
I'm a liberal snowflake but I'd fight for Britain in a heartbeat
As Keir Starmer unveiled plans today for an increase in defence spending in the UK, he argues the best way to deter aggression is with a trained Reserve ready to fight.
As a self-confessed bleeding heart liberal, I think the Prime Minister is right.
Believing that doesn't make me a warmonger; it makes me one of the first who'd pick up arms.
By every measure, I'm a left-wing stereotype: A metropolitan, millennial, liberal, pro‑European, anti‑Trump, anti-gun, anti-war, Ukraine‑defending, 'woke', DEI‑supporting, internationalist, vegetarian who chooses cycling over driving every time.
And yet, if my country was threatened tomorrow, I would not hesitate to fight for her.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
This confession – shared with only a handful of people (until now!) – tends to short‑circuit any conversation.
Progressives hear it and immediately summon images of chest‑beating nationalism or indefensible wars waged in our name.
That reflex, while not without historical foundation, exposes a blind spot.
It confuses the abuse of force with the existence of force, and it ignores a hard truth: Our generation has outsourced the defence of democracy to 'someone else'.
And with Keir Starmer talking of a 'unity of purpose' with his defence plans,but a 2024 YouGov poll revealed only 6% of Britons would volunteer if another world war erupted.
A shocking 36% of 18- to 24-year-olds and 33% of 25- to 49-year-olds said they'd still refuse even if called up.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sign up here.
You only have to cross a few borders to see our brave Ukrainian neighbours – people our age and younger in battle against an invader.
Their struggle is daily, physical and unimaginably costly – all for the fundamental right to exist.
Yes, they rely on conscription as well as volunteers, but their bravery reminds us that the liberties we champion and upon which our country is founded – free speech, human rights, the rule of law – survive only when citizens are prepared to guard them with something heavier than a hashtag.
In the UK, we need to step up, like our grandparents did in two bloody World Wars.
And so, much to the literal open-mouthed silence of a close friend and the stunned horror of my partner, I confessed I recently contacted both a British Army and Navy Reserve unit.
Truthfully, my skills would likely be better used elsewhere, and I'm hardly front‑line‑fit.
But if just 10% of British adults under 35 joined the Reserves – that's roughly 1.3 million people – the mere act would stiffen deterrence, signal unity with allies and, crucially, send a warning shot to the Putins of this world.
None of this requires conscription.
What it requires is a cultural reset: Universities that treat Reserve training with the same prestige as Erasmus placements; trade unions that negotiate protected leave for service; progressive politicians who speak of defence with the same urgency they reserve for the NHS.
So yes, I'm a liberal millennial. I recycle obsessively, believe trans rights are human rights and think we should re‑join the EU yesterday.
But I also believe that if darker forces come to our doorstep, the progressive response is not to leave the burden to someone else, but to shoulder it ourselves.
I want all wars to end, but readiness is not warmongering. It is the silent promise that liberty will never be forfeited for lack of volunteers.
Making – and keeping – that promise might be the most radical act my generation ever performs.
And for those who ask, what would we be fighting for?
As someone who left the UK to live in the US, I can tell you that our imperfect little island punches way above its weight.
We stumble now and again – Brexit being a fairly major faux pas – but when push comes to shove, we almost always get it right.
From Kosovo to Ebola relief, I couldn't be prouder of our leadership in stepping up to preserve a liberal global order time and time again.
It came much later than I'd have liked, and of course there is more action needed, but when Israel took things too far in Palestine, we pulled out of trade talks, publicly called for a halt to military operations and demanded the immediate flow of humanitarian aid.
While we should be doing more – including deploying troops – we didn't even blink before picking a side when Putin began an unprovoked, illegal invasion of Ukraine.
And just as Ukrainians refuse to back down despite years of brutal attrition, we haven't flinched and we haven't left their side – not for a single second.
Because that's who we are. We can be a self‑critical nation and still worth defending. More Trending
The United Kingdom today is, at its core, the same proud country that declared war to defend our Polish neighbours in 1939 and opened its arms to Jews fleeing Nazi persecution.
That is our country. Tiny, sure, but damn mighty. Proud. Open. Tolerant. Progressive. Diverse.
Time and again, whether under Labour, Conservative, or Liberal Democrat coalition governments, we have sided with what is right. Sometimes a little late, sometimes a little clunky, but we always get there.
If all that isn't worth fighting for, I don't know what is.
Do you have a story you'd like to share? Get in touch by emailing jess.austin@metro.co.uk.
Share your views in the comments below.
MORE: Like JoJo Siwa, I dated a man after women — we're both still queer
MORE: Inside UK's new £15,000,000,000 nuclear attack submarines to combat 'Russian aggression'
MORE: Ukraine's 'Pearl Harbour' strike on Putin 'may have breached nuclear doctrine'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
14 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Report: Trump plans to save TikTok for a third time
Published: | Updated: President Donald Trump plans to save Tiktok from going dark for a third time. Ahead of a June 19 deadline, the president is expected to sign an executive order staving off enforcement of a law banning the app or forcing its sale, the Wall Street Journal reported. This would be the third extension since Trump took office on January 20th. The extension comes as Trump officials head to London for a Monday meeting with Chinese officials on a trade deal. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, and United States Trade Representative Jamieson Greer will be meeting at the meeting. 'The meeting should go very well. Thank you for your attention to this matter!,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social account. He and Chinese President Xi Jinping spoke on the phone Thursday as both sides try to repair a breakdown in trade negotiations. Earlier this year, the administration had been working on a deal for American investors to take ownership of the popular video app but that deal fell victim to Trump's trade war with China . So, on April 4th, Trump signed an executive order granting a 75-day extension allowing TikTok to operate in the U.S. 'My Administration has been working very hard on a Deal to SAVE TIKTOK, and we have made tremendous progress. The Deal requires more work to ensure all necessary approvals are signed, which is why I am signing an Executive Order to keep TikTok up and running for an additional 75 days,' he announced on Truth Social at the time. Several American companies have expressed interest in having a stake in Tiktok, including Amazon, Wal-Mart, and Oracle. TikTok is one of the most powerful media sources in America today. It has 135.79 million users in America, making it the country with the biggest audience on the map. It also has grown to be one of the largest online shopping marketplaces with millions of dollars in daily sales. Congress passed the TikTok ban in 2024 with overwhelming bipartisan support demanding China lose its control of the popular video service. Lawmakers had national security concerns that an app used by so many Americans was controlled by China and feared the Chinese company that owns, ByteDance, could use it as a way to collect information on Americans. TikTok fought the ban all the way to the Supreme Court, calling it a violation of free speech rights, but the court upheld the law in early 2025. ByteDance didn't agree to terms with any US-based companies and went dark for a few hours on January 19th, the day before President Trump's inauguration. But Trump has fought to keep the social media site operational in the US. After his inauguration, he signed a delay in implementing the ban, then extended it again in April and is preparing for the third extension. Trump sees the app as a way to reach younger voter. He has indicated he'd like to come to a deal. 'We'll probably have to get China's approval. China's never easy,' he said last week. 'I'd like to save TikTok. I mean, TikTok was very good to me.'


Scottish Sun
20 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
What caused Trump & Elon Musk's explosive fallout? – from NASA spat to key role of Don's teen relative, I know the truth
The smart money was always on these two galactic-sized egos falling out HARRY COLE What caused Trump & Elon Musk's explosive fallout? – from NASA spat to key role of Don's teen relative, I know the truth THE richest man in the world going toe-to-toe with the most powerful man on the planet . . . what could possibly go wrong? And has the most outlandish politician in American history finally met his match? Advertisement 7 Elon Musk, left, looks down on Donald Trump during a White House press conference Credit: AP 7 Musk toured the swing states at last year's election telling the world that Trump was the greatest thing since sliced bread Credit: AFP 7 Trump was considering selling his own Tesla, which has spent weeks parked outside the Oval Office Credit: AP From the moment neuro-diverse rocket man Elon Musk backed New York real estate heavy Donald J. Trump to return to the White House, the smart money was on these two galactic-sized egos falling out. I hear it's the galaxy and beyond that has been at the centre of their tensions, but more on that later — as last night Washington was awash with claims Musk's attempts to befriend Kai Trump, the 18-year-old future golf star granddaughter of the President, also played a hefty part in the atomic row. 'Bankrupting America is not OK – kill the bill' But the powerful pair certainly have fallen out, trading public blows on their social media sites of choice — the very tech platforms that have both made them and could yet see them crash to back down to earth. Asked if they could reconcile yesterday, Trump slammed Musk as 'the man who has lost his mind'. Advertisement In the end, the most famous bromance in political history lasted less than a year, and the fallout risks dragging them both down. Musk claims credit for his $300million in donations swinging the election Trump's way, while the White House says that's fake news and the car salesman is sulking because he's not getting much bang for his buck. The pair clashed publicly over Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill' — legislation that he says will deliver a slew of campaign promises like banning taxes on tips for millions of American workers. 7 Trump was tiring of Elon's 'ketamine-fuelled' antics Credit: AFP Advertisement 7 Richest man in the world Musk is going toe-to-toe with the most powerful man on the planet Credit: AFP But Musk — appointed to the administration to cut eye-watering federal expenditure — baulked at the increase in government spending tacked on to the law by Congress, branding it an 'abomination'. He irked Trump by urging senators to vote it down, adding it could be 'big or beautiful but it cannot be both'. Musk raged on social media: 'This spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history! It is the Debt Slavery Bill… Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' Advertisement Trump crushes hopes of 'peace talks' call with Musk as he insists Elon has 'lost his mind' after feud went nuclear It's a long cry from when Musk toured the swing states at last year's election telling the world that Trump was the greatest thing since sliced bread and organising well-oiled get-out-the-vote operations. But behind the scenes I'm told Trump was already at the end of his tether with Musk who some sources accuse of 'gurning away' on the campaign trail and in meetings. Brought in to help slash costs through his Department of Government Efficiency, tensions reached a head after the New York Times ran a well-sourced hit piece accusing Musk of enjoying recreational drugs such as ketamine and ecstasy throughout his brief foray into politics. Those claims were not denied when Musk was confronted by Fox News in an Oval Office press conference last week. Advertisement Musk's coterie of love-children and his stated desire to help repopulate the planet with, what his former lovers have claimed, he calls genius offspring have also rubbed Trump up the wrong way. Teetotal Trump wanted rid of him but also wanted to give his big donor a decent goodbye, so lavished praise on him after he departed as special government employee last week. Yet despite all the niceties, the former allies are locked in a Cold War stand-off this weekend. 7 Devout Trump-backer Steve Bannon called for South African-born Musk to be deported Credit: The Mega Agency Advertisement Will they both retreat to their bunkers and realise mutually assured destruction is in neither of their interests, OR will they be unable to help themselves and launch a thermonuclear blow-out that burns them both up? Musk came close to that on Friday night, with his outlandish allegations that the President was sitting on files about billionaire deceased paedo-financier Jeffrey Epstein — because Trump himself is named as a murky connection. White House sources say that is nonsense and were that bombshell evidence to be sitting in a government file somewhere, surely previous Democrat governments would have leaked it by now. Musk ended his online diatribe with calls for Trump to be impeached, adding a menacing suggestion he could back the Democrats. Advertisement It's a mess, but one that was very obviously cooking Harry Cole Yet even some of his closest allies and supporters were left begging any friend possible to strip Musk of access to his own X platform before he caused any more damage. It's a dangerous game for the mercurial billionaire to play — because the President hit back that he was going to suspend US subsidies and government contracts for the entrepreneurs' many, many firms. Musk's electric car firm Tesla shares were down 14 per cent yesterday — the biggest one-day drop since the company went public, wiping $152billion off its value. And that's before the $3billion personal hit to Musk on the back of an evening of lively tweeting. Advertisement In a further snub, Trump was last night considering selling his own Tesla which has spent weeks parked outside the Oval Office, in a move which could spark a wave of similar fire sales across the US amongst his fans. 'Musk is an illegal alien and should be deported' The Tesla Cybertruck gifted to the President's granddaughter Kai is presumably for the chop too. Meanwhile, the row threatens to spark a wider war between various right-wing camps that run Washington, with implications felt in Congress and across the political spectrum. Devout Trump-backer Steve Bannon called for South African-born Musk to be deported from the US, saying yesterday: 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien and should be deported from the country immediately.' Advertisement 7 Twitter exchanges between the pair Meanwhile, the self-proclaimed autistic automaker said he could launch a new political party — an idea backed by 80 per cent of the millions of respondents to his social media poll yesterday. But this wasn't just a political knife-fight but also a brawl in the casino of capitalism. In short, it's a mess, but one that was very obviously cooking. Musk is a libertarian, free-marketeer who has his sights on the moon and Mars and beyond. Advertisement Trump is the tariff-loving protectionist who believes it's America First and everyone else can fall in line behind that. Prior to SpaceX, they couldn't even transport their own astronauts to the International Space Station and had to rely on outdated Russian rockets Dr Rainer Zitelmann Add to that their tensions on China that Trump sees as an existential threat to the US, while Musk views it as an opportunity to produce his electric cars on the cheap. It's amazing that things took so long to come to a head. And then it came down to space, where Musk obviously has a major financial interest as the boss of SpaceX — the rocket firm hat has all but colonised America's space projects. Advertisement As top economist Dr Rainer Zitelmann puts it: 'Without SpaceX, the US does not currently have much to offer. "Prior to SpaceX, they couldn't even transport their own astronauts to the International Space Station and had to rely on outdated Russian rockets — and paid exorbitant prices to do so. 'SpaceX is responsible for 86 per cent of all US launches.' But things were coming to a head when Trump blocked a Musk ally to take over Nasa last month, infuriating his former 'First Buddy'. Advertisement Moment of maximum danger Insiders say Musk's attempts to take over Nasa were a step too far that left America's future security beholden to a private company run by a wildly unpredictable boss. Sources claimed Musk recently had his high-level security clearances revoked by the White House as tensions mounted, leading to Friday's pyrotechnics. What happens next is a moment of maximum danger for Trump. Brits will be familiar with what happens when a leader and their dangerous right-hand man fall out. Advertisement Boris Johnson found out the hard way that if the snubbed guru bears enough of a grudge, it is fatal. The White House will be hoping this weekend that Elon holds less resentment than equally unstable Dominic Cummings — who spent the year after his No10 ousting doing all he could to unseat and destabilise his former boss. I wonder whether that might be a bit of wishful thinking . . .


The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Trump's new drone orders aim to counter threats while encouraging flying cars and supersonic flights
President Donald Trump wants to counter the threats drones pose to national security under new rules released Friday, while also aiming to make it easier for Americans to fly faster than the speed of sound and expedite the development of the flying cars of the future. The three executive orders will encourage the Federal Aviation Administration to expedite rules to allow companies to use drones beyond their operators' line of sight, while also imposing restrictions meant to help protect against terrorism, espionage and public safety threats. Drones are already used in a variety of ways, including bolstering search and rescue operations, applying fertilizer, inspecting power lines and railroad bridges, and even delivering packages. But the war in Ukraine has highlighted how drones could be used in a military or terrorist attack — a concern as the World Cup and Olympics approach in the U.S. There also have been espionage cases where drones have been used to surveil sensitive sites. And White House officials said drones are being used to smuggle drugs over the border, and there are concerns about the potential for a disastrous collision between a drone and an airliner around an airport. 'These orders also address the growing threat of criminal, terrorist and foreign misuse of drones in U.S. airspace. We have a responsibility to protect and restore airspace sovereignty,' said Michael Kratsios, assistant to the president and director of the White House office of Science and Technology Policy. Moving to protect the U.S. from the increasing threat of drones With major events like the World Cup scheduled in the U.S. next year, Sebastian Gorka, senior director for counterterrorism on the National Security Council, said it's crucial to protect the airspace above large public events. A federal task force will be created to review drone threats and existing terrorism task forces will look at drones. 'Drones are a disruptive technology. They have an amazing potential for both good and ill,' Gorka said. 'We will increase the enforcement of current laws to deter two types of individuals: evildoers and idiots — the clueless and the careless.' The orders direct the FAA to expedite a new rule restricting drone flights over sensitive sites and work with the Departments of Justice and Homeland Security to better enforce laws on illegal drone use. The FAA has been testing systems to detect and counter drones that the White House would like to expand to deal with threats to public safety and national security. Among the methods being examined: Using radio signals to jam drones or force them to land. Authorities are weighing whether to deploy high-powered microwaves or laser beams to disable the devices. The order will allow state and local authorities to be trained to respond to unauthorized drones and expand the government's ability to counter them. Law enforcement agencies also may receive additional training on how to use drones themselves to ensure safety around major events. Trump aims to clear the way for supersonic flights and flying cars One of Trump's orders directs the FAA to eliminate the old restriction on the speed of flights and replace it with a noise standard. New technology in supersonic aircraft can allow the planes to fly faster than the speed of sound without a disruptive sonic boom being heard on the ground, but decades-old regulations still ban those flights over land. A plane developed by Boom Supersonic became the first independently funded jet to break the sound barrier this year. 'The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' Kratsios said. 'Advances in aerospace engineering, material science and noise reduction now make overland supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable and commercially viable.' Several companies are developing flying cars for use as taxis and delivering cargo. They are likely still at least a couple years away from being ready, but orders are designed to remove regulatory barriers to their development. 'Flying cars are not just for 'The Jetsons.'' 'They're also for the American people,' Kratsios said. Blake Scholl, founder and CEO of Boom Supersonic, said a renaissance in supersonic passenger travel is made inevitable with the repeal of the ban. 'We're grateful to President Trump for his leadership — this important step allows us to accelerate development of our Overture supersonic airliner,' Scholl said. Concerns grow in the U.S. about Chinese drones The executive orders don't ban Chinese-made drones, including those by DJI that are popular in the U.S., but the Trump administration said it will prioritize American-made drones in federal procurement programs and open up grants to help state and local first responders buy U.S. drones. The White House said it would seek to reduce the U.S. reliance on foreign-made drones and restrict foreign devices in sensitive areas. 'This executive order marks a long-overdue investment in drone deterrence,' said Craig Singleton, a senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. 'Drone warfare isn't a future threat — it's already here.' The administration also is mandating national security reviews of some Chinese drone makers. That 'underscores that drone supply chains ... are now national security flashpoints,' Singleton said. The orders also tighten rules on wireless transmission tech, which Singleton said would disrupt the ability by Chinese drones to transmit data back to Beijing. States and the federal government are increasingly wary about Chinese technology, and at least six states have passed laws to restrict government purchases of Chinese drones because of concerns about spying. That's part of a slew of more than 240 anti-China measures state legislatures have considered this year. Congress has also banned federal agencies from acquiring Chinese drones, with some exceptions. But most commercial drones sold in the United States are made in China, and many Americans have come to rely on them. The Chinese models are widely known for their high performance and are generally significantly cheaper than American-made drones. Expanding the range of drones outside users' field of vision The FAA has generally prohibited drones from operating outside operators' line of sight because of safety concerns, but the agency has granted hundreds of waivers to Amazon and some other companies, including utilities and railroads, to use drones farther away. Drone manufacturers and users have long wanted rules that spell out the framework for such flights because they see that as a natural next step to unlock the technology's potential. The head of the trade advocacy group Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, or AUVSI, testified to Congress this week that the FAA missed a deadline for approving such rules last year. On Friday, Michael Robbins, chief executive officer of AUVSI, applauded the Trump administration for advancing policies that he said would ensure U.S. leadership in drone innovation, security, operation and manufacturing. He called it 'a historic day for the drone industry in the United States.' ___