Trump meets Zelensky and says higher Nato spending may deter future aggression
Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) annually on core defence requirements as well as defence- and security-related spending.
That target had been 2% of GDP.
'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Mr Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after meeting with Mr Zelensky.
'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.'
The US president also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022.
'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Mr Trump said.
'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia'.'
Mr Trump's meeting with Mr Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis's funeral.
Mr Trump also had a major confrontation with Mr Zelensky earlier this year at the White House.
Mr Zelensky, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Mr Trump for the US assistance.
'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Mr Zelensky added.
Mr Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more US-made Patriot air defence missile systems.
Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Mr Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause.
'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Mr Trump said.
'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.'
Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defence systems to Ukraine.
But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia.
Mr Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth towards the Ukrainian reporter.
'That's a very good question,' Mr Trump said about the query about Patriots.
'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.'
Ukraine has been front and centre at recent Nato summits.
But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Mr Zelensky was not in the room.
The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato.
The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians.
Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war.
During Mr Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war.
He saw it as a costly conflict that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won re-election in 2020.
Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Mr Putin and Mr Zelensky.
Mr Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting.
He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones.
British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defence missiles to Ukraine, funded by £70 million raised from the interest on seized Russian assets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
19 minutes ago
- Spectator
For Trump, solving Ukraine won't be as easy as Iran
For the moment, at least, the world seems to be going Donald Trump's way. Instead of setting the Middle East ablaze, Trump's air strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities have been met by a single, casualty-free Iranian counterstrike on the US's al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar. And though Tehran described the attack as 'mighty and successful', it emerged that Iran had actually warned the Qatar authorities in advance of the strikes – a message that they immediately passed on to the Americans. At the Nato summit in the Hague this week, European leaders lined up to support Trump's demand that they 'pay their way' and boost their defence spending to 5 per cent of GDP. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen hailed the new defence bonanza as an opportunity to boost European innovation and announced a 'Rearm Europe' plan to mobilise €650 billion (£554 million) in defence investment. Every Nato member state (except for Spain) signed up to the new 5 per cent target – even though for most members that figure entails doubling, or in some cases tripling, defence budgets. Trump came to office promising to be a peacemaking president Nato's secretary-general Mark Rutte even sent Trump an effusive note praising his strikes on Iran. 'Mr President, dear Donald, Congratulations and thank you for your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary, and something no one else dared to do,' gushed Rutte in language apparently intended to mirror Trump's own bombastic tweeting style. 'Donald, you have driven us to a really, really important moment for America and Europe, and the world,' continued Rutte. It was not easy but we've got them all signed onto 5 per cent! You will achieve something NO American president in decades could get done. Europe is going to pay in a BIG way, as they should, and it will be your win. It was a very different reaction to the last time Trump addressed a Nato summit in London back in 2019. Then, a hot-mike moment caught Canadian prime minister Justin Trudeau, British premier Boris Johnson, French President Emmanuel Macron and – yes – Mark Rutte, then-Dutch prime minister sniggering over Trump's lateness. Trump was so incensed by the mockery that he flew home early, but not before blasting Trudeau as being 'two faced' and criticising him for failing to meet Nato's spending benchmark – then a mere 2 per cent of GDP. Remarkably, Trump's order to both Israel and Iran to cease fire after twelve days of massive bombardments seems to be holding. More impressive still is that both sides immediately began to violate the ceasefire but were immediately brought to heel by hard words from the White House. That leaves just one major fire on Trump's foreign policy horizon that's still burning: Ukraine. As he was campaigning for the presidency, Trump vowed that he would stop the conflict 'within 24 hours'. In practice, three months of intensive negotiations both by Trump envoys and by phone direct with Putin have yielded nothing but weasel words from the Kremlin. At the same time, the White House's relationship with the Ukrainians reached rock bottom after Volodymyr Zelensky's train wreck meeting with Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance in the Oval Office in February was followed by a freeze on US arms and funding to Kyiv. But the Nato summit seemed to yield some positive news for Ukraine, too. Trump was photographed, beaming, beside Macron and Zelensky – whom he described as 'a nice guy'. When a Ukrainian reporter asked Trump about the US providing air defence systems, the President asked her about where her husband was – and on learning that he was a soldier, he said, 'I wish you a lot of luck, I can see it's very upsetting to you.' He also promised to send 'some' Patriots to Kyiv, noting that the US needed them and so did Israel. But most significantly, Trump blocked Putin's attempt to pivot away from Ukraine by publicly squashing the Kremlin's offers to mediate between Washington and Iran. 'I've spoken to Putin. I said no, I don't need help on Iran,' Trump told reporters. 'Do me a favour, help with Russia.' Trump's hard words for Putin were a welcome sign to Ukrainians that the White House does retain some scepticism about Putin's hollow claims to be serious about peace. At the same time, though, Trump's team made it clear that they saw talks, not military aid, as the only solution to the conflict. '@POTUS has been abundantly clear the Russia-Ukraine war must end,' tweeted Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 'There is no military solution, only a diplomatic one.' But there were hopeful words for the Kremlin too. Rubio added that the US would not be imposing additional sanctions against Russia because if 'we come in and crush them with more sanctions, we probably lose our ability to talk to them about the ceasefire and then who's talking to them?' In the space of a few days, Trump went from bombing Iran to being bombed to a ceasefire, allowing all sides to claim victory. Trump also succeeded in not only persuading recalcitrant Europeans to massively increase their defence spending but also in making them enthusiastic about doing it. Vice President Vance also articulated what he called the 'brutally simple' Trump Doctrine: Define a clear American interest. Push hard through diplomacy. If that fails, strike fast, win quick, and get out – before it becomes another endless war. Trump came to office promising to be a peacemaking president. After three months in office, he's fought his first short, victorious war. But it will be achieving a lasting peace in Ukraine – and wrangling the notoriously stubborn and duplicitous Putin into a deal – that will be the Trump's true foreign policy test. This article was originally published in The Spectator's world edition.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump will look at giving Ukraine more Patriot missiles as he calls on Putin to end war
Donald Trump said he is considering sending more Patriot missile systems to Ukraine, as he renewed calls on Russian leader Vladimir Putin to end the war. The president added that he isn't ruling out a new defense assistance package, when he spoke to reporters at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday. Trump, who has surrounded himself with isolationist-minded advisers who've publicly opposed continued support for Kyiv, responded, 'We'll see what happens' when asked whether the U.S. would contribute anything on top of the $8 billion pledged by NATO allies as part of the 32-member bloc's continued support for Ukraine's war effort. Click here for the latest updates on the war in Ukraine Speaking at a press conference on the heels of a closed-door sit-down with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky, Mr. Trump said there has been 'a lot of spirit' in Ukraine's fight against the invasion Putin ordered in February 2022. Trump also appeared to shift blame for the continuation and escalation of the war to Putin, marking a dramatic reversal from how he characterized the situation during a contentious Oval Office meeting with Zelensky earlier this year. 'Vladimir Putin really has to end that war,' the president said. 'People are dying at levels that people haven't seen before for a long time.' He recounted to reporters how he'd rebuked Putin during a recent phone call after the Russian leader offered to mediate an end to hostilities between Israel and Iran, stressing he would rather he brought an end to the conflict in Ukraine. He later added that Putin has been 'more difficult' than Zelensky, with whom Trump has had a contentious relationship dating back to his first term, when a phone call with the Ukrainian leader launched a scandal that led to the first of his two impeachment trials in the Senate. Trump's relationship with Putin has long been far friendlier, but even that has appeared to sour in recent months as the Russian dictator has continued to pound civilian targets in Ukraine with drones and missiles, killing thousands and complicating efforts by Trump to cajole both sides to the negotiating table. In April, he became so irate over Putin's attacks on civilians that he took to Truth Social to exhort the Russian leader to halt the attacks and get to the negotiating table, writing: 'Vladimir, STOP! 5,000 soldiers a week are dying. Let's get the Peace Deal DONE!' Since then, he has floated the possibility of imposing harsh new sanctions on Moscow if Putin refuses to cooperate in the U.S.-led efforts to bring about a settlement in the three-year-old conflict. The president's changed view of the war and Putin's culpability also became evident when he had an emotional exchange with a reporter for the BBC's Ukrainian service, who asked whether the U.S. was prepared to sell more Patriot anti-air missiles to Ukraine. Last year, the Biden administration announced they would prioritize deliveries of Patriot interceptors to Ukraine on account of Russia's accelerated pace of aerial attacks against civilians and infrastructure, but Kyiv has had to expand their use of the missiles and has been running low on them. Trump asked the reporter if she was currently living in Ukraine, at which point she replied that she was based in Warsaw with her children while her husband has remained in Ukraine. The president responded: 'That's rough stuff.' He asked the journalist again to confirm that she was living outside of Ukraine and working as a reporter, replying 'good' when she answered in the affirmative. 'Let me just tell you, they [Ukraine] do want to have the anti-missile missiles, as they call them, the Patriots, and we're going to see if we can make some available,' he said. Trump added that such weapons were 'very hard to get' and 'very effective', while admitting that the U.S. had been prioritizing supplies for Israel amid that country's ongoing wars. 'They do want that more than any other thing, as you probably know,' he said before praising her 'very good question' and telling her to 'say hello' to her husband for him. Trump's apparent openness to sending more American aid to Ukraine comes as NATO's 32 member nations pledged to 'reaffirm' what they described as 'enduring sovereign commitments to provide support to Ukraine,' calling Ukrainian security efforts a contribution to NATO's own security. The alliance also pledged to include 'direct contributions to Ukraine defense' as part of efforts to have each country meet a threshold of spending five percent of gross domestic product on defense.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
Why UK needs to pander to Trump but should not necessarily believe him
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Following the US attack on Iran, Donald Trump said its nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and fully obliterated', setting back the tyrannical regime's plans by 'decades'. However, according to a leaked preliminary assessment by the Pentagon, the missile strikes only caused a delay of a few months. Amid the ensuing uproar over these very different takes, the US President attacked the media for reporting the classified document's findings, saying they were "scum" and "disgusting", while US Secretary of State Marco Rubio accused those behind the leak of being "professional stabbers". Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad But, clearly, what matters is what has actually happened. If Iran still has the ability to quickly develop nuclear weapons, the world needs to be alive to that threat. With the situation still unclear, it would be far better to err on the side of caution. Keir Starmer speaks to US President Donald Trump at the Nato summit in The Hague (Picture: Kin Cheung/pool) | Getty Images Axis of Autocracies Where Trump deserves credit is that the US attack has demonstrated to Iran's leaders how vulnerable they are, and this may have a deterring effect on a regime, widely despised by its own people, which poses a very real threat to world peace. It is a member of what former Nato Secretary-General, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, has described as the 'Axis of Autocracies', along with Russia, China and North Korea. The combined threat these dictatorships pose is the reason why the world needs a much stronger Nato. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And that means European leaders must sometimes swallow their pride and be rather sycophantic towards Trump, even as he continues to cast doubt on his commitment to the Nato treaty which states an attack on one will be treated as an attack on all. The UK and Europe have no choice but to spend more on defence – commensurate with the increased threats facing the world and also, again erring on the side of caution, in case Trump decides to withdraw from the alliance, formally or not.
