First small boat migrants are detained for removal to France under new 'one-in, one-out' scheme after arriving in Dover yesterday
The Home Office confirmed Channel arrivals were held after they were brought into Dover yesterday.
It did not disclose how many migrants had been held.
But the detentions come amid huge concerns that human rights challenges and other legal actions could delay migrants being sent back for months, as well as scepticism over the narrow scope of the scheme.
Migrants selected for removal will be held in Home Office detention facilities rather than being sent to live in taxpayer-funded asylum hotels.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil [at Dover port] and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.
'That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.
'No-one should be making this illegal and dangerous journey that undermines our border security and lines the pockets of the criminal gangs.'
She added: 'Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make.
'These are the early days for this pilot scheme, and it will develop over time.
'But we are on track to do what no other government has done since this crisis first started - sending small boat arrivals back to France and strengthening our borders through the Plan for Change.'
As part of the treaty Britain will accept migrants from France in exchange for small boat arrivals.
That element of the scheme also began today, allowing migrants to lodge 'expressions of interest' on a specially-created Home Office website.
It comes after a Cabinet minister appeared to contradict the terms of the new treaty with France yesterday.
Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy said small boat migrants sent back under the deal would see their human rights claims heard after being sent back to France.
However, it later emerged that some types of human rights cases would, in fact, block the Home Office from being able to remove migrants in the first place.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper confirmed the first group of migrants had been detained
The treaty clearly sets out how small boat migrants cannot be sent back to France if they have 'an outstanding human rights claim '.
The Home Office confirmed some human rights claims will block migrants' removal until they have been concluded in full.
It will include cases which cannot be formally 'certified' by officials as 'clearly unfounded'.
The Mail has learned pro-migrant groups have begun informal discussions about launching a joint legal action against Labour's plan – just as they did against the Tories' Rwanda asylum scheme.
Sources said there had already been 'a certain amount of co-ordination' between charities and other groups, with details of the treaty still being analysed.
Meanwhile, the Free Movement website, which offers advice to immigration lawyers, yesterday published an analysis of the new measures which said: 'Legal challenges will be more difficult than for Rwanda, however there are still likely to be grounds on which some people can resist removal to France.
'For example, if the inadmissibility decision was wrong, if people have family in the UK, or had experiences in France which make it inappropriate to send them back.'
It means the Home Secretary is likely to face a huge legal battle to get the first migrants removed from Britain.
Last month Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer pledged migrants would be 'detained and returned to France in short order' under the agreement.
But yesterday – the first day it was in force – Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp posted videos from the Channel as he watched migrant boats bound for the UK coast, escorted by a French vessel.
He said it showed the Anglo-French deal was a failure, adding that occupants of the boats were 'coming to a hotel near you soon'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Labour accused of hypocrisy after raising age of party officials to 18
Labour has been accused of hypocrisy after voting to stop 16 and 17-year-olds standing in some party elections. This week, the party's ruling body voted to raise the age at which party members could stand for key roles to 18, despite Sir Keir Starmer vowing to lower the voting age in general elections to 16. The Prime Minister and Angela Rayner, the Deputy Prime Minister, were both present at the party's National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting when the vote was passed. Ellie Reeves, Labour chairman, and Shabana Mahmood, the Justice Secretary, also attended the meeting. The rule will require chairmen, vice-chairs, secretaries and treasurers of local Labour parties to be aged at least 18. The motion was carried overwhelmingly by 26 to 5 votes. Ann Black, one of the NEC members present, said she had voted in favour of the motion because of the 'significant legal responsibilities' attached to the roles in question. The Tories accused Labour of hypocrisy following the move, which they said appeared to run counter to its commitment to expand the franchise to younger voters. A Conservative party spokesman said: 'As always with Labour it's one rule for them and another for everyone else. 'If they don't think 16-year-olds are old enough to vote, then why are they forcing it on the rest of the country?' Sir Keir did not address the issue of votes at 16 when he spoke at the meeting. He instead spoke of the need to support the proscription of Palestine Action, claiming that the group had been responsible for the targeting of Jewish-owned businesses. He claimed the proscription was not stifling debate. The NEC is made up of representatives from different parts of Labour and is intended to provide strategic direction to the party. It meets regularly to discuss the Government's progress and rule on administrative issues. Early this year, the party stopped sharing regular updates on Labour membership figures with the NEC. One NEC member told The Telegraph that the party leadership stopped sharing the data with the NEC because they were under no obligation to do so and that they did not want the information to be leaked. Labour continues to share annual updates on its membership figures with the Electoral Commission, unlike some other parties. Its membership has been falling for a number of years since its peak of 564,000 under Jeremy Corbyn in 2017. The latest available figure, from February of this year, showed that the party had 309,000 members. Nigel Farage's Reform party has said its aim is to surpass the figure and thus become the largest political party in Britain. Mr Corbyn hopes that his new party will syphon off hundreds of thousands of current and former Labour members who are disaffected with Sir Keir's leadership. The former leader's new movement, with the placeholder name Your Party, already claims to have garnered 700,000 email registrations from members of the public expressing interest in joining.
Telegraph
15 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Protesters presented themselves as peaceniks, but ugliness lurked below the surface
As Moazzam Begg sat on a wall in Parliament Square, holding a yellow rose and a white sign reading 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' in neat black lettering, you could be forgiven for thinking this was a spontaneous moment of quiet defiance. But in fact, the arrest of the former Guantanamo Bay detainee on Saturday was the culmination of days of careful planning meant to send a message – that protesters were able to overwhelm the police as they sought to challenge the Government's decision to brand Palestine Action a terror organisation. With 365 arrests and counting as the protest wound up, it was not clear that Mr Begg's side had succeeded in that aim. Mr Begg remained silent during his arrest. But comments from others in the crowd shattered the apparent dignity of the moment and revealed a deep hostility towards the police and the state of Israel. As police led Mr Begg into a waiting van, one protester shouted: 'Pigs! Get your hands off Moazzam! Get your hands off Moazzam, you f------ pigs!' Another protester, a wheelchair-using pensioner who travelled from Reading to display a sign reading 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action' at the demonstration, told The Telegraph he was 'sure' the Government had been 'paid by the Israeli embassy' to proscribe the group. There is no evidence to support this claim. The 77-year-old man, who gave his name only as Frank, said he hoped the protest would help get Palestine Action de-proscribed. 'My aim is to show that when the law is a complete ass, you need to do something to resist it. And proscribing Palestine Action is one of the stupidest actions the Government has ever taken.' He also admitted to feeling uneasy at the prospect of being arrested. 'I've never been arrested before, I'm quite terrified to be honest. But we have to stand up to genocide, oppression, and taking away our freedom of assembly, our freedom of speech,' he said. Saturday's Palestine Action demonstration had been staged to appear organic, as if hundreds had simply converged opposite Parliament at 1pm, each with a handmade sign declaring support for the banned group. In reality, as The Telegraph has previously revealed, the event was anything but spontaneous. At a meeting in Birmingham last week, groups including Cage International and Defend Our Juries planned the protest, with Mr Begg urging the Muslim community to join in the act of defiance. 'Those from the Muslim community, we have a massive presence in this city, and we must engage our leaders, our imams, our habibs, those in positions of power, to join, there is strength in numbers, stop being a coward, cowards never win battles,' he said. The first of two pro-Palestine demonstrations in London on Saturday began around 11am, with activists co-ordinated by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Stop the War assembling at Russell Square. Protesters on this march, which set off at midday for Downing Street, appeared less eager to risk arrest under terrorism laws. While some chanted 'Intifada! Intifada, long live intifada', there were no visible signs explicitly backing Palestine Action. In the Russell Square station lift, a group of demonstrators discussed the risks of declaring support for the newly proscribed group. 'Hopefully I won't be arrested – because I've got a sign that says, 'I support Palestine Action',' one told a friend. 'But there's a twist to it though, it's got a full stop in it.' He remarked that an arrest would spoil his evening, as he planned to attend a poetry reading in support of the Palestinian cause at 7pm. For many activists participating in Saturday's demonstration, the idea of expressing support for a proscribed terror group was a new departure. But this was not universally true. Outside Russell Square Tube station, Majid Novsarka, also known as Majid Freeman, told The Telegraph he had already been charged under the Terrorism Act last year, not for supporting Palestine Action, but for allegedly supporting Hamas. Mr Novsarka, who denies all wrongdoing, said: 'I would never support a proscribed group.' 'I support the international law that every people have the right to armed resistance, especially if there's no one coming to the rescue and saving the day,' he added. Mr Novsarka said he was unable to attend the second demonstration that day, over in Parliament Square, a restriction he clearly resented, describing the Russell Square demonstration as 'dead' and 'boring'. 'The real place you want to be is Parliament Square. The only reason I am not there is because of my bail conditions. My solicitor said: 'Stay away!'' he said. Over in Parliament Square, it quickly became apparent that this was a pro-Palestine protest unlike any London has witnessed before. At about 12.30pm, supporters of the banned group began to reveal their signs. Officers moved in almost immediately, for one of the largest mass arrests for decades. The first arrest was William Hancock, from Kingston upon Thames. Asked why he thought he was being arrested, Mr Hancock initially replied: 'I don't know. I think it's a bit odd.' He then explained that he had held up a sign supporting Palestine Action. 'It's because I oppose genocide in Palestine,' he said. Under the blazing midday sun, the scale of the challenge facing police became clear, with between 500 to 600 protesters gathered on the grass opposite Parliament, many holding up near-identical white posters reading: 'I oppose genocide, I support Palestine Action.' The Metropolitan Police – their numbers boosted by officers shipped in from forces across the country – began arresting supporters of the proscribed group one by one. For the first dozen detentions, officers searched each protester's belongings and sealed them in plastic bags. As the afternoon wore on, this step was abandoned, with police cordoning off the main group of protesters in the middle of Parliament Square before a team of officers moved in as a unit to seize their target, often carrying them to the van as they went limp in resistance. One young man in a blue T-shirt and brown trousers went rigid as officers counted 'three, two, one' before hoisting him into the air. The Palestine Action supporter then raised aloft his sign in support of the proscribed group as he was carried off. Each arrest drew applause and cheers from fellow demonstrators, who shouted: 'Thank you for your courage! We applaud your bravery.' At the same time, they booed and jeered the police, calling 'shame!' and 'what will you tell your kids you got up to at work today?' and telling officers they were 'on the wrong side of history'. Undeterred, police pressed on, detaining at least 365 people by late afternoon. As vans carrying Palestine Action supporters pulled away, those left behind applauded. It was meant to be a demonstration of victory in the campaign to get Palestine Action de-proscribed. But police will be hoping that instead, their arrests deal a hammer blow to support for the group.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Far-right and anti-asylum protesters gather in Nuneaton
Far-right protesters clashed with police on Saturday after hundreds of people gathered outside the town hall in Nuneaton, Warwickshire, for a planned protest. The event was organised in response to two men, reportedly Afghan asylum seekers, who were charged over the alleged rape of a 12-year-old girl in the town
