logo
Who won the Israel-Iran war? What did US gain?

Who won the Israel-Iran war? What did US gain?

First Post4 hours ago

A Donald Trump-brokered ceasefire between Israel and Iran is in place, effectively ending the '12-day war'. Now, all three parties are claiming victory, but who gained the most from it? read more
People riding on a moped wave Iraqi and Iranian flags as they celebrate in front of the Iranian embassy in Baghdad, following a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Israel and Iran said they had agreed to US President Donald Trump's proposal for a ceasefire, on the 12th day of war between the foes. AFP
After 12 days of several missiles being fired, deaths and destruction and a whole lot of threats, the United States President Trump got his 'peace', Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu got his war, and Iran's Ayatollah Ali Khamenei got to survive.
On Tuesday (June 24), Iran and Israel finally agreed to a ceasefire brokered by the US president and after a rocky start with claims of violations of the truce, which even led to Trump dropping the F-bomb, it seems that the pause in the conflict is holding for now.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As the dust settles, all three — the US, Iran and Israel — have declared victory. But is that true? Or have all three sides lost? Here's the outcome of the '12-day war' and here's who — if any — came out on top.
How did the Iran-Israel war unfold?
It all began on June 13 when Israel launched Operation Rising Lion to neutralise what it described as an existential threat posed by Iran's advancing nuclear programme. To reach this end, the Jewish nation fired multiple rockets and missiles at Tehran, aiming military and civil infrastructure.
Iran, in retaliation, hit back with its own barrage of missiles, destroying residential buildings.
Then late on Saturday, Trump, who had until now demanded that Tehran negotiate on the nuclear deal, entered the war with strikes on three nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan, 'completely obliterating' them as the US president claimed.
A satellite image shows damage to the tunnel entrances of the Isfahan Nuclear Technology Research Centre, following US airstrikes amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Isfahan, Iran. Maxar Technologies/Reuters
In retaliation, Iran struck back, firing missiles at the largest US airbase in the Middle East, Al Udeid in Qatar , a day later. It appeared as though West Asia was poised for a broader, longer war.
But within two hours of that strike and rising fears, Donald Trump announced on Truth Social, 'It has been fully agreed by and between Israel and Iran that there will be a complete and total ceasefire.' Trump called it 'the 12 Day War … that could have gone on for years and destroyed the Middle East'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The news resulted in a collective sigh of relief, though many wondered if Israel and Iran would abide by the ceasefire terms. And two-and-a-half hours after it took effect, the world had its answer as the Jewish nation accused Tehran of firing missiles . The Iranian military denied firing on Israel, state media reported, but explosions boomed and sirens sounded across northern Israel, and an Israeli military official said two Iranian missiles were intercepted.
An irate Trump then told reporters that both sides had violated the truce agreement. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f*** they're doing.'
But it seems that at the end Trump's strong words helped and both countries held up their ends of the ceasefire.
But what did Israel gain from all of this?
Now, as both — Israel and Iran — adhere to the ceasefire, what is it that Israel gained from the '12-day war'?
Summing up the war against Iran, Prime Minister Netanyahu said on Tuesday that Israel removed 'two existential threats — the threat of destruction via nuclear weapons and the threat of destruction via 20,000 ballistic missiles' that Iran was moving to build. Israel would have faced destruction in the near future 'if we hadn't acted now.'
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In a statement to the country, he said, 'Israel destroyed Iran's ballistic missile production program and landed 'the most severe blow in [the regime's] history.'
Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has hailed the success of Operation Rising Lion. He said that that Israel has removed 'two existential threats — the threat of destruction via nuclear weapons and the threat of destruction via 20,000 ballistic missiles'. AFP
'We sent Iran's nuclear programme down the drain,' Netanyahu stated. 'If someone in Iran tries to restore that programme, we will act with the same determination, the same power, to cut off any such attempt.'
He also briefly mentioned Israel's ongoing war in Gaza, and said: 'We must defeat Hamas and bring back the hostages.'
Israeli watchers noted that through Operation Rising Lion, Netanyahu and his administration showcased the country's firepower — it gained air supremacy in the battle against Iran and even claimed to destroy half of Iran's launchers.
The war also boosted Israel diplomatically. By convincing Trump to launch the strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Israel demonstrated, not just to Tehran but to the world, that Washington stands firmly with Tel Aviv. The '12-day war' will also help Netanyahu politically — as he heads into the polls scheduled for next year.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Another gain for Israel was that the missile strikes diverted attention from the conflict in Gaza where it stands accused of weaponising food, which the United Nations deems as a war crime.
How did the '12-day war' bump Trump's stature?
The US entered the Iran-Israel conflict on late Saturday with its B-2 bombers striking three nuclear strikes in Iran, with Donald Trump stating that the attack was 'very successful' and 'completely obliterated' Tehran's nuclear programme.
An early Pentagon assessment and other experts opine that the damage to the three nuclear sites isn't as far-reaching as Trump claims. As per initial classified US assessment, the strikes only set back the nuclear programme by a few months.
The report produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency – the intelligence arm of the Pentagon – concluded key components of the nuclear programme, including centrifuges, were capable of being restarted within months.
There's also the case of the 400 kg of enriched uranium that is yet to be found.
After he brokered a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, Donald Trump has been nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize by a US House Representative. Reuters
However, while Trump may not have succeeded in eliminating Iran's nuclear ambitions, he was able to play peacemaker, at least somewhat. He was able to broker peace between the two warring nations and also avoided a 'forever war'. In fact, US House Representative Buddy Carter nominated Trump for the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize for his 'extraordinary and historic role' in brokering a ceasefire between Israel and Iran.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
'President Trump's leadership helped end the armed conflict between Israel and Iran and prevented the world's largest state sponsor of terrorism from obtaining the most lethal weapon on the planet,' Carter wrote, referencing Iran's suspected pursuit of nuclear weapons.
Why is all not lost for Iran?
If one goes by Trump and Netanyahu's statements, then Iran was the biggest loser of this war. However, that's not the case.
Despite claims that Iran's nuclear programme has been destroyed, assessments state otherwise. A Pentagon report finds that Tehran's nuclear programme has been pushed back by just a few months. Iran's Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi said that the war against his country had failed to achieve its goals.
'I'm not saying they haven't inflicted harm, yes, there was harm,' Araghchi said on Monday. 'But they did not achieve their main goal to strip us completely of all our capabilities or any other goals they may have had.'
An Iranian woman holds up her country's flag in an anti-US and anti-Israeli rally at Enqelab-e-Eslami (Islamic Revolution) square in downtown Tehran. AP
The war has also helped Iran keep up with its narrative of 'defiance'. Despite being continuously bombed by Israel, the Islamic Republic continued to strike back, causing equal damage to Israel.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moreover, through its measured strike on the US' Al Udeid Air Base , Iran showed that it is capable of restraint. It also helped reassert its military dominance to its own citizens. In a televised speech, a spokesman for Iran's Armed Forces said the attacks on the American base in Qatar had been carried out by the Revolutionary Guards Corps. 'We warn our enemies that the era of hit and run is over,' said the spokesman.
All in all, it seems that no one won this war. As ITV wrote, the war changed little, other than remind the region that survival is a good substitute for success.
With inputs from agencies

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices rise 2% as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire, Fed outlook
Oil prices rise 2% as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire, Fed outlook

Business Standard

time22 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Oil prices rise 2% as investors assess Iran-Israel ceasefire, Fed outlook

Oil prices climbed 2 per cent on Wednesday as investors assessed the stability of a ceasefire between Iran and Israel, while support also came from market expectations that interest rate cuts could happen soon in the United States, the world's largest economy. Brent crude futures rose $1.31, or 2 per cent, to $68.45 a barrel at 0750 GMT, while US West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude gained $1.24 cents, or 1.9 per cent, to $65.61. Brent settled on Tuesday at its lowest since June 10 and WTI since June 5, both before Israel launched a surprise attack on key Iranian military and nuclear facilities on June 13. Prices had rallied to five-month highs after the US attacked Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. "Geopolitical risk premiums have been reduced and will take a backseat for Chair Powell's first testimony to Congress (yesterday) has hinted at a slight chance of bringing forward the first rate cut of 2025 to should offer some form of floor on oil prices from the demand side," said OANDA senior market analyst Kelvin Wong. Technical factors drove price increases during the session, he added. Lower interest rates typically spur economic growth and demand for oil. A slew of US macroeconomic data released overnight including on consumer confidence showed possibly weaker than expected economic growth in the world's largest oil consumer, bolstering expectations of Federal Reserve rate cuts this year. Futures point to nearly 60 basis points worth of easing by December. On the geopolitical front, a preliminary US intelligence assessment said US airstrikes did not destroy Iran's nuclear capability and only set it back by a few months, as a shaky ceasefire brokered by US President Donald Trump took hold between Iran and Israel. Earlier on Tuesday, both Iran and Israel signalled that the air war between the two nations had ended, at least for now, after Trump publicly scolded them for violating a ceasefire. As the two countries lifted civilian restrictions after 12 days of war - which the US joined with an attack on Iran's uranium-enrichment facilities - each sought to claim victory. "While concerns regarding Middle Eastern supply have diminished for now, they have not entirely disappeared, and there remains a stronger demand for immediate supply," said ING analysts in a client note. Oil prices will likely consolidate at around $65-70 per barrel levels as traders look to more US macroeconomic data this week and the Fed's rate decision, said independent market analyst Tina Teng. Investors were also waiting on US government data on domestic crude and fuel stockpiles due on Wednesday. [EIA/S] Industry data showed US crude inventories fell by 4.23 million barrels in the week ended June 20, market sources said, citing American Petroleum Institute figures on Tuesday. [API/S] (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination in jeopardy after explosive fallout with Ukraine and Pakistan—what happens now?
Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination in jeopardy after explosive fallout with Ukraine and Pakistan—what happens now?

Time of India

time25 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Donald Trump's Nobel Peace Prize nomination in jeopardy after explosive fallout with Ukraine and Pakistan—what happens now?

Donald Trump has been formally nominated for the 2026 Nobel Peace Prize, credited for helping negotiate a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. The nomination was submitted by U.S. Republican Congressman Buddy Carter, who described Trump's efforts as 'extraordinary and historic.' In his letter to the Norwegian Nobel Committee, Carter highlighted Trump's role in halting a rapidly escalating conflict, saying the agreement 'offered the world a rare glimpse of hope.' Carter added that Trump's involvement required 'both courage and clarity,' and that the resulting ceasefire helped prevent what could have been a wider regional war in the Middle East. Ukrainian lawmaker withdraws support over Ukraine stance However, Trump's nomination has not been without controversy. Oleksandr Merezhko, a senior Ukrainian lawmaker who had earlier nominated Trump for the same prize, withdrew his support. Merezhko, who chairs Ukraine's parliamentary foreign affairs committee, told Newsweek he no longer believed Trump could deliver on his promise to end the Russia-Ukraine war. 'I have lost any sort of faith and belief in Trump and his ability to secure a ceasefire between Moscow and Kyiv,' he said. Merezhko also criticized Trump's reluctance to impose sanctions on Russia and described his response to recent missile attacks on Kyiv as 'appeasement.' In March, Ukraine accepted a U.S.-backed peace proposal, but Russia has not responded. Trump previously claimed he would end the conflict within 24 hours if re-elected. In May, he said, 'If Putin is stalling, we'll respond a little bit differently,' but did not follow up with action. Pakistan praises Trump, then Condemns US strikes Pakistan had initially expressed strong support for Trump's nomination. Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar credited him for reducing tensions between India and Pakistan and submitted a formal nomination. However, this endorsement was short-lived. A day after Trump's ceasefire announcement, he approved a U.S. strike on three Iranian nuclear sites. Pakistan's Foreign Ministry quickly responded with criticism, calling the military action 'deeply disturbing.' Ceasefire named '12-day war'; Trump voices disappointment The ceasefire between Israel and Iran, which Trump announced on a Monday, came just two days after the military action. He proposed naming the conflict the '12-Day War' and called the resolution a pivotal step toward avoiding broader violence in the region. Despite this, Trump expressed frustration over his past diplomatic efforts going unrecognized. On Truth Social, he said, 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do,' referencing previous attempts like the Abraham Accords and mediation efforts involving India-Pakistan and Serbia-Kosovo. Speaking to reporters, he added, 'I should have gotten it four or five times… They won't give me a Nobel Peace Prize because they only give it to liberals.' So far, only three U.S. presidents—Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, and Barack Obama—have received the Nobel nomination is official, but wavering international support and political criticism may complicate the path ahead.

Nouriel Roubini: Regime change in Iran could give peace a chance in West Asia
Nouriel Roubini: Regime change in Iran could give peace a chance in West Asia

Mint

time31 minutes ago

  • Mint

Nouriel Roubini: Regime change in Iran could give peace a chance in West Asia

Nouriel Roubini Hostilities between Israel and Iran may be ending after sharp US intervention, but the Iranian regime has been shaken and may fall. Should it be replaced, not just the West, but the whole volatile region might be better off. Iranians have revolted against their regime before and when given the chance, they have always chosen moderate leaders over theocratic zealots. Gift this article Last November, I said that Israel was likely to attack Iran's nuclear and other military facilities, even go so far as to eliminate the 'regime's top military and political leaders." I also argued that 'any US administration would inevitably continue to support [Israel], directly or indirectly." Last November, I said that Israel was likely to attack Iran's nuclear and other military facilities, even go so far as to eliminate the 'regime's top military and political leaders." I also argued that 'any US administration would inevitably continue to support [Israel], directly or indirectly." Regardless of divisions in Tel Aviv about the conduct of war in Gaza, the broad consensus across the Israeli political spectrum— including centre-left critics of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu—was that Iran was close to developing a nuclear weapon, seen as an existential threat to Israel. Centrist leaders such as Benny Gantz and Yair Lapid criticized Netanyahu for being soft on Iran. It was only matter of time before Israel struck Iran, which, starting on 7 October 2023, had unleashed Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis and Shia militias in Syria and Iraq against Israel. After Tel Aviv decimated these proxies and Iran lost deterrence, Iran's only option was to gain nukes, an unacceptable outcome for Israel and the West broadly. Thus, Israel's attack against Iran. And since some of Iran's hardened nuclear facilities were robust enough to withstand Israeli weapons, it was clear that the US would intervene to destroy those units, despite the anti-interventionist sentiment of US President Donald Trump's political base. Iran counter-attacked Israel with missile barrages [and later fired at a US base in Qatar, causing no serious damage]. [Trump announced a ceasefire thereafter], but the Iranian regime is so weakened that it can barely defend itself, let alone [hurt the US]. Yes, some Shia militias may try to attack well-defended US bases and troops in the region. But, leaving aside the risk of even more forceful US and Israeli attacks, they cannot damage much. Also, the Iranian regime's ability and veiled willingness to block the Strait of Hormuz, mine the Gulf and/or attack the oil facilities and pipelines of its Arab neighbours is limited. The regime is focusing on its survival, but its collapse looks likely in the coming months. True, for now Israel's attack has led even the anti-regime opposition to rally around the flag. Over time, however, a large majority of Iranians who despise a regime that has brought about the country's economic ruin will rise against it and replace it with something else. In 1990, Iran's per capita GDP was almost equal to that of Israel; today, Israel's is nearly 15 times higher. Iran's energy reserves rival Saudi Arabia's, yet it has lost hundreds of billions of dollars in potential energy revenues in [fierce but futile] opposition to the West. Also Read: Israel-Iran conflict: Echoes of history haunt West Asia Today, Iranians face skyrocketing inflation, collapsing real incomes, mass poverty and even hunger not because of US and Western sanctions, but because of their rulers' policies. A country that could have been richer than any Gulf oil state is near bankruptcy, owing to the regime's corruption, incompetence and strategic recklessness. In addition to being a curse to its own people, the Islamic Republic has financed terror groups in West Asia for decades and caused state failure or semi-failure across the region: in Yemen, Lebanon, Syria, Gaza/Palestine and Iraq. Stabilization and recovery of the region's failing and failed states requires regime change in Iran. The Iranian people could trigger it over the next year. Iranians have revolted against their regime at least a half-dozen times in the last few decades, and, when given the chance, they have always chosen moderate leaders over theocratic zealots. Also Read: Javier Blas: An Israel-Iran war may not rattle the oil market For now, financial markets are correctly betting that the global impact of this recent war is likely to be minimal. Current movements of oil prices, US and global equities, US and global bond yields, and currencies suggest that a major stagflationary shock coming from a disruption of production and energy exports from the Gulf remains only a tail risk, not the baseline scenario. The 1973 Yom Kippur War and Iran's Islamic Revolution in 1979 led to a huge spike in oil prices that fuelled the severe stagflations of 1974-75 and 1980-82. This time is likely to be different: the energy input in consumption and production in oil-importing economies is much lower than in the 1970s; the US and other major new non-Opec energy producers have emerged; Saudi Arabia and others are able to tap large excess production capacity and inventories. And in case oil prices rise as US actions create new risks, various macro policies and other tools can be used to reduce the stagflationary impact. A nuclear Iran would have been a threat not just to Israel but all Sunni regimes in the region, as well as the West. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said what many world leaders think but don't want to admit in public: 'Israel is doing the dirty work for all of us." Even China and Russia have shown restraint. Radical forces have destabilized West Asia for decades, with spillover effects on the West. It took Israel to weaken and destroy Iran's proxies. Regime collapse in Iran may boost stability and allow for reconstruction, with diplomatic relations established between Israel and Saudi Arabia. A new government in Israel more open to peace with Palestinians and an eventual two-state solution will then be possible. But the Iranian Hydra needs to be replaced with a rational regime eager [for peace]. ©2025/Project Syndicate The author is professor emeritus of economics at New York University's Stern School of Business and author of 'MegaThreats: Ten Dangerous Trends That Imperil Our Future, and How to Survive Them'. Topics You May Be Interested In

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store