King Charles lands in Canada in first visit since Coronation amid Trump's call for nation to become 51st US state
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
KING Charles yesterday took his initial steps on a 'diplomatic tightrope' on his first trip to Canada since his crowning.
Charles — also the giant nation's monarch — and Queen Camilla landed in Ottawa, where the couple were saluted by the military and given a Guard of Honour.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
7
King Charles took his first trip to Canada since his crowning
Credit: EPA
7
Charles and Queen Camilla were saluted by the military and given a Guard of Honour
Credit: AP
7
Charles and Camilla were also greeted by an indigenous tribe elder
Credit: PA
Their trip, on which Charles will be the first monarch to open the country's Parliament since 1957, follows Donald Trump's call for Canada to become the US's 51st state.
Experts hailed the packed two-day trip as a 'clever' move designed to signal to the US President that Britain stands by its Commonwealth ally.
Charles, 76, has praised the realm since its dispute with Mr Trump, 78, but has also invited the US leader for a second State visit.
Royal commentator Ingrid Seward said: 'This is a diplomatic challenge for Charles. He takes his obligations as King of Canada and Head of the Commonwealth very seriously.
'He is walking a tightrope, but he has so far found the right words and actions to navigate it. I think he will stay away from saying anything inflammatory, but he will handle whatever is thrown at him.'
Charles and Camilla, who were also greeted by an indigenous tribe elder, were taken from the airport to meet locals at a party on the city's Lansdowne Park.
Some made trips of up to eight hours to get there.
Charles dropped a puck to start a street hockey game as royal fans waved Canadian and Union flags and cheered 'God save the King'.
The royals also participated in a tree planting at Government House.
King Charles is Canada's secret weapon against Trump - his visit will be complex & fraught
Charles, still having cancer treatment, will give a speech today in English and French, Canada's official languages, as he opens parliament.
Dr Dexter Govan, director of research for the Constitution Society, said it is 'certainly no coincidence' that Charles is doing so.
He said: 'The King must balance his role as Head of State of both the UK and Canada, while also refraining from commenting directly on politics.
'When President Trump suggests Canada should become the 51st state, that becomes even more challenging. By opening Parliament, the King's continuing a long constitutional tradition where a monarch uses a symbolic gesture to make their point.'
He takes his obligations as King of Canada and Head of the Commonwealth very seriously
Royal commentator Ingrid Seward
Prof Damien Claude Bélanger, expert in Canadian-US relations, added: 'The visit is designed to show that Canada has close, intimate ties, with one of the world's great powers, and that we're not alone in the face of the US or American power.'
Prof Robert Hazell, expert in Government and the Constitution at University College London, said: 'Undoubtedly King Charles's visit has political significance.
'The Canadians are a proud, independent nation, and they're anxious to stress their difference from the United States. And one important difference — of which they've long been proud — is that they are a monarchy, not a republic.'
7
'He takes his obligations as King of Canada and Head of the Commonwealth very seriously', say Royal experts
Credit: PA
7
Charles greets school children as he arrives in Ottawa
Credit: AP
7
Experts hailed the packed two-day trip as a 'clever' move designed to signal to the US President that Britain stands by its Commonwealth ally
Credit: Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
28 minutes ago
- The National
Farage's proposal is just the latest undermining of the Barnett system
This, according to senior criminologists and ex-police officers, is not just a failure of admin, it's the result of austerity-era cuts that stripped police forces of capacity, dismantled the state-run Forensic Science Service in 2012, and left fragmented, underfunded systems to cope with ballooning evidence demands. Austerity didn't just weaken institutions; it disassembled infrastructure. READ MORE: Nigel Farage could cut the Barnett Formula. Here's what devolution experts think of that While these failings may seem like an English and Welsh concern, they tell a broader UK-wide story. Because when public services are cut in England, the Barnett formula translates those cuts into reduced budget allocations for Holyrood, too. Scotland has long borne the dual burden of being denied full fiscal autonomy while also seeing its devolved budget squeezed by decisions made for entirely different priorities south of the Border. Cuts to police, criminal courts, housing, public health, and local government in England have systematically eroded the spending floor on which Scottish services rest. So when justice collapses in England, it affects Scotland financially – even if the governance is separate. And now, against this backdrop of UK-wide budgetary degradation, Nigel Farage has called for the scrapping of the Barnett formula entirely. It's a move that's politically convenient, historically illiterate, and economically reckless. But more than anything, it's a distillation of what's already happening by stealth. Successive UK governments have undermined the foundations of the Barnett system – and devolution itself – for more than a decade. READ MORE: Furious Anas Sarwar clashes with BBC journalist over Labour policies It's obvious to every Scot that Farage's view relies on a mischaracterisation of Barnett as a subsidy, when in fact it simply ensures Scotland receives a proportional share of changes to spending in England for devolved services. It doesn't calculate entitlement or need, it mirrors policy shifts at Westminster. If England increases education or health spending, Scotland sees a relative uplift. If England cuts deeply, Scotland's budget falls, even if demand remains or rises. This has led to an absurd and punitive dynamic where Scotland loses funding not by its own decisions, but because England spends less. And when Scotland chooses to maintain higher standards in public services, it must do so from a proportionately smaller pot. Perversely, it doesn't stop there, though. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, Westminster has begun bypassing devolved governments directly. Funds like the Levelling Up Fund and Shared Prosperity Fund are allocated by UK ministers to local authorities, often bypassing Holyrood entirely. Promises made in The Vow on the eve of the 2014 independence referendum to deliver near-federal powers and respect Scottish decision-making have unravelled. READ MORE: SNP must turn support for independence into 'real political action' The Internal Market Act has overridden devolved laws under the banner of market 'consistency'. Powers that returned from Brussels in areas like food standards, procurement, and agriculture were supposed to go to Holyrood, but in many cases they were retained by Westminster. The Sewel Convention, once a safeguard of devolved consent, has been treated as optional. Farage's proposal to scrap Barnett isn't an outlier, it's the natural conclusion of a decade-long pattern: cut services in England, shrink the Barnett allocation, bypass devolved institutions, and then blame the devolved nations for 'taking more than their share'. There's no consideration of fairness, or implementation of a needs-based analysis, it's a strategy of erosion; one that gouges out the Union from the centre while draping itself in the flag. The failures of justice in England, catastrophic as they are, expose a deeper injustice: the systematic unravelling of the constitutional promises made to Scotland. Ron Lumiere via email
South Wales Guardian
2 hours ago
- South Wales Guardian
Swinney – Reform voters in Hamilton by-election ‘angry', not racist
The First Minister was asked on the BBC Scotland's Sunday Show if those who backed Reform were 'gullible' or 'racist' – a term the SNP leader has previously used to describe the party. Mr Swinney said the 7,088 people who backed Reform – more than a quarter of the vote – in the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse ballot were 'neither', but were instead 'angry at the cost-of-living crisis'. He added: 'I think that's what motivates the Reform vote. People have got poorer because of one central thing – Brexit, and the author of that is (Reform UK leader Nigel) Farage. 'I'm standing up to Farage. I'm going to make no apology for it.' He said the SNP is 'in the process of recovery' and he had come into office as First Minister a year ago 'inheriting some significant difficulties' within the party, and that it needs to get stronger before the Holyrood election in 2026. He said voters are 'having to work hard for less' and are concerned about public services, particularly the NHS. Mr Swinney was asked about comments he made prior to the vote saying 'Labour were not at the races' and claiming it was a 'two-horse race' between the SNP and Reform. Labour's Davy Russell gained the seat from the SNP with 8,559 votes, while SNP candidate Katy Loudon came second on 7,957, ahead of Reform's Ross Lambie. The First Minister said that since the general election campaign last year, people he has met have pledged never to vote Labour due to the winter fuel allowance being cut, while Reform's support increased. Mr Swinney said: 'People were telling us on the doorsteps, they were giving us reasons why they weren't supporting Labour. We could also see that Farage's support was rising dramatically and that's happening across the United Kingdom, it's not unique to Hamilton. 'I positioned the SNP to be strong enough to stop Farage, and that's what we were determined to do.' Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar has branded the SNP's campaign 'dishonest and disgraceful' and said it had put the spotlight on Reform. Those comments were put to the First Minister, who said he had previously been allies with Mr Sarwar in a campaign to 'stand up to far-right thinking'. Mr Swinney said: 'That was months ago and then we found ourselves in the aftermath of the UK local authority elections, the English local authority elections where Farage surged to a leading position and won a by-election south of the border. 'So the dynamic of our politics change in front of us. 'I've been standing up to Farage for months, I've been warning about the dangers of Farage for months, and they crystallised in the rise of Farage during the Hamilton, Stonehouse and Larkhall by-election.'
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Scottish castle that you can stay in for less than a night in a London hotel
Read on to find out how much it would cost per person ROYAL RETREAT Scottish castle that you can stay in for less than a night in a London hotel Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DO you want to live like a king or a queen during a stay at a Scottish castle? Well, you could do so for less than a night in a London hotel. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 The Scottish castle has its own private beach where visitors can enjoy stunning views Credit: Big House Experience Luxury rental company has revealed the costs per person for some of the most spectacular British castles available for private hire. And when split between a group, the cost per person is often less than a typical hotel stay. According to a Statista reports, the average price per night for a London hotel is £158 Carron Castle in Fife, which sits on the shores of the Firth of Tay, costs less per person. The stunning venue sleeps 30 and boasts a swimming pool, tennis court, gym, cinema room, games room, private beach access and dogs are welcome. Carron Castle has been described as the epitome of a Scottish fairytale escape. The Baronial-style estate has everything from sweeping staircases and crystal chandeliers to four-poster beds and gallery-worthy family portraits. As a historic ancestral home, Carron Castle strikes a perfect balance between impressive architecture and relaxed comfort. Inside, you will find an elegant drawing room, a richly stocked library, and an inviting sitting room for relaxed gatherings. Visitors can enjoy movie nights in the cinema room complete with Netflix, or let the musicians among you entertain with not one but two grand pianos and an organ. Inverlochy Castle: Scotland's Crown Jewel of Luxury Hospitality Outside, there is a swimming pool, tennis courts and a serene walled garden. The 1,500-acre estate stretches down to the Tay estuary, where you'll find a secluded fire pit spot for unforgettable beachside barbecues. Golfers can travel to top-tier courses nearby, including the iconic St Andrews Old Course. Others may prefer a day of culture and shopping in nearby Dundee, Perth, or Edinburgh. 2 Carron Castle sits on the banks of the Firth of Tay in Fife Credit: Big House Experience Holidaymakers can stay at the venue for £9,000 for three nights. If you break up the total between a group, this costs £300 per person for three nights or £100 per person per night. Gareth Allen, founder of Big House Experience said: "You can't help but be seduced by Carron Castle, nestled in it's own private estate on the shores of the Firth of Tay. "You can feel the history radiating from the walls." Pengarth Castle in Wales and Wyatt Castle in Dorset were also mentioned.
