&w=3840&q=100)
Despite close ties with Iran, Russia stands aside as Israel attacks
Iran aided the Kremlin with badly needed drones in the first year of its Ukraine invasion, helped Moscow build out a critical factory to make drones at home and inked a new strategic partnership treaty this year with President Vladimir V. Putin, heralding closer ties, including in defense.
But five months after that treaty was signed, the government in Iran is facing a grave threat to its rule from attacks by Israel. And Russia, beyond phone calls and condemnatory statements, is nowhere to be found.
Iranian nuclear facilities and energy installations have been damaged, and many of the country's top military leaders killed, in a broad Israeli onslaught that began Friday and has since expanded, with no sign that Moscow will come to Tehran's aid.
'Russia, when it comes to Iran, must weigh the possibility of a clash with Israel and the United States, so saving Iran is obviously not worth it,' said Nikita Smagin, an expert on Russia-Iran relations. 'For Russia, this is just a fact.'
The situation reflects a dispassionate political calculus by Moscow, which is prioritizing its own war against Ukraine, as well as its need to maintain warm relations with other partners in the Middle East, which have helped Moscow survive Western economic sanctions, analysts say.
Putin, the analysts add, doesn't want Iran to have nuclear weapons and also wants to keep improving relations with President Trump, who has called on Iran to make a deal on its nuclear program to end the attacks. Russia is also benefiting from a spike in oil prices since the attack began.
Analysts say Putin is unlikely to become involved militarily in the conflict or to arm Tehran too aggressively. In part, this caution arises from fear of alienating the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia, two increasingly important partners for Moscow that wouldn't welcome a more powerful Iran. But it's also because his forces are already tied down in Ukraine.
So instead, Moscow is positioning itself to be relevant in talks to end the fighting.
That marks a shift from how Russia responded a decade ago, when another regional partner faced a dire threat. In Syria, the Kremlin mounted a military intervention to shore up the regime of President Bashar al-Assad. The effort ultimately failed in December, when al-Assad's rule collapsed. Half a year later, Moscow now faces a further possible erosion of its regional influence.
'The real issue for Moscow is what can they afford to send the Iranians at this point as far as military equipment is concerned, given the demands of the conflict against Ukraine?' said Thomas Graham, a distinguished fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations.
In calls with Trump, Putin has offered to help with Iran negotiations, possibly in part to convince Washington that there are other benefits to normalizing relations with Russia, even if Putin won't grant the White House's demands to end the war against Ukraine.
Putin called the leaders of both Iran and Israel after the attacks began and briefed Trump on the content of those conversations, the Kremlin said.
In recent days, Russia's Foreign Ministry noted that the United States stood ready to continue talks with Iran over the nuclear program, hinting that Tehran should consider returning to the table. Russia has also offered to take Iran's highly enriched uranium.
'There is a desire to reset this relationship and present yourself to the Americans as an interlocutor on all things in global affairs, including the Iranian nuclear dossier, without actually talking about Ukraine with any kind of substance,' said Hanna Notte, director of the Eurasia program at the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies in Monterey, Calif.
But Putin risks alienating the Iranians, who have long distrusted Moscow and feared that the Kremlin could make a bargain with the White House and 'throw Tehran under the bus,' Notte said.
Regardless, negotiations could still be far away, despite the Kremlin's offer to facilitate them.
Israel expanded its targets on Monday to include the Iranian state broadcaster and Iran's elite Quds Force. Responding to a question at a news conference on Monday, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel didn't rule out the possibility that Iran's government would collapse.
Russia has long had a robust relationship with Iran, becoming the country's largest foreign investor last year. It has supplied arms to Iran for years but has stopped short of providing the full suite of weaponry that Tehran wants.
Until recently, Putin cultivated friendly relations with Israel, complicating his provision of sophisticated arms to Iran. He also developed deeper ties with Gulf nations opposed to seeing Tehran amass greater military might.
'Iran has been asking Russia for weapons for the last few years,' Smagin said. 'It has been asking for aircraft, it has been asking for air defense syste Russia has given practically nothing.'
'Overall, this, of course, leads to the weakening of Russia's positions in the Middle East,' Smagin said. 'This is certain.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
18 minutes ago
- The Hindu
‘I may do it, I may not do it', Trump on Iran strikes
U.S President Donald Trump said he was considering on Wednesday whether the United States would join Israeli strikes on Iran and said that Tehran had reached out to seek negotiations on ending the conflict. Speaking as he watched installation of a new flagpole at the White House, Mr. Trump added that his patience 'had already run out' with Iran and repeated his call for the Islamic republic's 'unconditional surrender'. Follow Israel-Iran conflict LIVE updates on June 18 'I may do it, I may not do it. I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do,' Mr. Trump told reporters on the South Lawn when asked if he had decided whether to launch U.S. air strikes. 'I can tell you this, that Iran's got a lot of trouble, and they want to negotiate.' Mr. Trump said Iran had even suggested sending officials to the White House for talks on Tehran's nuclear programme in a bid to end Israel's air assault, but added that it was 'very late.' 'I said it's very late to be talking. We may meet. There's a big difference between now and a week ago, right? Big difference,' Mr. Trump added. 'They've suggested that they come to the White House. That's, you know, courageous, but it's, like, not easy for them to do.' When asked if it was too late for negotiations, he said: 'Nothing is too late.' Mr. Trump had favoured diplomatic route to end Iran's nuclear programme, seeking a deal to replace the one he tore up in his first term in 2018. But since Israel launched strikes on Iran six days ago, Mr. Trump has moved in behind the key U.S. ally and is now weighing whether to use U.S. military power against Tehran too. Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth told lawmakers on Wednesday that the Pentagon was providing possible options to President Trump as he decides next steps on Iran, but would not say whether the military was planning to assist with Israeli strikes. Mr. Hegseth was on Capitol Hill for the last of his series of often combative hearings before lawmakers, who have pressed him on everything from a ban on transgender troops to his use of a Signal chat to share sensitive military plans earlier this year. In questioning before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Mr. Hegseth said 'maximum force protection' was being provided for U.S. troops in West Asia and that it is Mr. Trump's decision whether to provide Israel a 'bunker buster' bomb to strike at the core of Iran's nuclear programme, which would require U.S. pilots flying a B-2 stealth bomber. He would not indicate what the U.S. may do next. (With inputs from AFP, AP)


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is the Trump Mobile really worth the hype? Here's a breakdown
Is the Trump Mobile really worth the hype? Here's a breakdown Team TOI Plus Updated: Jun 18, 2025, 22:01 IST IST The Trump family's latest venture blends politics, business, and branding into one glossy handset. But scratch the surface, and questions about manufacturing, regulation, and credibility quickly pile up What do you get when you mix a political icon, a $499 gold-coloured smartphone, and a mobile plan named after a US President? A product called Trump Mobile — launched with fanfare by Donald Trump Jr and Eric Trump on the anniversary of their father's first presidential run.


Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Iran-Israel war: A lifeline for Netanyahu?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu As Israeli warplanes continue to hammer Iranian targets, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has emerged politically reinvigorated, both domestically and on the world stage. Just days before Israel's offensive began, Netanyahu's coalition government was teetering on collapse over internal tensions, particularly over plans to conscript ultra-Orthodox Jews. Facing mounting criticism for his handling of the prolonged Gaza war and a hostage crisis dating back to Hamas's October 2023 attack, Netanyahu's leadership seemed on the brink. Now, with the war against Iran reshaping Israel's political mood, Netanyahu's approval ratings are rebounding. A new poll published by a conservative Israeli broadcaster shows 54% of respondents support the prime minister, up significantly from earlier weeks. 'Netanyahu is greatly strengthened,' said Yonatan Freeman, a geopolitics expert at Hebrew University. 'There's broad public support for his argument that striking Iran preemptively was necessary.' Even opposition leader Yair Lapid backed the decision, calling the strike 'the right one' in a Jerusalem Post op-ed. For Netanyahu, who has long warned of Iran's nuclear ambitions, this war appears to be a defining moment. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like When Knee Pain Hits, Start Eating These Foods, and Feel Your Pain Go Away (It's Genius) Read More Undo 'Israel is fighting for its survival and has a chance to reshape the Middle East,' he said before the strikes began. The Israeli leader's international standing, badly damaged by the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and an ICC arrest warrant for alleged war crimes, has seen a shift. Since the Iran offensive began, European leaders have rallied behind him. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz even said Israel was doing 'the dirty work… for all of us.' Yet analysts warn the support may be fleeting. 'If the war drags on, public sentiment could turn again,' said Denis Charbit of Israel's Open University. 'Netanyahu is asserting his Churchillian image, but the final act is still unwritten.'