logo
House Dems, advocates for transparency blast NC Senate's ‘broken' budget

House Dems, advocates for transparency blast NC Senate's ‘broken' budget

Yahoo15-04-2025

Rep. Deb Butler and advocates call for a more transparent budget process as the Senate prepares to pass its budget blueprint. (Screengrab from NCGA video stream)
As the North Carolina Senate fast tracks a newly released two-year budget proposal through the chamber this week, members of the state's Progressive House Caucus held a press conference Tuesday to call out what they say is the lack of public input and accountability in the budgeting process.
Rep. Deb Butler (D-New Hanover) said the Senate budget that earmarks $32.6 billion in 2025-26 and $33.3 billion the year after was crafted with no collaboration from Democrats or real public input.
'[Billion of dollars] are rolled into a last-minute conference report, dumped on our desk, and shoved through with an up or down vote. That is not just a procedural complaint. It's a democratic crisis,' said Butler at a Tuesday legislative press conference.
Butler is advocating for two bills she sponsored earlier in the session to improve the budget process.
House Bill 178, the 'Budgeting Accountability and Transparency Act,' would require that any conference committee report (the document that spells out the final version of a bill that has been agreed to by House and Senate leaders) on the budget be publicly available for at least 72 hours before a vote can occur. It would give lawmakers, stakeholders and the public time to read the hundreds of pages that make up the budget bill.
House Bill 180, 'Fiscally Responsible & Sustainable Budgeting,' would require a multi-year look back and look forward based on performance rather than relying on one-time money. HB 180 also requires that any tax cut or spending increase over a certain threshold include an offset so future legislatures are not saddled with obligations the state cannot afford.
'These bills do not favor Democrats or Republicans. They favor the people of North Carolina who deserve to see how their money is being spent,' said Butler.
Rep. Marcia Morey (D-Durham) said legislative leaders would also be wise to embrace House Bill 303 ('Make Corporations Pay What They Owe') that would halt the ongoing gradual repeal of the corporate income tax.
'We don't need to cut the corporate income tax to zero by 2030. This state will lose $2 billion that can be used for our priorities of helping people, helping school children, the necessities we need to make the state stronger,' Morey urged. 'It must be reinstated so this state can be fiscally responsible.'
Alexandra Sirota of the North Carolina Budget and Tax Center cautioned that North Carolina is experiencing the ripple effects of federal funding chaos, program freezes, and a looming congressional budget that threatens to push even more costs onto the states.
'Unless our legislative leaders change course, we know that North Carolina's future budget picture will get worse, not better. We cannot afford to trust empty promises,' Sirota warned.
Charles Owens, a healthcare technician at Cherry Hospital in Goldsboro, said that with rising housing costs and living expenses, state workers deserve better than the meager increases being put forth in the budget proposal unveiled by Senate leaders Monday night.
'The workers at Cherry Hospital, along with all the other DHHS facilities, work with the most vulnerable, exploited, and sometimes the most dangerous people in North Carolina, meaning the mentally ill, the abused, and sometimes criminals shipped to us from the prisons,' Owens explained. 'We take care of them with some of the best treatment this state can offer. But yet, as public workers, we aren't being taken care of by our lawmakers.'
Most state workers would see a 1.25% raise next year, as well as a $3,000 bonus over the next two years in the Senate proposal.
Owens said that as budget writers advance another round of corporate tax cuts, state employees are being told to expect to pay higher costs for participating in the State Health Plan next year.
'Imagine public workers that provide health care, being told that the state can afford tax cuts, but they can't afford to continue making investments in our health.'
Sam Stites, the living wage program coordinator with the group Just Economics, traveled to Raleigh from Transylvania County on Tuesday to urge lawmakers to craft a better budget.
Stites said for western North Carolina it's been a year of rude awakenings since Helene, with relief dollars slow to materialize for many working-class individuals.
'Wealthy individuals and corporations should not be getting tax cuts when working western North Carolinians are being evicted and small businesses are shuttering. That is why I came here.'
Stites said in addition to rebuilding infrastructure, lawmakers need to help the hundreds of Helene survivors who are facing eviction.
'I'm talking about the $10 million you were asked for in rental assistance and said 'no' to, and the small business grants that you were asked for and aid 'No' to,' said Stites. 'To me it is simple, if you do not have enough money for working people and small businesses, then you do not have enough money for tax cuts for wealthy individuals and corporations.'
Abby Lublin, executive director of Carolina Jews for Justice, said the state budget is truly a statement about North Carolina's values.
'Cutting the corporate income tax does not fill a child's stomach. It doesn't raise teacher pay. It doesn't heal our rural hospitals or fix our crumbling roads.'
Lublin said simply pausing the corporate tax rate at its current level would provide revenue for services that are desperately needed at a time of sweeping federal cuts.
'To the lawmakers who are enacting a budget process without transparency, I'm looking right at you,' said Lublin. 'A budget that pits people and communities against each other to fight for crumbs is only due to a lack of moral courage.'
The Senate is expected to have floor votes on the budget Wednesday and Thursday.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests
Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Proud Boys Sue DOJ For $100 Million Over Jan. 6 Arrests

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump issued a blanket pardon to more than 1,500 people charged in the deadly Jan. 6 insurrection. But it still wasn't enough. Now, five Proud Boys leaders are suing the Department of Justice (DOJ) over their prosecutions and asking the government to surrender millions. The lawsuit, filed by Dominic Pezzola, Henry 'Enrique' Tarrio, Ethan Nordean, Joe Biggs, and Zachary Rehl, asks the government to pay them $100 million in restitution, despite the fact that the latter four were found guilty of engaging in a seditious 2021 conspiracy to keep Trump in power. Two years after the riot, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs and Rehl were found guilty of plotting to oppose Congress' election certification by force. Pezzola was the only one who was acquitted of seditious conspiracy but was still found guilty of assaulting police, stealing a riot shield, smashing a window breached by rioters, conspiring to impede lawmakers and police, and more. The five men filed the lawsuit Friday in Florida, putting the ball in Trump's court to either defend the prosecutions or pay an exorbitant sum at taxpayers' expense. The Proud Boys is a far-right militant organization that promotes political violence and embraces misogynistic, xenophobic, and anti-LGBTQ+ ideologies. If the DOJ decides to pay the Proud Boys members, many Democrats worry that it could symbolize the president's willingness to outwardly sanction political violence and empower extremists. In the pardon proclamation announced on Jan. 20, Trump noted that the controversial mercy 'ends a grave national injustice that has been perpetrated upon the American people over the last four years and begins a process of national reconciliation.' Prior to the pardons, Tarrio, Nordean, Biggs, Rehl, and Pezzola were each sentenced to 22, 18, 17, 15, and 10 years in prison, respectively. The Proud Boys members claim there was an 'egregious and systemic abuse of the legal system and the United States Constitution to punish and oppress political allies of President Trump, by any and all means necessary, legal, or illegal.' 'A settlement would suggest that the violence of January 6 was entirely justified,' Matthew Dallek, a political historian at The George Washington University, told The Washington Post. 'It would say to the country that these Proud Boys who were convicted in a court of law, in a fair trial, were wrongfully prosecuted and victims. It just turns the entire day on its head.' The insurrection interrupted Congress' attempt to certify former President Joe Biden as the winner of the 2020 election. After a mob stormed the Capitol, five people died in or immediately after the violence and 140 officers were assaulted. The Daily Beast has reached out to the Trump administration for comment.

Four Trump administration officials to travel to Santa Fe for regional governors event
Four Trump administration officials to travel to Santa Fe for regional governors event

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Four Trump administration officials to travel to Santa Fe for regional governors event

Jun. 6—SANTA FE — New Mexico's capital city frequently touts its art galleries, restaurants and progressive policies, but there's a different brand of politics coming to the City Different. Four Cabinet secretaries from President Donald Trump's administration will join seven western governors — including Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham — later this month at the Western Governors' Association's summer meeting in Santa Fe. The two-day event, which starts June 23 at a luxury downtown hotel, will feature discussions about housing shortages, outdoor recreation and wildfire response efforts, according to an online agenda. It will also allow attendees to mingle with corporate sponsors of the event, and travel to the Santa Fe Opera and other local spots. The Trump administration officials slated to attend the meeting are Interior Secretary Doug Burgum, Education Secretary Linda McMahon, Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Lee Zeldin. All four will headline the group's annual meeting as keynote speakers, a WGA spokesman confirmed Friday. Burgum, the former governor of North Dakota, took over as Interior secretary from former New Mexico congresswoman Deb Haaland in January, after Trump won the election. As for the governors slated to attend the event, the list includes Mike Dunleavy of Alaska, Jared Polis of Colorado, Kelly Armstrong of North Dakota, Spencer Cox of Utah, Mark Gordon of Wyoming and Arnold Palacios of the Northern Mariana Islands. Five of those governors are Republicans, with Polis and Lujan Grisham the lone Democrats. Additional governors could also end up attending. As for Lujan Grisham, who will be the event's official host, the governor has vowed to work with Trump administration officials when possible, even while criticizing a Republican-backed plan to trim federal spending on Medicaid and other programs. "My job is to create stability in every single relationship in the federal government," she said during a Bloomberg TV interview last month. The Western Governors' Association is a bipartisan group that includes 19 states and three U.S. territories — American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands. Previous WGA annual meetings have been held in Olympic Valley, California, and Boulder, Colorado. Meanwhile, Santa Fe has also hosted big political gatherings in past years, including a National Governors Association summer meeting in 2018. That event included a Western-themed reception and a private burning of Zozobra for governors and their family members.

Bolivia reinstates a leftist challenger but keeps former leader Morales off the ballot

timean hour ago

Bolivia reinstates a leftist challenger but keeps former leader Morales off the ballot

LA PAZ, Bolivia -- Bolivia's electoral tribunal on Friday included leftist Senate leader Andrónico Rodríguez on the list of presidential candidates approved for the ballot but excluded the powerful former socialist leader Evo Morales — the other major thorn in the president's side. As tensions escalate in the run-up to Bolivia's Aug. 17 elections, the Supreme Electoral Tribunal reinstated Rodríguez, a 36-year-old political upstart with close ties to Morales and roots in the ex-president's rural coca-growing stronghold, weeks after suspending his candidacy on technical grounds in a decision that shocked many Bolivians. 'We are the candidate of the people,' Rodríguez said in a speech welcoming the revival of his campaign. 'Our primary concern has been to wage the legal battle, and in the end, the power of the people had to prevail.' With the ruling Movement Toward Socialism party, or MAS, riven by dysfunction and division over President Luis Arce's power struggle with his former mentor, Morales, supporters of the senate leader see him as the only chance for MAS to beat the right-wing opposition and salvage its decades-long political dominance. President Arce, widely blamed for accelerating Bolivia's worst economic crisis in 40 years, dropped out of the race last month. Opinion polls show that his pick for the presidency, senior minister Eduardo del Castillo, has inherited the president's unpopularity. Arce's government insists that its main rival, Morales, is constitutionally barred from running. Morales accuses Arce of waging a 'judicial war' against him. In leaving out Morales, the tribunal opened the potential for further turmoil: Morales has called on his supporters to take to the streets to demand his eligibility. Over the last week his followers have blockaded some of the main roads around the country, adding to a sense of crisis as merchants and truckers rise up in outrage over surging food prices and severe fuel shortages. Morales, who governed Bolivia from 2006 to 2019, has been holed up in the country's tropics for months, surrounded by fiercely loyal coca-farmers, as Arce's government seeks his arrest on charges relating to his sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl. A constitutional court filled with judges beholden to Arce has disputed the legality of Morales' fourth candidacy and barred him from the contest. 'The constitutional court acts like a sniper ... restricting and enabling electoral participation upon request,' he said in response to his disqualification. 'The order is clear: Hand over the government to the right and legitimize the election with negotiated candidates who will protect their backs.' Morales, whose own loyalists packed the same court when he was president, points to an earlier court ruling that paved the way for his 2019 presidential campaign, that said it would violate his human rights to stop him running. Morales' bid that year for an unprecedented fourth term ultimately sparked mass protests and led to his resignation and brief self-exile. The conservative opposition to MAS is also fractured, with at least three right-of-center candidates vying for the presidency and no clear frontrunner. All of them are little-known abroad but well-known within Bolivia, where they have run for president or served in government in the past: Jorge 'Tuto' Quiroga, former president from 2001-2002, Samuel Doria Medina, a former cement tycoon and planning minister, and Manfred Reyes Villa, the mayor of Bolivia's major central city of Cochabamba.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store