz display on non-Pro iPhones, and it wasn't until the iPhone 13 Pro that we had such displays even in the most premium iPhones. Comparatively, Android phones pushed into 90Hz years before Apple followed suit, and now all of the best Android phones offer 120Hz displays, often with adaptive technology, for prices that undercut the standard iPhone 16. My hope is that Apple will finally move towards a high-refresh rate display for its standard and Plus iPhones, and I'm crossing my fingers in hope that this happens as soon as the iPhone 17. What brought this to mind was a recent article from my colleague Thomas Deehan who questions the need to go Pro when the standard iPhones are rather good. While I agree with him in part, I also agree with some of the comments on that article which note the non-Pro phones lack the slick displays of their more expensive stablemates and come without the telephoto camera; two things I rather like on my iPhone 16 Pro Max. But while I can live without a telephoto camera - the telephoto camera on the iPhone 16 Pro still uses a 12-megapixel sensor - I cannot swallow a 60Hz display. Neither should you. I absolutely get that there are still swathes of people - less tech-savvy - who might not care about their display's refresh rate. Compared to the old Android phones that used a 60Hz display, Apple manages to make its standard iPhones feel smooth and responsive; such is the nature of iOS and Apple having a tight grip over both its phone software and hardware. I also understand that sticking with a 60Hz display can help get as much life out of a battery on a single charge as possible. But having used 120Hz displays on a range of phones for some time now, I feel that rate, or at least 90Hz, should be the minimum standard for phone screens. Not only does it make the whole experience on both iOS and Android feel notably slicker and more responsive, it's also more comfortable on my eyes. I really think I'd struggle going back to 60Hz - but this article is more about why I think others should be able to enjoy higher refresh rates, especially if you are locked into the Apple ecosystem or can't fork out the cash for an iPhone 17 Pro. What's more, when Apple adopts a technology or a technique, it achieves mastery, even if it's late to the party. I reckon the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max offer some of the best high-refresh rate OLED displays on any smartphones. By making 90Hz or 120Hz the iPhone screen standard, Apple could help see the tech improve, perhaps making it more efficient or finding ways to reduce eye strain. The year is 2025 and I think Apple really needs to move past 60Hz displays when the rumored iPhone 17 arrives. Doing so will make the next-generation iPhone the best showcase for iOS 26 and potentially usher in a chapter where iPhones again feel fresh, and not like an iterative update. After six months with my iPhone 16 Pro, I'm still not convinced by the Action button Apple is advertising its F1 movie through the Wallet app, and I think that's a terrible mistake I think the iPhone 17 will be boring, but iOS 26 could save it

Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors
Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Google is working on a new Gemini logo with familiar colors

Just when we thought Gemini couldn't be Google-fied anymore, the Mountain View, California-based company succeeded in surprising us. Soon after the tech giant began rolling out Song Search on the Android Gemini app, paired with support for Scheduled Actions, it now seems to be giving the Gemini app and its logo a more Google-esque look. The app's familiar blue and purple tone, which can be observed across instances of the Gemini branding, is in the midst of being replaced with a more colorful hue — one that looks similar to Google Assistants signature multicolored branding. Hints about the redesign were spotted in the latest Google app beta build (version beta) by the folks over at Android Authority, surfacing Google's well-known color palette across the app's UI. Old, new, old, new The change was observed in the app's splash screen, which highlights an animated red, yellow, green, and blue Gemini logo for a brief second when you open a new instance of the app. Similarly, the logo on the onboarding screen appears in the same Google-themed colors, as seen in the screenshots above. Eagle-eyed users would have also spotted the lack of blue and purple on the "Get to know Gemini, your AI assistant" text at the top. The change also makes its way to the Gemini logo that appears above the AI tool's responses. These aren't huge changes by any means, and won't change the way users utilize Gemini. However, the refresh does make the experience feel a little more aligned and consistent with Google's overall brand identity. For what it's worth, these changes were manually enabled, and they won't surface for you in the beta build of the app just yet. The changes will likely make their way out widely with a future update, which might happen around the time when Google Assistant is fully phased out later this year. Google Gemini Google LLC PRODUCTIVITY Price: Free 4.5 Download

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store