
Russia tried to bury these war crimes — this play dares to expose them
The murderous Macbeth gets his comeuppance in the end. Medea kills her own children — tragic for them, catharsis for us. But can a play help to hold real evil accountable?
Take Russia's war crimes against Ukraine. This year the US administration abolished the Russian war crimes investigations unit at the State Department, a serious blow to the pursuit of justice. If there's one reason to value Anastasiia Kosodii and Josephine Burton's new documentary play, The Reckoning, based on war crimes testimonies in Ukraine, it's as a particularly moving way to keep Russia's crimes in the public mind. But this play is so much more than that.
Since the start of Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine I have been working with a team of journalists and lawyers to catalogue, publicise and build legal cases of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Ukraine. Our aim is to combine the power of law and media to achieve justice much quicker than usually happens in wars. When you think about Nuremberg, the justice process for the Yugoslav wars or Rwanda, the accountability came long after the war finished. We want to start now. We call ourselves the Reckoning Project, and we have provided Kosodii and Burton with the materials for their play, which is running at the Arcola Theatre in Dalston, east London.
The first phase of our work is built on the careful, often agonisingly detailed collection of witness testimonies by a specially trained team of Ukrainian reporters on the ground. We have collected more than 600 testimonies so far, cataloguing torture; sexual crimes; the bombardment of hospitals, schools and apartment blocks; deportations; the mass abduction of children; enforced disappearances; enforced indoctrination; and extrajudicial executions.
This collection already marks a sea change. War testimonies are usually collected well after the crimes have been committed, and it is so difficult to reconstruct the truth years later. Janine di Giovanni, the Reckoning's chief executive, is a former war reporter for The Times and an international justice expert who has covered three genocides, starting from the wars in Yugoslavia, and frequently found that though she had been first on the scene of crimes, the way she recorded and preserved evidence made it inadmissible in court. Our first aim at the Reckoning Project is to make sure that journalists who come to a crime scene collect evidence that will be admissible, and will thus hasten justice.
After the testimonies have been collected, they are analysed by lawyers and archivists in Berlin and London. They map the gruesome patterns, the repeat violations that show what we are witnessing are not one-off incidents but part of a larger Russian strategy. The lawyers build cases in courts of law, provide evidence to the Hague, create submissions to the United Nations and other international treaty bodies. Our journalists, meanwhile, create stories based on the archive. By putting journalists and lawyers together we expand the scope of justice to include both courts of law and the court of public opinion. We want to make the vague words about 'truth and justice' holding the powerful accountable tangible and impactful.
When we first shared testimonies with Kosodii and Burton, I wondered how they would bring them to life. The testimonies are very detailed, but they show little emotion. The central testimony the play focuses on is about a janitor at a country house in the Kyiv region, near Bucha, who was looking after an estate when the Russian occupiers arrived. In the 70-odd pages of testimony the facts drip out slowly, each detail more harrowing than the last. The occupiers took over the house the janitor was looking after, then used it as a shooting range to murder civilians fleeing the advancing Russian forces by car. A whole column of cars was shot up. The janitor was tied up, then released, and left alone wandering the cemetery of bullet-shredded cars and corpses.
• How can drama portray Russia?
As the dramatists explained to me, the emotion in the testimony is less in any explicit language the janitor uses than in the way he speaks with the Reckoning reporter taking the testimony. Their conversation lasted on and off for many months. The janitor first didn't fully trust the reporter, then slowly opened up. The pivotal moment came when he told her about how he had tried to save a man hiding from the remaining Russian soldiers in another house. The man had refused his help, was caught and killed. The sense of guilt for not doing more to help the victim was weighing the janitor down. When he could finally talk it through, he opened up. At the same time the reporter has a reckoning of her own, for the first time coming to terms with her feelings of remorse for how she struggled to get her mother out of an occupied town when she was somewhere safe.
So this is a story, and a drama, about how human connection, trust and empathy are essential for the truth to emerge. Part of the aim of Putin's invasion is to make the people of Ukraine so terrified that they will be too scared and ashamed to tell the horrifying truth of what they have been part of. What is striking in The Reckoning is how both the janitor and the reporter blame themselves for not moving faster to save other victims, as if their suffering is somehow the janitor's or the reporter's fault.
Battling the sense of misplaced shame and repressed memory is all too common in other contexts — not least the Holocaust, which so many survivors were unwilling to talk about. And it has taken nearly a century for Ukraine to find a public expression — in the form of books, musicals, monuments and exhibits — for the many millions murdered by the Stalin regime to suppress Ukrainian independence.
And in that sense this play is part of a greater journey to justice, where the traumas of the war are processed so that society can come to terms with, or at least to common grief for, what has been done to them — and name the guilty.
The Reckoning is at the Arcola Theatre, London, to Jun 28,
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
10 minutes ago
- BBC News
Saracens discuss Farrell return with Racing
Saracens have held talks with Racing 92 about a possible return for former club captain Owen Farrell, Sarries director of rugby Mark McCall England skipper Farrell moved to the French club last summer, having spent his career to that point in north London."I think there are some discussions with Racing as to whether or not they would release him from his contract," McCall told TNT Sports after his side's final day win over are looking to recruit cover with Alex Lozowski set to be out long term due to an Achilles injury suffered at the end of club ended an inconsistent season sixth in the Premiership with their 36-26 victory over an under-strength Bath side at StoneX Stadium on was just the third time Saracens have finished outside the top four since who has 112 England caps and has represented his country in three World Cups, was one of a number of senior players to depart the club last year including Mako and Billy Vunipola. 'He can only join our list if they let him go' Farrell made 256 appearances in a trophy-laden career in north London, winning six Premiership titles and three European Champions Cups - including the double in 2015-16 and last match for the club was a 22-20 defeat to eventual champions Northampton Saints in last season's has made 17 appearances for Racing this season as he has dealt with injuries and form."When Alex [Lozowski] got his injury up at Leicester, you are allowed to bring in an injury dispensation for that player because he's [going to be] out for such a long time," McCall said."We need to bring someone in in his position and someone who we can afford in this position, who's going to get a smaller salary than that player."We compile a list and as far as I know Owen's contracted to Racing, so he can only join that list if they are prepared to let him go."


The Sun
12 minutes ago
- The Sun
Derek Chisora considers wading into the political ring with a run at London Mayor for Reform UK
DEREK Chisora is eyeing up his toughest fight yet - to become a Reform UK mayor. The British heavyweight is being urged by pals to run to be London Mayor. 2 The boxing star, 41, is close pals with Nigel Farage and campaigned for Brexit. Friends reckon he could floor Labour in the capital. If he entered the fray for City Hall, he would be the second boxer to stand for Reform. Olympic medalist Luke Campbell was elected Mayor of Hull and East Yorkshire earlier this year. A source close to Chisora told The Sun on Sunday: 'Derek has been a loyal supporter of Nigel for years and they are known to attend social events together. Nigel is always ringside at his fights. 'Friends of Derek are urging him to ' do a Luke' and take on Labour at the next London election. 'He has real personality and stands a good chance of winning if the Reform surge continues.' Chisora is just one bout short of his 50th fight - and then is expected to hang up his boxing gloves. He has previously spoken of his friendship with Nigel Farage, saying: 'I don't know anything about politics, but I think we have to put British people first. "I became friends with Nigel and Nick Candy and campaigned for Brexit.' But Chisora faces a battle to be picked by Reform to be their candidate for London Mayor. 2 Fellow Reform backer Celebrity SAS hardman Ant Middleton has said he wants the job. Sadiq Khan is expected to step down as Labour London Mayor before the next election in 2028.


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Rebekah Vardy finally agrees to pay Coleen Rooney huge seven-figure sum after losing Wagatha Christie courtroom showdown
Rebekah Vardy will pay Coleen Rooney a huge seven-figure sum after she lost their epic Wagatha Christie courtroom showdown. The WAG, 42, agreed to pay £1,190,000 of Mrs Rooney's legal bill, plus was ordered to pay a further £212,266 in assessment courts, after sensationally losing their high-profile libel case. This takes the total Mrs Vardy must pay to at least £1,402,266.20. Mrs Rooney ran up a legal bill of more than £1.8 million while successfully defending herself against Mrs Vardy's High Court claim in 2022. After losing their High Court showdown, Mrs Vardy was ordered to pay 90 percent of Mrs Rooney's legal costs. In written submissions to a specialist costs court hearing on Tuesday, Mrs Vardy's barrister, Juliet Wells, said Mrs Rooney's total legal bill of £1,833,906.89 'has now been settled at £1,190,000, being [approximately] £1,125,000 plus interest of [approximately] £65,000'. The court heard that while Mrs Rooney was also asking for a further £315,000 in 'assessment costs', Costs Judge Mark Whalan ordered Mrs Vardy to pay £212,266.20 of Mrs Rooney's assessment costs, inclusive of VAT but before interest, on top of the £1.19 million settlement. Mrs Rooney must also pay Mrs Vardy a total of £135,097.50 in costs under the terms of court orders from 2024, which will be set off against what Mrs Vardy must pay. While Mrs Wells previously called for the 'grossly disproportionate' assessment costs to be capped at 'no more than £100,000', Judge Whalan said the amount awarded was 'reasonable and proportionate'. He added that while there had been 'extraordinary expenditure of costs' on both sides, he was 'generally happy' the outcome was 'commercially satisfactory conclusion' for the pair. 'I do mean it when I say that I hope that this is the end of a long and unhappy road,' he added. Rebekah, 42, was ordered to pay 90 percent of Coleen's (pictured) legal bills after she sensationally lost the libel case which accused her of leaking stories about Wayne Rooney 's wife to the press Mrs Vardy's lawyer previously argued Mrs Rooney's team had used a 'kitchen sink' approach when calculating the total and included 'over £120,000 of costs to which Mrs Rooney has no entitlement'. It was also claimed the bill included costs for one of the WAG's team to stay at Nobu - a five star luxury hotel - and 'substantial dinner and drinks charges as well as mini bar charges'. The lawyer said Coleen's £1,833,906.89 legal bill was over three times her 'agreed costs budget of £540,779.07'. But Coleen's lawyer, Robin Dunne, had argued it was 'frankly outrageous' to accuse them of dishonesty. Mrs Vardy unsuccessfully sued the I'm A Celeb star in the High Court in 2022 after she was publicly accused of leaking stories about her to the press. The catalyst for the famous Wagatha Christie case was a dramatic open letter written by Mrs Rooney and posted on social media in October 2019 in which she revealed she had turned detective to figure out who had been leaking the stories to the press. Mrs Rooney publicly claimed Mrs Vardy's account was the source behind three newspaper stories featuring fake details she had posted on her private Instagram profile - her travelling to Mexico for a 'gender selection' procedure, her planning to return to TV and the basement flooding at her home. Penning that she had a 'suspicion' of who it could be, Mrs Rooney told her millions of followers that 'to try and prove this' she 'came up with an idea'. 'I blocked everyone from viewing my Instagram stories except ONE account,' she wrote. The post that started it all: Mrs Rooney accused Mrs Vardy's social media account of leaking stories For the next five months, she uploaded 'a series of false stories' to see if 'they made their way' into the press. 'And you know what, they did!' she penned 'The story about gender selection in Mexico, the story about returning to TV and then the latest story about the basement flooding in my new house.' She continued to build suspense, writing: 'It's been tough keeping it to myself and not making any comment at all, especially when the stories have been leaked, however I had to. Now I know for certain which account/individual it's come from. 'I have saved and screenshotted all the original stories which clearly show just one person had viewed them.' And then, she delivered her final iconic line: 'It's.......... Rebekah Vardy's account.' What followed was a tearful appearance from Rebekah on ITV's Loose Women in February 2020 in which claimed the stress over the dispute had caused her to have anxiety attacks so severe she 'ended up in hospital three times'. The emotional display was met by Coleen with a statement to say she did not want to 'engage in further public debate' on the matter. Four months later, in June 2020, Rebekah began legal proceedings against Coleen for libel with her lawyers alleging she had 'suffered extreme distress, hurt, anxiety and embarrassment as a result of the publication of the post and the events which followed'. At the first preliminary hearing in London's High Court in November the same year, Mr Justice Warby ruled that Coleen's famous letter 'clearly identified' Rebekah as being 'guilty of the serious and consistent breach of trust'. He concluded the 'natural and ordinary' meaning of the posts was that Rebekah had 'regularly and frequently abused her status as a trusted follower of Mrs Rooney's personal Instagram account' by secretly informing the press of Coleen's 'private posts and stories'. When the case returned to the courts in February 2022, a series of explosive messages between Rebekah and her agent Caroline Watt were revealed with Coleen's lawyers alleging they were about her. Rebekah denied that one message calling someone a 'nasty b****' was in reference to Coleen. When asked by defence lawyers to present Ms Watt's phone so they could further investigate the WhatsApp messages, they were told it had fallen into the North Sea when Ms Watt was on a boat during a holiday. Coleen was denied permission to bring a High Court claim against Ms Watt for misuse of private information to be heard alongside the libel battle as it was brought too late. Ms Watt was then dubbed not fit to give oral evidence, revoked permission for her witness statement to be used and withdrew her waiver which would have allowed journalists to say whether she was a source of the leaked stories. Coleen's barrister then told the High Court Rebekah 'appears to accept' her agent was the source of the leaked stories and argued her new statement suggested this but Rebekah claimed she 'did not authorise or condone her'. In May 2022, the women finally came face-to-face in court to give evidence as the Wagatha Christie trial began in the Royal Courts of Justice in London. Coleen secured her victory the next month when Mrs Justice Steyn delivered her verdict, dismissing the claim made by Rebekah and finding Coleen had proved the meaning of her famous accusatory letter was 'substantially true'. Whilst Coleen said she was 'pleased' the judge had ruled in her favour, Rebekah declared she was 'extremely sad and disappointed' at the decision. MailOnline has reached out to representatives for Rebekah Vardy and Coleen Rooney for comment.